When canonicalizing dags according to the rule
(shl (zext (shr X, c1) ), c1) ==> (zext (shl (shr X, c1), c1))
remember to add the new shl dag to the DAGCombiner worklist of nodes.
If we don't explicitly add it to the worklist of nodes to visit, we
may not trigger later on the rule that folds the shift left + logical
shift right into a AND instruction with bitmask.
llvm-svn: 192883
This happens e.g. with <2 x i64> -1 on x86_32. It cannot be generated directly
because i64 is illegal. It would be nice if getNOT would handle this
transparently, but I don't see a way to generate a legal constant there right
now. Fixes PR17487.
llvm-svn: 192795
This is really an extension of the current (shl (shr ...)) -> shl optimization.
The main difference is that certain upper bits must also not be demanded.
The motivating examples are the first two in the testcase, which occur
in llvmpipe output.
llvm-svn: 192783
This should fix the buildbots.
Original commit message:
[DAGCombiner] Slice a big load in two loads when the element are next to each
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192476
other in memory and the target has paired load and performs post-isel loads
combining.
E.g., this optimization will transform something like this:
a = load i64* addr
b = trunc i64 a to i32
c = lshr i64 a, 32
d = trunc i64 c to i32
into:
b = load i32* addr1
d = load i32* addr2
Where addr1 = addr2 +/- sizeof(i32), if the target supports paired load and
performs post-isel loads combining.
One should overload TargetLowering::hasPairedLoad to provide this information.
The default is false.
<rdar://problem/14477220>
llvm-svn: 192471
DAGCombiner::visitFP_EXTEND will apply the following transformation:
fold (fpext (load x)) -> (fpext (fptrunc (extload x)))
but the implementation does not handle indexed loads (pre/post inc.), but did
not specifically ignore them either (unlike for extending loads, which it
already ignored), causing an assert when the transformation was applied to an
indexed load. This is the minimal fix for correctness (causing the
transformation to be skipped for indexed loads).
Unfortunately, I don't have an in-tree test case.
llvm-svn: 191989
SelectionDAG will now attempt to inverse an illegal conditon in order to
find a legal one and if that doesn't work, it will attempt to swap the
operands using the inverted condition.
There are no new test cases for this, but a nubmer of the existing R600
tests hit this path.
llvm-svn: 191602
This is useful for targets like R600, which only support GT, GE, NE, and EQ
condition codes as it removes the need to handle unsupported condition
codes in target specific code.
There are no tests with this commit, but R600 has been updated to take
advantage of this new feature, so its existing selectcc tests are now
testing the swapped operands path.
llvm-svn: 191601
Interpreting the results of this function is not very intuitive, so I
cleaned it up to make it more clear whether or not a SETCC op was
legalized and how it was legalized (either by swapping LHS and RHS or
replacing with AND/OR).
This patch does change functionality in the LHS and RHS swapping case,
but unfortunately there are no in-tree tests for this. However, this
patch is a prerequisite for R600 to take advantage of the LHS and RHS
swapping, so tests will be added in subsequent commits.
llvm-svn: 191600
This change fixes the problem reported in pr17380 and re-add the dagcombine
transformation ensuring that the value types are always legal if the
transformation is triggered after Legalization took place.
Added the test case from pr17380.
llvm-svn: 191509
(shl (zext (shr A, X)), X) => (zext (shl (shr A, X), X)).
The rule only triggers when there are no other uses of the
zext to avoid materializing more instructions.
This helps the DAGCombiner understand that the shl/shr
sequence can then be converted into an and instruction.
llvm-svn: 191393
Patch by Ana Pazos.
1.Added support for v1ix and v1fx types.
2.Added Scalar Pairwise Reduce instructions.
3.Added initial implementation of Scalar Arithmetic instructions.
llvm-svn: 191263
Sometimes a copy from a vreg -> vreg sneaks into the middle of a terminator
sequence. It is safe to slice this into the stack protector success bb.
This fixes PR16979.
llvm-svn: 191260
Previously, the DAGISel function WalkChainUsers was spotting that it
had entered already-selected territory by whether a node was a
MachineNode (amongst other things). Since it's fairly common practice
to insert MachineNodes during ISelLowering, this was not the correct
check.
