Since D77214 there is a testsuite regression for TestFixIts.py
on Fedora 31 x86_64.
File "/home/jkratoch/redhat/llvm-monorepo/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/fixits/TestFixIts.py", line 148, in test_with_target
self.assertEquals(value.GetError().GetCString(), "error: No value")
AssertionError: 'error: error: Multiple internal symbols found for \'d\'\nid = {0x00000d2a}, ran [truncated]... != 'error: No value'
That is because Fedora glibc incl. libm.so contains also ELF debug
symbols and there exists a 'd' symbol:
(gdb) p d
$1 = {i = {0, 1076887552}, d = 16}
(gdb) p &d
$2 = (const number *) 0x7ffff78e8bc0 <d>
(gdb) info sym 0x7ffff78e8bc0
d in section .rodata of /lib64/libm.so.6
$ nm /lib64/libm.so.6 |grep ' d$'
00000000000bfbc0 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
00000000000caa20 r d
glibc-build$ for i in `find -name "*.o"`;do nm 2>/dev/null $i|grep ' d$' && echo $i;done
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan-fma4.o
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan-avx.o
0000000000000080 r d
./math/s_atan.o
The final function call to `test_X` is failing on aarch64-linux with SIGILL.
Function calls to previous expressions seem to just not work on aarch64-linux
but I don't see another way to test the multiple-run Fix-Its.
This patch refactors the test that the skipIf for aarch64 Linux only covers
the part of the test that was added D77214.
I fixed the bug that the "log timer" has no tab command.
Original code has the only CommandObjectLogTimer class, but it is not
sufficient. Thus I divided the content of CommandObjectLog class into
CommandObjectLogEnable class, CommandObjectLogDisable class,
CommandObjectLogDump class, CommandObjectLogReset class,
CommandObjectLogIncrement class.
Reviewed by: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76906
Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.
This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).
The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: shafik, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
Summary:
LLDB currently applies Fix-Its if they are attached to a Clang diagnostic that has the
severity "error". Fix-Its connected to warnings and other severities are supposed to
be ignored as LLDB doesn't seem to trust Clang Fix-Its in these situations.
However, LLDB also ignores all Fix-Its coming from "note:" diagnostics. These diagnostics
are usually emitted alongside other diagnostics (both warnings and errors), either to keep
a single diagnostic message shorter or because the Fix-It is in a different source line. As they
are technically their own (non-error) diagnostics, we currently are ignoring all Fix-Its associated with them.
For example, this is a possible Clang diagnostic with a Fix-It that is currently ignored:
```
error: <user expression 1>:2:10: too many arguments provided to function-like macro invocation
ToStr(0, {,})
^
<user expression 1>:1:9: macro 'ToStr' defined here
#define ToStr(x) #x
^
<user expression 1>:2:1: cannot use initializer list at the beginning of a macro argument
ToStr(0, {,})
^ ~~~~
```
We also don't store "note:" diagnostics at all, as LLDB's abstraction around the whole diagnostic
concept doesn't have such a concept. The text of "note:" diagnostics is instead
appended to the last non-note diagnostic (which is causing that there is no "note:" text in the
diagnostic above, as all the "note:" diagnostics have been appended to the first "error: ..." text).
This patch fixes the ignored Fix-Its in note-diagnostics by appending them to the last non-note
diagnostic, similar to the way we handle the text in these diagnostics.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, jingham
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77055
This patch was reverted because it introduced a failure in
TestHelloWorld.py. The reason for that was running "ls" shell command
failed as it was evaluated in an environment with an empty path. This
has now been fixed with D77123, which ensures that all shell commands
inherit the host environment, so this patch should be safe to recommit.
The original commit message was:
A defensive check in ProcessLauncherWindows meant that we would never
attempt to launch a process with a completely empty environment -- the
host environment would be used instead. Instead, I make the function add
an extra null wchar_t at the end of an empty environment. The
documentation on this is a bit fuzzy, but it seems to be what is needed
to make windows accept these kinds of environments.
Reviewers: amccarth, friss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76835
Summary:
If we don't have a current frame then we can still run many expressions
as long as we have an active target. With this patch `expect_expr` directly
calls the target's EvaluateExpression function when there is no current frame.
Reviewers: labath
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77197
This reverts commit because of test failures in TestHelloWorld.
It seems that this test (specifically running "ls" as a platform shell
command) depended on the implicit passing of the host environment.
The fix should be fairly simple (inherit the environment explicitly),
but it may take me a while to figure where exactly to do that. Revert
while I am figuring that out.
Summary:
A defensive check in ProcessLauncherWindows meant that we would never
attempt to launch a process with a completely empty environment -- the
host environment would be used instead. Instead, I make the function add
an extra null wchar_t at the end of an empty environment. The
documentation on this is a bit fuzzy, but it seems to be what is needed
to make windows accept these kinds of environments.
