Allocation functions should be marked with onlyAccessesInaccessibleMemory (when that is correct for the given function) which is checked elsewhere so this check is no longer needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117180
Since we don't merge/expand non-sequential umin exprs into umin_seq exprs,
we may have umin_seq(umin(umin_seq())) chain, and the innermost umin_seq
can have duplicate operands still.
This doesn't require callers to put the pointer operand and the indices
in a container like a vector when calling the function. This is not
really an issue with the existing callers. But when using it from
IRBuilder the inputs are available as separate pointer value and indices
ArrayRef.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117038
The reinterpret load code will convert undef values into zero.
Check the uniform value case before it to produce a better result
for all-undef initializers.
However, the uniform value handling will return the uniform value
even if the access is out of bounds, while the reinterpret load
code will return undef. Add an explicit check to retain the
previous result in this case.
The basic idea is that we can parameterize the getObjectSize implementation with a callback which lets us replace the operand before analysis if desired. This is what Attributor is doing during it's abstract interpretation, and allows us to have one copy of the code.
Note this is not NFC for two reasons:
* The existing attributor code is wrong. (Well, this is under-specified to be honest, but at least inconsistent.) The intermediate math needs to be done in the index type of the pointer space. Imagine e.g. i64 arguments in a 32 bit address space.
* I did not preserve the behavior in getAPInt where we return 0 for a partially analyzed value. This looks simply wrong in the original code, and nothing test wise contradicts that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117241
Since 26c6a3e736, LLVM's inliner will "upgrade" the caller's stack protector
attribute based on the callee. This lead to surprising results with Clang's
no_stack_protector attribute added in 4fbf84c173 (D46300). Consider the
following code compiled with clang -fstack-protector-strong -Os
(https://godbolt.org/z/7s3rW7a1q).
extern void h(int* p);
inline __attribute__((always_inline)) int g() {
return 0;
}
int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
LLVM will inline g() into f(), and f() would get a stack protector, against the
users explicit wishes, potentially breaking the program e.g. if h() changes the
value of the stack cookie. That's a miscompile.
More recently, bc044a88ee (D91816) addressed this problem by preventing
inlining when the stack protector is disabled in the caller and enabled in the
callee or vice versa. However, the problem remained if the callee is marked
always_inline as in the example above. This affected users, see e.g.
http://crbug.com/1274129 and http://llvm.org/pr52886.
One way to fix this would be to prevent inlining also in the always_inline
case. Despite the name, always_inline does not guarantee inlining, so this
would be legal but potentially surprising to users.
However, I think the better fix is to not enable the stack protector in a
caller based on the callee. The motivation for the old behaviour is unclear, it
seems counter-intuitive, and causes real problems as we've seen.
This commit implements that fix, which means in the example above, g() gets
inlined into f() (also without always_inline), and f() is emitted without stack
protector. I think that matches most developers' expectations, and that's also
what GCC does.
Another effect of this change is that a no_stack_protector function can now be
inlined into a stack protected function, e.g. (https://godbolt.org/z/hafP6W856):
extern void h(int* p);
inline int __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) __attribute__((always_inline)) g() {
return 0;
}
int f() {
int a[1];
h(a);
return g();
}
I think that's fine. Such code would be unusual since no_stack_protector is
normally applied to a program entry point which sets up the stack canary. And
even if such code exists, inlining doesn't change the semantics: there is still
no stack cookie setup/check around entry/exit of the g() code region, but there
may be in the surrounding context, as there was before inlining. This also
matches GCC.
See also the discussion at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94722
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116589
We could use knownbits on both operands for even more folds (and there are
already tests in place for that), but this is enough to recover the example
from:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/51934
(the tests are derived from the code in that example)
I am assuming no noticeable compile-time impact from this because udiv/urem
are rare opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116616
This is required to query the legality more precisely in the LoopVectorizer.
This adds another TTI function named 'forceScalarizeMaskedGather/Scatter'
function to work around the hack introduced for MVE, where
isLegalMaskedGather/Scatter would return an answer by second-guessing
where the function was called from, based on the Type passed in (vector
vs scalar). The new interface makes this explicit. It is also used by
X86 to check for vector widths where gather/scatters aren't profitable
(or don't exist) for certain subtargets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115329
This avoids the InlineAdvisor carrying the responsibility of deleting
Function objects. We use LazyCallGraph::Node objects instead, which are
stable in memory for the duration of the Module-wide performance of CGSCC
passes started under the same ModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor (which
is the case here)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116964
This happens in e.g. regalloc, where we trace decisions per function,
but wouldn't want to spew N log files (i.e. one per function). So we
output a key-value association, where the key is an ID for the
sub-module object, and the value is the tensorflow::SequenceExample.
