A PC-relative relocation referencing a non-preemptible absolute symbol
(due to STT_TLS) is not representable in -pie/-shared mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77021
In most cases, LLD prints its multiline diagnostic messages starting
additional lines with ">>> ". That greatly helps external tools to parse
the output, simplifying combining several lines of the log back into one
message. The patch fixes the only message I found that does not follow
the common pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77132
As of a while ago, lld groups all undefined references to a single
symbol in a single diagnostic. Back then, I made it so that we
print up to 10 references to each undefined symbol.
Having used this for a while, I never wished there were more
references, but I sometimes found that this can print a lot of
output. lld prints up to 10 diagnostics by default, and if
each has 10 references (which I've seen in practice), and each
undefined symbol produces 2 (possibly very long) lines of output,
that's over 200 lines of error output.
Let's try it with just 3 references for a while and see how
that feels in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77017
Hexagon ABI specifies that call x@gdplt is transformed to call __tls_get_addr.
Example:
call x@gdplt
is changed to
call __tls_get_addr
When x is an external tls variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74443
Similar to D63182 [ELF][PPC64] Don't report "relocation refers to a discarded section" for .toc
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75419
For an out-of-range relocation referencing a non-local symbol, report the symbol name and the object file that defines the symbol. As an example:
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]
```
=>
```
t.o:(function func: .text.func+0x3): relocation R_X86_64_32S out of range: -281474974609120 is not in [-2147483648, 2147483647]; references func
>>> defined in t1.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73518
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
* Generalize the code added in D70637 and D70937. We should eventually remove the EM_MIPS special case.
* Handle R_PPC_LOCAL24PC the same way as R_PPC_REL24.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73424
-fno-pie produces a pair of non-GOT-non-PLT relocations R_PPC_ADDR16_{HA,LO} (R_ABS) referencing external
functions.
```
lis 3, func@ha
la 3, func@l(3)
```
In a -no-pie/-pie link, if func is not defined in the executable, a canonical PLT entry (st_value>0, st_shndx=0) will be needed.
References to func in shared objects will be resolved to this address.
-fno-pie -pie should fail with "can't create dynamic relocation ... against ...", so we just need to think about -no-pie.
On x86, the PLT entry passes the JMP_SLOT offset to the rtld PLT resolver.
On x86-64: the PLT entry passes the JUMP_SLOT index to the rtld PLT resolver.
On ARM/AArch64: the PLT entry passes &.got.plt[n]. The PLT header passes &.got.plt[fixed-index]. The rtld PLT resolver can compute the JUMP_SLOT index from the two addresses.
For these targets, the canonical PLT entry can just reuse the regular PLT entry (in PltSection).
On PPC32: PltSection (.glink) consists of `b PLTresolve` instructions and `PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r11 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
On PPC64 ELFv2: PltSection (.glink) consists of `__glink_PLTresolve` and `bl __glink_PLTresolve`. The rtld PLT resolver depends on r12 having been set up to the .plt (GotPltSection) entry.
We cannot reuse a `b PLTresolve`/`bl __glink_PLTresolve` in PltSection as a canonical PLT entry. PPC64 ELFv2 avoids the problem by using TOC for any external reference, even in non-pic code, so the canonical PLT entry scenario should not happen in the first place.
For PPC32, we have to create a PLT call stub as the canonical PLT entry. The code sequence sets up r11.
Reviewed By: Bdragon28
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73399
This essentially reverts b841e119d7.
