Support for XNACK and SRAMECC is not static on some GPUs. We must be able
to differentiate between different scenarios for these dynamic subtarget
features.
The possible settings are:
- Unsupported: The GPU has no support for XNACK/SRAMECC.
- Any: Preference is unspecified. Use conservative settings that can run anywhere.
- Off: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC Off
- On: Request support for XNACK/SRAMECC On
GCNSubtarget will track the four options based on the following criteria. If
the subtarget does not support XNACK/SRAMECC we say the setting is
"Unsupported". If no subtarget features for XNACK/SRAMECC are requested we
must support "Any" mode. If the subtarget features XNACK/SRAMECC exist in the
feature string when initializing the subtarget, the settings are "On/Off".
The defaults are updated to be conservatively correct, meaning if no setting
for XNACK or SRAMECC is explicitly requested, defaults will be used which
generate code that can be run anywhere. This corresponds to the "Any" setting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85882
This should lower the amount of used registers for gfx9.
I updated some of the changed tests with the update script because
changing them by hand is tedious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73884
Summary:
Virtual registers that are undef have an empty LiveInterval at this
point, which means beginIndex() and endIndex() cannot be used. We
only need those indices to determine the range in which to scan for
affected other NSA instructions, and undef operands cannot contribute
to that range.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, mareko
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73831
Austin Kerbow