This fixes PR20671, see the bug for details. In short, ActOnTranslationUnit()
calls DefineUsedVTables() and only then PerformPendingInstantiations(). But
PerformPendingInstantiations() is what does delayed template parsing, so
vtables only references from late-parsed templates weren't marked used.
As a fix, move the SavePendingInstantiationsAndVTableUsesRAII in
PerformPendingInstantiations() up above the delayed template parsing code.
That way, vtables referenced from templates end up in the RAII object, and the
call to DefineUsedVTables() in PerformPendingInstantiations() marks them used.
llvm-svn: 215786
FunctionProtoType::ExtProtoInfo. Most of the users of these fields don't care
about the other ExtProtoInfo bits and just want to talk about the exception
specification.
llvm-svn: 214450
When instantiating dllimport variables with dynamic initializers, don't
bail out of Sema::InstantiateVariableInitializer without calling
PopExpressionEvaluationContext().
This was causing a stale object to stay on the ExprEvalContexts stack,
causing subsequent calls to getCurrentMangleNumberContext() to fail,
resulting in incorrect numbering of static locals (and probably other
broken things).
llvm-svn: 211137
We would previously assert if the initializer was dependent. I also think that
checking isConstantInitializer is more correct here than checkInitIsICE.
llvm-svn: 210505
member functions), ensure that the redecl chain never transitions from 'inline'
to 'not inline', since that violates an AST invariant.
llvm-svn: 209794
specialization from a module. (This can also happen for function template
specializations in PCHs if they're instantiated eagerly, because they're
constexpr or have a deduced return type.)
llvm-svn: 204547
const-qualified parameter type and the defined with a non-const-qualified
parameter type, the parameter is not const inside its body. Ensure that
the type we use when instantiating the body is the right one. Patch by
suyog sarda!
This is still rather unsatisfactory; it seems like it might be better to
instantiate at least the function parameters, and maybe the complete function
declaration, when we instantiate the definition for such a member function
(instead of reusing the declaration from inside the instantiated class
definition).
llvm-svn: 203741
This is a reapplication of r203236 with modifications to the definition of attrs() and following the new style guidelines on auto usage.
llvm-svn: 203362
Summary:
The MSVC ABI appears to mangle the lexical scope into the names of
statics. Specifically, a counter is incremented whenever a scope is
entered where things can be declared in such a way that an ambiguity can
arise. For example, a class scope inside of a class scope doesn't do
anything interesting because the nested class cannot collide with
another nested class.
There are problems with this scheme:
- It is unreliable. The counter is only incremented when a previously
never encountered scope is entered. There are cases where this will
cause ambiguity amongst declarations that have the same name where one
was introduced in a deep scope while the other was introduced right
after in the previous lexical scope.
- It is wasteful. Statements like: {{{{{{{ static int foo = a; }}}}}}}
will make the mangling of "foo" larger than it need be because the
scope counter has been incremented many times.
Because of these problems, and practical implementation concerns. We
choose not to implement this scheme if the local static or local type
isn't visible. The mangling of these declarations will look very
similar but the numbering will make far more sense, this scheme is
lifted from the Itanium ABI implementation.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, rnk, eli.friedman, cdavis5x
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2953
llvm-svn: 202951
It was previously thought that Sema::InstantiateClass could not fail
from within this point in instantiate.
However, it can happen if the class is invalid some way (i.e. invalid
base specifier).
This fixes PR18907.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2850
llvm-svn: 201913
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
Additionally, remove the optional nature of the spelling list index when creating attributes. This is supported by table generating a Spelling enumeration when the spellings for an attribute are distinct enough to warrant it.
llvm-svn: 199378
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
We would lose track of the mangling number assigned to the original
declaration which would cause us to create manglings that didn't match
the Itanium C++ specification.
e.g. Two static fields with the same name inside of a function template
would receive the same mangling with LLVM fixing up the second field so
they wouldn't collide. This would create an incompatibility with other
compilers following the Itanium ABI.
I've confirmed that the new mangling is identical to the ones generated
by icc and gcc.
N.B. This was uncovered while working on Microsoft mangler.
llvm-svn: 196368
Nico Weber