This string no longer appears in the Vector Extension specification.
The segment load/store instructions are just part of the vector
instruction set.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117724
`zve` is the new standard vector extension to specify varying degrees of
vector support for embedding processors. The `zve` extension is related
to the `zvl` extension and other updates that are added in v1.0.
According to https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/21,
Clang defines macro `__riscv_v_max_elen`, `__riscv_v_max_elen_fp` for
`zve` and it can be used by applications that uses the vector extension.
Authored by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com> @khchen
Co-Authored by: Eop Chen <eop.chen@sifive.com> @eopXD
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112408
`zvl` is the new standard vector extension that specifies the minimum vector length of the vector extension.
The `zvl` extension is related to the `zve` extension and other updates that are added in v1.0.
According to https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-c-api-doc/pull/21,
Clang defines macro `__riscv_v_min_vlen` for `zvl` and it can be used for applications that uses the vector extension.
LLVM checks whether the option `riscv-v-vector-bits-min` (if specified) matches the `zvl*` extension specified.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108694
Agreed policy is that RISC-V extensions that have not yet been ratified
should be marked as experimental, and enabling them requires the use of
the -menable-experimental-extensions flag when using clang alongside the
version number. These extensions have now been ratified, so this is no
longer necessary, and the target feature names can be renamed to no
longer be prefixed with "experimental-".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117131
I've removed the Zbs W instructions that are not part of the frozen spec.
References to B as an extension name have been removed. Tests are updated or split accordingly.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110669
At this point it looks like a B extension will never exist. Instead
Zba, Zbb, Zbc, and Zbs are individual extensions being ratified
together as a package. Unknown at this time when or if the other
Zb* extensions will be ratified.
This patch removes references to the B extension. I've updated and
split tests accordingly.
This has been split from D110669 to make review a little easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111338
This consists of 3 compressed instructions, c.not, c.neg, and c.zext.w.
I believe these have been picked up by the Zce effort using different
encodings. I don't think it makes sense to keep them in bitmanip. It
will eventually cause a conflict if/when Zce is implemented in llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110871
As v1.0-rc specs say Zvamo is removed from standard extension,
Zvamo has to be specified explicitly.
Reviewed By: evandro
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105396
1. Undefined macro test for rv32i and rv64i.
a. Reorder it with canonical order.
b. Add missing undefined macro check.
c. Append defined value to `__riscv_a`, `__riscv_f` and `__riscv_c` to distinguish with
`__riscv_arch_test`, `__riscv_cmodel_medlow` and `__riscv_float_abi_soft`. They have the same prefix.
2. Move abi macro test below f and d.
3. Unify coding style for newline.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99631
When running clang as a native compiler in RISC-V Linux the flag
-mabi=ilp32d / -mabi=lp64d is always mandatory. This change makes it the
default there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65634
llvm-svn: 371494
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s)
* Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Re-landed after backing out 366450 due to missed hunks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366480
The RISC-V hard float calling convention requires the frontend to:
* Detect cases where, once "flattened", a struct can be passed using
int+fp or fp+fp registers under the hard float ABI and coerce to the
appropriate type(s) * Track usage of GPRs and FPRs in order to gate the
above, and to
determine when signext/zeroext attributes must be added to integer
scalars
This patch attempts to do this in compliance with the documented ABI,
and uses ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand in order to do this. @rjmccall, as
author of that code I've tagged you as reviewer for initial feedback on
my usage.
Note that a previous version of the ABI indicated that when passing an
int+fp struct using a GPR+FPR, the int would need to be sign or
zero-extended appropriately. GCC never did this and the ABI was changed,
which makes life easier as ABIArgInfo::CoerceAndExpand can't currently
handle sign/zero-extension attributes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60456
llvm-svn: 366450
Summary:
This patch extend getTargetDefines and implement handleTargetFeatures
and hasFeature. and define corresponding marco for those features.
Reviewers: asb, apazos, eli.friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44727
Patch by Kito Cheng.
llvm-svn: 329278
Craig Topper