This patch changes these functions:
vectorizeLoadInsert
isExtractExtractCheap
foldExtractedCmps
scalarizeBinopOrCmp
getShuffleExtract
foldBitcastShuf
to use the class InstructionCost when calling TTI.get<something>Cost().
This patch is part of a series of patches to use InstructionCost instead of
unsigned/int for the cost model functions.
See this thread for context:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-November/146408.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91174
ps.:This patch adds the test || !NewCost.isValid(), because we want to
return false when:
!NewCost.isValid && !OldCost.isValid()->the cost to transform it expensive
and
!NewCost.isValid() && OldCost.isValid()
Therefore for simplication we only add test for !NewCost.isValid()
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94069
This is an enhancement motivated by https://llvm.org/PR16739
(see D92858 for another).
We can look through a GEP to find a base pointer that may be
safe to use for a vector load. If so, then we shuffle (shift)
the necessary vector element over to index 0.
Alive2 proof based on 1 of the regression tests:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/yPJLkh
The vector translation is independent of endian (verify by
changing to leading 'E' in the datalayout string).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93229
Here's another minimal step suggested by D93229 / D93397 .
(I'm trying to be extra careful in these changes because
load transforms are easy to get wrong.)
We can optimistically choose the greater alignment of a
load and its pointer operand. As the test diffs show, this
can improve what would have been unaligned vector loads
into aligned loads.
When we enhance with gep offsets, we will need to adjust
the alignment calculation to include that offset.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93406
As discussed in D93229, we only need a minimal alignment constraint
when querying whether a hypothetical vector load is safe. We still
pass/use the potentially stronger alignment attribute when checking
costs and creating the new load.
There's already a test that changes with the minimum code change,
so splitting this off as a preliminary commit independent of any
gep/offset enhancements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93397
As noted in D93229, the transform from scalar load to vector load
potentially leaks poison from the extra vector elements that are
being loaded.
We could use freeze here (and x86 codegen at least appears to be
the same either way), but we already have a shuffle in this logic
to optionally change the vector size, so let's allow that
instruction to serve both purposes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93238
This is an enhancement to load vectorization that is motivated by
a pattern in https://llvm.org/PR16739.
Unfortunately, it's still not enough to make a difference there.
We will have to handle multi-use cases in some better way to avoid
creating multiple overlapping loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92858
We can not bitcast pointers across different address spaces, and VectorCombine
should be careful when it attempts to find the original source of the loaded
data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89577
As discussed in:
https://llvm.org/PR47558
...there are several potential fixes/follow-ups visible
in the test case, but this is the quickest and safest
fix of the perf regression.
Similar to the tsan suppression in
`Utils/VNCoercion.cpp:getLoadLoadClobberFullWidthSize` (rL175034; load widening used by GVN),
the D81766 optimization should be suppressed under tsan due to potential
spurious data race reports:
struct A {
int i;
const short s; // the load cannot be vectorized because
int modify; // it overlaps with bytes being concurrently modified
long pad1, pad2;
};
// __tsan_read16 does not know that some bytes are undef and accessing is safe
Similarly, under asan, users can mark memory regions with
`__asan_poison_memory_region`. A widened load can lead to a spurious
use-after-poison error. hwasan/memtag should be similarly suppressed.
`mustSuppressSpeculation` suppresses asan/hwasan/tsan but not memtag, so
we need to exclude memtag in `vectorizeLoadInsert`.
Note, memtag suppression can be relaxed if the load is aligned to the
its granule (usually 16), but that is out of scope of this patch.
Reviewed By: spatel, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87538
First, shuffle cost for scalable type is not known for scalable type;
Second, we cannot reason if the narrowed shuffle mask for scalable type
is a splat or not.
E.g., Bitcast splat vector from type <vscale x 4 x i32> to <vscale x 8 x i16>
will involve narrowing shuffle mask <vscale x 4 x i32> zeroinitializer to
<vscale x 8 x i32> with element sequence of <0, 1, 0, 1, ...>, which cannot be
reasoned if it's a valid splat or not.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86995
This is an enhancement to D81766 to allow loading the minimum target
vector type into an IR vector with a different number of elements.
In one of the motivating tests from PR16739, SLP creates <2 x float>
load ops mixed with <4 x float> insert ops, so we want to handle that
pattern in addition to potential oversized vectors created by the
vectorizers.
For now, we are assuming the insert/extract subvector with undef is
free because there is no exact corresponding TTI modeling for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86160
This is a fixup to commit 43bdac2906, to make sure the
address space from the original load pointer is retained in the
vector pointer.
Resolves problem with
Assertion `castIsValid(op, S, Ty) && "Invalid cast!"' failed.
due to address space mismatch.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85912
Based on post-commit discussion in D81766, Hexagon sets this to "0".
I'll see if I can come up with a test, but making the obvious
code fix first to unblock that target.
This patch was adjusted to match the most basic pattern that starts with an insertelement
(so there's no extract created here). Hopefully, that removes any concern about
interfering with other passes. Ie, the transform should almost always be profitable.
We could make an argument that this could be part of canonicalization, but we
conservatively try not to create vector ops from scalar ops in passes like instcombine.
If the transform is not profitable, the backend should be able to re-scalarize the load.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81766
binop i1 (cmp Pred (ext X, Index0), C0), (cmp Pred (ext X, Index1), C1)
-->
vcmp = cmp Pred X, VecC
ext (binop vNi1 vcmp, (shuffle vcmp, Index1)), Index0
This is a larger pattern than the existing extractelement folds because we can't
reasonably vectorize the sub-patterns with constants based on cost model calcs
(it doesn't usually make sense to replace a single extracted scalar op with
constant operand with a vector op).
