As discovered in D117817, `std::ranges::input_range<Holder<Incomplete>*[10]>`
hard-errored before this patch. That's because `input_range` requires
`iter_rvalue_reference_t`, which requires `iter_move`, which was
not ADL-proofed.
Add ADL-proofing tests to all the range refinements.
`output_range` and `common_range` shouldn't be affected,
and all the others subsume `input_range` anyway, but we might as
well be thorough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118213
Fixed in counted_iterator and transform_view::iterator.
The LWG issue also affected elements_view::iterator, but we haven't
implemented that one yet, and whoever does implement it will get
the fix for free if they just follow the working draft's wording.
Drive-by stop calling `.base()` on test iterators in the test,
and improve the transform_view::iterator/sentinel tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117329
* Default-initialized `basic_string` iterators are not portably in the domain of `==`.
* Avoid comparing iterators from non-equal string_views which MSVCSTL considers not to be in the domain of equality.
* Don't test invalid range `[in, out + N)`.
Also silence some truncation warnings by testing with a non-narrowing conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118049
Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714, there is missing test coverage
for the behavior of `enable_view` when given a const or reference qualified
type. Add such tests showing the current behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117918
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
Instead of storing the wrapped iterator inside the stride_counting_iterator,
store its base so we can have e.g. a stride_counting_iterator of an
input_iterator (which was previously impossible because input_iterators
are not copyable). Also a few other simplifications in stride_counting_iterator.
As a fly-by fix, remove the member base() functions, which are super
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116613
... from testing with MSVC's STL. Mostly truncation warnings and variables that are only used in `LIBCPP_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116878
Also remove some bogus `std::forward`s. My impression is that these
forwards were actually harmless, because `ranges::begin(FWD(t))` is
always identical to `ranges::begin(t)` (except when it's ill-formed,
and that can't happen in this case). However, they're also superfluous
and don't reflect the wording in the standard, so let's eliminate them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117043
For example, `std::ranges::range<Holder<Incomplete>*>` should be
well-formed false, not a hard error at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239
The big change here is that they now work as intended for rvalues,
e.g. `ranges::cbegin(std::string_view("hello"))`.
Also, add tests verifying their return types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116199
AFAICT, Cpp17InputIterators are not required to be default constructible,
since that requirement is added in Cpp17ForwardIterator. Hence, our
archetype for Cpp17InputIterator should not be default constructible.
Removing that constructor has a ripple effect on a couple of tests that
were making incorrect assumptions. Notably:
- Some tests were using cpp17_input_iterator as a sentinel for itself.
That is not valid, because a cpp17_input_iterator is not semiregular
anymore after the change (and hence it doesn't satisfy sentinel_for).
- Some tests were using a stride-counted cpp17_input_iterator as the
sentinel for a range. This doesn't work anymore because of the problem
above, so these tests were changed not to check stride counts for
input iterators.
- Some tests were default constructing cpp17_input_iterator when a simple
alternative was available -- those have been changed to use that alternative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115806
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
It was missing the cast to `bool` in `bool(__t.empty())`.
It was wrongly using `std::forward` in some places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115312
Clang is gaining `auto(x)` support in D113393; sadly there
seems to be no feature-test macro for it. Zhihao is opening
a core issue for that macro.
Use `_LIBCPP_AUTO_CAST` where C++20 specifies we should use `auto(x)`;
stop using `__decay_copy(x)` in those places.
In fact, remove `__decay_copy` entirely. As of C++20, it's purely
a paper specification tool signifying "Return just `x`, but it was
perfect-forwarded, so we understand you're going to have to call
its move-constructor sometimes." I believe there's no reason we'd
ever need to do its operation explicitly in code.
This heisenbugs away a test failure on MinGW; see D112214.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115686
As discussed with ldionne. The problem with this static_assert
is that it makes ranges::begin a pitfall for anyone ever to use
inside a constraint or decltype. Many Ranges things, such as ranges::size,
are specified as "Does X if X is well-formed, or else Y if Y is well-formed,
or else `ranges::end(t) - ranges::begin(t)` if that is well-formed, or else..."
And if there's a static_assert hidden inside `ranges::begin(t)`, then you get
a hard error as soon as you ask the question -- even if the answer would have
been "no, that's not well-formed"!
Constraining on `requires { t + 0; }` or `requires { t + N; }` is verboten
because of https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103700 . For ranges::begin,
we can just decay to a pointer even in the incomplete-type case. For ranges::end,
we can safely constrain on `sizeof(*t)`. Yes, this means that an array of incomplete
type has a `ranges::begin` but no `ranges::end`... just like an unbounded array of
complete type. This is a valid manifestation of IFNDR.
All of the new libcxx/test/std/ cases are mandatory behavior, as far as I'm aware.
Tests for the IFNDR cases in ranges::begin and ranges::end remain in `libcxx/test/libcxx/`.
The similar tests for ranges::empty and ranges::data were simply wrong, AFAIK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115838
Eliminate a bogus operator== overload.