The current relation with protobuf is tenuous, so we're avoiding a
custom message type in favor of using the `Struct` message, but that
requires the values be wire-able strings, hence base64 encoding.
We plan on resolving the protobuf situation shortly, and improve the
encoding of such logs, but this is sufficient for now for setting up
regalloc training.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116985
Alternative to D116817.
This introduces a new value-based folding interface for Or (FoldOr),
which takes 2 values and returns an existing Value or a constant if the
Or can be simplified. Otherwise nullptr is returned. This replaces the
more restrictive CreateOr which takes 2 constants.
This is the used to implement a folder that uses InstructionSimplify.
The logic to simplify `Or` instructions is moved there. Subsequent
patches are going to transition other CreateXXX to the more general
FoldXXX interface.
Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116935
Extend the existing malloc-family specific optimization to all noalias calls. This allows us to handle allocation wrappers, and removes a dependency on a lib-func check in favor of generic attribute usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116980
D92270 updated constant expression folding to fold inbounds GEP to
poison if the base is undef. Apply the same logic to SimplifyGEPInst.
The justification is that we can choose an out-of-bounds pointer as base
pointer.
Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117015
We could just merge all umin into umin_seq, but that is likely
a pessimization, so don't do that, but pretend that we did
for the purpose of deduplication.
Having the same operand more than once doesn't change the outcome here,
neither reduction-wise nor poison-wise.
We must keep the first instance specifically though.
Two crashes have been reported. This change disables the new logic while leaving the new node in tree. Hopefully, that's enough to allow investigation without breakage while avoiding massive churn.
Not all allocation functions are removable if unused. An example of a non-removable allocation would be a direct call to the replaceable global allocation function in C++. An example of a removable one - at least according to historical practice - would be malloc.
As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53020 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D116692,
SCEV is forbidden from reasoning about 'backedge taken count'
if the branch condition is a poison-safe logical operation,
which is conservatively correct, but is severely limiting.
Instead, we should have a way to express those
poison blocking properties in SCEV expressions.
The proposed semantics is:
```
Sequential/in-order min/max SCEV expressions are non-commutative variants
of commutative min/max SCEV expressions. If none of their operands
are poison, then they are functionally equivalent, otherwise,
if the operand that represents the saturation point* of given expression,
comes before the first poison operand, then the whole expression is not poison,
but is said saturation point.
```
* saturation point - the maximal/minimal possible integer value for the given type
The lowering is straight-forward:
```
compare each operand to the saturation point,
perform sequential in-order logical-or (poison-safe!) ordered reduction
over those checks, and if reduction returned true then return
saturation point else return the naive min/max reduction over the operands
```
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/Q7jxvH (2 ops)
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/QCRrhk (3 ops)
Note that we don't need to check the last operand: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/abvHQS
Note that this is not commutative: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/FK9e97
That allows us to handle the patterns in question.
Reviewed By: nikic, reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116766
(Split from original patch to separate non-NFC part and add coverage. I typoed when adding the new test, so this change includes the typo fix to let libfunc recongize the signature. Didn't figure it was worth another separate commit.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116851 (part 2 of 2)
There are a few places where the alignment argument for AlignedAllocLike functions was previously hardcoded. This patch adds an getAllocAlignment function and a change to the MemoryBuiltin table to allow alignment arguments to be found generically.
This will shortly allow alignment inference on operator new's with align_val params and an extension to Attributor's HeapToStack. The former will follow shortly - I split Bryce's patch for purpose of having the large change be NFC. The later will be reviewed separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116851 (part 1 of 2)
We currently have two similar implementations of this concept:
isNoAliasCall() only checks for the noalias return attribute.
isNoAliasFn() also checks for allocation functions.
We should switch to only checking the attribute. SLC is responsible
for inferring the noalias return attribute for non-new allocation
functions (with a missing case fixed in
348bc76e35).
For new, clang is responsible for setting the attribute,
if -fno-assume-sane-operator-new is not passed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116800
We're testing that the RegionLoop pointer is null in the first part of the check, so we need to check that its non-null before dereferencing it in a later part of the check.
strdup/strndup are already partially implemented, move remaining comment to relevant place. Remaining named routines are copy routines and mostly handled via intrinsics already - they do not allocate new memory.
This is in preparation for D115545 which attempts to delete discardable functions if they are unused. With that change, shifting RefSCCs becomes noticeable in compile time. This change makes the LCG update negligible again.
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116776
This is a reoccuring pattern, we can consolidate three copies into one. The main motivation is to reduce usages of isMallocLike.