I salvaged as much of the existing logic as I could, but there might be better
ways to share and reduce code.
The motivating case from PR43745:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43745
...is the special case of a 2-way reduction. We tried to get SLP to handle that
particular pattern in D59710, but that caused crashing and regressions.
This patch is more general, but hopefully safer.
The v2f64 test with SSE2 surprised me - the cost model accounting looks like this:
OldCost = 0 (free extract of f64 at index 0) + 1 (extract of f64 at index 1) + 2 (scalar fcmps) + 1 (and of bools) = 4
NewCost = 2 (vector fcmp) + 1 (shuffle) + 1 (vector 'and') + 1 (extract of bool) = 5
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82474
This saves creating/destroying a builder every time we
perform some transform.
The tests show instruction ordering diffs resulting from
always inserting at the root instruction now, but those
should be benign.
This doesn't change anything currently, but it would make sense
to create a class-level IRBuilder instead of recreating that
everywhere. As we expand to more optimizations, we will probably
also want to hold things like the DataLayout or other constant
refs in here too.
Generalize scalarization (recently enhanced with D80885)
to allow compares as well as binops.
Similar to binops, we are avoiding scalarization of a loaded
value because that could avoid a register transfer in codegen.
This requires 1 extra predicate that I am aware of: we do not
want to scalarize the condition value of a vector select. That
might also invert a transform that we do in instcombine that
prefers a vector condition operand for a vector select.
I think this is the final step in solving PR37463:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81661
scalarizeBinop currently folds
vec_bo((inselt VecC0, V0, Index), (inselt VecC1, V1, Index))
->
inselt(vec_bo(VecC0, VecC1), scl_bo(V0,V1), Index)
This patch extends this to account for cases where one of the vec_bo operands is already all-constant and performs similar cost checks to determine if the scalar binop with a constant still makes sense:
vec_bo((inselt VecC0, V0, Index), VecC1)
->
inselt(vec_bo(VecC0, VecC1), scl_bo(V0,extractelt(V1,Index)), Index)
Fixes PR42174
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80885
As noted in D80236, moving the pass in the pipeline exposed this
shortcoming. Extra work to recalculate the alias results showed
up as a compile-time slowdown.
This is split off from D79799 - where I was proposing to fully iterate
over a function until there are no more transforms. I suspect we are
still going to want to do something like that eventually.
But we can achieve the same gains much more efficiently on the current
set of regression tests just by reversing the order that we visit the
instructions.
This may also reduce the motivation for D79078, but we are still not
getting the optimal pattern for a reduction.
As with the extractelement patterns that are currently in vector-combine,
there are going to be several possible variations on this theme. This
should be the clearest, simplest example.
Scalarization is the right direction for target-independent canonicalization,
and InstCombine has some of those folds already, but it doesn't do this.
I proposed a similar transform in D50992. Here in vector-combine, we can
check the cost model to be sure it's profitable, so there should be less risk.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79452
The API for shuffles and reductions uses generic Type parameters,
instead of VectorType, and so assertions and casts are used a lot.
This patch makes those types explicit, which means that the clients
can't be lazy, but results in less ambiguity, and that can only be a
good thing.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78357
bitcast (shuf V, MaskC) --> shuf (bitcast V), MaskC'
This is the widen shuffle elements enhancement to D76727.
It builds on the analysis and simplifications in
D77881 and rG6a7e958a423e.
The phase ordering tests show that we can simplify inverse
shuffles across a binop in both directions (widen/narrow or
narrow/widen) now.
There's another potential transform visible in some of the
remaining TODOs - move a bitcasted operand of a shuffle
after the shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78371
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: rriddle, sdesmalen, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77259
As proposed in D77881, we'll have the related widening operation,
so this name becomes too vague.
While here, change the function signature to take an 'int' rather
than 'size_t' for the scaling factor, add an assert for overflow of
32-bits, and improve the documentation comments.
Extracting to the same index that we are going to insert back into
allows forming select ("blend") shuffles and enables further transforms.
Admittedly, this is a quick-fix for a more general problem that I'm
hoping to solve by adding transforms for patterns that start with an
insertelement.
But this might resolve some regressions known to be caused by the
extract-extract transform (although I have not gotten more details on
those yet).
In the motivating case from PR34724:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34724
The combination of subsequent instcombine and codegen transforms gets us this improvement:
vmovshdup %xmm0, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
vhaddps %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm4
vmovshdup %xmm1, %xmm3 ## xmm3 = xmm1[1,1,3,3]
vaddps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
vaddps %xmm1, %xmm3, %xmm1
vshufps $200, %xmm4, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm4[0,3]
vinsertps $177, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = zero,xmm0[1,2],xmm1[2]
-->
vmovshdup %xmm0, %xmm2 ## xmm2 = xmm0[1,1,3,3]
vhaddps %xmm1, %xmm1, %xmm1
vaddps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
vshufps $200, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,3]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76623
bitcast (shuf V, MaskC) --> shuf (bitcast V), MaskC'
We do not attempt this in InstCombine because we do not want to change
types and create new shuffle ops that are potentially not lowered as
well as the original code. Here, we can check the cost model to see if
it is worthwhile.
I've aggressively enabled this transform even if the types are the same
size and/or equal cost because moving the bitcast allows InstCombine to
make further simplifications.
In the motivating cases from PR35454:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35454
...this is enough to let instcombine and the backend eliminate the
redundant shuffles, but we probably want to extend VectorCombine to
handle the inverse pattern (shuffle-of-bitcast) to get that
simplification directly in IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76727
Caroline Concatto