The SVE ACLE allows using a short-form for the intrinsics, e.g.
the following two declarations generate the same code:
svuint32_t svld1(svbool_t, uint32_t const *);
svuint32_t svld1_u32(svbool_t, uint32_t const *);
using the attribute:
__clang_arm_builtin_alias
so that any call to svld1(svbool_t, uint32_t const *) will
map to __builtin_sve_svld1_u32.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, miyuki, efriedma, simon_tatham, rengolin
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75861
Summary:
[Clang] Attribute to allow defining undef global variables
Initializing global variables is very cheap on hosted implementations. The
C semantics of zero initializing globals work very well there. It is not
necessarily cheap on freestanding implementations. Where there is no loader
available, code must be emitted near the start point to write the appropriate
values into memory.
At present, external variables can be declared in C++ and definitions provided
in assembly (or IR) to achive this effect. This patch provides an attribute in
order to remove this reason for writing assembly for performance sensitive
freestanding implementations.
A close analogue in tree is LDS memory for amdgcn, where the kernel is
responsible for initializing the memory after it starts executing on the gpu.
Uninitalized variables in LDS are observably cheaper than zero initialized.
Patch is loosely based on the cuda __shared__ and opencl __local variable
implementation which also produces undef global variables.
Reviewers: kcc, rjmccall, rsmith, glider, vitalybuka, pcc, eugenis, vlad.tsyrklevich, jdoerfert, gregrodgers, jfb, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Anastasia, aaron.ballman, davidb, Quuxplusone, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74361
This excludes some builtins that take argument types not yet handled
by the `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` machinery, and also excludes
builtins that are already defined in `Builtins.def`.
Sizeless types can't be used with "new", so it doesn't make sense
to use them with "delete" either. The SVE ACLE therefore doesn't
allow that.
This is slightly stronger than for normal incomplete types, since:
struct S;
void f(S *s) { delete s; }
is (by necessity) just a default-on warning rather than an error.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76219
new-expressions for a type T require sizeof(T) to be computable,
so the SVE ACLE does not allow them for sizeless types. At the moment:
auto f() { return new __SVInt8_t; }
creates a call to operator new with a zero size:
%call = call noalias nonnull i8* @_Znwm(i64 0)
This patch reports an appropriate error instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76218
In the current SVE ACLE spec, the usual rules for throwing and
catching incomplete types also apply to sizeless types. However,
throwing pointers to sizeless types should not pose any real difficulty,
so as an extension, the clang implementation allows that.
This patch enforces these rules for catch statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76090
Summary:
The same rules for throwing and catching incomplete types also apply
to sizeless types. This patch enforces that for throw statements.
It also make sure that we use "sizeless type" rather "incomplete type"
in the associated message. (Both are correct, but "sizeless type" is
more specific and hopefully more user-friendly.)
The SVE ACLE simply extends the rule for incomplete types to
sizeless types. However, throwing pointers to sizeless types
should not pose any real difficulty, so as an extension,
the clang implementation allows that.
Reviewers: sdesmalen, efriedma, rovka, rjmccall
Subscribers: tschuett, rkruppe, psnobl, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76088
In the current SVE ACLE spec, the usual rules for throwing and
catching incomplete types also apply to sizeless types. However,
throwing pointers to sizeless types should not pose any real difficulty,
so as an extension, the clang implementation allows that.
This patch enforces these rules for explicit exception specs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76087
This patch completes a trio of changes related to arrays of
sizeless types. It rejects various forms of arithmetic on
pointers to sizeless types, in the same way as for other
incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76086
clang currently accepts:
__SVInt8_t &foo1(__SVInt8_t *x) { return *x; }
__SVInt8_t &foo2(__SVInt8_t *x) { return x[1]; }
The first function is valid ACLE code and generates correct LLVM IR
(and assembly code). But the second function is invalid for the
same reason that arrays of sizeless types are. Trying to code-generate
the function leads to:
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h:126: uint64_t llvm::TypeSize::getFixedSize() const: Assertion `!IsScalable && "Request for a fixed size on a s
calable object"' failed.
