I didn't split the calendar bits more than this because there was little
benefit to doing it, and I know our calendar support is incomplete.
Whoever picks up the missing calendar bits can organize these headers
at their leisure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116965
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Louis Dionne