Implement LWG3549 by making `view_interface` not inherit from `view_base`. Types
are still views if they have a public and unambiguous derivation from
`view_interface`, so adjust the `enable_view` machinery as such to account for
that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714
This will detect if someone writes `inline auto cpo =` instead of
`inline constexpr auto cpo =`. I don't know how that'd be possible,
but it's easy to test, so let's test it.
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_set>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117917
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D117714, there is missing test coverage
for the behavior of `enable_view` when given a const or reference qualified
type. Add such tests showing the current behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117918
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
This addresses the usage of `operator&` in `<unordered_map>`.
(Note there are still more headers with the same issue.)
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117393
It was not in P0355R7, nor has it ever been so in a working draft.
Drive-by:
* tests should test something: fix loop bounds so initial value is not >= final value
* calender type streaming tests are useless - let's remove them
* don't declare printf, especially if you don't intend to use it
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117638
As prefigured in the comments on D115315.
This gives us one unified style for all niebloids,
and also simplifies the modulemap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116570
... rather than using `__has_builtin` directly. This both (1) allows a compiler that doesn't speak `__has_builtin` to workaround with preprocessor magic, and (2) avoids diagnostics about things that look like function like macros after `#if` but are not.
... it's easier to suppress warnings internally, where we can detect the compiler.
* Rename `TEST_COMPILER_C1XX` to `TEST_COMPILER_MSVC`
* Rename all `TEST_WORKAROUND_C1XX_<meow>` to `TEST_WORKAROUND_MSVC_<meow>`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117422
Currently it is not checked that operator in_in_result<II1, II2>() SFINAEs away properly
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117517
The function `std::fill` requires a ForwardIterator, but `std::fill_n`
only requires an OutputIterator. Adds a test to validate `std::fill_n`
works with an OutputIterator.
Noticed this while working on LWG3539
format_to must not copy models of output_iterator<const charT&>
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117395
Instead of storing the wrapped iterator inside the stride_counting_iterator,
store its base so we can have e.g. a stride_counting_iterator of an
input_iterator (which was previously impossible because input_iterators
are not copyable). Also a few other simplifications in stride_counting_iterator.
As a fly-by fix, remove the member base() functions, which are super
confusing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116613
This change is the basis for a further refactoring where I'm going to
split up the various implementations we have in __threading_support to
make that code easier to understand.
Note that I had to make __convert_to_timespec a template to break
circular dependencies. Concretely, we never seem to use it with anything
other than ::timespec, but I am wary of hardcoding that assumption as
part of this change, since I suspect there's a reason for going through
these hoops in the first place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116944
This essentially reverts e02ed1c255 and puts in a new fix, which makes `path::iterator`
a true C++20 `bidirectional_iterator`, but downgrades it to an `input_iterator` in C++17.
Fixes#37852.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116489
The code in libc++ already satisfy the requirements of LWG-3373. Since
the issue was written to specifically allow the types to be used in
structured bindings, tests have been added to validate the new
requirement.
Implements
LWG-3373 {to,from}_chars_result and format_to_n_result need the "we really mean what we say" wording
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117337
I believe all four of these failures are directly due to the pattern where
allocations in the dylib are unobserved by the client program. If AIX32 and AIX64
don't support that, we should just disable the ASSERT_WITH_LIBRARY_INTERNAL_ALLOCATIONS
macro on AIX, and then we don't need to XFAIL these tests.
This also means I won't need to XFAIL a dozen other tests in D89057,
which rely heavily on ASSERT_WITH_LIBRARY_INTERNAL_ALLOCATIONS and
also currently fail on AIX.
See https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/7669
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116866
I didn't split the calendar bits more than this because there was little
benefit to doing it, and I know our calendar support is incomplete.
Whoever picks up the missing calendar bits can organize these headers
at their leisure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116965
... from testing with MSVC's STL. Mostly truncation warnings and variables that are only used in `LIBCPP_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116878
This makes all the tests consistent and improves code coverage. This also
uncovers a bug with negative indices in advance() (which also impacts
prev()) -- I'll fix that in a subsequent patch.
I chose to only count operations in the tests for ranges::advance because
doing so in prev() and next() too was reaching diminishing returns, and
didn't meaningfully improve our test coverage.
Also remove some bogus `std::forward`s. My impression is that these
forwards were actually harmless, because `ranges::begin(FWD(t))` is
always identical to `ranges::begin(t)` (except when it's ill-formed,
and that can't happen in this case). However, they're also superfluous
and don't reflect the wording in the standard, so let's eliminate them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117043
On Apple platforms, arc4random is faster than /dev/urandom, and it is
the recommended user-space RNG according to Apple's own OS folks.
This commit adds an ABI switch to guard ABI-break-protections in
std::random_device, and starts using arc4random instead of /dev/urandom
to implement std::random_device on Apple platforms.
Note that previously, `std::random_device` would allow passing a custom
token to its constructor, and that token would be interpreted as the name
of a file to read entropy from. This was implementation-defined and
undocumented. After this change, Apple platforms will be using arc4random()
instead, and any custom token passed to the constructor will be ignored.
