Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C
definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is
isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType().
However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of
"integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped
enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right
predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its
elements.
This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the
general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where
it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These
cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>()
plus BuiltinType::isInteger().
isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and
include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-)
Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701>
llvm-svn: 179081
This is important because sometimes two nodes are identical, except the
second one is a sink.
This bug has probably been around for a while, but it wouldn't have been an
issue in the old report graph algorithm. I'm ashamed to say I actually looked
at this the first time around and thought it would never be a problem...and
then didn't include an assertion to back that up.
PR15684
llvm-svn: 178944
This turns on not only destructor inlining, but inlining of constructors
for types with non-trivial destructors. Per r178516, we will still not
inline the constructor or destructor of anything that looks like a
container unless the analyzer-config option 'c++-container-inlining' is
set to 'true'.
In addition to the more precise path-sensitive model, this allows us to
catch simple smart pointer issues:
#include <memory>
void test() {
std::auto_ptr<int> releaser(new int[4]);
} // memory allocated with 'new[]' should not be deleted with 'delete'
<rdar://problem/12295363>
llvm-svn: 178805
Improvement of r178684 and r178685.
Jordan has pointed out that I should not rely on the value of the condition to know which expression branch
has been taken. It will not work in cases the branch condition is an unknown value (ex: we do not track the constraints for floats).
The better way of doing this would be to find out if the current node is the right or left successor of the node
that has the ternary operator as a terminator (which is how this is done in other places, like ConditionBRVisitor).
llvm-svn: 178701
The lifetime of a temporary can be extended when it is immediately bound
to a local reference:
const Value &MyVal = Value("temporary");
In this case, the temporary object's lifetime is extended for the entire
scope of the reference; at the end of the scope it is destroyed.
The analyzer was modeling this improperly in two ways:
- Since we don't model temporary constructors just yet, we create a fake
temporary region when it comes time to "materialize" a temporary into
a real object (lvalue). This wasn't taking base casts into account when
the bindings being materialized was Unknown; now it always respects base
casts except when the temporary region is itself a pointer.
- When actually destroying the region, the analyzer did not actually load
from the reference variable -- it was basically destroying the reference
instead of its referent. Now it does do the load.
This will be more useful whenever we finally start modeling temporaries,
or at least those that get bound to local reference variables.
<rdar://problem/13552274>
llvm-svn: 178697
1) Look for the node where the condition expression is live when checking if
it is constrained to true or false.
2) Fix a bug in ProgramState::isNull, which was masking the problem. When
the expression is not a symbol (,which is the case when it is Unknown) return
unconstrained value, instead of value constrained to “false”!
(Thankfully other callers of isNull have not been effected by the bug.)
llvm-svn: 178684
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when
constructing a CXXConstructorCall.
- If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store.
- Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use
the helper variable that Sema provides.
<rdar://problem/13091608>
llvm-svn: 178602
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't
model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that
'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be
nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of
false positives.
The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or
'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type
as opaque, rather than inlining them.
This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives
reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the
heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives
for now.
<rdar://problem/13497258>
llvm-svn: 178516
Certain properties of a function can determine ahead of time whether or not
the function is inlineable, such as its kind, its signature, or its
location. We can cache this value in the FunctionSummaries map to avoid
rechecking these static properties for every call.
Note that the analyzer may still decide not to inline a specific call to
a function because of the particular dynamic properties of the call along
the current path.
No intended functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178515
The summaries lasted for the lifetime of the map anyway; no reason to
include an extra allocation.
Also, use SmallBitVector instead of BitVector to track the visited basic
blocks -- most functions will have less than 64 basic blocks -- and
use bitfields for the other fields to reduce the size of the structure.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178514
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag.
It is currently off by default.
This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can
be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield
a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work
around.
llvm-svn: 178513
Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate
ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously-
reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the
rest of the evaluation.
Caught by the assertion a few lines later.
<rdar://problem/13510065>
llvm-svn: 178401
We can check if the receiver is nil in the node that corresponds to the StmtPoint of the message send.
At that point, the receiver is guaranteed to be live. We will find at least one unreclaimed node due to
my previous commit (look for StmtPoint instead of PostStmt) and the fact that the nil receiver nodes are tagged.
+ a couple of extra tests.
llvm-svn: 178381
trackNullOrUndefValue tries to find the first node that matches the statement it is tracking.
Since we collect PostStmt nodes (in node reclamation), none of those might be on the
current path, so relax the search to look for any StmtPoint.
llvm-svn: 178380
Add a new callback that notifies checkers when a const pointer escapes. Currently, this only works
for const pointers passed as a top level parameter into a function. We need to differentiate the const
pointers escape from regular escape since the content pointed by const pointer will not change;
if it’s a file handle, a file cannot be closed; but delete is allowed on const pointers.
This should suppress several false positives reported by the NewDelete checker on llvm codebase.
llvm-svn: 178310
We should only suppress a bug report if the IDCed or null returned nil value is directly related to the value we are warning about. This was
not the case for nil receivers - we would suppress a bug report that had an IDCed nil receiver on the path regardless of how it’s
related to the warning.
1) Thread EnableNullFPSuppression parameter through the visitors to differentiate between tracking the value which
is directly responsible for the bug and other values that visitors are tracking (ex: general tracking of nil receivers).
2) in trackNullOrUndef specifically address the case when a value of the message send is nil due to the receiver being nil.
llvm-svn: 178309
These types will not have a CXXConstructExpr to do the initialization for
them. Previously we just used a simple call to ProgramState::bindLoc, but
that doesn't trigger proper checker callbacks (like pointer escape).
