There is no reason for the parts of std::span that don't depend on ranges
to be disabled when ranges aren't provided. Also, to make sure the
"no-experimental-stuff" configuration is tested, add a CI job for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118740
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
span.cons/container.pass.cpp
N4842 22.7.3.2 [span.cons]/13 constrains span's range constructor
for ranges::contiguous_range (among other criteria).
24.4.5 [range.refinements]/2 says that contiguous_range requires data(),
and (via contiguous_range, random_access_range, bidirectional_range,
forward_range, input_range, range) it also requires begin() and end()
(see 24.4.2 [range.range]/1).
Therefore, IsAContainer needs to provide begin() and end().
(Detected by MSVC's concept-constrained implementation.)
span.cons/stdarray.pass.cpp
This test uses std::array, so it must include <array>.
<span> isn't guaranteed to drag in <array>.
(Detected by MSVC's implementation which uses a forward declaration to
avoid dragging in <array>, for increased compiler throughput.)
span.objectrep/as_bytes.pass.cpp
span.objectrep/as_writable_bytes.pass.cpp
Testing `sp.extent == std::dynamic_extent` triggers MSVC warning
C4127 "conditional expression is constant". Using `if constexpr` is a
simple way to avoid this without disrupting anyone else (as span
requires C++20 mode).
span.tuple/get.pass.cpp
22.7.3.2 [span.cons]/4.3: "Preconditions: If extent is not equal to
dynamic_extent, then count is equal to extent."
These lines were triggering undefined behavior (detected by assertions
in MSVC's implementation).
I changed the count arguments in the first two chunks, followed by
changing the span extents, in order to preserve the test's coverage
and follow the existing pattern.
span.cons/span.pass.cpp
22.7.3.2 [span.cons]/18.1 constrains span's converting constructor with
"Extent == dynamic_extent || Extent == OtherExtent is true".
This means that converting from dynamic extent to static extent is
not allowed. (Other constructors tested elsewhere, like
span(It first, size_type count), can be used to write such code.)
As this is the test for the converting constructor, I have:
* Removed the "dynamic -> static" case from checkCV(), which is
comprehensive.
* Changed the initialization of std::span<T, 0> s1{}; in
testConstexprSpan() and testRuntimeSpan(), because s1 is used below.
* Removed ASSERT_NOEXCEPT(std::span<T, 0>{s0}); from those functions,
as they are otherwise comprehensive.
* Deleted testConversionSpan() entirely. Note that this could never
compile (it had a bool return type, but forgot to say `return`). And it
couldn't have provided useful coverage, as the /18.2 constraint
"OtherElementType(*)[] is convertible to ElementType(*)[]"
permits only cv-qualifications, which are already tested by checkCV().
Louis Dionne