Looking around, it seems that other nodes get their NodeId set to -1
upon selection, so this makes sure the same thing happens to all
MachineNodes and uses that characteristic to determine whether we
should stop looking for a loop during selection.
This should fix PR15840.
llvm-svn: 191165
The Type Legalizer recognizes that VSELECT needs to be split, because the type
is to wide for the given target. The same does not always apply to SETCC,
because less space is required to encode the result of a comparison. As a result
VSELECT is split and SETCC is unrolled into scalar comparisons.
This commit fixes the issue by checking for VSELECT-SETCC patterns in the DAG
Combiner. If a matching pattern is found, then the result mask of SETCC is
promoted to the expected vector mask for the given target. This mask has usually
te same size as the VSELECT return type (except for Intel KNL). Now the type
legalizer will split both VSELECT and SETCC.
This allows the following X86 DAG Combine code to sucessfully detect the MIN/MAX
pattern. This fixes PR16695, PR17002, and <rdar://problem/14594431>.
llvm-svn: 191130
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
llvm-svn: 191049
C-like languages promote types like unsigned short to unsigned int before
performing an arithmetic operation. Currently the rotate matcher in the
DAGCombiner does not consider this situation.
This commit extends the DAGCombiner in the way that the pattern
(or (shl ([az]ext x), (*ext y)), (srl ([az]ext x), (*ext (sub 32, y))))
is folded into
([az]ext (rotl x, y))
The matching is restricted to aext and zext because in this cases the upper
bits are either undefined or known. Test case is included.
This fixes PR16726.
llvm-svn: 191045
Use the DIVariable::isIndirect() flag set by the frontend instead of
guessing whether to set the machine location's indirection bit.
Paired commit with CFE.
llvm-svn: 190961
When a truncate node defines a legal vector type but uses an illegal
vector type, the legalization process was splitting the vector until
<1 x vector> type, but then it was failing to scalarize the node because
it did not know how to handle TRUNCATE.
<rdar://problem/14989896>
llvm-svn: 190830
DAGCombiner::isAlias can be called with SrcValue1 or SrcValue2 null, and we
can't use AA in this case (if we try, then the casting code in AA will assert).
llvm-svn: 190763
The vselect mask isn't a setcc.
This breaks in the case when the result of getSetCCResultType
is larger than the vector operands
e.g. %tmp = select i1 %cmp <2 x i8> %a, <2 x i8> %b
when getSetCCResultType returns <2 x i32>, the assertion
that the (MaskTy.getSizeInBits() == Op1.getValueType().getSizeInBits())
is hit.
No test since I don't think I can hit this with any of the current
targets. The R600/SI implementation would break, since it returns a
vector of i1 for this, but it doesn't reach ExpandSELECT for other
reasons.
llvm-svn: 190376
The work on this project was left in an unfinished and inconsistent state.
Hopefully someone will eventually get a chance to implement this feature, but
in the meantime, it is better to put things back the way the were. I have
left support in the bitcode reader to handle the case-range bitcode format,
so that we do not lose bitcode compatibility with the llvm 3.3 release.
This reverts the following commits: 155464, 156374, 156377, 156613, 156704,
156757, 156804 156808, 156985, 157046, 157112, 157183, 157315, 157384, 157575,
157576, 157586, 157612, 157810, 157814, 157815, 157880, 157881, 157882, 157884,
157887, 157901, 158979, 157987, 157989, 158986, 158997, 159076, 159101, 159100,
159200, 159201, 159207, 159527, 159532, 159540, 159583, 159618, 159658, 159659,
159660, 159661, 159703, 159704, 160076, 167356, 172025, 186736
llvm-svn: 190328
Occasionally DAGCombiner can spot that a SETCC operation is completely
redundant and reduce it to "all true" or "all false". If this happens to a
vector, the value produced has to take account of what a normal comparison
would have produced, which may be an all-1s bitmask.