Another problem is that:
template<typename T>
constexpr __SIZE_TYPE__ f(T *x) { return &x[1] - x; }
typedef int arr1[f((int *)0) - 1];
typedef int arr2[f((__SVInt8_t *)0) - 1];
produces:
a.cpp:2:48: warning: subtraction of pointers to type '__SVInt8_t' of zero size has undefined behavior [-Wpointer-arith]
constexpr __SIZE_TYPE__ f(T *x) { return &x[1] - x; }
~~~~~ ^ ~
a.cpp:4:18: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'f<__SVInt8_t>' requested here
typedef int arr2[f((__SVInt8_t *)0) - 1];
This patch reports an appropriate diagnostic instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76084
To group the code in one place, simplify it and make it easier to add
the containsErrors bit and find existing bugs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73638
TryAnnotateTypeConstraint could annotate a template-id which doesn't end up being a type-constraint,
in which case control flow would incorrectly flow into ParseImplicitInt.
Reenter the loop in this case.
Enable relevant tests for C++20. This required disabling typo-correction during TryAnnotateTypeConstraint
and changing a test case which is broken due to a separate bug (will be reported and handled separately).
transparent context.
(The same crash would happen if a class template with a friend was
declared in an 'export' block, but there are more issues with that
case.)
Avoid copying of the orignal variable if it is going to be marked as
firstprivate in task regions. For taskloops, still need to copy the
non-trvially copyable variables to correctly construct them upon task
creation.
This reapplies the following patch, which was reverted because it caused
neon CodeGen tests to fail:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGa6150b48cea00ab31e9335cc73770327acc4cb3a
I've added checks to detect half precision neon vectors and avoid
promiting them to vectors of floats.
See the discussion here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG825235c140e7
Original commit message:
This fixes an assertion in Sema::CreateBuiltinBinOp that fails when one
of the vector operand's element type is a typedef of __fp16.
rdar://problem/55983556
The SVE ACLE doesn't allow arrays of sizeless types. At the moment
clang accepts the TU:
__SVInt8_t x[2];
but trying to code-generate it triggers the LLVM assertion:
llvm/lib/IR/Type.cpp:588: static llvm::ArrayType* llvm::ArrayType::get(llvm::Type*, uint64_t): Assertion `isValidElementType(ElementType) && "Invalid type for array element!"' failed.
This patch reports an appropriate error instead.
The rules are slightly more restrictive than for general incomplete types.
For example:
struct s;
typedef struct s arr[2];
is valid as far as it goes, whereas arrays of sizeless types are
invalid in all contexts. BuildArrayType therefore needs a specific
check for isSizelessType in addition to the usual handling of
incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76082
Since fields can't have sizeless type, it also doesn't make sense
to capture sizeless types by value in lambda expressions. This patch
makes sure that we diagnose that and that we use "sizeless type" rather
"incomplete type" in the associated message. (Both are correct, but
"sizeless type" is more specific and hopefully more user-friendly.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75738
The SVE ACLE doesn't allow fields to have sizeless type. At the moment
clang accepts things like:
struct s { __SVInt8_t x; } y;
but trying to code-generate it leads to LLVM asserts like:
llvm/include/llvm/Support/TypeSize.h:126: uint64_t llvm::TypeSize::getFixedSize() const: Assertion `!IsScalable && "Request for a fixed size on a scalable object"' failed.
This patch adds an associated clang diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75737
function and an overridden function until we know whether the overriding
function is deleted.
We previously did these checks when we first built the declaration,
which was too soon in some cases. We now defer all these checks to the
end of the class.
Also add missing check that a consteval function cannot override a
non-consteval function and vice versa.
clang accepts a TU containing just:
__SVInt8_t x;
However, sizeless types are not allowed to have static or thread-local
storage duration and trying to code-generate the TU triggers an LLVM
fatal error:
Globals cannot contain scalable vectors
<vscale x 16 x i8>* @x
fatal error: error in backend: Broken module found, compilation aborted!
This patch adds an associated clang diagnostic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75736
It would be difficult to guarantee atomicity for sizeless types,
so the SVE ACLE makes atomic sizeless types invalid. As it happens,
we already rejected them before the patch, but for the wrong reason:
error: _Atomic cannot be applied to type 'svint8_t' (aka '__SVInt8_t')
which is not trivially copyable
The SVE types should be treated as trivially copyable; a later
patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75734
A previous patch rejected alignof for sizeless types. This patch
extends that to cover the "aligned" attribute and _Alignas. Since
sizeless types are not meant to be used for long-term data, cannot
be used in aggregates, and cannot have static storage duration,
there shouldn't be any need to fiddle with their alignment.
