In DWARF5 DW_AT_low_pc (and DW_AT_entry_pc, and possibly others) can use
DW_FORM_addrx to refer to the address indirectly. This means we need to
have processed the DW_AT_addr_base attribute before we can do anything
with these.
Since we were processing the unit attributes serially, this created a
problem in cases where the DW_AT_addr_base comes after DW_AT_low_pc --
we would end up computing the wrong unit base address, which also
corrupted any values which later depended on that (for instance range
lists). Clang currently always emits DW_AT_addr_base last.
The fix is simple -- process DW_AT_addr_base first, regardless of its
position in the attribute list.
the value of DW_AT_rnglists_base of the skeleton unit is for that unit
alone (e.g. used in DW_AT_ranges of the unit DIE) and should not apply
to the split unit.
The split unit has a hardcoded range list base value -- we should
initialize range list code whenever we detect a nonempty
debug_rnglists.dwo section.
Summary:
Our rnglist support was working only for the trivial cases (one CU),
because we only ever parsed one contribution out of the debug_rnglists
section. This means we were never able to resolve range lists for the
second and subsequent units (DW_FORM_sec_offset references came out
blang, and DW_FORM_rnglistx references always used the ranges lists from
the first unit).
Since both llvm and lldb rnglist parsers are sufficiently
self-contained, and operate similarly, we can fix this problem by
switching to the llvm parser instead. Besides the changes which are due
to variations in the interface, the main thing is that now the range
list object is a member of the DWARFUnit, instead of the entire symbol
file. This ensures that each unit can get it's own private set of range
list indices, and is consistent with how llvm's DWARFUnit does it
(overall, I've tried to structure the code the same way as the llvm
version).
I've also added a test case for the two unit scenario.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: dblaikie, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71021
Summary:
Lldb's "format-independent" debug info made use of the fact that DWARF
(<=4) did not use the file index zero, and reused the support file index
zero for storing the compile unit name.
While this provided some convenience for DWARF<=4, it meant that the PDB
plugin needed to artificially remap file indices in order to free up
index 0. Furthermore, DWARF v5 make file index 0 legal, which meant that
similar remapping would be needed in the dwarf plugin too.
What this patch does instead is remove the requirement of having the
compile unit name in the index 0. It is not that useful since the name
can always be fetched from the CompileUnit object. Remapping code in the
pdb plugin(s) has been removed or simplified.
DWARF plugin has started inserting an empty FileSpec at index 0 to
ensure the indices keep matching up (in case of DWARF<=4). For DWARF5,
we insert the file 0 from the line table.
I add a test to ensure we can correctly lookup line table entries
referencing file 0, and in particular the case where the file 0 is also
duplicated in another file entry, as this is how clang produces line
tables in some circumstances (see pr44170). Though this is probably a
bug in clang, this is not forbidden by DWARF, and lldb already has
support for that in some (but not all) cases -- this adds a test for the
code path which was not fixed in this patch.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70954
The previous fix attempt, in 62a635e864, used too much escaping
for the backslashes.
But instead of using regexes to match both path separator forms,
remove the path altogether to unify the output from the testcase
between platforms.
If filling in a DataExtractor from an ObjectFile, e.g. via the
ReadSectionData method, the output DataExtractor gets the address
size from the m_data member.
ObjectFile's m_data member is initialized without knowledge about
the address size (so the address size is set based on the host's
sizeof(void*), and at that point within ObjectFile's constructor,
virtual methods implemented in subclasses (like GetAddressByteSize())
can't be called, therefore fix it up when filling in external
DataExtractors.
This makes sure that line tables from executables with a different
address size are parsed properly; previously this tripped up
DWARFDebugLine::LineTable::parse for 32 bit executables on a 64 bit
host, as the address size in the line table (4) didn't match the
one set in the DWARFDataExtractor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70848
Summary:
I recently re-discovered that the unsinged stream operators of the
lldb_private::Stream class have a surprising behavior in that they print
the number in hex. This is all the more confusing because the "signed"
versions of those operators behave normally.
Now that, thanks to Raphael, each Stream class has a llvm::raw_ostream
wrapper, I think we should delete most of our formatting capabilities
and just delegate to that. This patch tests the water by just deleting
the operators with the most surprising behavior.
Most of the code using these operators was printing user_id_t values. It
wasn't fully consistent about prefixing them with "0x", but I've tried
to consistenly print it without that prefix, to make it more obviously
different from pointer values.
Reviewers: teemperor, JDevlieghere, jdoerfert
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70241
This is a correctness fix for the Clang DWARF parser that primarily
matters for swift-lldb's ability to import Clang types that were
reconstructed from DWARF into Swift.
rdar://problem/55025799
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70580
This allows explicitly specifying the intended target architecture,
for tests that aren't supposed to be executed, and that don't
require MSVC headers or libraries to be available.
(These tests already implicitly assumed to be built for x86; one
didn't specify anything, assuming x86_64, while the other specified
--arch=32, which only picks the 32 bit variant of the default target
architecture).
Join two comment lines in disassembly.cpp, to keep row numbers
checked in the test unchanged.
This fixes running check-lldb on arm linux.
Previously when this was applied (in 95980409e6), it broke
macos buildbots, as they added "-isysroot <path>" to all %clang*
substitutions, and clang-cl didn't support that.
Reapplying it without further changes to this patch, after D69619
(9c73925226), because now, such extra parameters are added to
%clang_host*, but not to plain %clang_cl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69031
Summary:
Not all minidumps contain information about memory permissions. However,
it is still important to know which regions of memory contain
potentially executable code. This is particularly important for
unwinding on win32, as the default unwind method there relies on
scanning the stack for things which "look like" code pointers.