The fix in SelectionDAG.cpp is tested, however, as far as I can see the code in
TargetLowering.cpp is possibly unreachable and almost certainly irrelevant when
triggered so there are no tests. However, I believe it's still clearly the
right change and may save someone else some hassle if it suddenly becomes
reachable. So I'm doing it anyway.
llvm-svn: 190147
This uses the TargetSubtargetInfo::useAA() function to control the defaults of
the -combiner-alias-analysis and -combiner-global-alias-analysis options.
llvm-svn: 189564
We want to convert code like (or (srl N, 8), (shl N, 8)) into (srl (bswap N),
const), but this is only valid if the bits above 16 on the source pattern are
0, the checks we were doing on this were slightly wrong before.
llvm-svn: 189348
If we have a binary operation like ISD:ADD, we can set the result type
equal to the result type of one of its operands rather than using
TargetLowering::getPointerTy().
Also, any use of DAG.getIntPtrConstant(C) as an operand for a binary
operation can be replaced with:
DAG.getConstant(C, OtherOperand.getValueType());
llvm-svn: 189227
This adds minimal support to the SelectionDAG for handling address spaces
with different pointer sizes. The SelectionDAG should now correctly
lower pointer function arguments to the correct size as well as generate
the correct code when lowering getelementptr.
This patch also updates the R600 DataLayout to use 32-bit pointers for
the local address space.
v2:
- Add more helper functions to TargetLoweringBase
- Use CHECK-LABEL for tests
llvm-svn: 189221
When truncated vector stores were being custom lowered in
VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(), the old (illegal) and new (legal) node pair
was not being added to LegalizedNodes list. Instead of the legalized
result being passed to VectorLegalizer::TranslateLegalizeResult(),
the result was being passed back into VectorLegalizer::LegalizeOp(),
which ended up adding a (new, new) pair to the list instead.
This was causing an assertion failure when a custom lowered truncated
vector store was the last instruction a basic block and the VectorLegalizer
was unable to find it in the LegalizedNodes list when updating the
DAG root.
llvm-svn: 188953
The small utility function that pattern matches Base + Index +
Offset patterns for loads and stores fails to recognize the base
pointer for loads/stores from/into an array at offset 0 inside a
loop. As a result DAGCombiner::MergeConsecutiveStores was not able
to merge all stores.
This commit fixes the issue by adding an additional pattern match
and also a test case.
Reviewer: Nadav
llvm-svn: 188936
SystemZTargetLowering::emitStringWrapper() previously loaded the character
into R0 before the loop and made R0 live on entry. I'd forgotten that
allocatable registers weren't allowed to be live across blocks at this stage,
and it confused LiveVariables enough to cause a miscompilation of f3 in
memchr-02.ll.
This patch instead loads R0 in the loop and leaves LICM to hoist it
after RA. This is actually what I'd tried originally, but I went for
the manual optimisation after noticing that R0 often wasn't being hoisted.
This bug forced me to go back and look at why, now fixed as r188774.
We should also try to optimize null checks so that they test the CC result
of the SRST directly. The select between null and the SRST GPR result could
then usually be deleted as dead.
llvm-svn: 188779
Previously, generation of stack protectors was done exclusively in the
pre-SelectionDAG Codegen LLVM IR Pass "Stack Protector". This necessitated
splitting basic blocks at the IR level to create the success/failure basic
blocks in the tail of the basic block in question. As a result of this,
calls that would have qualified for the sibling call optimization were no
longer eligible for optimization since said calls were no longer right in
the "tail position" (i.e. the immediate predecessor of a ReturnInst
instruction).
Then it was noticed that since the sibling call optimization causes the
callee to reuse the caller's stack, if we could delay the generation of
the stack protector check until later in CodeGen after the sibling call
decision was made, we get both the tail call optimization and the stack
protector check!
A few goals in solving this problem were:
1. Preserve the architecture independence of stack protector generation.
2. Preserve the normal IR level stack protector check for platforms like
OpenBSD for which we support platform specific stack protector
generation.
The main problem that guided the present solution is that one can not
solve this problem in an architecture independent manner at the IR level
only. This is because:
1. The decision on whether or not to perform a sibling call on certain
platforms (for instance i386) requires lower level information
related to available registers that can not be known at the IR level.