Found by Anton Yartsev.
llvm-svn: 178160
The visitor should look for the PreStmt node as the receiver is nil in the PreStmt and this is the node. Also, tag the nil
receiver nodes with a special tag for consistency.
llvm-svn: 178152
Register the nil tracking visitors with the region and refactor trackNullOrUndefValue a bit.
Also adds the cast and paren stripping before checking if the value is an OpaqueValueExpr
or ExprWithCleanups.
llvm-svn: 178093
This addresses an undefined value false positive from concreteOffsetBindingIsInvalidatedBySymbolicOffsetAssignment.
Fixes PR14877; radar://12991168.
llvm-svn: 177905
These aren't generated by default, but they are needed when either side of
the comparison is tainted.
Should fix our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 177846
In C, comparisons between signed and unsigned numbers are always done in
unsigned-space. Thus, we should know that "i >= 0U" is always true, even
if 'i' is signed. Similarly, "u >= 0" is also always true, even though '0'
is signed.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003> (false positives related to std::vector)
llvm-svn: 177806
For two concrete locations, we were producing another concrete location and
then casting it to an integer. We should just create a nonloc::ConcreteInt
to begin with.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177805
We can support the full range of comparison operations between two locations
by canonicalizing them as subtraction, as in the previous commit.
This won't work (well) if either location includes an offset, or (again)
if the comparisons are not consistent about which region comes first.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177803
Canonicalizing these two forms allows us to better model containers like
std::vector, which use "m_start != m_finish" to implement empty() but
"m_finish - m_start" to implement size(). The analyzer should have a
consistent interpretation of these two symbolic expressions, even though
it's not properly reasoning about either one yet.
The other unfortunate thing is that while the size() expression will only
ever be written "m_finish - m_start", the comparison may be written
"m_finish == m_start" or "m_start == m_finish". Right now the analyzer does
not attempt to canonicalize those two expressions, since it doesn't know
which length expression to pick. Doing this correctly will probably require
implementing unary minus as a new SymExpr kind (<rdar://problem/12351075>).
For now, the analyzer inverts the order of arguments in the comparison to
build the subtraction, on the assumption that "begin() != end()" is
written more often than "end() != begin()". This is purely speculation.
<rdar://problem/13239003>
llvm-svn: 177801
We just treat this as opaque symbols, but even that allows us to handle
simple cases where the same condition is tested twice. This is very common
in the STL, which means that any project using the STL gets spurious errors.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003>.
llvm-svn: 177800
The algorithm used here was ridiculously slow when a potential back-edge
pointed to a node that already had a lot of successors. The previous commit
makes this feature unnecessary anyway.
This reverts r177468 / f4cf6b10f863b9bc716a09b2b2a8c497dcc6aa9b.
Conflicts:
lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/BugReporter.cpp
llvm-svn: 177765
For a given bug equivalence class, we'd like to emit the report with the
shortest path. So far to do this we've been trimming the ExplodedGraph to
only contain relevant nodes, then doing a reverse BFS (starting at all the
error nodes) to find the shortest paths from the root. However, this is
fairly expensive when we are suppressing many bug reports in the same
equivalence class.
r177468-9 tried to solve this problem by breaking cycles during graph
trimming, then updating the BFS priorities after each suppressed report
instead of recomputing the whole thing. However, breaking cycles is not
a cheap operation because an analysis graph minus cycles is still a DAG,
not a tree.
This fix changes the algorithm to do a single forward BFS (starting from the
root) and to use that to choose the report with the shortest path by looking
at the error nodes with the lowest BFS priorities. This was Anna's idea, and
has the added advantage of requiring no update step: we can just pick the
error node with the next lowest priority to produce the next bug report.
<rdar://problem/13474689>
llvm-svn: 177764
This fixes some mistaken condition logic in RegionStore that caused
global variables to be invalidated when /any/ region was invalidated,
rather than only as part of opaque function calls. This was only
being used by CStringChecker, and so users will now see that strcpy()
and friends do not invalidate global variables.
Also, add a test case we don't handle properly: explicitly-assigned
global variables aren't being invalidated by opaque calls. This is
being tracked by <rdar://problem/13464044>.
llvm-svn: 177572
Due to improper modelling of copy constructors (specifically, their
const reference arguments), we were producing spurious leak warnings
for allocated memory stored in structs. In order to silence this, we
decided to consider storing into a struct to be the same as escaping.
However, the previous commit has fixed this issue and we can now properly
distinguish leaked memory that happens to be in a struct from a buffer
that escapes within a struct wrapper.
Originally applied in r161511, reverted in r174468.
<rdar://problem/12945937>
llvm-svn: 177571
In this case, the value of 'x' may be changed after the call to indirectAccess:
struct Wrapper {
int *ptr;
};
void indirectAccess(const Wrapper &w);
void test() {
int x = 42;
Wrapper w = { x };
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // TRUE
indirectAccess(w);
clang_analyzer_eval(x == 42); // UNKNOWN
}
This is important for modelling return-by-value objects in C++, to show
that the contents of the struct are escaping in the return copy-constructor.
<rdar://problem/13239826>
llvm-svn: 177570
This is a bit of old code trying to deal with the fact that functions that
take pointers often use them to access an entire array via pointer
arithmetic. However, RegionStore already conservatively assumes you can use
pointer arithmetic to access any part of a region.
Some day we may want to go back to handling this specifically for calls,
but we can do that in the future.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 177569
Jordan Rose