Like with alignof, this is a conservative position that can be
relaxed in future if it turns out to be too restrictive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75573
clang current accepts:
void foo1(__SVInt8_t *x, __SVInt8_t *y) { *x = *y; }
void foo2(__SVInt8_t *x, __SVInt8_t *y) {
memcpy(y, x, sizeof(__SVInt8_t));
}
The first function is valid ACLE code and generates correct LLVM IR.
However, the second function is invalid ACLE code and generates a
zero-length memcpy. The point of this patch is to reject the use
of sizeof in the second case instead.
There's no similar wrong-code bug for alignof. However, the SVE ACLE
conservatively treats alignof in the same way as sizeof, just as the
C++ standard does for incomplete types. The idea is that layout of
sizeless types is an implementation property and isn't defined at
the language level.
Implementation-wise, the patch adds a new CompleteTypeKind enum
that controls whether RequireCompleteType & friends accept sizeless
built-in types. For now the default is to maintain the status quo
and accept sizeless types. However, the end of the series will flip
the default and remove the Default enum value.
The patch also adds new ...CompleteSized... wrappers that callers can
use if they explicitly want to reject sizeless types. The callers then
use diagnostics that have an extra 0/1 parameter to indicats whether
the type is sizeless or not.
The idea is to have three cases:
1. calls that explicitly reject sizeless types, with a tweaked diagnostic
for the sizeless case
2. calls that explicitly allow sizeless types
3. normal/old-style calls that don't make an explicit choice either way
Once the default is flipped, the 3. calls will conservatively reject
sizeless types, using the same diagnostic as for other incomplete types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75572
a dependent context.
This matches the GCC behavior.
We track the enclosing template depth when determining whether a
statement expression is within a dependent context; there doesn't appear
to be any other reliable way to determine this.
We previously assumed they were neither value- nor
instantiation-dependent under any circumstances, which would lead to
crashes and other misbehavior.
We would assign the incorrect DeclContext when transforming the RequiresExprBodyDecl, causing incorrect
handling of 'this' inside RequiresExprBodyDecls (bug #45162).
Assign the current context as the DeclContext of the transformed decl.
Fix a bug in IRGen where it wasn't destructing compound literals in C
that are ObjC pointer arrays or non-trivial structs. Also diagnose jumps
that enter or exit the lifetime of the compound literals.
rdar://problem/51867864
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64464
induction variable abends.
Used incorrect loop bound when trying to calculate the index in the vec
array for doacross construct in the loops with the reverse order.
Summary:
This patch generalizes the existing code to support CDE intrinsics
which will share some properties with existing MVE intrinsics
(some of the intrinsics will be polymorphic and accept/return values
of MVE vector types).
Specifically the patch:
* Adds new tablegen backends -gen-arm-cde-builtin-def,
-gen-arm-cde-builtin-codegen, -gen-arm-cde-builtin-sema,
-gen-arm-cde-builtin-aliases, -gen-arm-cde-builtin-header based on
existing MVE backends.
* Renames the '__clang_arm_mve_alias' attribute into
'__clang_arm_builtin_alias' (it will be used with CDE intrinsics as
well as MVE intrinsics)
* Implements semantic checks for the coprocessor argument of the CDE
intrinsics as well as the existing coprocessor intrinsics.
* Adds one CDE intrinsic __arm_cx1 to test the above changes
Reviewers: simon_tatham, MarkMurrayARM, ostannard, dmgreen
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: sdesmalen, mgorny, kristof.beyls, danielkiss, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75850
This adds infrastructure for a multiversioning whitelist, plus adds
'used' to the allowed list with 'target'. The behavior here mirrors the
implementation in GCC, where 'used' only applies to the single
declaration and doesn't apply to the ifunc or resolver.
This is not being applied to cpu_dispatch and cpu_specific, since the
rules are more complicated for cpu_specific, which emits multiple
symbols. Additionally, the author isn't currently aware of uses in the
wild of this combination, but is aware of a number of target+used
combinations.
RebuildLambdaScopeInfo
Previously the type of the variable was being passed, which was causing
clang to crash when a non-reference variable was captured by reference
or a reference variable was captured by value by a lambda and a block
nested inside the lambda body was referencing the variable.
Original patch by JF Bastien.
rdar://problem/47550338
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58164
Clang is missing a warning for
builtin_return_address/builtin_frame_address called with > 0 argument.
Gcc provides a warning for this via -Wframe-address:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Return-Address.html
As calling these functions with argument > 0 has caused several crashes
for us, we would like to have the same warning as gcc here. This diff
adds the warning and makes it part of -Wmost.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75768
GCC does not warn on casts from pointers to enumerators, while clang
currently does: https://godbolt.org/z/3DFDVG
This causes a bunch of extra warnings in the Linux kernel, where
certain structs contain a void pointer to avoid using a gigantic
union for all of the various types of driver data, such as
versions.