Reviewers: amccarth, friss
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76835
Commit 83c81c0a46 enabled Fix-Its for top-level
expressions which change the error message of this test here as Clang comes
up with a strange Fix-It for this expression. This patch just changes the
test to declare a void variable so that Clang doesn't see a way to
recover with a Fix-It and change the error message.
Summary:
Currently top-level expressions won't automatically get Fix-Its applied. The reason
for that is that we only set the `m_fixed_text` member if we have a wrapping
source code (I.e. `m_source_code` is not zero and is wrapping some expressions).
This patch just always sets `m_fixed_text` to get this working.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77042
There an option: EvaluateExpressionOptions::SetResultIsInternal to indicate
whether the result number should be returned to the pool or not. It
got broken when the PersistentExpressionState was refactored.
This fixes the issue and provides a test of the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76532
The newly introduced tests for unsetting environment variables
is failing on Windows. Skip the test there to allow investigation.
It seems like setting inherit-env to false was never tested
before. Could it be that the Windows process launcher doesn't
honor this setting?
Summary:
The interactions between the environment settings (`target.env-vars`,
`target.inherit-env`) and the inferior life-cycle are non-obvious
today. For example, if `target.inherit-env` is set, the `target.env-vars`
setting will be augmented with the contents of the host environment
the first time the launch environment is queried (usually at
launch). After that point, toggling `target.inherit-env` will have no
effect as there's no tracking of what comes from the host and what is
a user setting.
This patch computes the environment every time it is queried rather
than updating the contents of the `target.env-vars` property. This
means that toggling the `target.inherit-env` property later will now
have the intended effect.
This patch also adds a `target.unset-env-vars` settings that one can
use to remove variables from the launch environment. Using this, you
can inherit all but a few of the host environment.
The way the launch environment is constructed is:
1/ if `target.inherit-env` is set, then read the host environment
into the launch environment.
2/ Remove for the environment the variables listed in
`target.unset-env`.
3/ Augment the launch environment with the contents of
`target.env-vars`. This overrides any common values with the host
environment.
The one functional difference here that could be seen as a regression
is that `target.env-vars` will not contain the inferior environment
after launch. The patch implements a better alternative in the
`target show-launch-environment` command which will return the
environment computed through the above rules.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76470
Summary:
When no arguments or environment is provided to SBTarget::LaunchSimple,
make it use the values surrently set in the target properties. You can
get the current behavior back by passing an empty array instead.
It seems like using the target defaults is a much more intuitive
behavior for those APIs. It's unllikely that anyone passed NULL/None to
this API after having set properties in order to explicitely ignore them.
One direct application of this change is within the testsuite. We have
plenty of tests calling LaunchSimple and passing None as environment.
If you passed --inferior-env to dotest.py to, for example, set
(DY)LD_LIBRARY_PATH, it wouldn't be taken into account.
Reviewers: jingham, labath, #libc_abi!
Subscribers: libcxx-commits, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb, #libc_abi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76045
Summary:
The TargetProperties constructor invokes a series of callbacks to
prime the properties from the default ones. The one callback in
charge of updating the inferior environment was commented out
because it crashed.
The reason for the crash is that TargetProperties is a parent class
of Target and the callbacks were invoked using a Target that was
not fully initialized. This patch moves the initial callback
invocations to a separate function that can be called at the end
the Target constructor, thus preventing the crash.
One existing test had to be modified, because the initialization of
the environment properties now take place at the time the target is
created, not at the first use of the environment (usually launch
time).
The added test checks that the LaunchInfo object returned by
the target has been primed with the values from the settings.
Reviewers: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76009
Summary:
LLDB keeps statistics of how many expression evaluations are 'successful' and 'failed'
which are updated after each expression evaluation (assuming statistics are enabled).
From what I understand the idea is that this could be used to define how well LLDB's
expression evaluator is working.
Currently all expressions are considered successful unless the user passes an explicit
positive element counting to the expression command (with the `-Z` flag) and then passes
an expression that successfully evaluates to a type that doesn't support element counting.
Expressions that fail to parse, execute or any other outcome are considered successful
at the moment which means we nearly always have a 100% expression evaluation
success rate.
This patch makes that expressions that fail to parse or execute to count as failed
expressions.
We can't know whether the expression failed because of an user error
of because LLDB couldn't correctly parse/compile it, but I would argue that this is
still an improvement. Assuming that the percentage of valid user expressions stays
mostly constant over time (which seems like a reasonable assumption), then this
way we can still see if we are doing relatively better/worse from release to release.
Reviewers: davide, aprantl, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76280
This patch changes the way the StackFrame Recognizers match a certain
frame.
Until now, recognizers could be registered with a function
name but also an alternate symbol.
