Summary:
Otherwise they can force us to build lots of snapshots that we don't need.
Particularly, try to do this for operations that are frequently
generated by editors without explicit user interaction, and where
editing the file makes the result less useful. (Code action
enumeration is a good example).
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/298
This doesn't return the "right" LSP error code (ContentModified) to the client,
we need to teach the cancellation API to distinguish between different causes.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75602
Summary:
Motivation:
- this layout is a pain to work with
- without a common root, it's painful to express things like "disable clangd" (D61122)
- CMake/lit configs are a maintenance hazard, and the more the one-off hacks
for various tools are entangled, the more we see apathy and non-ownership.
This attempts to use the bare-minimum configuration needed (while still
supporting the difficult cases: windows, standalone clang build, dynamic libs).
In particular the lit.cfg.py and lit.site.cfg.py.in are merged into lit.cfg.in.
The logic in these files is now minimal.
(Much of clang-tools-extra's lit configs can probably be cleaned up by reusing
lit.llvm.llvm_config.use_clang(), and every llvm project does its own version of
LDPATH mangling. I haven't attempted to fix any of those).
Docs are still in clang-tools-extra/docs, I don't have any plans to touch those.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jfb, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov, thakis
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61187
llvm-svn: 359424
Sam McCall