It removes some needless deep indentation and some redundant statements.
It prepares the code for a more clean next patch - DWARF index callbacks
D77327.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77326
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
This is mostly useful for Swift support; it allows LLDB to substitute
a matching SDK it shipped with instead of the sysroot path that was
used at compile time.
The goal of this is to make the Xcode SDK something that behaves more
like the compiler's resource directory, as in that it ships with LLDB
rather than with the debugged program. This important primarily for
importing Swift and Clang modules in the expression evaluator, and
getting at the APINotes from the SDK in Swift.
For a cross-debugging scenario, this means you have to have an SDK for
your target installed alongside LLDB. In Xcode this will always be the
case.
rdar://problem/60640017
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76471
This is a preparation for an upcoming patch which adds support for
DWARFv5 unit index sections. The patch adds tag "_EXT_" to identifiers
which reference sections that are deprecated in the DWARFv5 standard.
See D75929 for the discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77141
Apparently the intention was to copy the condition above:
if (types.GetSize() >= max_matches)
break;
So that if the iteration stopped because of too many matches we do not
add even more matches in this 'Clang modules' block downward.
It was implemented by:
SymbolFileDWARF: Unconditionally scan through clang modules. NFCish
fe9eaadd68
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77336
It is an obvious part of D77326.
It removes some needless deep indentation and some redundant statements.
It prepares the code for a more clean next patch - DWARF index callbacks
in D77327.
The old name was a bit misleading because the functions actually return
contributions to the corresponding sections.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77302
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
When parsing DWARF and laying out bit-fields we currently don't take into account whether we have a base class or not.
Currently if the first field is a bit-field but the bit offset is due a field we inherit from a base class we currently
treat it as an unnamed bit-field and therefore add an extra field.
This fix will not check if we have a base class and assume that this offset is due to members we are inheriting from the base.
We are currently seeing asserts during codegen when debugging clang::DiagnosticOptions.
This assumption will fail in the case where the first field in the derived class in an unnamed bit-field. Fixing the first field
being an unnamed bit-field looks like it will require a larger change since we will need a way to track or discover the last field offset of the bases(s).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76808
In breakpad, only x86 (and mips) registers have a leading '$' in their
names. Arm architectures use plain register names.
Previously, lldb was assuming all registers have a '$'. Fix the code to
match the (unfortunately, inconsistent) reality.
Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed
on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cause was that lldb looked
up the line location for an artificial frame by subtracting 1 from the
frame's address. For artificial frames, the subtraction must not happen
because the address is already exact.
---
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
This reverts commit 6905394d15. The
changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly because lldb is
subtracting an offset from the DW_AT_call_pc address used for the
artificial frame:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/7171/steps/test/logs/stdio
/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/main.cpp:6:17: error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-NEXT: frame #1: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`func3() at main.cpp:14:3 [opt] [artificial]
^
<stdin>:3:2: note: scanning from here
frame #1: 0x0000000000401127 a.out`func3() at main.cpp:13:4 [opt] [artificial]
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
Fix to get the AST we generate for function templates closer to what clang generates and expects.
We fix which FuntionDecl we are passing to CreateFunctionTemplateSpecializationInfo and we strip
template parameters from the name when creating the FunctionDecl and FunctionTemplateDecl.
These two fixes together fix asserts and ambiguous lookup issues for several cases which are added to the already existing small function template test.
This fixes issues with overloads, overloads and ADL, variadic function templates and templated operator overloads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75761
If a producer emits a nonzero segment size, `lldb` will silently read
incorrect values and crash, or do something worse later as the tuple
size is expected to be 2, rather than 3.
Neither LLVM, nor GCC produce segmented aranges, but this dangerous case
should still be checked and handled.
Reviewed by: clayborg, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75925
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Summary:
Currently `SymbolFileDWARF::TypeSet` is a typedef to a `std::set<Type *>`.
In `SymbolFileDWARF::GetTypes` we iterate over a TypeSet variable when finding
types so that logic is non-deterministic as it depends on the actual pointer address values.
This patch changes the `TypeSet` to a `llvm::UniqueVector` which always iterates in
the order in which we inserted the types into the list.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: mgrang, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75481
The convention is that the dwp file name is derived from the name of the
file holding the executable code, even if the linked portion of the
debug info is elsewhere (objcopy --only-keep-debug).
Summary:
When we added support for type units in dwo files, we changed the
"manual" dwarf index to index _all_ dwarf units in the dwo file instead
of just the split unit belonging to our skeleton unit. This was fine for
dwo files, as they contain only a single compile units and type units do
not have a split type unit which would point to them.
However, this does not work for dwp files because, these files do
contain multiple split compile units, and the current approach means
that each unit gets indexed multiple times (once for each split unit =>
n^2 complexity).
