Trusting summaries of inlined code would require a more thorough work,
as the current approach was causing too many false positives, as the new
example in test. The culprit lies in the fact that we currently escape
all variables written into a field (but not passed off to unknown
functions!), which can result in inconsistent behavior.
rdar://45655344
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53902
llvm-svn: 345746
Previously, OSDynamicCast was modeled as an identity.
This is not correct: the output of OSDynamicCast may be zero even if the
input was not zero (if the class is not of desired type), and thus the
modeling led to false positives.
Instead, we are doing eager state split:
in one branch, the returned value is identical to the input parameter,
and in the other branch, the returned value is zero.
This patch required a substantial refactoring of canEval infrastructure,
as now it can return different function summaries, and not just true/false.
rdar://45497400
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53624
llvm-svn: 345338
For now, tresting the cast as a no-op, and disregarding the case where
the output becomes null due to the type mismatch.
rdar://45174557
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53156
llvm-svn: 344311
George Karpenkov