This behavioral change will also impact other platforms that use the
arc4random() implementation, such as OpenBSD. This should be fine since
that is effectively a relaxation of the constructor's requirements.
rdar://86638350
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116045
This needs a proper solution in a follow-up. The issue is that the
Standard defines conversions between `in_out_result` classes with
different template types as just `return {in, out};`. Because the
expression uses list initialization, it will fail to compile if the
conversion happens to be narrowing -- which is probably unintended.
Surprisingly, this error wasn't caught by the CI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117089
Move `iter_swap.pass.cpp` into a new subdirectory: `iterator.cust.swap`
for symmetry with the neighboring subdirectory `iterator.cust.move`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116992
... even when `!defined(_LIBCPP_VERSION)`. (Note that the previous definition for this case - `((void)0);` - is ill-formed at namespace scope.) Ditto for `LIBCPP_ASSERT`, `LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOEXCEPT`, `LIBCPP_ASSERT_NOT_NOEXCEPT`, and `LIBCPP_ONLY`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116880
That will make it easier to change the behavior of the arc4random()
based implementation. Note that in particular, the eval.pass.cpp test
used to work with non "/dev/random" based implementations because we'd
throw an exception upon constructing the random_device. This patch makes
the intent of the test clearer.
Before this patch, the user needed to specialize both of
`is_placeholder<MyType>` and `is_placeholder<const MyType>`.
After this patch, only the former is needed (although the
latter is harmless if provided).
The new tests don't actually fail unless return type deduction
is used, which is a C++14 feature. Specializing `is_placeholder`
is still allowed in C++11, though.
Fixes#51095.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116388
Casey Carter says, "We run std/thread/thread.mutex/thread.lock.algorithm/lock.pass.cpp
on every CI and it works fine with MSVC STL. I'm guessing this annotation predates
Billy's rewrite of std::lock in 2017-ish."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116712
In the test files, replace the old-style tests with a simple static_assert,
matching the current style as depicted in e.g.
`ranges_uninitialized_default_construct.pass.cpp`.
Preserve `is_function_like` (but renamed to `is_niebloid`) at
ldionne's request. The removal of this test helper will happen
in D116570 if at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116384
This should have been done in 6a6a80e88e, but buildkite was down so I
hadn't noticed. This brings this test file into line with several others
in this directory.
z/OS doesn't support fopen64() functions. Modify the preprocessor directive for z/OS to use fopen() instead.
Reviewed By: #libc, abhina.sreeskantharajan, muiez, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111226
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
The fix in D116381 makes an existing exception message wrong. This
improves the message and fixes the associated unit tests.
Note other message can be also be improved, but that will be done later.
Changing these messages may cause merge conflicts with other patches
that are under review or WIP.
Depends on D116381
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116495
@CaseyCarter reported that the tests for the std-format-spec rejects leading
zeroes for precision, which the Standard does not require. The Standard allows
them. Only for precision, not for the width or an arg-id.
Fixes the precision parser and adds some test for the arg-id since they
were missing.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116381
`__cpp_lib_type_identity` was implemented way back in cf49ccd0 (Clang 8),
probably before the feature-test macro had been settled on.
`__cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite` will be added by D113013 so I didn't add it here.
Fixes#46605.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116433
For example, `std::ranges::range<Holder<Incomplete>*>` should be
well-formed false, not a hard error at compile time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116239
The big change here is that they now work as intended for rvalues,
e.g. `ranges::cbegin(std::string_view("hello"))`.
Also, add tests verifying their return types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116199
AFAICT, Cpp17InputIterators are not required to be default constructible,
since that requirement is added in Cpp17ForwardIterator. Hence, our
archetype for Cpp17InputIterator should not be default constructible.
Removing that constructor has a ripple effect on a couple of tests that
were making incorrect assumptions. Notably:
- Some tests were using cpp17_input_iterator as a sentinel for itself.
That is not valid, because a cpp17_input_iterator is not semiregular
anymore after the change (and hence it doesn't satisfy sentinel_for).
- Some tests were using a stride-counted cpp17_input_iterator as the
sentinel for a range. This doesn't work anymore because of the problem
above, so these tests were changed not to check stride counts for
input iterators.
- Some tests were default constructing cpp17_input_iterator when a simple
alternative was available -- those have been changed to use that alternative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115806
Line 1140 is a duplicate of line 1119; it tests the two-argument version
of std::hypot, whereas all the lines in this section are supposed to be
testing the C++17 three-argument version. Remove the erroneous duplicated line.
Split out of D116295.
Some individual test files verify the CPO under test satisfies
`semiregular` concept. This is redundant since it is already part of the test
in verifying whether the entity is indeed a CPO in
`libcxx/test/std/library/description/conventions/customization.point.object/cpo.compile.pass.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116173
We didn't support noop_coroutine for GCC in previous conforming patch.
So that GCC couldn't use noop_coroutine() defined in <coroutine>. And
after this patch, GCC should be able to compile the whole <coroutine>
header.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116144
It was missing the cast to `bool` in `bool(__t.empty())`.
It was wrongly using `std::forward` in some places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115312
During the review of D115991 @vitaut pointed out the enum shouldn't
depend on whether or not _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INT128 is defined. The current
implementation lets the enum's ABI depend on this configuration option
without a good cause.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116120
Arthur O'Dwyer