This change is motivated by a test failure for the Assert frame
recognizer on Linux. Depending the version of the libc, the abort
function (triggered by an assertion), could have more than two
signatures (i.e. `raise`, `__GI_raise` and `gsignal`).
Instead of only checking the default symbol name and the alternate one,
lldb will iterate over a list of symbols to match against.
rdar://60386577
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76188
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Global properties are shared between debugger instances and
if a test doesn't clear changes in settings it made,
this leads to side effects in other tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75537
There is still the bug that empty lines seem to skip any following expressions
and it makes it harder to commend between all the comments. Let's make this
a normal test instead which is just slightly more verbose but can be properly
formatted.
Some tests set settings and don't clean them up, this leads to side effects in other tests.
The patch removes a global debugger instance with a per-test debugger to avoid such effects.
From what I see, lldb.DBG was needed to determine the platform before a test is run,
lldb.selected_platform is used for this purpose now. Though, this required adding a new function
to the SBPlatform interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74903
Since the `platform process` commamnd has more tests now, this commits
separates each of the `platform process` subcommand's test in its own directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74836
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
Around a third of our test sources have LLVM license headers. This patch removes those headers from all test
sources and also fixes any tests that depended on the length of the license header.
The reasons for this are:
* A few tests verify line numbers and will start failing if the number of lines in the LLVM license header changes. Once I landed my patch for valid SourceLocations in debug info we will probably have even more tests that verify line numbers.
* No other LLVM project is putting license headers in its test files to my knowledge.
* They make the test sources much more verbose than they have to be. Several tests have longer license headers than the actual test source.
For the record, the following tests had their line numbers changed to pass with the removal of the license header:
lldb-api :: functionalities/breakpoint/breakpoint_by_line_and_column/TestBreakpointByLineAndColumn.py
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestGDBRemoteRepro.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestMultipleTargets.test
lldb-shell :: Reproducer/TestReuseDirectory.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test
lldb-shell :: ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook.test
lldb-api :: lang/objc/exceptions/TestObjCExceptions.py
Reviewers: #lldb, espindola, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: emaste, aprantl, arphaman, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74839
Summary:
Currently when printing data types we include implicit scopes such as inline namespaces or anonymous namespaces.
This leads to command output like this (for `std::set<X>` with X being in an anonymous namespace):
```
(lldb) print my_set
(std::__1::set<(anonymous namespace)::X, std::__1::less<(anonymous namespace)::X>, std::__1::allocator<(anonymous namespace)::X> >) $0 = size=0 {}
```
This patch removes all the implicit scopes when printing type names in TypeSystemClang::GetDisplayTypeName
so that our output now looks like this:
```
(lldb) print my_set
(std::set<X, std::less<X>, std::allocator<X> >) $0 = size=0 {}
```
As previously GetDisplayTypeName and GetTypeName had the same output we actually often used the
two as if they are the same method (they were in fact using the same implementation), so this patch also
fixes the places where we actually want the display type name and not the actual type name.
Note that this doesn't touch the `GetTypeName` class that for example the data formatters use, so this patch
is only changes the way we display types to the user. The full type name can also still be found when passing
'-R' to see the raw output of a variable in case someone is somehow interested in that.
Partly fixes rdar://problem/59292534
Reviewers: shafik, jingham
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: christof, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74478
All calls to operator new in this test fail for me with:
```
expression --show-types -- *(new foo(47))`
Error output:
error: Execution was interrupted, reason: internal c++ exception breakpoint(-6)..
The process has been returned to the state before expression evaluation.
```
As calling operator new isn't the idea of this test, this patch moves that
logic to the binary with some new_* utility functions and explicitly tests
this logic in the constructor test (where we can isolate the failures and
skip them on Linux).
Commit 82b47b2978 changes the way the stdlib.h
header is structured which seems to cause strange lookup failures in the modules
build. This updates a few failing tests so that they pass with the new
behavior of stdlib.h.
See the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/rG82b47b2978405f802a33b00d046e6f18ef6a47be
Summary:
The error message from the construct `assertTrue(a == b, "msg") ` are nearly always completely useless for actually debugging the issue.
This patch is just replacing this construct (and similar ones like `assertTrue(a != b, ...)` with the proper call to assertEqual or assertNotEquals.
This patch was mostly written by a shell script with some manual verification afterwards:
```
lang=python
import sys
def sanitize_line(line):
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " == " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertEquals(")
line = line.replace(" == ", ", ", 1)
if line.strip().startswith("self.assertTrue(") and " != " in line:
line = line.replace("self.assertTrue(", "self.assertNotEqual(")
line = line.replace(" != ", ", ", 1)
return line
for a in sys.argv[1:]:
with open(a, "r") as f:
lines = f.readlines()
with open(a, "w") as f:
for line in lines:
f.write(sanitize_line(line))
```
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74475
Jan Kratochvil