The original commit (which was quickly reverted) didn't account for the allocation function could be an invoke, test coverage for that case added in this commit.
This patch adds a couple of NewPM function passes (dot-dom and
dot-dom-only) that dump DomTree into .dot files.
Reviewed-By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116629
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
The naming has come up as a source of confusion in several recent reviews. onlyWritesMemory is consist with onlyReadsMemory which we use for the corresponding readonly case as well.
In particular, this also preserves undef when loading from padding,
rather than converting it to zero through a different codepath.
This is the remaining part of D115924.
There are a number of places that specially handle loads from a
uniform value where all the bits are the same (zero, one, undef,
poison), because we a) don't care about the load offset in that
case b) it bypasses casts that might not be legal generally but
do work with uniform values.
We had multiple implementations of this, with a different set of
supported values each time. This replaces two usages with a more
complete helper. Other usages will be replaced separately, because
they have larger impact.
This is part of D115924.
This was noted in post-commit review for D116322 / 0edf99950e .
I am not seeing how to expose the bug in a test though because
we don't pass an assumption cache into this analysis from there.
This ports the logic we generate in instcombine for a single use x.with.overflow check for use in SCEV's analysis. The result is that we can prove trip counts for many checks, and (through existing logic) often discharge them.
Motivation comes from compiling a simple example with -ftrapv.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116499
0a00d64 turned an early exit here into an assertion, but the assertion
can be triggered, as PR52920 shows.
The later code is agnostic to the accessed type, so just drop the
assert. The patch also adds tests for LAA directly and
loop-load-elimination to show the behavior is sane.
For loops that contain in-loop reductions but no loads or stores, large
VFs are chosen because LoopVectorizationCostModel::getSmallestAndWidestTypes
has no element types to check through and so returns the default widths
(-1U for the smallest and 8 for the widest). This results in the widest
VF being chosen for the following example,
float s = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i)
s += (float) i*i;
which, for more computationally intensive loops, leads to large loop
sizes when the operations end up being scalarized.
In this patch, for the case where ElementTypesInLoop is empty, the widest
type is determined by finding the smallest type used by recurrences in
the loop instead of falling back to a default value of 8 bits. This
results in the cost model choosing a more sensible VF for loops like
the one above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113973
This function returns an upper bound on the number of bits needed
to represent the signed value. Use "Max" to match similar functions
in KnownBits like countMaxActiveBits.
Rename APInt::getMinSignedBits->getSignificantBits. Keeping the old
name around to keep this patch size down. Will do a bulk rename as
follow up.
Rename KnownBits::countMaxSignedBits->countMaxSignificantBits.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, RKSimon, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116522
This reverts commit fd4808887e.
This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:
warning: base class ‘class llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand’ should be
explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]
We can fold an equality or unsigned icmp between base+offset1 and
base+offset2 with inbounds offsets by comparing the offsets directly.
This replaces a pair of specialized folds that tried to reason
based on the GEP structure instead. One of those folds was plain
wrong (because it does not account for negative offsets), while
the other is unnecessarily complicated and limited (e.g. it will
fail with bitcasts involved).
The disadvantage of this change is that it requires data layout,
so the fold is no longer performed by datalayout-independent
constant folding. I don't think this is a loss in practice, but
it does regress the ConstantExprFold.ll test, which checks folding
without running any passes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116332
We should not lose analysis precision if an 'add' has both no-wrap
flags (nsw and nuw) compared to just one or the other.
This patch is modeled on a similar construct that was added with
D59386.
I don't think it is possible to expose a problem with an unsigned
compare because of the way this was coded (nuw is handled first).
InstCombine has an assert that fires with the example from:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52884
...because it was expecting InstSimplify to handle this kind of
pattern with an smax.
Fixes#52884
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116322
Remove the special casing for intrinsics in MemoryLocation::getForDest()
and handle them through the general attribute based code. On the DSE
side, this means that isRemovable() now needs to handle more than a
hardcoded list of intrinsics. We consider everything apart from
volatile memory intrinsics and lifetime markers to be removable.
This allows us to perform DSE on intrinsics that DSE has not been
specially taught about, using a matrix store as an example here.
There is an interesting test change for invariant.start, but I
believe that optimization is correct. It only looks a bit odd
because the code is immediate UB anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116210
Adding following fold opportunity:
((A | B) ^ A) & ((A | B) ^ B) --> 0
Reviewed By: spatel, rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115755
When looking at building the generator for regalloc, we realized we'd
need quite a bit of custom logic, and that perhaps it'd be easier to
just have each usecase (each kind of mlgo policy) have it's own
stand-alone test generator.
