New rule:
- Method decls in @implementation are considered "redeclarations"
and inherit deprecated/availability from the @interface.
- All other cases are consider overrides, which do not inherit
deprecated/availability. For example:
(a) @interface redeclares a method in an adopted protocol.
(b) A subclass redeclares a method in a superclass.
(c) A protocol redeclares a method from another protocol it adopts.
The idea is that API authors should have the ability to easily
move availability/deprecated up and down a class/protocol hierarchy.
A redeclaration means that the availability/deprecation is a blank
slate.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13574571>
llvm-svn: 178937
This removes a bit of patching that survived r178663. Without it we can produce
better a better error message for
const int a = 5;
static const int a;
llvm-svn: 178795
Having these not be the same makes an easy to misuse API. We should audit the
uses and probably rename to something like
foo->hasExternalLinkage():
The c++ standard one. That is UniqueExternalLinkage or ExternalLinkage.
foo->hasUniqueExternalLinkage():
Is UniqueExternalLinkage.
foo->hasCogeGenExternalLinkage():
Is ExternalLinkage.
llvm-svn: 178768
This mostly reverts 178733, but keeps the tests.
I don't claim to understand how hidden sub modules work or when we need to see
them (is that documented?), but this has the same semantics and avoids adding
hasExternalLinkageUncached which has the same foot gun potential as the old
hasExternalLinkage.
Last but not least, not computing linkage when it is not needed is more
efficient.
llvm-svn: 178739
This test was exactly the opposite of what it should be. We should check if
there old decl has linkage (where it makes sense) and if the new decl has
the extern keyword.
llvm-svn: 178735
caching the linkage for a declaration before we set up its redeclaration chain,
when determining whether a declaration could be a redeclaration of something
from an unimported submodule. We actually want to look at the declaration as if
it were not a redeclaration here, so compute the linkage but don't cache it.
llvm-svn: 178733
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-gdb went back green
before it processed the reverted 178663, so it could not have been the culprit.
Revert "Revert 178663."
This reverts commit 4f8a3eb2ce5d4ba422483439e20c8cbb4d953a41.
llvm-svn: 178682
For variables and functions clang used to store two storage classes. The one
"as written" in the code and a patched one, which, for example, propagates
static to the following decls.
This apparently is from the days clang lacked linkage computation. It is now
redundant and this patch removes it.
llvm-svn: 178663
Doxygen treats "@command" the same as "\command" in a doc comment, so
whenever we talk about Objective-C things like "@interface" we have to
make sure to escape them.
Let's try to keep Clang -Wdocumentation-clean!
llvm-svn: 178603
variable in a C99 inline (but not static-inline or extern-inline)
function definition.
The standard doesn't actually say that this doesn't apply to
"extern inline" definitions, but that seems like a useful extension,
and it at least doesn't have the obvious flaw that a static
mutable variable in an externally-available definition does.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178520
visible. There's a lot of potential badness in how we're modelling
these things, but getting this much correct is reasonably easy.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178488
We already avoided warning for
extern "C" const char *Version_string = "2.9";
now we also don't produce any warnings for
extern "C" {
extern const char *Version_string2 = "2.9";
}
llvm-svn: 178333
picking up cleanups from earlier in the statement. Also fix a
crash-on-invalid where a reference to an invalid decl from an
enclosing scope was causing an expression to fail to build, but
only *after* a cleanup was registered from that statement,
causing an assertion downstream.
The crash-on-valid is rdar://13459289.
llvm-svn: 177692
Before this patch we would compute the linkage lazily and cache it. When the
AST was modified in ways that could change the value, we would invalidate the
cache.
That was fairly brittle, since any code could ask for the a linkage before
the correct value was available.
We should change the API to one where the linkage is computed explicitly and
trying to get it when it is not available asserts.
This patch is a first step in that direction. We still compute the linkage
lazily, but instead of invalidating a cache, we assert that the AST
modifications didn't change the result.
llvm-svn: 176999
extern "C" {
void test5_f() {
extern int test5_b;
}
}
static float test5_b;
This patch makes us report one for
extern "C" {
void test6_f() {
extern int test6_b;
}
}
extern "C" {
static float test6_b;
}
Not because we think the declaration would be extern C, but because of the rule:
An entity with C language linkage shall not be declared with the same name as an entity in global scope...
We were just not looking past the extern "C" to see if the decl was in global
scope.
llvm-svn: 176875
Without this patch we produce an error for
extern "C" {
void f() {
extern int b;
}
}
extern "C" {
extern float b;
}
but not for
extern "C" {
void f() {
extern int b;
}
}
extern "C" {
float b;
}
llvm-svn: 176867
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
control the visibility of a type for the purposes of RTTI
and template argument restrictions independently of how
visibility propagates to its non-type member declarations.
Also fix r175326 to not ignore template argument visibility
on a template explicit instantiation when a member has
an explicit attribute but the instantiation does not.
The type_visibility work is rdar://11880378
llvm-svn: 175587
The TypeLoc hierarchy used the llvm::cast machinery to perform undefined
behavior by casting pointers/references to TypeLoc objects to derived types
and then using the derived copy constructors (or even returning pointers to
derived types that actually point to the original TypeLoc object).
Some context is in this thread:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-December/056804.html
Though it's spread over a few months which can be hard to read in the mail
archive.
llvm-svn: 175462
Benjamin Kramer