2. Even if the previous point were not true, the decision on whether to
perform a tail call is done in LowerCallTo in SelectionDAG which
occurs after the Stack Protector Pass. As a result, one would need to
put the relevant callinst into the stack protector check success
basic block (where the return inst is placed) and then move it back
later at SelectionDAG/MI time before the stack protector check if the
tail call optimization failed. The MI level option was nixed
immediately since it would require platform specific pattern
matching. The SelectionDAG level option was nixed because
SelectionDAG only processes one IR level basic block at a time
implying one could not create a DAG Combine to move the callinst.
To get around this problem a few things were realized:
1. While one can not handle multiple IR level basic blocks at the
SelectionDAG Level, one can generate multiple machine basic blocks
for one IR level basic block. This is how we handle bit tests and
switches.
2. At the MI level, tail calls are represented via a special return
MIInst called "tcreturn". Thus if we know the basic block in which we
wish to insert the stack protector check, we get the correct behavior
by always inserting the stack protector check right before the return
statement. This is a "magical transformation" since no matter where
the stack protector check intrinsic is, we always insert the stack
protector check code at the end of the BB.
Given the aforementioned constraints, the following solution was devised:
1. On platforms that do not support SelectionDAG stack protector check
generation, allow for the normal IR level stack protector check
generation to continue.
2. On platforms that do support SelectionDAG stack protector check
generation:
a. Use the IR level stack protector pass to decide if a stack
protector is required/which BB we insert the stack protector check
in by reusing the logic already therein. If we wish to generate a
stack protector check in a basic block, we place a special IR
intrinsic called llvm.stackprotectorcheck right before the BB's
returninst or if there is a callinst that could potentially be
sibling call optimized, before the call inst.
b. Then when a BB with said intrinsic is processed, we codegen the BB
normally via SelectBasicBlock. In said process, when we visit the
stack protector check, we do not actually emit anything into the
BB. Instead, we just initialize the stack protector descriptor
class (which involves stashing information/creating the success
mbbb and the failure mbb if we have not created one for this
function yet) and export the guard variable that we are going to
compare.
c. After we finish selecting the basic block, in FinishBasicBlock if
the StackProtectorDescriptor attached to the SelectionDAGBuilder is
initialized, we first find a splice point in the parent basic block
before the terminator and then splice the terminator of said basic
block into the success basic block. Then we code-gen a new tail for
the parent basic block consisting of the two loads, the comparison,
and finally two branches to the success/failure basic blocks. We
conclude by code-gening the failure basic block if we have not
code-gened it already (all stack protector checks we generate in
the same function, use the same failure basic block).
llvm-svn: 188755
This adds a llvm.copysign intrinsic; We already have Libfunc recognition for
copysign (which is turned into the FCOPYSIGN SDAG node). In order to
autovectorize calls to copysign in the loop vectorizer, we need a corresponding
intrinsic as well.
In addition to the expected changes to the language reference, the loop
vectorizer, BasicTTI, and the SDAG builder (the intrinsic is transformed into
an FCOPYSIGN node, just like the function call), this also adds FCOPYSIGN to a
few lists in LegalizeVector{Ops,Types} so that vector copysigns can be
expanded.
In TargetLoweringBase::initActions, I've made the default action for FCOPYSIGN
be Expand for vector types. This seems correct for all in-tree targets, and I
think is the right thing to do because, previously, there was no way to generate
vector-values FCOPYSIGN nodes (and most targets don't specify an action for
vector-typed FCOPYSIGN).
llvm-svn: 188728
- split WidenVecRes_Binary into WidenVecRes_Binary and WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap
- WidenVecRes_BinaryCanTrap preserves the original behaviour for operations
that can trap
- WidenVecRes_Binary simply widens the operation and improves codegen for
3-element vectors by allowing widening and promotion on x86 (matches the
behaviour of unary and ternary operation widening)
- use WidenVecRes_Binary for operations on integers.