This patch just consolidates the old `config.py` and
`generate_mock_model.py` into one file, and does away with
subdirectories under Analysis/models.
As reames mentioned on related reviews, we don't need the nocapture
requirement here. First of all, from an API perspective, this is
not something that MemoryLocation::getForDest() should be checking
in the first place, because it does not affect which memory this
particular call can access; it's an orthogonal concern that should
be handled by the caller if necessary.
However, for both of the motivating users in DSE and InstCombine,
we don't need the nocapture requirement, because the capture can
either be purely local to the call (a pointer identity check that
is irrelevant to us), be part of the return value (which we check
is unused), or be written in the dest location, which we have
determined to be dead.
This allows us to remove the special handling for libcalls as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116148
The areFunctionArgsABICompatible() hook currently accepts a list of
pointer arguments, though what we're actually interested in is the
ABI compatibility after these pointer arguments have been converted
into value arguments.
This means that a) the current API is incompatible with opaque
pointers (because it requires inspection of pointee types) and
b) it can only be used in the specific context of ArgPromotion.
I would like to reuse the API when inspecting calls during inlining.
This patch converts it into an areTypesABICompatible() hook, which
accepts a list of types. This makes the method more generally usable,
and compatible with opaque pointers from an API perspective (the
actual usage in ArgPromotion/Attributor is still incompatible,
I'll follow up on that in separate patches).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116031
This fixes the assertion failure reported at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114889#3198921 with a straightforward
check, until the cleaner fix in D115924 can be reapplied.
This is a reapply of a8a51fe5, which was reverted in 1ba99e due to a failing compiler-rt test. That test was a false positive because it was checking asan failures not accounting for the fact the call could be validly optimized out. I hopefully managed to stablize that test in 9b955f. (That's a speculative fix due to disk consumption needed to build compiler-rt tests locally being absurd.)
Original commit message follows..
The majority of this change is sinking logic from instcombine into MemoryLocation such that it can be generically reused. If we have a call with a single analyzable write to an argument, we can treat that as-if it were a store of unknown size.
Merging the code in this was unblocks DSE in the store to dead memory code paths. In theory, it should also enable classic DSE of such calls, but the code appears to not know how to use object sizes to refine unknown access bounds (yet).
In addition, this does make the isAllocRemovable path slightly stronger by reusing the libfunc and additional intrinsics bits which are already in getForDest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115904
The availability of SVE should be sufficient to enable scalable
auto-vectorization.
This patch adds a new TTI interface to query the target what style of
vectorization it wants when scalable vectors are available. For other
targets than AArch64, this currently defaults to 'FixedWidthOnly'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115651
This reverts commit 9fd4f80e33.
This breaks SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/pr19687.c
in test-suite. Either the test is incorrect, or clang is generating
incorrect union initialization code. I've submitted
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115994 to fix the test, assuming my
interpretation is correct. Reverting this in the meantime as it
may take some time to resolve.
Before this change, AAResults::getModRefInfo() was missing a case for
callbr instructions (asm goto), which may read/write memory. In PR52735,
this led to a miscompile where a load was incorrect eliminated.
Add this missing case, as well as an assert verifying that all
memory-accessing instructions are handled properly.
Fixes#52735.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115992
The majority of this change is sinking logic from instcombine into MemoryLocation such that it can be generically reused. If we have a call with a single analyzable write to an argument, we can treat that as-if it were a store of unknown size.
Merging the code in this was unblocks DSE in the store to dead memory code paths. In theory, it should also enable classic DSE of such calls, but the code appears to not know how to use object sizes to refine unknown access bounds (yet).
In addition, this does make the isAllocRemovable path slightly stronger by reusing the libfunc and additional intrinsics bits which are already in getForDest.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115904
Pull out an explicit check rather than relying on the fact that the callee operand is not a data operand. The only real value is it gives us a clear place to move the comment, and makes the code slightly more understandable.
There are a number of places that specially handle loads from a
uniform value where all the bits are the same (zero, one, undef,
poison), because we a) don't care about the load offset in that
case and b) it bypasses casts that might not be legal generally
but do work with uniform values.
We had multiple implementations of this, with a different set of
supported values each time, as well as incomplete type checks in
some cases. In particular, this fixes the assertion reported in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D114889#3198921, as well as a similar
assertion that could be triggered via constant folding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115924
Preserve the invariant that offset reported in the case of a
`PartialAlias` between `Loc1` and `Loc2`, is such that
`Loc1 + Offset = Loc2`, where `Loc1` and `Loc2` are the first and
the second argument, respectively, in alias queries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115927
This patch updates applyLoopGuards to first collect all conditions and
then applies them in reverse order. This ensures the SCEVs with the
shortest dependency chains are constructed first, limiting the required
stack size.
