When printing a std::string_view, print the referenced string as the
summary. Support string_view, u32string_view, u16string_view and
wstring_view, as we do for std::string and friends.
This is based on the existing fomratter for std::string, and just
extracts the data and length members, pushing them through the existing
string formatter.
In testing this, a "FIXME" was corrected for printing of non-ASCII empty
values. Previously, the "u", 'U" etc. prefixes were not printed for
basic_string<> types that were not char. This is trivial to resolve by
printing the prefix before the "".
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112222
This adds extra tests for libstdcpp and libcxx list and forward_list formatters to check whether formatter behaves correctly when applied on pointer and reference values.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115137
This adds the formatters for libstdcpp's deque as a python
implementation. It adds comprehensive tests for the two different
storage strategies deque uses. Besides that, this fixes a couple of bugs
in the libcxx implementation. Finally, both implementation run against
the same tests.
This is a minor improvement on top of Danil Stefaniuc's formatter.
This diff is adding the capping_size determination for the list and forward list, to limit the number of children to be displayed. Also it modifies and unifies tests for libcxx and libstdcpp list data formatter.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114433
This diff adds a data formatter and tests for libstdcpp's unordered_map, unordered_set, unordered_multimap, unordered_multiset
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113760
This diff adds a data formatter for libstdcpp's forward_list. Besides, it refactors the existing code by extracting the common functionality between libstdcpp forward_list and list formatters into the AbstractListSynthProvider class.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113362
This diff adds a data formatter for libstdcpp's multiset. Besides, it improves and unifies the tests for multiset for libcxx and libstdcpp for maintainability.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112785
This diff adds a data formatter for libstdcpp's multimap. Besides, it improves and unifies the tests for multimap for libcxx and libstdcpp for maintainability.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112752
The patch [1] introduced this FIXME but ended up not being removed when fixed.
[1]: f68df12fb0
Signed-off-by: Luís Ferreira <contact@lsferreira.net>
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112586
This diff adds a data formatter for libstdcpp's set. Besides, it unifies the tests for set for libcxx and libstdcpp for maintainability.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112537
This diff adds a data formatter for libstdcpp's bitset. Besides, it unifies the tests for bitset for libcxx and libstdcpp for maintainability.
Reviewed By: wallace
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112180
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
There is no reason why this function should be returning a ConstString.
While modifying these files, I also fixed several instances where
GetPluginName and GetPluginNameStatic were returning different strings.
I am not changing the return type of GetPluginNameStatic in this patch, as that
would necessitate additional changes, and this patch is big enough as it is.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111877
This change accomplishes the following:
- Moves `IRExecutionUnit::FindBestAlternateMangledName` to `Language`.
- Renames `FindBestAlternateMangledName` to
`FindBestAlternateFunctionMangledName`
- Changes the first parameter of said method from a `ConstString`
representing a demangled name to a `Mangled`.
- Remove the use of CPlusPlusLanguage from Expression
I have 2 goals with this change:
1. Disambiguate between CPlusPlus::FindAlternateFunctionManglings and
IRExecutionUnit::FindBestAlternateMangledName. These are named very
similar things, they try to do very similar things, but their
approaches are different. This change should make it clear that one
is generating possible alternate manglings (through some
heuristics-based approach) and the other is finding alternate
manglings (through searching the SymbolFile for potential matches).
2. Change GenerateAlternateFunctionManglings from a static method in
CPlusPlusLanguage to a virtual method in Language. This will allow us
to remove a direct use of CPlusPlusLanguage in IRExecutionUnit,
further pushing it to be more general. This change doesn't meet this
goal completely but allows for it to happen later.
Though this doesn't remove IRExecutionUnit's dependency on
CPlusPlusLanguage, it does bring us closer to that goal.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109785
In all these years, we haven't found a use for this function (it has
zero callers). Lets just remove the boilerplate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109600
Module::LookupInfo's constructor currently goes over supported languages
trying to figure out the best way to search for a symbol name. This
seems like a great candidate for refactoring. Specifically, this is work
that can be delegated to language plugins.
Once again, the goal here is to further decouple plugins from
non-plugins. The idea is to have each language plugin take a name and
give you back some information about the name from the perspective of
the language. Specifically, each language now implements a
`GetFunctionNameInfo` method which returns an object of type
`Language::FunctionNameInfo`. Right now, it consists of a basename,
a context, and a FunctionNameType. Module::LookupInfo's constructor will
call `GetFunctionNameInfo` with the appropriate language plugin(s) and
then decide what to do with that information. I have attempted to maintain
existing behavior as best as possible.
A nice side effect of this change is that lldbCore no longer links
against the ObjC Language plugin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108229
The only remaining plugin dependency in Mangled is CPlusPlusLanguage which it
uses to extract information from C++ mangled names. The static function
GetDemangledNameWithoutArguments is written specifically for C++, so it
would make sense for this specific functionality to live in a
C++-related plugin. In order to keep this functionality in Mangled
without maintaining this dependency, I added
`Language::GetDemangledFunctionNameWithoutArguments`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105215
Display null pointer as `nullptr`, `nil` and `NULL` for C++,
Objective-C/Objective-C++ and C respectively. The original motivation
for this patch was to display a null std::string pointer as nullptr
instead of "", but the fix seemed generic enough to be done for all
summary providers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77153
This reverts commit 856fd98a17. The type formatters
use inline namespaces to find the formatter that fits the type ABI, so they
can't just ignore the inline namespaces.