Such code construct can be used in the following way:
// glibc/stdlib/exit.c
// clang -fuse-ld=lld => succeeded
// clang -fuse-ld=lld -fpie -pie => relocation R_PLT_PC cannot refer to absolute symbol
__attribute__((weak, visibility("hidden"))) extern void __call_tls_dtors();
void __run_exit_handlers() {
if (__call_tls_dtors)
__call_tls_dtors();
}
Since we allow R_PLT_PC in -no-pie mode, it makes sense to allow it in
-pie mode as well.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72943
In D71281 a fix was put in to round up the size of a ThunkSection to the
nearest 4KiB when performing errata patching. This fixed a problem with a
very large instrumented program that had thunks and patches mutually
trigger each other. Unfortunately it triggers an assertion failure in an
AArch64 allyesconfig build of the kernel. There is a specific assertion
preventing an InputSectionDescription being larger than 4KiB. This will
always trigger if there is at least one Thunk needed in that
InputSectionDescription, which is possible for an allyesconfig build.
Abstractly the problem case is:
.text : {
*(.text) ;
...
. = ALIGN(SZ_4K);
__idmap_text_start = .;
*(.idmap.text)
__idmap_text_end = .;
...
}
The assertion checks that __idmap_text_end - __idmap_start is < 4 KiB.
Note that there is more than one InputSectionDescription in the
OutputSection so we can't just restrict the fix to OutputSections smaller
than 4 KiB.
The fix presented here limits the D71281 to InputSectionDescriptions that
meet the following conditions:
1.) The OutputSection is bigger than the thunkSectionSpacing so adding
thunks will affect the addresses of following code.
2.) The InputSectionDescription is larger than 4 KiB. This will prevent
any assertion failures that an InputSectionDescription is < 4 KiB
in size.
We do this at ThunkSection creation time as at this point we know that
the addresses are stable and up to date prior to adding the thunks as
assignAddresses() will have been called immediately prior to thunk
generation.
The fix reverts the two tests affected by D71281 to their original state
as they no longer need the 4KiB size roundup. I've added simpler tests to
check for D71281 when the OutputSection size is larger than the ThunkSection
spacing.
Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/812
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72344
R_HINT is ignored like R_NONE. There are no strong reasons to keep
R_HINT. The largest RelExpr member R_RISCV_PC_INDIRECT is 60 now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71822
Weak undefined symbols are preemptible after D71794.
if (sym.isPreemptible)
return false;
if (!config->isPic)
return true;
// isPic means includeInDynsym is true after D71794.
...
// We can delete this if because it can never be true.
if (sym.isUndefWeak)
return true;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71795
```
lld/ELF/Relocations.cpp:1622:56: warning: loop variable 'ts' of type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' (aka 'const pair<lld:🧝:ThunkSection *, unsigned int>') creates a copy from type 'const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t>' [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
for (const std::pair<ThunkSection *, uint32_t> ts : isd->thunkSections)
```
Drop const qualifier to fix -Wrange-loop-analysis.
We can make -Wrange-loop-analysis warnings (DiagnoseForRangeConstVariableCopies) on `const A` more
permissive on more types (e.g. POD -> trivially copyable), unfortunately it will not make std::pair
good, because `constexpr pair& operator=(const pair& p);` is unfortunately user-defined.
Reviewed By: Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72211
For undef-not-suggest.test, we currently make redundant alternative
spelling suggestions:
```
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .text.foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x0)
>>> did you mean:
>>> defined in: a.o
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a symbol in a discarded section: foo
>>> defined in a.o
>>> section group signature: foo
>>> prevailing definition is in a.o
>>> referenced by a.o:(.rodata+0x8)
>>> did you mean: for
>>> defined in: a.o
```
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71735
PltSection is used by both PLT and IPLT. The PLT section may have a
header while the IPLT section does not. Split off IpltSection from
PltSection to be clearer.
Unlike other targets, PPC64 cannot use the same code sequence for PLT
and IPLT. This helps make a future PPC64 patch (D71509) more isolated.
On EM_386 and EM_X86_64, when PLT is empty while IPLT is not, currently
we are inconsistent whether the PLT header is conceptually attached to
in.plt or in.iplt . Consistently attach the header to in.plt can make
the -z retpolineplt logic simpler. It also makes `jmp` point to an
aesthetically better place for non-retpolineplt cases.
