One of the checks has been removed as it seem invalid.
The LoopStep size is always almost a 32-bit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75079
Printing floating point number in decimal is inconvenient for humans.
Verbose asm output will print out floating point values in comments, it
helps.
But in lots of cases, users still need additional work to covert the
decimal back to hex or binary to check the bit patterns,
especially when there are small precision difference.
Hexadecimal form is one of the supported form in LLVM IR, and easier for
debugging.
This patch try to print all FP constant in hex form instead.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73566
The hasSideEffect parameter is usually automatically inferred from
instruction patterns. For some of our MVE instructions, we do not have
patterns though, such as for the pre/post inc loads and stores. This
instead specifies the flag manually on the base MVE_VLDRSTR_base
tablegen class, making sure we get this correct.
This can help with scheduling multiple loads more optimally. Here I've
added a unittest as a more direct form of testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73117
We were previously not necessarily favouring postinc for the MVE loads
and stores, leading to extra code prior to the loop to set up the
preinc. MVE in general can benefit from postinc (as we don't have
unrolled loops), and certain instructions like the VLD2's only post-inc
versions are available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70790
Architecturally, it's allowed to have MVE-I without an FPU, thus
-mfpu=none should not disable MVE-I, or moves to/from FP-registers.
This patch removes `+/-fpregs` from features unconditionally added to
target feature list, depending on FPU and moves the logic to Clang
driver, where the negative form (`-fpregs`) is conditionally added to
the target features list for the cases of `-mfloat-abi=soft`, or
`-mfpu=none` without either `+mve` or `+mve.fp`. Only the negative
form is added by the driver, the positive one is derived from other
features in the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71843
While we do manage to fold integer-typed IR in middle-end,
we can't do that for the main motivational case of pointers.
There is @llvm.ptrmask() intrinsic which may or may not be helpful,
but i'm not sure it is fully considered canonical yet,
not everything is fully aware of it likely.
Name: PR44448 ptr - (ptr & C) -> ptr & (~C)
%bias = and i32 %ptr, C
%r = sub i32 %ptr, %bias
=>
%r = and i32 %ptr, ~C
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
Current tail duplication integrated in bb layout is designed to increase the fallthrough from a BB's predecessor to its successor, but we have observed cases that duplication doesn't increase fallthrough, or it brings too much size overhead.
To overcome these two issues in function canTailDuplicateUnplacedPreds I add two checks:
make sure there is at least one duplication in current work set.
the number of duplication should not exceed the number of successors.
The modification in hasBetterLayoutPredecessor fixes a bug that potential predecessor must be at the bottom of a chain.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64376
David Green