Note that most changes to `strings` and `views.span` from the One Ranges
Proposal are no longer applicable:
- free `begin` and `end` functions taking `basic_string_view` and `span`
were removed by [P1870](http://wg21.link/p1870);
- `span::const_iterator` was removed by [LWG3320](https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#3320).
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118687
This started breaking in the CI because we bumped the Clang version
to 15, which requires adjusting the markup in the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118838
There is no reason for the parts of std::span that don't depend on ranges
to be disabled when ranges aren't provided. Also, to make sure the
"no-experimental-stuff" configuration is tested, add a CI job for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118740
The old `__regex_word` aliased the mask for `xdigit`, causing stray
test failures.
The diff may look surprising, as if the previous faulty value had
been set specifically for Windows - but this is due to a restructuring
in 411c630bae. Prior to that, there
were OS specific settings for some OSes, and one fallback used for
the rest (which turns out to not work for Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118188
In ancient Microsoft C runtimes, there might only have been
a nonstandard `_vsnprintf` instead of the standard `vsnprintf`, but
in modern versions (the only ones relevant for libc++), both
are available.
In MinGW configurations built with `__USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO=1` (as it
is built in CI), `vsnprintf` provides a more standards compliant
behaviour than what Microsoft's CRT provides, while `_vsnprintf` retains
the Microsoft C runtime specific quirks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118187
As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
This includes an experimental workaround for
LWG3664 "LWG3392 broke std::ranges::distance(a, a+3)",
but the workaround may be incomplete, I'm not sure.
This should be re-audited when LWG3664 is actually adopted,
to see if we need to change anything about our implementation.
See also https://github.com/microsoft/STL/pull/2500
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117940
The macro that opts out of `std::ranges::` functionality is called
`_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES`, and is unrelated to this macro
which is specifically about _compiler_ support for the _syntax_.
The only non-mechanical diff here is in `<__config>`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118507
Remove copy and copy assignment rather than have them as private declarations.
They are superfluous given the move and move assignment.
As a drive-by, also specialize `std::hash` without reopening `namespace std`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118502
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
This should fix the regressions detected in D117992.
This lands before D117992 to avoid breaking main.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118056
In `ranges::advance(iter, n, bound)`, we'd incorrectly handle the case
where bound < iter and n is 0:
int a[10];
int *p = a+5;
int *bound = a+3;
std::ranges::advance(p, 0, bound);
assert(p - a == 5); // we'd return 3 before this patch
This was caused by an incorrect handling of 0 inside __magnitude_geq.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117240
We were missing a constraint in common_iterator's iterator_traits and
we were eagerly instantiating iter_value_t even when invalid.
Thanks to Casey Carter for finding this bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117449
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
Remove a bunch of LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG. This is the result of a
rabbithole to re-eliminate the workaround I introduced into
std::cref in D117953. It turns out that Clang's C++03 mode
(the only compiler we care about C++03 for) now supports all
the things we were originally eschewing via LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG;
we can fully support these reference_wrapper features in
C++03 mode, and un-XFAIL the relevant tests.
Drive-by constexprify a few more tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117974
The Windows and Glibc abbreviated form of Saturday in French locale
is "sam." with a trailing period included. Account for this in the
test reference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118240
These tests were formatted with older clang-format settings, this
updates them to the current settings.
In order to implement P2216 a lot of changes to these tests are
required. This makes it easier to review those patches.
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue3422
Also add a static_assert to check the "Mandates:" on the
iterator-pair constructor. Oddly, the `InputIterator` parameter
itself is merely preconditioned, not constrained, to satisfy the
input iterator requirements.
Also drive-by rename `init` to `__init`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117962
* Default-initialized `basic_string` iterators are not portably in the domain of `==`.
* Avoid comparing iterators from non-equal string_views which MSVCSTL considers not to be in the domain of equality.
* Don't test invalid range `[in, out + N)`.
Also silence some truncation warnings by testing with a non-narrowing conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118049
This implements the handler according to P0645. P2418 changes the wording
in the Standard. That isn't implemented and requires changes in more
places. LWG3631 applies modifications to P2418, but is currently
unresolved.
Implements parts of:
* P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115989
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115991
[format.formatter.spec]/5 lists the requirements for the default
formatter. The original implementation didn't implement this. This
implements the default formatter according to the Standard.
This adds additional test to validate the default formatter is disabled
and the required standard formatters are enabled.
While adding the tests it seems the formatters needed a constraint for the
character types they were valid for.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115988
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115989
This implements the last required formatter specialization.
Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D114001
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988
This properly implements the formatter for floating-point types.
Completes:
- P1652R1 Printf corner cases in std::format
- LWG 3250 std::format: # (alternate form) for NaN and inf
- LWG 3243 std::format and negative zeroes
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114001
Since their nested reference types are defined in terms of `iter_reference_t<T>`, which examines `decltype(*declval<T>())`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117371
A number of the filesystem tests create a directory that contains a bad
symlink. On AIX recursively setting permissions on said directory will
return a non-zero value because of the bad symlink, however the
following rm -r still completes successfully. Avoid the assertion on
AIX, and rely on the return value of the remove command to detect
problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112086
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
This will detect if someone writes `inline auto cpo =` instead of
`inline constexpr auto cpo =`. I don't know how that'd be possible,
but it's easy to test, so let's test it.
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_set>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117917
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714, there is missing test coverage
for the behavior of `enable_view` when given a const or reference qualified
type. Add such tests showing the current behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117918
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
Konstantin Varlamov