This fixes a crash reported in D113578.
Note that the order conditions are applied can impact the accuracy of
the result, mostly due to missing min/max simplifications when
constructing SCEVs.
The changed test highlights the impact of the evaluation order. I will
follow up with a SCEV patch to improve min/max simplifications to get
the same results for both orders.
After the switch to the new pass manager, we have observed multiple
instances of catastrophic inlining, where the inliner produces huge
functions with many hundreds of thousands of instructions from small
input IR. We were forced to back out the switch to the new pass
manager for this reason. This patch fixes at least one of the root
cause issues.
LLVM uses a bottom-up inliner, and the fact that functions are processed
bottom-up is not just a question of optimality -- it is an imporant
requirement to prevent runaway inlining. The premise of the current
inlining approach and cost model is that after all calls inside a function
have been inlined, it may get large enough that inlining it into its
callers is no longer considered profitable. This safeguard does not
exist if inlining doesn't happen bottom-up, as inlining the callees,
and their callees, and their callees etc. will always seem individually
profitable, and the inliner can easily flatten the whole call tree.
There are instances where we necessarily have to deviate from bottom-up
inlining: When inlining in an SCC there is no natural "bottom", so
inlining effectively happens top-down. This requires special care,
and the inliner avoids exponential blowup by ensuring that functions
in the SCC grow in a balanced way and will eventually hit the threshold.
However, there is one instance where the inlining advisor explicitly
violates the bottom-up principle: Deferred inlining tries to "defer"
inlining a call if it determines that inlining the caller into all
its call-sites would be more profitable. Something very important to
understand about deferred inlining is that it doesn't make one inlining
choice in place of another -- it effectively chooses to do both. If we
have a call chain A -> B -> C and cost modelling tells us that inlining
B -> C is profitable, but we defer this and instead inline A -> B first,
then we'll now have a call A -> C, and the cost model will (a few special
cases notwithstanding) still tell us that this is profitable. So the end
result is that we inlined *both* B and C, even though under the usual
cost model function B would have been too large to further inline after
C has been integrated into it.
Because deferred inlining violates the bottom-up invariant of the inliner,
it can result in exponential inlining. The exponential-deferred-inlining.ll
test case illustrates this on a simple example (see
https://gist.github.com/nikic/1262b5f7d27278e1b34a190ae10947f5 for a
much more catastrophic case with about 5000x size blowup). If the call
chain A -> B -> C is not a chain but a tree of calls, then we end up
deferring inlining across the tree and end up flattening everything into
the root node.
This patch proposes to address this by disabling deferred inlining
entirely (currently still behind an option). Beyond the issue of
exponential inlining, I don't think that the whole concept makes sense,
at least as long as deferred inlining still ends up inlining both call
edges.
I believe the motivation for having deferred inlining in the first place
is that you might have a small wrapper function with local linkage that
could be eliminated if inlined. This would automatically happen if there
was a single caller, due to the large "last call to local" bonus. However,
this bonus is not extended if there are multiple callers, even if we
would eventually end up inlining into all of them (if the bonus were
extended).
Now, unlike the normal inlining cost model, the deferred inlining cost
model does look at all callers, and will extend the "last call to local"
bonus if it determines that we could inline all of them as long as we
defer the current inlining decision. This makes very little sense.
The "last call to local" bonus doesn't really cost model anything.
It's basically an "infinite" bonus that ensures we always inline the
last call to a local. The fact that it's not literally infinite just
prevents inlining of huge functions, which can easily result in
scalability issues. I very much doubt that it was an intentional
cost-modelling choice to say that getting rid of a small local function
is worth adding 15000 instructions elsewhere, yet this is exactly how
this value is getting used here.
The main alternative I see to complete removal is to change deferred
inlining to an actual either/or decision. That is, to mark deferred
calls as noinline so we're actually trading off one inlining decision
against another, and not just adding a side-channel to the cost model
to do both.
Apart from fixing the catastrophic inlining case, the effect on rustc
is a modest compile-time improvement on average (up to 8% for a
parsing-type crate, where tree-like calls are expected) and pretty
neutral where run-time performance is concerned (mix of small wins
and losses, usually in the sub-1% category).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115497
An well-formed IR function definition must have an entry basic block and
a well-formed IR basic block must have one terminator so the emptiness
check can be simplified.
Also simplify the test a bit.
Reviewed By: luna
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115780
These are deprecated and should be replaced with getAlign().
Some of these asserts don't do anything because Load/Store/AllocaInst never have a 0 align value.
Bryce Wilson