macro arguments.
Previously, these warnings skipped any code in a macro expansion. Preform an
additional check and warn when the expression and context locations are both
in the macro argument.
The most obvious case not caught is passing a pointer directly to a macro,
i.e 'assert(&array)' but 'assert(&array && "valid array")' is caught. This is
because macro arguments are not typed and the conversion happens inside the
macro.
llvm-svn: 215251
question mark instead of the context of the conditional operator. The
condition does not need the context of the conditional operator at all.
llvm-svn: 215048
The main subtlety here is that the Darwin tools still need to be given "-arch
arm64" rather than "-arch aarch64". Fortunately this already goes via a custom
function to handle weird edge-cases in other architectures, and it tested.
I removed a few arm64_be tests because that really isn't an interesting thing
to worry about. No-one using big-endian is also referring to the target as
arm64 (at least as far as toolchains go). Mostly they date from when arm64 was
a separate target and we *did* need a parallel name simply to test it at all.
Now aarch64_be is sufficient.
llvm-svn: 213744
Windows ARM indicates __va_start as a variadic function. However, the function
itself is treated as having 4 formal arguments:
- (out) pointer to the va_list
- (in) address of the last named argument
- (in) slot size for the type of the last argument
- address of the last named argument
The last argument does not seem to have any bearing on codegen, and thus is not
explicitly type checked at this point.
Unlike the previous handling for __va_start, it does not currently validate if
the parameter is the last named parameter (it seems that MSVC currently accepts
this).
llvm-svn: 213595
This fixes a couple of asserts when analyzing comparisons involving
C11 atomics that were uncovered by r205608 when we extended the
applicability of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare.
llvm-svn: 213573
In MS-compatibility mode, we support the __assume builtin. The __assume builtin
does not evaluate its arguments, and we should issue a warning if __assume is
provided with an argument with side effects (because these effects will be
discarded).
This is similar in spirit to the warnings issued by other compilers (Intel
Diagnostic 2261, MS Compiler Warning C4557).
llvm-svn: 213266
Memory barrier __builtin_arm_[dmb, dsb, isb] intrinsics are required to
implement their corresponding ACLE and MSVC intrinsics.
This patch ports ARM dmb, dsb, isb intrinsic to AArch64.
Requires LLVM r213247.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4521
llvm-svn: 213250
ARMv8 adds (to both AArch32 and AArch64) acquiring and releasing
variants of the exclusive operations, in line with the C++11 memory
model.
This adds support for two new intrinsics to expose them to C & C++
developers directly: __builtin_arm_ldaex and __builtin_arm_stlex, in
direct analogy with the versions with no implicit barrier.
rdar://problem/15885451
llvm-svn: 212175
Fixes PR20110, where Clang hits an assertion failure when it expects that the
sub-expression of a bit cast to pointer to also be a pointer, but gets a value
instead.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4280
llvm-svn: 212160
The compilation pipeline doesn't actually need to know about the high-level
concept of diagnostic mappings, and hiding the final computed level presents
several simplifications and other potential benefits.
The only exceptions are opportunistic checks to see whether expensive code
paths can be avoided for diagnostics that are guaranteed to be ignored at a
certain SourceLocation.
This commit formalizes that invariant by introducing and using
DiagnosticsEngine::isIgnored() in place of individual level checks throughout
lex, parse and sema.
llvm-svn: 211005
to call themselves will get the warning:
"Capturing <itself> strongly in this block is likely to
lead to a retain cycle". Cut down on the amount of noise
by noticing that user at some point sets the captured variable
to null in order to release it (and break the cycle).
// rdar://16944538
llvm-svn: 210823
will never be true in a well-defined context. The checking for null pointers
has been moved into the caller logic so it does not rely on undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 210498
to the normal non-placement ::operator new and ::operator delete, but allow
optimizations like new-expressions and delete-expressions do.
llvm-svn: 210137
This allows us to be more careful when dealing with enums whose fixed
underlying type requires special handling in a format string, like
NSInteger.
A refinement of r163266 from a year and a half ago, which added the
special handling for NSInteger and friends in the first place.
<rdar://problem/16616623>
llvm-svn: 209966
A few (mostly CodeGen) parts of Clang were tightly coupled to the
AArch64 backend. Now that it's gone, they will not even compile.
I've also deduplicated RUN lines in many of the AArch64 tests. This
might improve "make check-all" time noticably: some of those NEON
tests were monsters.
llvm-svn: 209578
The conventional form is '<action> to silence this warning'.
Also call the diagnostic an 'issue' rather than a 'message' because the latter
term is more widely used with reference to message expressions.
llvm-svn: 209052
Warn on std::abs() with unsigned argument.
Suggest std::abs as replacement for the C absolute value functions.
Suggest C++ headers if the specific std::abs overload is not found.
llvm-svn: 206340
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
The main difference between __va_start and __builtin_va_start is that
the address of the va_list has already been taken, and the va_list is
always a char*.
__va_end and __va_arg are not needed.
llvm-svn: 204821
Someone could write:
if (0) {
__c11_atomic_load(ptr, memory_order_release);
}
or the equivalent, which is perfectly valid, so we shouldn't outright reject
invalid orderings on purely static grounds.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203564
This is a conservative check, because it's valid for the expression to be
non-constant, and in cases like that we just don't know whether it's valid.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203561
Yi Kong