Add a diagnostic that allows certain projects like the kernel to
disable the warning just for enums, which allows those projects to
keep full compatibility with GCC but keeps the intention of treating
casts to integers and enumerators the same by default so that other
projects have the opportunity to catch issues not noticed before (or
follow suite and disable the warning).
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/887
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75758
__builtin_os_log_format
This is needed to keep all the objects, including temporaries returned
by function calls, written to the buffer alive until os_log_pack_send is
called.
rdar://problem/60105410
deduction guides.
Previously if an implicit deduction guide had a default argument with a
cleanup, we'd leave the 'pending cleanup' flag set after declaring the
implicit guide. But it turns out that there's no reason to even
substitute into the default argument when declaring an implicit
deduction guide: we only need to record that the default argument
exists, not what it is, since we never actually form a call to a
deduction guide.
GetContainedInventedTypeParmVisitor would not account for the case where TemplateTypeParmType::getDecl() is
nullptr, causing bug #45102.
Add the nullptr check.
Summary:
The messages for two of the warnings are misleading:
* warn_for_range_const_reference_copy suggests that the initialization
of the loop variable results in a copy. But that's not always true,
we just know that some conversion happens, potentially invoking a
constructor or conversion operator. The constructor might copy, as in
the example that lead to this message [1], but it might also not.
However, the constructed object is bound to a reference, which is
potentially misleading, so we rewrite the message to emphasize that.
We also make sure that we print the reference type into the warning
message to clarify that this warning only appears when operator*
returns a reference.
* warn_for_range_variable_always_copy suggests that a reference type
loop variable initialized from a temporary "is always a copy". But
we don't know this, the range might just return temporary objects
which aren't copies of anything. (Assuming RVO a copy constructor
might never have been called.)
The message for warn_for_range_copy is a bit repetitive: the type of a
VarDecl and its initialization Expr are the same up to cv-qualifiers,
because Sema will insert implicit casts or constructor calls to make
them match.
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32823
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, Mordante, rtrieu
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75613
Various vload and vstore builtins were missing or misdefined in the
TableGen description. Align the OpenCL vload* and vstore* builtins of
the `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` option to those of `opencl-c.h`.
Reviewed-by: Stuart Brady <stuart.brady@arm.com>
We need to make sure that PluginAttrInstances is deleted before shared libraries
are unloaded, because otherwise when deleting its contents we'll try to access
a virtual destructor which no longer exists.
As shared libraries are managed using ManagedStatic we can do this by also using
ManagedStatic for PluginAttrInstances as ManagedStatics are deleted in reverse
order of construction and we know that PluginAttrInstances will only be
accessed, and thus constructed, after shared libraries have been loaded.
Use castAs if we know the cast should succeed (or we're dereferencing without check), the castAs will assert as well so we can remove local non-null asserts.
Summary:
This changes introduces an enum to represent dependencies as a bitmask
and extract common patterns from code that computes dependency bits into
helper functions.
Reviewers: rsmith, martong, shafik, ilya-biryukov, hokein
Subscribers: hokein, sammccall, Mordante, riccibruno, merge_guards_bot, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71920
dependent contexts.
We previously assumed they were neither value- nor
instantiation-dependent under any circumstances, which would lead to
crashes and other misbehavior.
Chen
Summary:
Base declaration in pointer arithmetic expression is determined by
binary search with type information. Take "int *a, *b; *(a+*b)" as an
example, we determine the base by checking the type of LHS and RHS. In
this case the type of LHS is "int *", the type of RHS is "int",
therefore, we know that we need to visit LHS in order to find base
declaration.
Reviewers: ABataev, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: guansong, cfe-commits, sandoval, dreachem
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75077
When constructing a ParsedAttr the ParsedAttrInfo gets looked up in the
AttrInfoMap, which is auto-generated using tablegen. If that lookup fails then
we look through the ParsedAttrInfos that plugins have added to the registry and
check if any has a spelling that matches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31338
is ambiguous, but only one of the possible lookup results could possibly
be right.
Clang recently started diagnosing ambiguity in more cases, and this
broke the build of Firefox. GCC, ICC, MSVC, and previous versions of
Clang all accept some forms of ambiguity here (albeit different ones in
each case); this patch mostly accepts anything any of those compilers
accept.