Reviewed By: grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71519
Fixes PPC64 part of PR40438
// clang -target ppc64le -c a.cc
// .text.unlikely may be placed in a separate output section (via -z keep-text-section-prefix)
// The distance between bar in .text.unlikely and foo in .text may be larger than 32MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.unlikely"))) static int bar() { foo(); return 0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for PPC64.
AArch64: .text -> `__AArch64ADRPThunk_ (adrp x16, ...; add x16, x16, ...; br x16)` -> target
PPC64: .text -> `__long_branch_ (addis 12, 2, ...; ld 12, ...(12); mtctr 12; bctr)` -> target
AArch64 can leverage ADRP to jump to the target directly, but PPC64
needs to load an address from .branch_lt . Before Power ISA v3.0, the
PC-relative ADDPCIS was not available. .branch_lt was invented to work
around the limitation.
Symbol::ppc64BranchltIndex is replaced by
PPC64LongBranchTargetSection::entry_index which take addends into
consideration.
The tests are rewritten: ppc64-long-branch.s tests -no-pie and
ppc64-long-branch-pi.s tests -pie and -shared.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70937
replaceWithDefined is used by canonical PLT and copy relocations, which
imply that the symbol is preemptable. ppc64BranchltIndex is only used by
non-preemptable cases, and it can only be the default value in
replaceWithDefined.
Fixes AArch64 part of PR40438
The current range extension thunk framework does not handle a relocation
relative to a STT_SECTION symbol with a non-zero addend, which may be
used by jumps/calls to local functions on some RELA targets (AArch64,
powerpc ELFv1, powerpc64 ELFv2, etc). See PR40438 and the following
code for examples:
// clang -target $target a.cc
// .text.cold may be placed in a separate output section.
// The distance between bar in .text.cold and foo in .text may be larger than 128MiB.
static void foo() {}
__attribute__((section(".text.cold"))) static int bar() { foo(); return
0; }
__attribute__((used)) static int dummy = bar();
This patch makes such thunks with addends work for AArch64. The target
independent part can be reused by PPC in the future.
On REL targets (ARM, MIPS), jumps/calls are not represented as
STT_SECTION + non-zero addend (see
MCELFObjectTargetWriter::needsRelocateWithSymbol), so they don't need
this feature, but we need to make sure this patch does not affect them.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70637
ThunkCreator::getThunk and ThunkCreator::normalizeExistingThunk
currently assume that the implicit addends are -8 for ARM and -4 for
Thumb. In D70637, ThunkCreator::getThunk will need to take care of the
relocation addend explicitly.
Add the utility function getPCBias() as a prerequisite so that the getThunk change in D70637
can be more general.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70690
D62381 introduced forEachSymbol(). It seems that many call sites cannot
be parallelized because the body shared some states. Replace
forEachSymbol with iterator_range<filter_iterator<...>> symbols() to
simplify code and improve debuggability (std::function calls take some
frames).
It also allows us to use early return to simplify code added in D69650.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70505
The definition may be mangled while an undefined reference is not.
This may come up when (1) the reference is from a C file or (2) the definition
misses an extern "C".
(2) is more common. Suggest an arbitrary mangled name that matches the
undefined reference, if such a definition exists.
ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: foo
>>> referenced by a.o:(.text+0x1)
>>> did you mean to declare foo(int) as extern "C"?
>>> defined in: a1.o
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69650
When missing an extern "C" declaration, an undefined reference may be
mangled while the definition is not. Suggest the missing
extern "C" and the base name.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69592
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
Fixes PR38748
mergeSections() calls getOutputSectionName() to get output section
names. Two MergeInputSections may be merged even if they are made
different by SECTIONS commands.
This patch moves mergeSections() after processSectionCommands() and
addOrphanSections() to fix the issue. The new pass is renamed to
OutputSection::finalizeInputSections().
processSectionCommands() and addorphanSections() are changed to add
sections to InputSectionDescription::sectionBases.
finalizeInputSections() merges MergeInputSections and migrates
`sectionBases` to `sections`.
