Summary:
Introduce new helper functions getVGPRClassForBitWidth,
getAGPRClassForBitWidth, getSGPRClassForBitWidth and use them to
refactor various other functions that all contained their own lists of
valid register class widths. NFC.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78311
Summary:
Use more logic and fewer tables. This reduces the line count and
reduces the effort required to introduce more register classes of
different sizes in future.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec, nhaehnle
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78351
This does for G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT what 588bd7be36 did for G_TRUNC.
Ideally types without a corresponding register class wouldn't reach
here, but we're currently missing some (in particular a 192-bit class
is missing).
This allows targets to know exactly which operands are contributing to
the dependency, which is required for targets with per-operand
scheduling models.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77135
These are needed as a counterpart for VGPR subregs even though
there are no scalar instructions which can operate 16 bit values.
When we are materializing a constant that is done into an SGPR
and that SGPR may/will be copied into a 16 bit VGPR subreg. Such
copy is illegal. There are also similar problems if a source
operand of a 16 bit VALU instruction is an SGPR. In addition
we need to get a register with a lo16 subregister of an SGPR
RC during selection and this fails as well.
All of that makes me believe we need these subregisters as a
syntactic glue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78250
An irreducible SCC is one which has multiple "header" blocks, i.e., blocks
with control-flow edges incident from outside the SCC. This pass converts an
irreducible SCC into a natural loop by introducing a single new header
block and redirecting all the edges on the original headers to this
new block.
This is a useful workaround for a limitation in the structurizer
which, which produces incorrect control flow in the presence of
irreducible regions. The AMDGPU backend provides an option to
enable this pass before the structurizer, which may eventually be
enabled by default.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77198
This restores commit 2ada8e2525.
Originally reverted with commit 44e09b59b8.
This reverts commit 2ada8e2525.
Buildbots produced compilation errors which I was not able to quickly
reproduce locally. Need more time to investigate.
An irreducible SCC is one which has multiple "header" blocks, i.e., blocks
with control-flow edges incident from outside the SCC. This pass converts an
irreducible SCC into a natural loop by introducing a single new header
block and redirecting all the edges on the original headers to this
new block.
This is a useful workaround for a limitation in the structurizer
which, which produces incorrect control flow in the presence of
irreducible regions. The AMDGPU backend provides an option to
enable this pass before the structurizer, which may eventually be
enabled by default.
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77198
Ports the existing DAG combines, minus the simplify demanded bits
which seems to have no equivalent now. Without these, this isn't
particularly helpful in most of the IR sample cases.
Since 1725f28841, this should check
isFMADLegalForFAddFSub rather than the the plain isOperationLegal.
This would assert in a subset of cases due to an oddity in how FMAD is
selected. We will allow FMA formation pre-legalize, but not FMAD even
in cases where it would be valid.
The current hook requires passing in the root fadd/fsub. However, in
this distributed case, this would be far more complicated to pass in
the relevant operand. AMDGPU doesn't get any value from the node, and
only needs the type and is the only implementor, so I'm not sure why
we have this complexity. Just rename and expand the assert to avoid
the more complicated checks spread through the distribution logic.
Summary:
Updated CallPromotionUtils and impacted sites. Parameters that are
expected to be non-null, and return values that are guranteed non-null,
were replaced with CallBase references rather than pointers.
Left FIXME in places where more changes are facilitated by CallBase, but
aren't CallSites: Instruction* parameters or return values, for example,
where the contract that they are actually CallBase values.
Reviewers: davidxl, dblaikie, wmi
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, eraman, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77930
Selection would fail after the post legalize combiner put an illegal
zextload back together.
The base combiner has parameter to only allow legal operations, but
they appear to not be used. I also don't see a nice way to remove a
single entry from all_combines, so just hack around this.
These will be widened in the DAG. In the meanwhile early
widening prevents otherwise possible vectorization of
such loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77835
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: arsenm, efriedma, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77268
This patch extends existing constant folding in logical operations to
handle S_XNOR, S_NAND, S_NOR, S_ANDN2, S_ORN2, V_LSHL_ADD_U32 and
V_AND_OR_B32. Also added a couple of tests for existing folds.
We can only collapse adjacent SI_END_CF if outer statement
belongs to a simple SI_IF, otherwise correct mask is not in the
register we expect, but is an argument of an S_XOR instruction.
Even if SI_IF is simple it might be lowered using S_XOR because
lowering is dependent on a basic block layout. It is not
considered simple if instruction consuming its output is
not an SI_END_CF. Since that SI_END_CF might have already been
lowered to an S_OR isSimpleIf() check may return false.
This situation is an opportunity for a further optimization
of SI_IF lowering, but that is a separate optimization. In the
meanwhile move SI_END_CF post the lowering when we already know
how the rest of the CFG was lowered since a non-simple SI_IF
case still needs to be handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77610
Now that we have scalable vectors, there's a distinction that isn't
getting captured in the original SequentialType: some vectors don't have
a known element count, so counting the number of elements doesn't make
sense.
In some cases, there's a better way to express the commonality using
other methods. If we're dealing with GEPs, there's GEP methods; if we're
dealing with a ConstantDataSequential, we can query its element type
directly.
In the relatively few remaining cases, I just decided to write out
the type checks. We're talking about relatively few places, and I think
the abstraction doesn't really carry its weight. (See thread "[RFC]
Refactor class hierarchy of VectorType in the IR" on llvmdev.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75661
The extracts from control flow intrinsics are already properly handled
by divergence analysis. The inline asm case isn't dead, but has also
never really worked correctly so leave it as-is for now.
Craig Topper