This doesn't do anything on its own, but it's the first step towards
allowing plugins to define attributes. It does simplify the
ParsedAttrInfo generation in ClangAttrEmitter a little though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31337
Add atomic types and builtins operating on those atomic types to
`-fdeclare-opencl-builtins`. The _explicit variants are left out of
this commit, as these take enum arguments that are not yet supported
by the `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` machinery.
Summary:
Right now we annotate C++'s `operator new` with `noalias` attribute,
which very much is healthy for optimizations.
However as per [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic.allocation | `[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]` ]],
there are more promises on global `operator new`, namely:
* non-`std::nothrow_t` `operator new` *never* returns `nullptr`
* If `std::align_val_t align` parameter is taken, the pointer will also be `align`-aligned
* ~~global `operator new`-returned pointer is `__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__`-aligned ~~ It's more caveated than that.
Supplying this information may not cause immediate landslide effects
on any specific benchmarks, but it for sure will be healthy for optimizer
in the sense that the IR will better reflect the guarantees provided in the source code.
The caveat is `-fno-assume-sane-operator-new`, which currently prevents emitting `noalias`
attribute, and is automatically passed by Sanitizers ([[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16386 | PR16386 ]]) - should it also cover these attributes?
The problem is that the flag is back-end-specific, as seen in `test/Modules/explicit-build-flags.cpp`.
But while it is okay to add `noalias` metadata in backend, we really should be adding at least
the alignment metadata to the AST, since that allows us to perform sema checks on it.
Reviewers: erichkeane, rjmccall, jdoerfert, eugenis, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: xbolva00, jrtc27, atanasyan, nlopes, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
Summary:
There was even a TODO for this.
The main motivation is to make use of call-site based
`__attribute__((alloc_align(param_idx)))` validation (D72996).
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane, aaron.ballman, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73020
Verifies that an argument passed to __builtin_frame_address or __builtin_return_address is within the range [0, 0xFFFF]
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66839
Re-committed after fixed: c93112dc4f
Compute and propagate conversion kind to diagnostics helper in C++
to provide more specific diagnostics about incorrect implicit
conversions in assignments, initializations, params, etc...
Duplicated some diagnostics as errors because C++ is more strict.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74116
Summary:
Clang's "asm goto" feature didn't initially support outputs constraints. That
was the same behavior as gcc's implementation. The decision by gcc not to
support outputs was based on a restriction in their IR regarding terminators.
LLVM doesn't restrict terminators from returning values (e.g. 'invoke'), so
it made sense to support this feature.
Output values are valid only on the 'fallthrough' path. If an output value's used
on an indirect branch, then it's 'poisoned'.
In theory, outputs *could* be valid on the 'indirect' paths, but it's very
difficult to guarantee that the original semantics would be retained. E.g.
because indirect labels could be used as data, we wouldn't be able to split
critical edges in situations where two 'callbr' instructions have the same
indirect label, because the indirect branch's destination would no longer be
the same.
Reviewers: jyknight, nickdesaulniers, hfinkel
Reviewed By: jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: MaskRay, rsmith, hiraditya, llvm-commits, cfe-commits, craig.topper, rnk
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69876
The diagnostic added in D72231 also shows a diagnostic when casting to a
_Bool. This is unwanted. This patch removes the diagnostic for _Bool types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74860
Summary:
As @rsmith notes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D73020#inline-672219
while that is certainly UB land, it may not be actually reachable at runtime, e.g.:
```
template<int N> void *make() {
if ((N & (N-1)) == 0)
return operator new(N, std::align_val_t(N));
else
return operator new(N);
}
void *p = make<7>();
```
and we shouldn't really error-out there.
That being said, i'm not really following the logic here.
Which ones of these cases should remain being an error?
Reviewers: rsmith, erichkeane
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rsmith
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73996
Summary:
Previously any symlinks would be ignored since the directory
traversal doesn't follow them.
With this change we now follow symlinks (via a `stat` call
in order to figure out the target type of the symlink if it
is valid).
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74790
The `-fdeclare-opencl-builtins` option was accepting saturated
conversions for non-integer types, which contradicts both the OpenCL
specification (v2.0 s6.2.3) and Clang's opencl-c.h file.
Use the more accurate location when emitting the location of the
function being called's prototype in diagnostics emitted when calling
a function with an incorrect number of arguments.
In particular, avoids showing a trace of irrelevant macro expansions
for "MY_EXPORT static int AwesomeFunction(int, int);". Fixes PR#23564.
