Some tests assume that iteration through an unordered multiset elements
will return them in the same order as at the container creation. This
assumption is not true since the container is unordered, so that no
specific order of elements is ever guaranteed for such container. This
patch introduces checks verifying that any iteration will return
elements exactly from a set of valid values and without repetition,
but in no particular order.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56500
llvm-svn: 361494
Some tests assume that iteration through an unordered multimap elements
will return them in the same order as at the container creation. This
assumption is not true since the container is unordered, so that no
specific order of elements is ever guaranteed for such container. This
patch is a continuation of D54838 and introduces checks verifying that
any iteration will return elements exactly from a set of valid values
and without repetition, but in no particular order.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56498
llvm-svn: 361414
Some tests #include <iostream> but they don't use anything from the
header. Those are probably artifacts of when the tests were developped.
llvm-svn: 357181
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
The unordered_set and unordered_multiset iterators are specified in the standard as follows:
using iterator = implementation-defined; // see [container.requirements]
using const_iterator = implementation-defined; // see [container.requirements]
using local_iterator = implementation-defined; // see [container.requirements]
using const_local_iterator = implementation-defined; // see [container.requirements]
The pairs iterator/const_iterator and local_iterator/const_local_iterator
are not required to be the same. The reasonable requirement would be that
iterator can convert to const_iterator and local_iterator can convert to
const_local_iterator. This patch weakens the check and makes the test
more portable.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D56493.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 352083
to reflect the new license. These used slightly different spellings that
defeated my regular expressions.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351648
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: ldionne, EricWF
Subscribers: jyknight, christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 351289
There were 3 tests with 'int main(void)', and 6 with the return type on a different line. I'm about to send a patch for main in tests, and this NFC change is unrelated.
llvm-svn: 350770
We already have a specialization that will use memcpy for construction
of trivial types from an iterator range like
std::vector<int>(int *, int *);
But if we have const-ness mismatch like
std::vector<int>(const int *, const int *);
we would use a slow path that copies each element individually. This change
enables the optimal specialization for const-ness mismatch. Fixes PR37574.
Contributions to the patch are made by Arthur O'Dwyer, Louis Dionne.
rdar://problem/40485845
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF, ldionne, scanon
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, ldionne, howard.hinnant, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48342
llvm-svn: 350583
Some tests assume that iteration through an unordered multimap elements
will return them in the same order as at the container creation. This
assumption is not true since the container is unordered, so that no
specific order of elements is ever guaranteed for such container. This
patch introduces checks verifying that any iteration will return elements
exactly from a set of valid values and without repetition, but in no
particular order.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54838.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 349780
The standard section [array.zero] requires the return value of begin()
and end() methods of a zero-sized array to be unique. Eric Fiselier
clarifies: "That unique value cannot be null, and must be properly aligned".
This patch adds checks for the first part of this clarification: unique
value returned by these methods cannot be null.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55366.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348509
The section array.zero says: "The return value of data() is unspecified".
This patch marks all checks of the array<T, 0>.data() return value as
libc++ specific.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D55364.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 348485
This reverts commit 087f065cb0c7463f521a62599884493aaee2ea12.
The tests were failing on 32 bit builds, and I don't have time
to clean them up right now. I'll recommit tomorrow with fixed tests.
llvm-svn: 347816
Summary:
Starting in Clang 8.0 and GCC 8.0, `alignof` and `__alignof` return different values in same cases. Specifically `alignof` and `_Alignof` return the minimum alignment for a type, where as `__alignof` returns the preferred alignment. libc++ currently uses `__alignof` but means to use `alignof`. See llvm.org/PR39713
This patch introduces the macro `_LIBCPP_ALIGNOF` so we can control which spelling gets used.
This patch does not introduce any ABI guard to provide the old behavior with newer compilers. However, if we decide that is needed, this patch makes it trivial to implement.
I think we should commit this change immediately, and decide what we want to do about the ABI afterwards.
Reviewers: ldionne, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54814
llvm-svn: 347787
The iterator types for different specializations of containers with the
same element type but different allocators are not required to be
convertible. This patch makes the test to take the iterator type from
the same container specialization as the created container.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54806.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347423
Some tests use type std::max_align_t, but don't include <cstddef> header
directly. As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant
libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54645.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347232
A bunch of unordered containers tests call library functions but don't directly
include the corresponding header files:
- fabs() (defined in <cmath> which is not included);
- is_permutation() (defined in <algorithm> which is not included);
- next() (defined in <iterator> which is not included).
- As a result, these tests won't compile against some conformant libraries.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D54643.
Thanks to Andrey Maksimov for the patch.
llvm-svn: 347085
This was implicitly converting [1, 3] to bool, which triggers
an MSVC warning. The test should just pass `true`, which is
simpler, has the same behavior, and avoids the warning. (This
is a library test, not a compiler test, and the conversion happens
before calling `push_back`, so passing [1, 3] isn't interesting
in any way. This resembles a previous change to stop passing
`1 == 1` in the `vector<bool>` tests.)
llvm-svn: 346910
This patch adds tests to ensure that multiset/unordered_multiset's emplace
method correctly constructs the elements without any intervening
constructions.
llvm-svn: 346743
This commit adds a merge member function to all the map and set containers,
which splices nodes from the source container. This completes support for
P0083r3.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48896
llvm-svn: 345744
This commit adds a node handle type, (located in __node_handle), and adds
extract() and insert() members to all map and set types, as well as their
implementations in __tree and __hash_table.
The second half of this feature is adding merge() members, which splice nodes
in bulk from one container into another. This will be committed in a follow-up.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46845
llvm-svn: 338472
C++2a[container.requirements.general]p8 states that when move constructing
a container, the allocator is move constructed. Vector previously copy
constructed these allocators. This patch fixes that bug.
Additionally it cleans up some unnecessary allocator conversions
when copy constructing containers. Libc++ uses
__internal_allocator_traits::select_on_copy_construction to select
the correct allocator during copy construction, but it unnecessarily
converted the resulting allocator to the user specified allocator
type and back. After this patch list and forward_list no longer
do that.
Technically we're supposed to be using allocator_traits<allocator_type>::select_on_copy_construction,
but that should seemingly be addressed as a separate patch, if at all.
llvm-svn: 334053
Patch from Joe Loser.
Several unit tests meaning to test the behavior of lvalue insertion incorrectly
pass rvalues. Fixes bug PR # 27394
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D44411
llvm-svn: 329541
Patch from ngolovliov@gmail.com
Reviewed as: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42344
As described in llvm.org/PR30959, the current
implementation of std::{map, key}::{count, equal_range} in libcxx is
non-conforming. Quoting the C++14 standard [associative.reqmts]p3
> The phrase “equivalence of keys” means the equivalence relation imposed by
> the comparison and not the operator== on keys. That is, two keys k1 and k2 are
> considered to be equivalent if for the comparison object comp,
> comp(k1, k2) == false && comp(k2, k1) == false.
In the same section, the requirements table states the following:
> a.equal_range(k) equivalent to make_pair(a.lower_bound(k), a.upper_bound(k))
> a.count(k) returns the number of elements with key equivalent to k
The behaviour of libstdc++ seems to conform to the standard here.
llvm-svn: 324799
An array T[1] isn't necessarily the same say when it's
a member of a struct. This patch addresses that problem and corrects
the tests to deal with it.
llvm-svn: 324545
Louis Dionne