Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Nikolai Bozhenov fca527af5c [BypassSlowDivision] Do not bypass division of hash-like values
Disable bypassing if one of the operands looks like a hash value. Slow
division often occurs in hashtable implementations and fast division is
never taken there because a hash value is extremely unlikely to have
enough upper bits set to zero.

A value is considered to be hash-like if it is produced by

1) XOR operation
2) Multiplication by a constant wider than the shorter type
3) PHI node with all incoming values being hash-like

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28200

llvm-svn: 299329
2017-04-02 13:14:30 +00:00
Nikolai Bozhenov 4a04fb9e90 [BypassSlowDivision] Use ValueTracking to simplify run-time checks
ValueTracking is used for more thorough analysis of operands. Based on the
analysis, either run-time checks can be simplified (e.g. check only one operand
instead of two) or the transformation can be avoided. For example, it is quite
often the case that a divisor is promoted from a shorter type and run-time
checks for it are redundant.

With additional compile-time analysis of values, two special cases naturally
arise and are addressed by the patch:

 1) Both operands are known to be short enough. Then, the long division can be
    simply replaced with a short one without CFG modification.

 2) If a division is unsigned and the dividend is known to be short then the
    long division is not needed at all. Because if the divisor is too big for
    short division then the quotient is obviously zero (and the remainder is
    equal to the dividend). Actually, the division is not needed when
    (divisor > dividend).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29897

llvm-svn: 296832
2017-03-02 22:12:15 +00:00