This patch enables ProcessMinidump to reconstruct the likely permissions
of memory regions using the sections of loaded object files. It only
does this if we don't have a better source (memory info list stream, or
linux /proc/maps) for this information, and only if the information in
the object files does not conflict with the information in the minidump.
Theoretically that last bit could be improved, since the permissions
obtained from the MemoryList streams is also only a very rough guess,
but it did not seem worthwhile to complicate the implementation because
of that because there will generally be no overlap in practice as the
MemoryList will contain the stack contents and not any module data.
The patch adds a test checking that the module section permissions are
entered into the memory region list, and also a test which demonstrate
that now the unwinder is able to correctly find return addresses even in
minidumps without memory info list streams.
There's one TODO left in this patch, which is that the "memory region"
output does not give any indication about the "don't know" values of
memory region permissions (it just prints them as if they permission bit
was set). I address this in a follow up.
Reviewers: amccarth, clayborg
Subscribers: mgrang, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69105
Summary:
This patch addresses an ambiguity in how our existing tests invoke the
compiler. Roughly two thirds of our current "shell" tests invoke the
compiler to build the executables for the host. However, there is also
a significant number of tests which don't build a host binary (because
they don't need to run it) and instead they hardcode a certain target.
We also have code which adds a bunch of default arguments to the %clang
substitutions. However, most of these arguments only really make sense
for the host compilation. So far, this has worked mostly ok, because the
arguments we were adding were not conflicting with the target-hardcoding
tests (though they did provoke an occasional "argument unused" warning).
However, this started to break down when we wanted to use
target-hardcoding clang-cl tests (D69031) because clang-cl has a
substantially different command line, and it was getting very confused
by some of the arguments we were adding on non-windows hosts.
This patch avoid this problem by creating separate %clang(xx,_cl)_host
substutitions, which are specifically meant to be used for compiling
host binaries. All funny host-specific options are moved there. To
ensure that the regular %clang substitutions are not used for compiling
host binaries (skipping the extra arguments) I employ a little
hac^H^H^Htrick -- I add an invalid --target argument to the %clang
substitution, which means that one has to use an explicit --target in
order for the compilation to succeed.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, mstorsjo, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, jfb, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69619
Summary:
We add support for DW_AT_export_symbols to detect anonymous struct on top of the heuristics implemented in D66175
This should allow us to differentiate anonymous structs and unnamed structs.
We also fix TestTypeList.py which was incorrectly detecting an unnamed struct as an anonymous struct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68961
Summary:
This patch fixes a crash encountered when debugging optimized code. If some
variable has been completely optimized out, but it's value is nonetheless known,
the compiler can replace it with a DWARF expression computing its value. The
evaluating these expressions results in a eValueTypeHostAddress Value object, as
it's contents are computed into an lldb buffer. However, any value that is
obtained by dereferencing pointers in this object should no longer have the
"host" address type.
Lldb had code to account for this, but it was only present in the
ValueObjectVariable class. This wasn't enough when the object being described
was a struct, as then the object holding the actual pointer was a
ValueObjectChild. This caused lldb to dereference the contained pointer in the
context of the host process and crash.
Though I am not an expert on ValueObjects, it seems to me that this children
address type logic should apply to all types of objects (and indeed, applying
applying the same logic to ValueObjectChild fixes the crash). Therefore, I move
this code to the base class, and arrange it to be run everytime the value is
updated.
The test case is a reduced and simplified version of the original debug info
triggering the crash. Originally we were dealing with a local variable, but as
these require a running process to display, I changed it to use a global one
instead.
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69273
This allows explicitly specifying the intended target architecture,
for tests that aren't supposed to be executed, and that don't
require MSVC headers or libraries to be available.
(These tests already implicitly assumed to be built for x86; one
didn't specify anything, assuming x86_64, while the other specified
--arch=32, which only picks the 32 bit variant of the default target
architecture).
Join two comment lines in disassembly.cpp, to keep row numbers
checked in the test unchanged.
This fixes running check-lldb on arm linux.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69031
llvm-svn: 375156
The DWARFExpression is parsing the location lists in about five places.
Of those, only one actually had proper support for base address
selection entries.
Since r374600, llvm has started to produce location expressions with
base address selection entries more aggresively, which caused some tests
to fail.
This patch adds support for these entries to the places which had it
missing, fixing the failing tests. It also adds a targeted test for the
two of the three fixes, which should continue testing this functionality
even if the llvm output changes. I am not aware of a way to write a
targeted test for the third fix (DWARFExpression::Evaluate).
llvm-svn: 374769
LLDB has three major testing strategies: unit tests, tests that exercise
the SB API though dotest.py and what we currently call lit tests. The
later is rather confusing as we're now using lit as the driver for all
three types of tests. As most of this grew organically, the directory
structure in the LLDB repository doesn't really make this clear.
The 'lit' tests are part of the root and among these tests there's a
Unit and Suite folder for the unit and dotest-tests. This layout makes
it impossible to run just the lit tests.
This patch changes the directory layout to match the 3 testing
strategies, each with their own directory and their own configuration
file. This means there are now 3 directories under lit with 3
corresponding targets:
- API (check-lldb-api): Test exercising the SB API.
- Shell (check-lldb-shell): Test exercising command line utilities.
- Unit (check-lldb-unit): Unit tests.
Finally, there's still the `check-lldb` target that runs all three test
suites.
Finally, this also renames the lit folder to `test` to match the LLVM
repository layout.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68606
llvm-svn: 374184