This patch removes the explicit call graph for CUDA/HIP/OpenMP deferred
diagnostics generated during parsing since it is error prone due to
incomplete information about function declarations during parsing. In stead,
this patch does a post-parsing AST traverse and emits deferred diagnostics
based on the use graph implicitly generated during the traverse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70172
Add fixits for messaging self in MRR or using super, as the intent is
clear, and it turns out people do that a lot more than expected.
Allow for objc_direct_members on main interfaces, it's extremely useful
for internal only classes, and proves to be quite annoying for adoption.
Add some better warnings around properties direct/non-direct clashes (it
was done for methods but properties were a miss).
Add some errors when direct properties are marked @dynamic.
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58355212
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73755
Converting a pointer to an integer whose result cannot represented in the
integer type is undefined behavior is C and prohibited in C++. C++ already
has a diagnostic when casting. This adds a diagnostic for C.
Since this diagnostic uses the range of the conversion it also modifies
int-to-pointer-cast diagnostic to use a range.
Fixes PR8718: No warning on casting between pointer and non-pointer-sized int
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72231
This swaps out the OpenMPDefaultClauseKind enum with a
llvm::omp::DefaultKind enum which is stored in OMPConstants.h.
This should not change any functionality.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74513
This patch implements an almost complete handling of OpenMP
contexts/traits such that we can reuse most of the logic in Flang
through the OMPContext.{h,cpp} in llvm/Frontend/OpenMP.
All but construct SIMD specifiers, e.g., inbranch, and the device ISA
selector are define in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPKinds.def`. From
these definitions we generate the enum classes `TraitSet`,
`TraitSelector`, and `TraitProperty` as well as conversion and helper
functions in `llvm/lib/Frontend/OpenMP/OMPContext.{h,cpp}`.
The above enum classes are used in the parser, sema, and the AST
attribute. The latter is not a collection of multiple primitive variant
arguments that contain encodings via numbers and strings but instead a
tree that mirrors the `match` clause (see `struct OpenMPTraitInfo`).
The changes to the parser make it more forgiving when wrong syntax is
read and they also resulted in more specialized diagnostics. The tests
are updated and the core issues are detected as before. Here and
elsewhere this patch tries to be generic, thus we do not distinguish
what selector set, selector, or property is parsed except if they do
behave exceptionally, as for example `user={condition(EXPR)}` does.
The sema logic changed in two ways: First, the OMPDeclareVariantAttr
representation changed, as mentioned above, and the sema was adjusted to
work with the new `OpenMPTraitInfo`. Second, the matching and scoring
logic moved into `OMPContext.{h,cpp}`. It is implemented on a flat
representation of the `match` clause that is not tied to clang.
`OpenMPTraitInfo` provides a method to generate this flat structure (see
`struct VariantMatchInfo`) by computing integer score values and boolean
user conditions from the `clang::Expr` we keep for them.
The OpenMP context is now an explicit object (see `struct OMPContext`).
This is in anticipation of construct traits that need to be tracked. The
OpenMP context, as well as the `VariantMatchInfo`, are basically made up
of a set of active or respectively required traits, e.g., 'host', and an
ordered container of constructs which allows duplication. Matching and
scoring is kept as generic as possible to allow easy extension in the
future.
---
Test changes:
The messages checked in `OpenMP/declare_variant_messages.{c,cpp}` have
been auto generated to match the new warnings and notes of the parser.
The "subset" checks were reversed causing the wrong version to be
picked. The tests have been adjusted to correct this.
We do not print scores if the user did not provide one.
We print spaces to make lists in the `match` clause more legible.
Reviewers: kiranchandramohan, ABataev, RaviNarayanaswamy, gtbercea, grokos, sdmitriev, JonChesterfield, hfinkel, fghanim
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, rampitec, mgorny, hiraditya, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, simoncook, bollu, guansong, dexonsmith, jfb, s.egerton, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71830
Summary:
Zero-parameter K&R definitions specify that the function has no
parameters, but they are still not prototypes, so calling the function
with the wrong number of parameters is just a warning, not an error.
The C11 standard doesn't seem to directly define what a prototype is,
but it can be inferred from 6.9.1p7: "If the declarator includes a
parameter type list, the list also specifies the types of all the
parameters; such a declarator also serves as a function prototype
for later calls to the same function in the same translation unit."