The failing tests should be fixed by da121fff11 .
Summary:
Since commit 7b3ef05a37 the Objective-C++ plugin is dead code.
That commit added Objective-C++ to the list of languages for which `Language::LanguageIsCPlusPlus`
returns true. As the C++ language plugin also uses that method to figure out if it is responsible for a
given language, the C++ plugin since then also became the plugin that we found when looking for
a language plugin for Objective-C++. The only real fallout from that is that the source highlighting
for Objective-C++ files never worked as we always found the C++ plugin which refuses to highlight
files with Objective-C++ extensions.
This patch just adds a special exception for Objective-C++ to the list of languages that are governed
by the C++ plugin. Also adds a test that makes sure that we find the right plugin for all C language
types and that the highlighting for `.mm` (Objective-C++) and `.m` (Objective-C) files works.
I didn't revert 7b3ef05a37 as it does make sense to return
true for Objective-C++ from `Language::LanguageIsCPlusPlus` (e.g., we currently check if we care about
ODR violations by doing `if (Language::LanguageIsCPlusPlus(...))` and this should also work for
Objective-C++).
Fixes rdar://64420183
Reviewers: aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: mgorny, abidh, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82109
This adds a formatter for libc++ std::unique_ptr.
I also refactored GetValueOfCompressedPair(...) out of LibCxxList.cpp since I need the same functionality and it made sense to share it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76476
This is a step towards making the initialize and terminate calls be
generated by CMake, which in turn is towards making it possible to
disable plugins at configuration time.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74245
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This patch adds code which will substitute references to the full object
constructors/destructors with their base object versions.
Like all substitutions in this category, this operation is not really
sound, but doing this in a more precise way allows us to get rid of a
much larger hack -- matching function according to their demangled
names, which effectively does the same thing, but also much more.
This is a (very late) follow-up to D54074.
Background: clang has an optimization which can eliminate full object
structors completely, if they are found to be equivalent to their base
object versions. It does this because it assumes they can be regenerated
on demand in the compile unit that needs them (e.g., because they are
declared inline). However, this doesn't work for the debugging scenario,
where we don't have the structor bodies available -- we pretend all
constructors are defined out-of-line as far as clang is concerned. This
causes clang to emit references to the (nonexisting) full object
structors during expression evaluation.
Fun fact: This is not a problem on darwin, because the relevant
optimization is disabled to work around a linker bug.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70721
Performance issues lead to the libc++ std::function formatter to be disabled. We addressed some of those performance issues by adding caching see D67111
This PR fixes the first lookup performance by not using FindSymbolsMatchingRegExAndType(...) and instead finding the compilation unit the std::function wrapped callable should be in and then searching for the callable directly in the CU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69913
There is now std::shared_ptr passed around which is expensive for manycore
CPUs. Most of the times (except for 3 cases) it is now just std::moved with no
CPU locks needed. It also makes it possible to sort the keys (which is now not
needed much after D66398).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67049
llvm-svn: 370863
Since D66174 I see failures of TestDataFormatterStdList in about 50% of runs on
Fedora 30 x86_64 libstdc++. I have found out that LLDB internally expects these
RegularExpressions to be matched in their alphabetical order:
^std::(__cxx11::)?list<.+>(( )?&)?$
^std::__[[:alnum:]]+::list<.+>(( )?&)?$
But since D66174 they are sometimes matched in reverse order. In fact it was
only some luck it worked before as there is internally
std::map<lldb::RegularExpressionSP, FormatterImpl> (FormattersContainer).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66398
llvm-svn: 369655
Summary: We have been seeing increased reports of performance issue around large project and formatting std::function variables especially in functions signatures in back traces. There are some possible fixes but exploring those fixes may take time and it is better to temporarily disable the formatter due to its impact and re-enable it once we have a fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65666
llvm-svn: 367701
Summary:
According to [C128] "Virtual functions should specify exactly one
of `virtual`, `override`, or `final`", I've added override where a
virtual function is overriden but the explicit `override` keyword
was missing. Whenever both `virtual` and `override` were specified,
I removed `virtual`. As C.128 puts it:
> [...] writing more than one of these three is both redundant and
> a potential source of errors.
I anticipate a discussion about whether or not to add `override` to
destructors but I went for it because of an example in [ISOCPP1000].
Let me repeat the comment for you here:
Consider this code:
```
struct Base {
virtual ~Base(){}
};
struct SubClass : Base {
~SubClass() {
std::cout << "It works!\n";
}
};
int main() {
std::unique_ptr<Base> ptr = std::make_unique<SubClass>();
}
```
If for some odd reason somebody removes the `virtual` keyword from the
`Base` struct, the code will no longer print `It works!`. So adding
`override` to destructors actively protects us from accidentally
breaking our code at runtime.
[C128]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#c128-virtual-functions-should-specify-exactly-one-of-virtual-override-or-final
[ISOCPP1000]: https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/issues/1000#issuecomment-476951555
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, davide, shafik
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: kwk, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61440
llvm-svn: 359868
Summary:
This previous fix 5469bda296 did not have a test since we did not have a reproducer.
This is related to how formatters deal with pointers and references. The added tests both the new behavior and covers the previous bug fix as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60588
llvm-svn: 359118
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
Pavel Labath