This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
Each "Nothing To Do" issue only changed nits in the English wording,
not anything to do with the code.
Each "Complete" issue was completed already, as far as I can tell.
I tried to err on the side of caution: I didn't mark a few issues
whose P/Rs were very invasive and would take time to verify, and I
didn't mark a lot of issues involving features we haven't even started
yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117960
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3422
Also add a static_assert to check the "Mandates:" on the
iterator-pair constructor. Oddly, the `InputIterator` parameter
itself is merely preconditioned, not constrained, to satisfy the
input iterator requirements.
Also drive-by rename `init` to `__init`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117962
This implements the last required formatter specialization.
Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D114001
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
We didn't support noop_coroutine for GCC in previous conforming patch.
So that GCC couldn't use noop_coroutine() defined in <coroutine>. And
after this patch, GCC should be able to compile the whole <coroutine>
header.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116144
Most of the code has been implemented using the eel.is draft. It seems
some issues were inplemented but not marked as completed yet.
Note the wording of LWG-3372 has been implemented, but has been changed
in the current draft due to P2216, see D110494.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112363
`libc++` has had the guarantee of the default constructor of `tuple<>` being
trivial since 405570dc7a. Now, the
standard mandates it as of LWG3211. So, move the file out of
`libcxx/test/libcxx` and into `libcxx/test/std` since it's no longer
`libc++`-specific. Rename it to be `.compile.pass.cpp` instead of
`.pass.cpp` while we're at it.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112743
Mark LWG2731 as complete. The type alias `mutex_type` is only provided if
`scoped_lock` is given one mutex type and it has been implemented that
way since the beginning of Clang 5 it seems. There already are tests for
verifying existence (and lack thereof) for `mutex_type` type alias
depending on the number of mutex types, so there is nothing to
do for this LWG issue.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112462
Mark LWG3573 as complete. It involves a change in wording around when
`basic_string_view`'s constructor for iterator/sentinel can throw. The
current implementation is not marked conditionally `noexcept`, so there
is nothing to do here. Add a test that binds this behavior to verify the
constructor is not marked `noexcept(true)` when `end - begin` throws.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111925
Mark LWG3420 as complete. Currently, the `cpp17_iterator` concept
checks that the type looks like an iterator first before checking if it
is copyable.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Quuxplusone, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111598
A followup to D111458 adding more labels to LWG-issues. This should add
the labels for the not completed chrono, format, ranges, and spaceship
issues.
Some minor formatting cleanups along the way.
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111935
During the review of D111166 I had a private discussion with @ldionne to
avoid the duplication of the C++2b issues in the Ranges and Format
status pages. The main reason for duplicating them is to make it easier to
find them. The title of the paper may not always make it clear to which
project the paper belongs.
This commit removes all LWG-issues from the Ranges and Format status page
and adds labels for these issue in the C++20/C++23 issues list.
A quick scan revealed there are some issues that are missing a label since
they weren't on the ranges issue list. These can be labelled in a separate
commit. In that commit I'll also look for issues for the spaceship operator
and chrono.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111458
Implement LWG3480 which enables `directory_iterator` and
`recursive_directory_iterator` to be both a `borrowed_range` and a
`view`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111644
Mark LWG3447 as complete since it was not an issue since the original
implementation of `take_view` from
0f4b41e038. Currently, `take_view`'s
deduction guide does not constrain the range on the `range` concept.
Reviewed By: ldionne, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111501
Update the status with the approved papers and LWG-issues in the October 2021 plenary.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111166
Implement the changes in all language modes.
LWG3506 "Missing allocator-extended constructors for priority_queue"
makes the following changes:
- New allocator-extended constructors for priority_queue.
- New deduction guides targeting those constructors.
LWG3522: "Missing requirement on InputIterator template parameter
for priority_queue constructors". The iterator parameter should be
constrained to actually be an iterator type. `priority_queue{1,2}`
should be SFINAE-friendly ill-formed.
Also, do a drive-by fix in the allocator-extended move constructor:
there's no need to do a `make_heap` after moving from `__q.c` into
our own `c`, because that container was already heapified when it
was part of `__q`. [priqueue.cons.alloc] actually specifies the
behavior and does *not* mention calling `make_heap`. I think this
was just a copy-paste thinko. It dates back to the initial import
of libc++.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106824
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106827
Updates the status pages with the LWG issues accepted in the Standard
during the June 2021 plenary session. The LWG papers for this meeting
have been added in D105103.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106529
Arthur O'Dwyer