This adds support for the predicted forms of branches (+/-).
There are three cases to consider:
- Branches using a PPC::Predicate code
For these, I've added new PPC::Predicate codes corresponding
to the BO values for predicted branch forms, and updated insn
printing to print them correctly. I've also added new aliases
for the asm parser matching the new forms.
- bt/bf
I've added new aliases matching to gBC etc.
- bd(n)z variants
I've added new instruction patterns for the predicted forms.
In all cases, the new patterns are used for the asm parser only.
(The new infrastructure ought to be sufficient to allow use by
the compiler too at some point.)
llvm-svn: 184754
I'm taking David Blaikie's suggestion to use an
Optional<PPC::Predicate> return value instead. That's the right
solution for this problem. Thanks for pointing out that possibility!
llvm-svn: 183858
Allows returning a PPC::Predicate from a function with a no-predicate
value possible. Preparatory patch for fast-isel on PPC64 ELF. No
behavioral change intended.
llvm-svn: 183841
The getSwappedPredicate function can be used in other places (such as in
improvements to the PPCCTRLoops pass). Instead of trapping it as a static
function in PPCInstrInfo, move it into PPCPredicates with other
predicate-related things.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 179926
The BLR pattern cannot be recognized by the asm parser in its current form.
This complexity is due to an apparent attempt to enable conditional BLR
variants. However, none of those can ever be generated by current code;
the pattern is only ever created using the default "pred" operand.
To simplify the pattern and allow it to be recognized by the parser,
this commit removes those attempts at conditional BLR support.
When we later come back to actually add real conditional BLR, this
should probably be done via a fully generic conditional branch pattern.
No change in generated code.
llvm-svn: 178002
Ulrich Weigand