Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Summary:
LLDB currently applies Fix-Its if they are attached to a Clang diagnostic that has the
severity "error". Fix-Its connected to warnings and other severities are supposed to
be ignored as LLDB doesn't seem to trust Clang Fix-Its in these situations.
However, LLDB also ignores all Fix-Its coming from "note:" diagnostics. These diagnostics
are usually emitted alongside other diagnostics (both warnings and errors), either to keep
a single diagnostic message shorter or because the Fix-It is in a different source line. As they
are technically their own (non-error) diagnostics, we currently are ignoring all Fix-Its associated with them.
For example, this is a possible Clang diagnostic with a Fix-It that is currently ignored:
```
error: <user expression 1>:2:10: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
ToStr(0, {,})
^
<user expression 1>:1:9: macro 'ToStr' defined here
#define ToStr(x) #x
^
<user expression 1>:2:1: cannot use initializer list at the beginning of a macro argument
ToStr(0, {,})
^ ~~~~
```
We also don't store "note:" diagnostics at all, as LLDB's abstraction around the whole diagnostic
concept doesn't have such a concept. The text of "note:" diagnostics is instead
appended to the last non-note diagnostic (which is causing that there is no "note:" text in the
diagnostic above, as all the "note:" diagnostics have been appended to the first "error: ..." text).
This patch fixes the ignored Fix-Its in note-diagnostics by appending them to the last non-note
diagnostic, similar to the way we handle the text in these diagnostics.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77055
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Summary:
D73024 seems to have fixed one set crash, but it introduced another.
Namely, if a class contains a covariant method returning itself, the
logic in MaybeCompleteReturnType could cause us to attempt a recursive
import, which would result in an assertion failure in
clang::DeclContext::removeDecl.
For some reason, this only manifested itself if the class contained at
least two member variables, and the class itself was imported as a
result of a recursive covariant import.
This patch fixes the crash by not attempting to import classes which are
already completed in MaybeCompleteReturnType. However, it's not clear to
me if this is the right fix, or if this should be handled automatically
by functions lower in the stack.
Reviewers: teemperor, shafik
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76840
LLDB only automatically applies Fix-Its from errors, but not from warnings.
Currently we only store Fix-Its from errors and then later apply all Fix-Its
we stored. This moves the filter to the application phase, so that we now
store *all* Fix-Its but only apply Fix-Its from errors later on.
This is NFC preparation for an upcoming patch.
Summary:
Currently top-level expressions won't automatically get Fix-Its applied. The reason
for that is that we only set the `m_fixed_text` member if we have a wrapping
source code (I.e. `m_source_code` is not zero and is wrapping some expressions).
This patch just always sets `m_fixed_text` to get this working.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77042
lldbassert is the macro that takes care of passing along line/file/function
to the lldb_assert function. Let's call that instead of manually calling the
function.
There an option: EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetResultIsInternal to indicate
whether the result number should be returned to the pool or not. It
got broken when the PersistentExpressionState was refactored.
This fixes the issue and provides a test of the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76532
The nullptr check here was removed in 4ef50a33b1
when I replaced (nearly) all log->Print to LLDB_LOG calls (which automatically
check for this stuff). But it seems this one call escaped my sed call.
Currently working on a test that can cover this code path but we can revert
this until I have found one.
Most clients of SourceManager.h need to do things like turning source
locations into file & line number pairs, but this doesn't require
bringing in FileManager.h and LLVM's FS headers.
The main code change here is to sink SM::createFileID into the cpp file.
I reason that this is not performance critical because it doesn't happen
on the diagnostic path, it happens along the paths of macro expansion
(could be hot) and new includes (less hot).
Saves some includes:
309 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileManager.h
272 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/clang/include/clang/Basic/FileSystemOptions.h
271 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/VirtualFileSystem.h
267 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/FileSystem.h
266 - /usr/local/google/home/rnk/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/Support/Chrono.h
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75406
Module.h takes 86ms to parse, mostly parsing the class itself. Avoid it
if possible. ASTContext.h depends on ExternalASTSource.h.
A few NFC changes were needed to make this possible:
- Move ASTSourceDescriptor to Module.h. This needs Module to be
complete, and seems more related to modules and AST files than
external AST sources.