Reviewed by: nrotem
llvm-svn: 188699
We had previously been asserting when faced with a FCOPYSIGN f64, ppcf128 node
because there was no way to expand the FCOPYSIGN node. Because ppcf128 is the
sum of two doubles, and the first double must have the larger magnitude, we
can take the sign from the first double. As a result, in addition to fixing the
crash, this is also an optimization.
llvm-svn: 188655
Teach the generic instruction selection helper functions to constrain
the register classes of their input operands. For non-physical register
references, the generic code needs to be careful not to mess that up
when replacing references to result registers. As the comment indicates
for MachineRegisterInfo::replaceRegWith(), it's important to call
constrainRegClass() first.
rdar://12594152
llvm-svn: 188593
Generalize r188163 to cope with return types other than MVT::i32, just
as the existing visitMemCmpCall code did. I've split this out into a
subroutine so that it can be used for other upcoming patches.
I also noticed that I'd used the wrong API to record the out chain.
It's a load that uses DAG.getRoot() rather than getRoot(), so the out
chain should go on PendingLoads. I don't have a testcase for that because
we don't do any interesting scheduling on z yet.
llvm-svn: 188540
A common idiom is to use zero and all-ones as sentinal values and to
check for both in a single conditional ("x != 0 && x != (unsigned)-1").
That generates code, for i32, like:
testl %edi, %edi
setne %al
cmpl $-1, %edi
setne %cl
andb %al, %cl
With this transform, we generate the simpler:
incl %edi
cmpl $1, %edi
seta %al
Similar improvements for other integer sizes and on other platforms. In
general, combining the two setcc instructions into one is better.
rdar://14689217
llvm-svn: 188315
LowerCallTo returns a pair with the return value of the call as the first
element and the chain associated with the return value as the second element. If
we lower a call that has a void return value, LowerCallTo returns an SDValue
with a NULL SDNode and the chain for the call. Thus makeLibCall by just
returning the first value makes it impossible for you to set up the chain so
that the call is not eliminated as dead code.
I also updated all references to makeLibCall to reflect the new return type.
llvm-svn: 188300
Previously the asserts were only checking that RHS and LHS were the same type and had the same element type as the result. All downstream code for ISD::VECTOR_SHUFFLE requires the types to be the same.
Also removed one unnecessary check of matched element counts that was present in the code.
llvm-svn: 188051
All libm floating-point rounding functions, except for round(), had their own
ISD nodes. Recent PowerPC cores have an instruction for round(), and so here I'm
adding ISD::FROUND so that round() can be custom lowered as well.
For the most part, this is straightforward. I've added an intrinsic
and a matching ISD node just like those for nearbyint() and friends. The
SelectionDAG pattern I've named frnd (because ISD::FP_ROUND has already claimed
fround).
This will be used by the PowerPC backend in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 187926
This virtual function can be implemented by targets to specify the type
to use for the index operand of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT, EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT,
INSERT_SUBVECTOR, EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR. The default implementation returns
the result from TargetLowering::getPointerTy()
The previous code was using TargetLowering::getPointerTy() for vector
indices, because this is guaranteed to be legal on all targets. However,
using TargetLowering::getPointerTy() can be a problem for targets with
pointer sizes that differ across address spaces. On such targets,
when vectors need to be loaded or stored to an address space other than the
default 'zero' address space (which is the address space assumed by
TargetLowering::getPointerTy()), having an index that
is a different size than the pointer can lead to inefficient
pointer calculations, (e.g. 64-bit adds for a 32-bit address space).
There is no intended functionality change with this patch.
llvm-svn: 187748
For a testcase like the following:
typedef unsigned long uint64_t;
typedef struct {
uint64_t lo;
uint64_t hi;
} blob128_t;
void add_128_to_128(const blob128_t *in, blob128_t *res) {
asm ("PAND %1, %0" : "+Q"(*res) : "Q"(*in));
}
where we'll fail to allocate the register for the output constraint,
our matching input constraint will not find a register to match,
and could try to search past the end of the current operands array.