Also, check more intermediate steps in the logic we're checking here.
Some of this simplification is possible only now that we've implemented
more of <ranges>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116002
Remove `s.base()`; every test that wants to get the base of a "test sentinel"
should use the ADL `base(s)` from now on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115766
When `a` was an array type, `__decay_copy(a)` was incorrectly marking itself
noexcept(false), because it is false that `int[10]` is nothrow convertible to `int[10]`
(in fact it is not convertible at all).
We have no tests explicitly for `__decay_copy`, but the new ranges::begin
and ranges::end tests fail before this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115658
No decrease in test coverage intended. The original goal here
was just to get rid of the global name `sentinel` so that we can
rename the `sentinel_wrapper` in "test_iterators.h" to `sentinel`;
but then I took a closer look at the offending tests and saw
that some of them probably weren't testing what they intended.
Also, add one `/*explicit*/` and one #if'ed out test indicating
bugs in the current ranges::empty (to be fixed by D115312 or
some equivalent patch).
Reviewed as part of D115272.
Before this patch, the new test's `CountedInvocable<int*, int*>`
would hard-error instead of SFINAEing and cleanly returning false.
Notice that views::counted specifically does NOT work with pipes;
`counted(42)` is ill-formed. This is because `counted`'s first argument
is supposed to be an iterator, not a range.
Also, mark `views::counted(it, n)` as [[nodiscard]], and test that.
(We have a general policy now that range adaptors are consistently
marked [[nodiscard]], so that people don't accidentally think that
they have side effects. This matters mostly for `reverse` and
`transform`, arguably `drop`, and just generally let's be consistent.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115177
Clang trunk rejects the new test case, but this is a Clang bug
(PR47414, 47509, 50864, 44833).
```
In module 'std' imported from /Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.transform/general.pass.cpp:17:
/Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/build2/include/c++/v1/__ranges/transform_view.h:85:44: error: constraints not satisfied for alias template 'range_reference_t' [with _Rp = const NonConstView]
regular_invocable<const _Fn&, range_reference_t<const _View>>
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/build2/include/c++/v1/__ranges/transform_view.h:416:25: note: in instantiation of template class 'std::ranges::transform_view<NonConstView, (lambda at /Users/aodwyer/llvm-project/libcxx/test/std/ranges/range.adaptors/range.transform/general.pass.cpp:73:71)>' requested here
-> decltype( transform_view(_VSTD::forward<_Range>(__range), _VSTD::forward<_Fn>(__f)))
^
```
We can work around this by adding a layer of indirection: put the
problematic constraint into a named concept and Clang becomes more
amenable to SFINAE'ing instead of hard-erroring.
Drive-by simplify `range.transform/general.pass.cpp` to make it clearer
what it's actually testing in this area.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115116
The type `MoveOnlyForwardRange` violates the precondition stated in
`view.interface.general`. Specifically, the type passed to
`view_interface` shall model the `view` concept. In turn, this requires the
type to satisfy `movable` concept (and others), but this type
`MoveOnlyForwardRange` does not satisfy the `movable` concept.
Add a move assignment operator so that `MoveOnlyForwardRange` satisfies the
`movable` concept. While we're here, ensure the neighboring types that inherit
from `view_interface` also satisfy the `view` concept to avoid similar issues.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50720
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, Mordante, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112631
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
The unique (ha!) thing about this range type is that it's move-only.
Its contiguity is unsurprising (most of our test ranges are contiguous).
Discussed in D111231 but committed separately for clarity.
If you have a `begin() const` member, you don't need a `begin()` member
unless you want it to do something different (e.g. have a different return
type). So in general, //view// types don't need `begin()` non-const members.
Also, static_assert some things about the types in "types.h", so that we
don't accidentally break those properties under refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111231
The existing tests for transform_view::iterator weren't quite right,
and can be simplified now that we have more of C++20 available to us.
Having done that, let's use the same pattern for iota_view::iterator
as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110774
Instead of using a base class to store the members and the optional
size, use [[no_unique_address]] to achieve the same thing without
needing a base class.
Also, as a fly-by:
- Change subrange from struct to class (per the standard)
- Improve the diagnostic for when one doesn't provide a size to the ctor of a sized subrange
- Replace this->member by just member since it's not in a dependent base anymore
This change would be an ABI break due to [[no_unique_address]], but we
haven't shipped ranges anywhere yet, so this shouldn't affect anyone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110370
Before this patch, we had features named 'libc++', 'libstdc++' and
'msvc' to describe the three implementations that use our test suite.
This patch renames them to 'stdlib=libc++', 'stdlib=libstdc++', etc
to avoid confusion between MSVC's STL and the MSVC compiler (or Clang
in MSVC mode).
Furthermore, this prepares the terrain for adding support for additional
"implementations" to the test suite. Basically, I'd like to be able to
treat Apple's libc++ differently from LLVM's libc++ for the purpose of
testing, because those effectively behave in different ways in some aspects.
Arthur O'Dwyer