- Move "import complete" bit from Module* pointer int pair to
NextLocalImport pointer. Required because PointerIntPair<Module*,...>
requires Module to be complete, and now it may not be.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75784
The indexes need to start at 0 but in D74951 I removed the first parameter
and didn't decrement all the indexes. This patch at least makes sure that
LLDB logging no longer crashes (but it still deadlocks).
The GetOffset documentation was copied from the function above
so I completely deleted that one. The rest was just outdated
documentation that didn't keep up with renamed or changed
function parameters/return types.
This member is for some reason initialized in ClangASTSource::FindExternalVisibleDecls
so all other functions using this member dereference a nullptr unless we
call this function before that. Let's just initialize this in the constructor.
This should be NFC as the only side effect is that we don't reset the namespace map
when calling ClangASTSource::FindExternalVisibleDecls multiple times (and we never
call this function multiple times for one NameSearchContext from what I can see).
The size of NameSearchContext isn't important as we never store it and rarely
allocate more than a few. This way we also don't have to use the memset to
initialize these fields to zero.
Summary:
We have a lot of code in our lookup code to pass around `current_id` counters which end up in our logs like this:
```
AOCTV::FT [234] Found XYZ
```
This patch removes all of this code because:
* I'm splitting up all humongous functions, so I need to write more and more boilerplate to pass around these ids.
* I never saw any similar counters in the LLDB/LLVM code base.
* They're essentially globals and the last thing we need in LLDB is even more global state.
* They're not really useful when readings logs. It doesn't help that there isn't just 1 or 2 counters, but 12 (!) unique counters. I always thought that if I see two identical counter values in those brackets it's the same lookup request, but it seems that's only true by accident (and you can't know which of the 12 counters is actually printed without reading the code). The only time I know I can trust the counters is when it's obvious from the log that it's the same counter like in the log below, but then why have the counters in the first place?
```
LayoutRecordType[28] on (ASTContext*)0x00007FFA1C840200 'scratch ASTContext' for (RecordDecl*)0x00007FFA0AAE8CF0 [name = '__tree']
LRT[28] returned:
LRT[28] Original = (RecordDecl*)%p
LRT[28] Size = %lld
LRT[28] Alignment = %lld
LRT[28] Fields:
LRT[28] (FieldDecl*)0x00007FFA1A13B1D0, Name = '__begin_node_', Offset = 0 bits
LRT[28] (FieldDecl*)0x00007FFA1C08FD30, Name = '__pair1_', Offset = 64 bits
LRT[28] (FieldDecl*)0x00007FFA1C061210, Name = '__pair3_', Offset = 128 bits
LRT[28] Bases:
```
Reviewers: labath, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, shafik, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74951
Summary:
All of our lookup APIs either use `CompilerDeclContext &` or `CompilerDeclContext *` semi-randomly it seems.
This leads to us constantly converting between those two types (and doing nullptr checks when going from
pointer to reference). It also leads to the confusing situation where we have two possible ways to express
that we don't have a CompilerDeclContex: either a nullptr or an invalid CompilerDeclContext (aka a default
constructed CompilerDeclContext).
This moves all APIs to use references and gets rid of all the nullptr checks and conversions.
Reviewers: labath, mib, shafik
Reviewed By: labath, shafik
Subscribers: shafik, arphaman, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74607
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
The previously landed patch got reverted because it was lacking:
(1) A plugin definition for the Objective-C language runtime,
(2) The dependency between the Static and WASM dynamic loader,
(3) Explicit initialization of ScriptInterpreterNone for lldb-test.
All issues have been addressed in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
Sema::RequireCompleteTypeImpl is supposed to have an assert that checks that the
SourceLocation that is passed in is always valid. It's currently commented out, but
as soon as this assert goes active, nearly every LLDB expression will start crashing as
we always pass in an invalid SourceLocation from the ASTResultSynthesizer.
This patch just passes in the valid SourceLocation of the expression (which is
the SourceLocation where the complete type is required) to prevent that from happening.
Summary:
lldb-forward.h is convenient in many ways, but having clang-based
class forward declarations in there makes it easy to proliferate uses of clang
outside of plugins. Removing them makes you much more conscious of when
you're using something from clang and marks where we're using things
from clang in non-plugins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73935
Summary:
I think that there are very few things from clang that actually need forward
declaration, so not having a ClangForward header makes sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73827
Med Ismail Bennani