This refers to 6.7.6.3p5: "If, in the declaration “T D1”, D1 has
the form
D(parameter-type-list)
or
D(identifier-list_opt)
[...]". Later in 6.11.7 it also refers only to the parameter-type-list
variant as prototype: "The use of function definitions with separate
parameter identifier and declaration lists (not prototype-format
parameter type and identifier declarators) is an obsolescent feature."
We already correctly treat an empty parameter list as non-prototype
declaration, so we can just take that information.
GCC also warns about this with -Wstrict-prototypes.
This shouldn't affect C++, because there all FunctionType's are
FunctionProtoTypes. I added a simple test for that.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66919
According to OpenMP 5.0, cancel and cancellation point constructs are
supported in taskloop directive. Added support for cancellation in
taskloop, master taskloop and parallel master taskloop.
We previously checked the constraints of instantiated function templates even in cases where
PartialOverloading was true and not all template arguments have been deduced, which caused crashes
in clangd (bug 44714).
We now check if all arguments have been deduced before checking constraints in partial overloading
scenarios.
directive.
According to OpenMP 5.0, The atomic_default_mem_order clause specifies the default memory ordering behavior for atomic constructs that must be provided by an implementation. If the default memory ordering is specified as seq_cst, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the seq_cst clause appears. If the default memory ordering is specified as relaxed, all atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the relaxed clause appears.
If the default memory ordering is specified as acq_rel, atomic constructs on which memory-order-clause is not specified behave as if the release clause appears if the atomic write or atomic update operation is specified, as if the acquire clause appears if the atomic read operation is specified, and as if the acq_rel clause appears if the atomic captured update operation is specified.
Added restrictions for atomic directive.
1. If atomic-clause is read then memory-order-clause must not be acq_rel or release.
2. If atomic-clause is write then memory-order-clause must not be
acq_rel or acquire.
3. If atomic-clause is update or not present then memory-order-clause
must not be acq_rel or acquire.
The C++ rules briefly allowed this, but the rule changed nearly 10 years
ago and we never updated our implementation to match. However, we've
warned on this by default for a long time, and no other compiler accepts
(even as an extension).
New intrinisics are implemented for when we need to port SIMD code from other
arhitectures and only load or store portions of MSA registers.
Following intriniscs are added which only load/store element 0 of a vector:
v4i32 __builtin_msa_ldrq_w (const void *, imm_n2048_2044);
v2i64 __builtin_msa_ldr_d (const void *, imm_n4096_4088);
void __builtin_msa_strq_w (v4i32, void *, imm_n2048_2044);
void __builtin_msa_str_d (v2i64, void *, imm_n4096_4088);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73644
1) Fix a regression in llvmorg-11-init-2485-g0e3a4877840 that would
reject some cases where a class name is shadowed by a typedef-name
causing a destructor declaration to be rejected. Prefer a tag type over
a typedef in destructor name lookup.
2) Convert the "type in destructor declaration is a typedef" error to an
error-by-default ExtWarn to allow codebases to turn it off. GCC and MSVC
do not enforce this rule.
Also add extension warnings for the cases that are disallowed by the
current rules for destructor name lookup, refactor and simplify the
lookup code, and improve the diagnostic quality when lookup fails.
The special case we previously supported for converting
p->N::S<int>::~S() from naming a class template into naming a
specialization thereof is subsumed by a more general rule here (which is
also consistent with Clang's historical behavior and that of other
compilers): if we can't find a suitable S in N, also look in N::S<int>.
The extension warnings are off by default, except for a warning when
lookup for p->N::S::~T() looks for T in scope instead of in N (or N::S).
That seems sufficiently heinous to warn on by default, especially since
we can't support it for a dependent nested-name-specifier.
Summary:
Due to a recent (but retroactive) C++ rule change, only sufficiently
C-compatible classes are permitted to be given a typedef name for
linkage purposes. Add an enabled-by-default warning for these cases, and
rephrase our existing error for the case where we encounter the typedef
name for linkage after we've already computed and used a wrong linkage
in terms of the new rule.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74103
Address space conversion changes pointer representation.
This commit disallows such conversions when they are not
legal i.e. for the nested pointers even with compatible
address spaces. Because the address space conversion in
the nested levels can't be generated to modify the pointers
correctly. The behavior implemented is as follows:
- Any implicit conversions of nested pointers with different
address spaces is rejected.
- Any conversion of address spaces in nested pointers in safe
casts (e.g. const_cast or static_cast) is rejected.
- Conversion in low level C-style or reinterpret_cast is accepted
but with a warning (this aligns with OpenCL C behavior).
