Previously, the analyzer used isIntegerType() everywhere, which uses the C
definition of "integer". The C++ predicate with the same behavior is
isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType().
However, the analyzer is /really/ using this to ask if it's some sort of
"integrally representable" type, i.e. it should include C++11 scoped
enumerations as well. hasIntegerRepresentation() sounds like the right
predicate, but that includes vectors, which the analyzer represents by its
elements.
This commit audits all uses of isIntegerType() and replaces them with the
general isIntegerOrEnumerationType(), except in some specific cases where
it makes sense to exclude scoped enumerations, or any enumerations. These
cases now use isIntegerOrUnscopedEnumerationType() and getAs<BuiltinType>()
plus BuiltinType::isInteger().
isIntegerType() is hereby banned in the analyzer - lib/StaticAnalysis and
include/clang/StaticAnalysis. :-)
Fixes real assertion failures. PR15703 / <rdar://problem/12350701>
llvm-svn: 179081
Test that the path notes do not change. I don’t think we should print a note on escape.
Also, I’ve removed a check that assumed that the family stored in the RefStete could be
AF_None and added an assert in the constructor.
llvm-svn: 179075
This is important because sometimes two nodes are identical, except the
second one is a sink.
This bug has probably been around for a while, but it wouldn't have been an
issue in the old report graph algorithm. I'm ashamed to say I actually looked
at this the first time around and thought it would never be a problem...and
then didn't include an assertion to back that up.
PR15684
llvm-svn: 178944
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.
llvm-svn: 178891
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.
<rdar://problem/6194569>
llvm-svn: 178890
This fixes an issue pointed to by Jordan: if unix.Malloc and unix.MismatchedDeallocator are both on, then we end up still tracking leaks of memory allocated by new.
Moved the guards right before emitting the bug reports to unify and simplify the logic of handling of multiple checkers. Now all the checkers perform their checks regardless of if they were enabled, or not, and it is decided just before the emitting of the report, if it should be emitted. (idea from Anna).
Additional changes:
improved test coverage for checker correlations;
refactoring: BadDealloc -> MismatchedDealloc
llvm-svn: 178814
This turns on not only destructor inlining, but inlining of constructors
for types with non-trivial destructors. Per r178516, we will still not
inline the constructor or destructor of anything that looks like a
container unless the analyzer-config option 'c++-container-inlining' is
set to 'true'.
In addition to the more precise path-sensitive model, this allows us to
catch simple smart pointer issues:
#include <memory>
void test() {
std::auto_ptr<int> releaser(new int[4]);
} // memory allocated with 'new[]' should not be deleted with 'delete'
<rdar://problem/12295363>
llvm-svn: 178805
...and add a new test case.
I thought this was broken, but it isn't; refactoring and reformatting anyway
so that I don't make the same mistake again. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178799
Improvement of r178684 and r178685.
Jordan has pointed out that I should not rely on the value of the condition to know which expression branch
has been taken. It will not work in cases the branch condition is an unknown value (ex: we do not track the constraints for floats).
The better way of doing this would be to find out if the current node is the right or left successor of the node
that has the ternary operator as a terminator (which is how this is done in other places, like ConditionBRVisitor).
llvm-svn: 178701
The lifetime of a temporary can be extended when it is immediately bound
to a local reference:
const Value &MyVal = Value("temporary");
In this case, the temporary object's lifetime is extended for the entire
scope of the reference; at the end of the scope it is destroyed.
The analyzer was modeling this improperly in two ways:
- Since we don't model temporary constructors just yet, we create a fake
temporary region when it comes time to "materialize" a temporary into
a real object (lvalue). This wasn't taking base casts into account when
the bindings being materialized was Unknown; now it always respects base
casts except when the temporary region is itself a pointer.
- When actually destroying the region, the analyzer did not actually load
from the reference variable -- it was basically destroying the reference
instead of its referent. Now it does do the load.
This will be more useful whenever we finally start modeling temporaries,
or at least those that get bound to local reference variables.
<rdar://problem/13552274>
llvm-svn: 178697
1) Look for the node where the condition expression is live when checking if
it is constrained to true or false.
2) Fix a bug in ProgramState::isNull, which was masking the problem. When
the expression is not a symbol (,which is the case when it is Unknown) return
unconstrained value, instead of value constrained to “false”!
(Thankfully other callers of isNull have not been effected by the bug.)
llvm-svn: 178684
- Find the correct region to represent the first array element when
constructing a CXXConstructorCall.
- If the array is trivial, model the copy with a primitive load/store.