For the -r case, we drop an optimization that tries keeping sh_entsize
non-zero. This is for the simplicity of addOrphanSections(). The
updated merge-entsize2.s reflects the change.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67504
llvm-svn: 372734
Non-undefined symbols with Levenshtein distance 1 or a transposition are
suggestion candidates. This is probably good enough and it can suggest
some missing/superfluous qualifiers: const, restrict, volatile, & and &&
ref-qualifier, e.g.
error: undefined symbol: foo(int*)
>>> referenced by b.o:(.text+0x1)
+>>> did you mean: foo(int const*)
+>>> defined in: a.o
error: undefined symbol: foo(int*&)
>>> referenced by b.o:(.text+0x1)
+>>> did you mean: foo(int*)
+>>> defined in: b.o
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67039
llvm-svn: 370853
PR42990. For `SECTIONS { b = a; . = 0xff00 + (a >> 8); a = .; }`,
we currently set st_value(a)=0xff00 while st_value(b)=0xffff.
The following call tree demonstrates the problem:
```
link<ELF64LE>(Args);
Script->declareSymbols(); // insert a and b as absolute Defined
Writer<ELFT>().run();
Script->processSectionCommands();
addSymbol(cmd); // a and b are re-inserted. LinkerScript::getSymbolValue
// is lazily called by subsequent evaluation
finalizeSections();
forEachRelSec(scanRelocations<ELFT>);
processRelocAux // another problem PR42506, not affected by this patch
finalizeAddressDependentContent(); // loop executed once
script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0, b = 0xff00
script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0xff00, _end = 0xffff
```
We need another assignAddresses() to finalize the value of `a`.
This patch
1) modifies assignAddress() to track the original section/value of each
symbol and return a symbol whose section/value has changed.
2) moves the post-finalizeSections assignAddress() inside the loop
of finalizeAddressDependentContent() and makes it iterative.
Symbol assignment may not converge so we make a few attempts before
bailing out.
Note, assignAddresses() must be called at least twice. The penultimate
call finalized section addresses while the last finalized symbol values.
It is somewhat obscure and there was no comment.
linkerscript/addr-zero.test tests this.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66279
llvm-svn: 369889
After D66007/r369262, if the control flow reaches `if (sym.isUndefined())`, we know:
* The relocation is not a link-time constant => symbol is preemptable => Undefined or SharedSymbol
* Not an undef weak.
* -no-pie.
* The symbol type is neither STT_OBJECT nor STT_FUNC.
ld.lld --export-dynamic --unresolved-symbols=ignore-all %t.o can satisfy
these conditions. Delete the isUndefined() test so that we error
`symbol '...' has no type`, because we don't know the type to make the
decision to create copy relocation/canonical PLT.
llvm-svn: 369271
In processRelocAux(), we handle errors before copy relocation/canonical PLT.
This makes error checking a bit complex because we have to check for
conditions that will be allowed by copy relocation/canonical PLT.
Instead, move copy relocation/canonical PLT before error checking. This
simplifies the previous clumsy error checking code
`config->shared || (config->pie && expr == R_ABS && type != target->symbolicRel)`
to the simple `config->isPic`. Some diagnostics can be reported in
different ways. The code motion changes diagnostics for some contrived
test cases:
* copy-rel-pie-error.s -> copy-rel-pie2.s:
It was rejected before but accepted now. ld.bfd also accepts the case.
* copy-errors.s: "cannot preempt symbol" changes to "symbol 'bar' has no type"
* got32{,x}-i386.s: the suggestion changes from "-fPIC or -Wl,-z,notext" to "-fPIE"
* x86-64-dyn-rel-error5.s: one diagnostic changes for -pie case
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66007
llvm-svn: 369262
R_GOTPLT is relative to .got.plt since D59594. Since R_HEXAGON_GOT
relocations always have 0 r_addend, they can use R_GOTPLT instead.