Fixes PR39674
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73360
constant initialization.
Removing this zeroing regressed our code generation in a few cases, also
fixed here. We now compute whether a variable has constant destruction
even if it doesn't have a constant initializer, by trying to destroy a
default-initialized value, and skip emitting a trivial default
constructor for a variable even if it has non-trivial (but perhaps
constant) destruction.
We would incorrectly check whether the type-constraint had already been initialized, causing us
to ignore the invented template type constraints entirely.
Also, TemplateParameterList would store incorrect information about invented type parameters
when it observed them before their type-constraint was initialized, so we recreate it after
initializing the function type of an abbreviated template.
Apply the fix of f780e15caf ("[OpenCL] Fix support for
cl_khr_mipmap_image_writes", 2020-01-27) also to the TableGen OpenCL
builtin function definitions.
We did not have a CXXThisScope around constraint checking of functions and
function template specializations, causing a crash when checking a constraint
that had a 'this' (bug 44689).
Recommit after fixing test.
We did not have a CXXThisScope around constraint checking of functions and
function template specializations, causing a crash when checking a constraint
that had a 'this' (bug 44689)
Summary:
Changes:
- Calls to consteval function are now evaluated in constant context but IR is still generated for them.
- Add diagnostic for taking address of a consteval function in non-constexpr context.
- Add diagnostic for address of consteval function accessible at runtime.
- Add tests
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: mgrang, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63960
Align `Type` names to their actual OpenCL C type names, such that we
can print OpenCL C types from TableGen. This is particularly helpful
for completeness comparisons with `opencl-c.h`.
Drop the "Name" field from `TypeList`, as it is unused.
Minor formatting changes.
We previously instantiated type-constraints of template type parameters along with the type parameter itself,
this caused problems when the type-constraints created by abbreviated templates refreneced other parameters
in the abbreviated templates.
When encountering a template type parameter with a type constraint, if it is implicit, delay instantiation of
the type-constraint until the function parameter which created the invented template type parameter is
instantiated.
Reland after fixing bug caused by another flow reaching SubstParmVarDecl and instantiating the TypeConstraint
a second time.
We previously instantiated type-constraints of template type parameters along with the type parameter itself,
this caused problems when the type-constraints created by abbreviated templates refreneced other parameters
in the abbreviated templates.
When encountering a template type parameter with a type constraint, if it is implicit, delay instantiation of
the type-constraint until the function parameter which created the invented template type parameter is
instantiated.
Summary: Just like templates, they are excepted from the ODR rule.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68923
types are needed to compute the return type of a defaulted operator<=>.
This raises the question of what to do if return type deduction fails.
The standard doesn't say, and implementations vary, so for now reject
that case eagerly to keep our options open.
We previously would not correctly for the initial parameter mapping for variadic template parameters in Concepts.
Testing this lead to the discovery that with the normalization process we would need to substitute into already-substituted-into
template arguments, which means we need to add NonTypeTemplateParmExpr support to TemplateInstantiator.
We do that by substituting into the replacement and the type separately, and then re-checking the expression against the NTTP
with the new type, in order to form any new required implicit casts (for cases where the type of the NTTP was dependent).
Add fixits for messaging self in MRR or using super, as the intent is
clear, and it turns out people do that a lot more than expected.
Allow for objc_direct_members on main interfaces, it's extremely useful
for internal only classes, and proves to be quite annoying for adoption.
Add some better warnings around properties direct/non-direct clashes (it
was done for methods but properties were a miss).
Radar-Id: rdar://problem/58355212
Signed-off-by: Pierre Habouzit <phabouzit@apple.com>
A constrained function with an auto return type would have it's definition
instantiated in order to deduce the auto return type before the constraints
are checked.
Move the constraints check after the return type deduction.
when building a defaulted comparison.
As a convenient way of asking whether `x @ y` is valid and building it,
we previouly always performed overload resolution and built an
overloaded expression, which would both end up picking a builtin
operator candidate when given a non-overloadable type. But that's not
quite right, because it can result in our finding a user-declared
operator overload, which we should never do when applying operators
non-overloadable types.
Handle this more correctly: skip overload resolution when building
`x @ y` if the operands are not overloadable. But still perform overload
resolution (considering only builtin candidates) when checking validity,
as we don't have any other good way to ask whether a binary operator
expression would be valid.
In passing, split it up into three values (no explicit functions /
explicit conversion functions only / any explicit functions) in
preparation for using that in a future change.
Sander de Smalen