llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
David Spickett	09036be126	[clang] Require x86 target for tbaa test Added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320. Failing on our bots that only build Arm/AArch64 targets: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/188/builds/6951	2021-12-15 16:40:26 +00:00
Sindhu Chittireddy	4706a297fb	Avoid setting tbaa on the store of return type of call to inline assembler. In 32bit mode, attaching TBAA metadata to the store following the call to inline assembler results in describing the wrong type by making a fake lvalue(i.e., whatever the inline assembler happens to leave in EAX:EDX.) Even if inline assembler somehow describes the correct type, setting TBAA information on return type of call to inline assembler is likely not correct, since TBAA rules need not apply to inline assembler. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320	2021-12-14 17:40:33 -08:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

David Spickett

09036be126

[clang] Require x86 target for tbaa test

Added in https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320.
Failing on our bots that only build Arm/AArch64 targets:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/188/builds/6951

2021-12-15 16:40:26 +00:00

Sindhu Chittireddy

4706a297fb

Avoid setting tbaa on the store of return type of call to inline assembler.

In 32bit mode, attaching TBAA metadata to the store following the call
to inline assembler results in describing the wrong type by making a
fake lvalue(i.e., whatever the inline assembler happens to leave in
EAX:EDX.) Even if inline assembler somehow describes the correct type,
setting TBAA information on return type of call to inline assembler is
likely not correct, since TBAA rules need not apply to inline assembler.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115320

2021-12-14 17:40:33 -08:00

2 Commits