On the idea that we'd like to attempt to keep compilation going
to find more errors in the module, change the error cases when
we're visiting inline asm IR to return immediately and avoid
trying to create a node in the DAG. This leaves us with only
a single error message per inline asm instruction, but allows us
to safely keep going in the general case.
llvm-svn: 187470
This patch prevents the following combine when the input vector is used more
than once.
insert_vector_elt (build_vector elt0, ..., eltN), NewEltIdx, idx
=>
build_vector elt0, ..., NewEltIdx, ..., eltN
The reasons are:
- Building a vector may be expensive, so try to reuse the existing part of a
vector instead of creating a new one (think big vectors).
- elt0 to eltN now have two users instead of one. This may prevent some other
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 187396
Adds unit tests for it too.
Split BasicBlockUtils into an analysis-half and a transforms-half, and put the
analysis bits into a new Analysis/CFG.{h,cpp}. Promote isPotentiallyReachable
into llvm::isPotentiallyReachable and move it into Analysis/CFG.
llvm-svn: 187283
CustomLowerNode was not being called during SplitVectorOperand,
meaning custom legalization could not be used by targets.
This also adds a test case for NVPTX that depends on this custom
legalization.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1195
Attempt to fix the buildbots by making the X86 test I just added platform independent
llvm-svn: 187202
This reverts commit 187198. It broke the bots.
The soft float test probably needs a -triple because of name differences.
On the hard float test I am getting a "roundss $1, %xmm0, %xmm0", instead of
"vroundss $1, %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0".
llvm-svn: 187201
CustomLowerNode was not being called during SplitVectorOperand,
meaning custom legalization could not be used by targets.
This also adds a test case for NVPTX that depends on this custom
legalization.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1195
llvm-svn: 187198
There is a comment at the top of DAGTypeLegalizer::PerformExpensiveChecks
which, in part, says:
// Note that these invariants may not hold momentarily when processing a node:
// the node being processed may be put in a map before being marked Processed.
Unfortunately, this assert would be valid only if the above-mentioned invariant
held unconditionally. This was causing llc to assert when, in fact,
everything was fine.
Thanks to Richard Sandiford for investigating this issue!
Fixes PR16562.
llvm-svn: 186338
Change the informal convention of DBG_VALUE machine instructions so that
we can express a register-indirect address with an offset of 0.
The old convention was that a DBG_VALUE is a register-indirect value if
the offset (operand 1) is nonzero. The new convention is that a DBG_VALUE
is register-indirect if the first operand is a register and the second
operand is an immediate. For plain register values the combination reg,
reg is used. MachineInstrBuilder::BuildMI knows how to build the new
DBG_VALUES.
rdar://problem/13658587
llvm-svn: 185966
Because integer BUILD_VECTOR operands may have a larger type than the result's
vector element type, and all operands must have the same type, when widening a
BUILD_VECTOR node by adding UNDEFs, we cannot use the vector element type, but
rather must use the type of the existing operands.
Another bug found by llvm-stress.
llvm-svn: 185960
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
When folding sub x, x (and other similar constructs), where x is a vector, the
result is a vector of zeros. After type legalization, make sure that the input
zero elements have a legal type. This type may be larger than the result's
vector element type.
This was another bug found by llvm-stress.
llvm-svn: 185949
This fixes a bug (found by llvm-stress) in
DAGTypeLegalizer::PromoteIntRes_BUILD_VECTOR where it assumed that the result
type would always be larger than the original operands. This is not always
true, however, with boolean vectors. For example, promoting a node of type v8i1
(where the operands will be of type i32, the type to which i1 is promoted) will
yield a node with a result vector element type of i16 (and operands of type
i32). As a result, we cannot blindly assume that we can ANY_EXTEND the operands
to the result type.
llvm-svn: 185794
ReduceLoadWidth unconditionally drops extensions from loads. Limit it to the
case when all of the bits the extension would otherwise produce are dropped by
the shrink. It would be possible to shrink the load in more cases by merging
the extensions, but this isn't trivial and a very rare case. I left a TODO for
that case.
Fixes PR16551.
llvm-svn: 185755
This prevents the emission of DAG-generated vreg definitions after a
tail call be dropping them entirely (on the grounds that nothing could
use them anyway, and they interfere with O0 CodeGen).
llvm-svn: 185754
Stop using the ISD::EXCEPTIONADDR and ISD::EHSELECTION when lowering
landing pad arguments. These nodes were previously legalized into
CopyFromReg nodes, but that never worked properly because the
CopyFromReg node weren't guaranteed to be scheduled at the top of the
basic block.