This patch teaches the manual dwarf index to treat dwp files specially.
Any type units in the dwp file added to the main list of compile units
and indexed with them in a single batch. Split compile units in dwp
files are still indexed as a part of their skeleton unit -- this is done
because we need the DW_AT_language attribute from the skeleton unit to
index them properly.
Handling of dwo files remains unchanged -- all units (type and skeleton)
are indexed when we reach the dwo file through the split unit.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, aprantl
Subscribers: arphaman, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74964
Change the return value of SymbolFileDWARF::DebugInfo from a pointer to
a reference, and remove all null checks.
Previously, we were not constructing the DebugInfo object when the
debug_info section was empty. Now we always construct the object but
it will return an empty list of dwarf units (a thing which it already
supported).
The only thing needed was to account for the offset from the
debug_cu_index section when searching for the location list.
This patch also fixes a bug in the Module::ParseAllDebugSymbols
function, which meant that we would only parse the variables of the
first compile unit in the module. This function is only used from
lldb-test, so this does not fix any real issue, besides preventing me
from writing a test for this patch.
Summary:
In dwp files a constant (from the debug_cu_index section) needs to be
added to each reference into the debug_str_offsets section.
I've tried to implement this to roughly match the llvm flow: I've
changed the DWARFormValue to stop resolving the indirect string
references directly -- instead, it calls into DWARFUnit, which resolves
this for it (similar to how it already resolves indirect range and
location list references). I've also done a small refactor of the string
offset base computation code in DWARFUnit in order to make it easier to
access the debug_cu_index base offset.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74723
Summary:
All of our lookup APIs either use `CompilerDeclContext &` or `CompilerDeclContext *` semi-randomly it seems.
This leads to us constantly converting between those two types (and doing nullptr checks when going from
pointer to reference). It also leads to the confusing situation where we have two possible ways to express
that we don't have a CompilerDeclContex: either a nullptr or an invalid CompilerDeclContext (aka a default
constructed CompilerDeclContext).
This moves all APIs to use references and gets rid of all the nullptr checks and conversions.
Reviewers: labath, mib, shafik
Reviewed By: labath, shafik
Subscribers: shafik, arphaman, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74607
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
The previously landed patch got reverted because it was lacking:
(1) A plugin definition for the Objective-C language runtime,
(2) The dependency between the Static and WASM dynamic loader,
(3) Explicit initialization of ScriptInterpreterNone for lldb-test.
All issues have been addressed in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D73206#1871895 there is both
`DIERef` and `user_id_t` and sometimes (for DWZ) we need to encode Main
CU into them and sometimes we cannot as it is unavailable at that point
and at the same time not even needed.
I have also noticed `DIERef` and `user_id_t` in fact contain the same
information which can be seen in SymbolFileDWARF::GetUID.
SB* API/ABI is already using `user_id_t` and it needs to encode Main CU
for DWZ. Therefore what about making `DIERef` the identifier not
containing Main CU and `user_id_t` the identifier containing Main CU?
It is sort of a revert of D63322.
I find this patch as a NFC cleanup to the codebase - to satisfy a new
premise `user_id_t` is used as little as possible and thus only for
external interfaces which must not deal with MainCU in any way.
Its larger goal is to satisfy a plan to implement DWZ support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74637
Summary:
This patch removes the bitrotted SymbolFileDWARF(Dwo)Dwp classes, and
replaces them with dwp support implemented directly inside
SymbolFileDWARFDwo, in a manner mirroring the implementation in llvm.
This patch does:
- add support for the .debug_cu_index section to our DWARFContext
- adds a llvm::DWARFUnitIndex argument to the DWARFUnit constructors.
This argument is used to look up the offsets of the debug_info and
debug_abbrev contributions in the sections of the dwp file.
- makes sure the creation of the DebugInfo object as well as the initial
discovery of DWARFUnits is thread-safe, as we can now call this
concurrently when doing parallel indexing.
This patch does not:
- use the DWARFUnitIndex to search for other kinds of contributions
(debug_loc, debug_ranges, etc.). This means that units which reference
these sections will not work correctly. These will be handled by
follow-up patches, but even the present level of support is sufficient
to enable basic functionality.
- Make the llvm::DWARFContext thread-safe. Right now, it just avoids this
problem by ensuring everything is initialized ahead of time. However,
this is something we will run into more often as we try to use more of
llvm, and so I plan to start looking into our options here.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73783
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D73206#1871895> simplifying
usage of `user_id_t`.
There is even written:
// The compile unit ID is the index of the DWARF unit.
DWARFUnit *dwarf_cu = info->GetUnitAtIndex(comp_unit->GetID());
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74670
Davide Italiano