Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Krzysztof Parzyszek b1d47467e2 [Hexagon] Change HVX vector predicate types from v512/1024i1 to v64/128i1
This commit removes the artificial types <512 x i1> and <1024 x i1>
from HVX intrinsics, and makes v512i1 and v1024i1 no longer legal on
Hexagon.

It may cause existing bitcode files to become invalid.

* Converting between vector predicates and vector registers must be
  done explicitly via vandvrt/vandqrt instructions (their intrinsics),
  i.e. (for 64-byte mode):
    %Q = call <64 x i1> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandvrt(<16 x i32> %V, i32 -1)
    %V = call <16 x i32> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandqrt(<64 x i1> %Q, i32 -1)

  The conversion intrinsics are:
    declare  <64 x i1> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandvrt(<16 x i32>, i32)
    declare <128 x i1> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandvrt.128B(<32 x i32>, i32)
    declare <16 x i32> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandqrt(<64 x i1>, i32)
    declare <32 x i32> @llvm.hexagon.V6.vandqrt.128B(<128 x i1>, i32)
  They are all pure.

* Vector predicate values cannot be loaded/stored directly. This directly
  reflects the architecture restriction. Loading and storing or vector
  predicates must be done indirectly via vector registers and explicit
  conversions via vandvrt/vandqrt instructions.
2020-02-19 14:14:56 -06:00
Brian Cain bf3b86bc2f [Hexagon] v67+ HVX register pairs should support either direction
Assembler now permits pairs like 'v0:1', which are encoded
differently from the odd-first pairs like 'v1:0'.

The compiler will require more work to leverage these new register
pairs.
2020-02-14 12:43:43 -06:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek c12a5917d2 [Hexagon] Add support for Hexagon/HVX v67 ISA 2020-01-20 16:16:49 -06:00
James Molloy 9026518e73 [ModuloSchedule] Peel out prologs and epilogs, generate actual code
Summary:
This extends the PeelingModuloScheduleExpander to generate prolog and epilog code,
and correctly stitch uses through the prolog, kernel, epilog DAG.

The key concept in this patch is to ensure that all transforms are *local*; only a
function of a block and its immediate predecessor and successor. By defining the problem in this way
we can inductively rewrite the entire DAG using only local knowledge that is easy to
reason about.

For example, we assume that all prologs and epilogs are near-perfect clones of the
steady-state kernel. This means that if a block has an instruction that is predicated out,
we can redirect all users of that instruction to that equivalent instruction in our
immediate predecessor. As all blocks are clones, every instruction must have an equivalent in
every other block.

Similarly we can make the assumption by construction that if a value defined in a block is used
outside that block, the only possible user is its immediate successors. We maintain this
even for values that are used outside the loop by creating a limited form of LCSSA.

This code isn't small, but it isn't complex.

Enabled a bunch of testing from Hexagon. There are a couple of tests not enabled yet;
I'm about 80% sure there isn't buggy codegen but the tests are checking for patterns
that we don't produce. Those still need a bit more investigation. In the meantime we
(Google) are happy with the code produced by this on our downstream SMS implementation,
and believe it generates correct code.

Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, jsji, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68205

llvm-svn: 373462
2019-10-02 12:46:44 +00:00
Krzysztof Parzyszek 461e6691eb [Hexagon] Add a few more lit tests
llvm-svn: 327884
2018-03-19 19:03:18 +00:00