This meant the exception pointer and selector registers could be
clobbered before being copied to a virtual register.
This patch copies the two physical registers to virtual registers at
the beginning of the basic block, and lowers the landingpad instruction
directly to two CopyFromReg nodes reading the *virtual* registers. This
is safe because virtual registers don't get clobbered.
A future patch will remove the ISD::EXCEPTIONADDR and ISD::EHSELECTION
nodes.
llvm-svn: 185617
Compute the insertion point from the end of the basic block instead of
skipping labels from the front.
This caused failures in landing pads when live-in copies where inserted
before instruction selection.
llvm-svn: 185616
Stop using the ISD::EXCEPTIONADDR and ISD::EHSELECTION when lowering
landing pad arguments. These nodes were previously legalized into
CopyFromReg nodes, but that never worked properly because the
CopyFromReg node weren't guaranteed to be scheduled at the top of the
basic block.
This meant the exception pointer and selector registers could be
clobbered before being copied to a virtual register.
This patch copies the two physical registers to virtual registers at
the beginning of the basic block, and lowers the landingpad instruction
directly to two CopyFromReg nodes reading the *virtual* registers. This
is safe because virtual registers don't get clobbered.
A future patch will remove the ISD::EXCEPTIONADDR and ISD::EHSELECTION
nodes.
llvm-svn: 185595
DAGCombiner was counting all uses of a load node when considering whether it's
worth combining into a zextload. Really, it wants to ignore the chain and just
count real uses.
rdar://problem/13896307
llvm-svn: 185419
should expand ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP nodes the same way that it does for ATOMIC_SWAP.
Since ATOMIC_LOADs on some targets (e.g. older ARM variants) get legalized to
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAPs, the missing case had been causing i64 atomic loads to crash
during isel.
<rdar://problem/14074644>
llvm-svn: 185186
No functionality change.
It should suffice to check the type of a debug info metadata, instead of
calling Verify. For cases where we know the type of a DI metadata, use
assert.
Also update testing cases to make them conform to the format of DI classes.
llvm-svn: 185135
A FastISel optimization was causing us to emit no information for such
parameters & when they go missing we end up emitting a different
function type. By avoiding that shortcut we not only get types correct
(very important) but also location information (handy) - even if it's
only live at the start of a function & may be clobbered later.
Reviewed/discussion by Evan Cheng & Dan Gohman.
llvm-svn: 184604
value is zero.
This allows optmizations to kick in more easily.
Fix some test cases so that they remain meaningful (i.e., not completely dead
coded) when optimizations apply.
<rdar://problem/14096009> superfluous multiply by high part of zero-extended
value.
llvm-svn: 184222
Rather than using the full power of target-specific addressing modes in
DBG_VALUEs with Frame Indicies, simply use Frame Index + Offset. This
reduces the complexity of debug info handling down to two
representations of values (reg+offset and frame index+offset) rather
than three or four.
Ideally we could ensure that frame indicies had been eliminated by the
time we reached an assembly or dwarf generation, but I haven't spent the
time to figure out where the FIs are leaking through into that & whether
there's a good place to convert them. Some FI+offset=>reg+offset
conversion is done (see PrologEpilogInserter, for example) which is
necessary for some SelectionDAG assumptions about registers, I believe,
but it might be possible to make this a more thorough conversion &
ensure there are no remaining FIs no matter how instruction selection
is performed.
llvm-svn: 184066
The TargetLoweringInfo object is owned by the TargetMachine. In the future, the
TargetMachine object may change, which may also change the TargetLoweringInfo
object.
llvm-svn: 183356
Fixes PR16146: gdb.base__call-ar-st.exp fails after
pre-RA-sched=source fixes.
Patch by Xiaoyi Guo!
This also fixes an unsupported dbg.value test case. Codegen was
previously incorrect but the test was passing by luck.
llvm-svn: 182885
Richard Sandiford