- Don't warn about the "uninitialized" subscript in the AST -- we don't use
the helper variable that Sema provides.
<rdar://problem/13091608>
llvm-svn: 178602
Refactor invalidateRegions to take SVals instead of Regions as input and teach RegionStore
about processing LazyCompoundVal as a top-level “escaping” value.
This addresses several false positives that get triggered by the NewDelete checker, but the
underlying issue is reproducible with other checkers as well (for example, MallocChecker).
llvm-svn: 178518
This is a heuristic to make up for the fact that the analyzer doesn't
model C++ containers very well. One example is modeling that
'std::distance(I, E) == 0' implies 'I == E'. In the future, it would be
nice to model this explicitly, but for now it just results in a lot of
false positives.
The actual heuristic checks if the base type has a member named 'begin' or
'iterator'. If so, we treat the constructors and destructors of that type
as opaque, rather than inlining them.
This is intended to drastically reduce the number of false positives
reported with experimental destructor support turned on. We can tweak the
heuristic in the future, but we'd rather err on the side of false negatives
for now.
<rdar://problem/13497258>
llvm-svn: 178516
This is controlled by the 'suppress-c++-stdlib' analyzer-config flag.
It is currently off by default.
This is more suppression than we'd like to do, since obviously there can
be user-caused issues within 'std', but it gives us the option to wield
a large hammer to suppress false positives the user likely can't work
around.
llvm-svn: 178513
Evaluating a C++ new expression now includes generating an intermediate
ExplodedNode, and this node could very well represent a previously-
reachable state in the ExplodedGraph. If so, we can short-circuit the
rest of the evaluation.
Caught by the assertion a few lines later.
<rdar://problem/13510065>
llvm-svn: 178401
We can check if the receiver is nil in the node that corresponds to the StmtPoint of the message send.
At that point, the receiver is guaranteed to be live. We will find at least one unreclaimed node due to
my previous commit (look for StmtPoint instead of PostStmt) and the fact that the nil receiver nodes are tagged.
+ a couple of extra tests.
llvm-svn: 178381
Add a new callback that notifies checkers when a const pointer escapes. Currently, this only works
for const pointers passed as a top level parameter into a function. We need to differentiate the const
pointers escape from regular escape since the content pointed by const pointer will not change;
if it’s a file handle, a file cannot be closed; but delete is allowed on const pointers.
This should suppress several false positives reported by the NewDelete checker on llvm codebase.
llvm-svn: 178310
We should only suppress a bug report if the IDCed or null returned nil value is directly related to the value we are warning about. This was
not the case for nil receivers - we would suppress a bug report that had an IDCed nil receiver on the path regardless of how it’s
related to the warning.
1) Thread EnableNullFPSuppression parameter through the visitors to differentiate between tracking the value which
is directly responsible for the bug and other values that visitors are tracking (ex: general tracking of nil receivers).
2) in trackNullOrUndef specifically address the case when a value of the message send is nil due to the receiver being nil.
llvm-svn: 178309
+ Improved display names for allocators and deallocators
The checker checks if a deallocation function matches allocation one. ('free' for 'malloc', 'delete' for 'new' etc.)
llvm-svn: 178250
These types will not have a CXXConstructExpr to do the initialization for
them. Previously we just used a simple call to ProgramState::bindLoc, but
that doesn't trigger proper checker callbacks (like pointer escape).
Found by Anton Yartsev.
llvm-svn: 178160
Previously all unimplemented methods for a class were grouped under
a single warning, with all the unimplemented methods mentioned
as notes. Based on feedback from users, most users would like
a separate warning for each method, with a note pointing back to
the original method declaration.
Implements <rdar://problem/13350414>
llvm-svn: 178097
Register the nil tracking visitors with the region and refactor trackNullOrUndefValue a bit.
Also adds the cast and paren stripping before checking if the value is an OpaqueValueExpr
or ExprWithCleanups.
llvm-svn: 178093
This addresses an undefined value false positive from concreteOffsetBindingIsInvalidatedBySymbolicOffsetAssignment.
Fixes PR14877; radar://12991168.
llvm-svn: 177905
These aren't generated by default, but they are needed when either side of
the comparison is tainted.
Should fix our internal buildbot.
llvm-svn: 177846
In C, comparisons between signed and unsigned numbers are always done in
unsigned-space. Thus, we should know that "i >= 0U" is always true, even
if 'i' is signed. Similarly, "u >= 0" is also always true, even though '0'
is signed.
Part of <rdar://problem/13239003> (false positives related to std::vector)
llvm-svn: 177806
Jordan Rose