LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
Summary:
The ClangModulesDeclVendor is currently interpreting all injected `@import` statements in our expression
wrapper as modules that the user has explicitly requested to be persistently loaded. As we inject
`@import` statements with our std module prototype, the ClangModulesDeclVendor will start compiling
and loading unrelated C++ modules because it thinks the user has requested that it should load them. As
the ClangModulesDeclVendor is lacking the setup to compile these modules (e.g. it lacks the include paths),
it will then actually just fail to compile them and cause the whole expression evaluation to fail. This causes
these tests to fail on systems that enable the ClangModulesDeclVendor (such as macOS).
This patch fixes this by preventing the ClangModulesDeclVendor from interpreting `@import` statements
in the wrapper source code. This is done by check if the import happens in the fake source file containing
our wrapper code (which implies it was generated by LLDB).
This patch doesn't reenable the tests as there is more work needed to get the tests running on macOS (D67760)
Reviewers: aprantl, shafik, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61565
llvm-svn: 372690
Summary:
Currently our expression evaluators only prints very basic errors that are not very useful when writing complex expressions.
For example, in the expression below the user made a type error, but it's not clear from the diagnostic what went wrong:
```
(lldb) expr printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
error: invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'double')
```
This patch enables full Clang diagnostics in our expression evaluator. After this patch the diagnostics for the expression look like this:
```
(lldb) expr printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
error: <user expression 1>:1:54: invalid operands to binary expression ('int' and 'float')
printf("Modulos are:", foobar%mo1, foobar%mo2, foobar%mo3)
~~~~~~^~~~
```
To make this possible, we now emulate a user expression file within our diagnostics. This prevents that the user is exposed to
our internal wrapper code we inject.
Note that the diagnostics that refer to declarations from the debug information (e.g. 'note' diagnostics pointing to a called function)
will not be improved by this as they don't have any source locations associated with them, so caret or line printing isn't possible.
We instead just suppress these diagnostics as we already do with warnings as they would otherwise just be a context message
without any context (and the original diagnostic in the user expression should be enough to explain the issue).
Fixes rdar://24306342
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, shafik, #lldb
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, #lldb
Subscribers: usaxena95, davide, jingham, aprantl, arphaman, kadircet, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65646
llvm-svn: 372203
Summary:
In r259902, LLDB started injecting all the locals in every expression
evaluation. This fixed a bunch of issues, but also caused others, mostly
performance regressions on some codebases. The regressions were bad
enough that we added a setting in r274783 to control the behavior and
we have been shipping with the setting off to avoid the perf regressions.
This patch changes the logic injecting the local variables to only inject
the ones present in the expression typed by the user. The approach is
fairly simple and just scans the typed expression for every local name.
Hopefully this gives us the best of both world as it just realizes the
types of the variables really used by the expression.
Landing this requires the 2 other issues I pointed out today to be addressed
but I wanted to gather comments right away.
Original patch by Frédéric Riss!
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: teemperor, labath, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46551
llvm-svn: 359773
Summary:
This patch is the MVP version of importing the std module into the expression parser to improve C++ debugging.
What happens in this patch is that we inject a `@import std` into our expression source code. We also
modify our internal Clang instance for parsing this expression to work with modules and debug info
at the same time (which is the main change in terms of LOC). We implicitly build the `std` module on the first use. The
C++ include paths for building are extracted from the debug info, which means that this currently only
works if the program is compiled with `-glldb -fmodules` and uses the std module. The C include paths
are currently specified by LLDB.
I enabled the tests currently only for libc++ and Linux because I could test this locally. I'll enable the tests
for other platforms once this has landed and doesn't break any bots (and I implemented the platform-specific
C include paths for them).
With this patch we can now:
* Build a libc++ as a module and import it into the expression parser.
* Read from the module while also referencing declarations from the debug info. E.g. `std::abs(local_variable)`.
What doesn't work (yet):
* Merging debug info and C++ module declarations. E.g. `std::vector<CustomClass>` doesn't work.
* Pretty much anything that involves the ASTImporter and templated code. As the ASTImporter is used for saving the result declaration, this means that we can't
call yet any function that returns a non-trivial type.
* Use libstdc++ for this, as it requires multiple include paths and Clang only emits one include path per module. Also libstdc++ doesn't support Clang modules without patches.
Reviewers: aprantl, jingham, shafik, friss, davide, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: labath, mgorny, abidh, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Tags: #c_modules_in_lldb, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58125
llvm-svn: 355939
Jonas Devlieghere