Reviewed By: sidneym
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66274
llvm-svn: 369128
Currently the following 3 relocation types do not trigger the creation
of a canonical PLT (which changes STT_GNU_IFUNC to STT_FUNC and
redirects all references):
1) GOT-generating (`needsGot`)
2) PLT-generating (`needsPlt`)
3) R_ABS with 0 addend in a writable location. This is used for
for ifunc function pointers in writable sections such as .data and .toc.
This patch deletes case 3) to simplify the R_*_IRELATIVE generating
logic added in D57371. Other advantages:
* It is guaranteed no more than 1 R_*_IRELATIVE is created for an ifunc.
* PPC64: no need to special case ifunc in toc-indirect to toc-relative relaxation. See D65755
The deleted elf::addIRelativeRelocs demonstrates that one-pass scan
through relocations makes several optimizations difficult. This is
something we can think about in the future.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65995
llvm-svn: 368661
After r367869, VER_NDX_LOCAL can only be assigned to Defined and
CommonSymbol. CommonSymbol becomes Defined after replaceCommonSymbols(),
thus `versionId == VER_NDX_LOCAL` will imply `isDefined()`.
In maybeReportUndefined(), computeBinding() is called when the symbol is
unknown to be Undefined. computeBinding() != STB_LOCAL will always be
true.
llvm-svn: 368536
This patch does the same thing as r365595 to other subdirectories,
which completes the naming style change for the entire lld directory.
With this, the naming style conversion is complete for lld.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64473
llvm-svn: 365730
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
Some variables in lld have the same name as functions ignoring case.
This patch gives them different names, so that my next patch is easier
to read.
llvm-svn: 365003
RISC-V psABI doesn't specify TLS relaxation. It can be handled the same
way as we handle ARM TLS. RISC-V TLS is even simpler because GD/LD use
the same relocation type.
Reviewed By: jrtc27, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63220
llvm-svn: 364813
This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded"
and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue.
.rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries:
// start address of a range list entry
// old: 0; after r361830: 0
00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0
// end address of a range list entry
// old: 0xe; after r361830: 0
00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e
If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0,
DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the
.debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely:
while (true) {
decode StartAddress
decode EndAddress
if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely
break;
Entries.push_back(Entry);
}
In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read
incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be
incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses
.gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to
symbolize some addresses.
To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols
in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them.
This patch should fix:
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067
llvm-svn: 364391
(In effect, reverting "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded".)
It caused debug info problems in LibreOffice [1] and Chromium/V8 [2].
Reverting until those can be fixed.
It also reverts r362497 "STT_SECTION symbol should be defined" on .eh_frame, .debug*, .zdebug* and .gcc_except_table"
which was landed as a follow-up to the above.
> With -r or --emit-relocs, we warn `STT_SECTION symbol should be defined`
> on relocations to discarded section symbol. This was added as an error
> in rLLD319404, but was not so effective before D61583 (it turned the
> error to a warning).
>
> Relocations from .eh_frame .debug* .zdebug* .gcc_except_table to
> discarded .text are very common and somewhat expected. Don't warn/error
> on them. As a reference, ld.bfd has a similar logic in
> _bfd_elf_default_action_discarded() to allow these cases.
>
> Delete invalid-undef-section-symbol.test because what it intended to
> check is now covered by the updated comdat-discarded-reloc.s
>
> Delete relocatable-eh-frame.s because we allow relocations from
> .eh_frame as a special case now.
And finally it reverts r362218 "[ELF] Replace a dead test in getSymVA() with assert()"
as that also depended on the main change reverted here.
> Symbols relative to discarded comdat sections are Undefined instead of
> Defined now (after D59649 and D61583). The `== &InputSection::Discarded`
> test becomes dead. I cannot find a test related to this behavior.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html
[2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067
llvm-svn: 364321
Sid Manning