Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Sanjay Patel 8cc6d42e8d [SLP] avoid reduction transform on patterns that the backend can load-combine (2nd try)
The 1st attempt at this modified the cost model in a bad way to avoid the vectorization,
but that caused problems for other users (the loop vectorizer) of the cost model.

I don't see an ideal solution to these 2 related, potentially large, perf regressions:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42708
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43146

We decided that load combining was unsuitable for IR because it could obscure other
optimizations in IR. So we removed the LoadCombiner pass and deferred to the backend.
Therefore, preventing SLP from destroying load combine opportunities requires that it
recognizes patterns that could be combined later, but not do the optimization itself (
it's not a vector combine anyway, so it's probably out-of-scope for SLP).

Here, we add a cost-independent bailout with a conservative pattern match for a
multi-instruction sequence that can probably be reduced later.

In the x86 tests shown (and discussed in more detail in the bug reports), SDAG combining
will produce a single instruction on these tests like:

  movbe   rax, qword ptr [rdi]

or:

  mov     rax, qword ptr [rdi]

Not some (half) vector monstrosity as we currently do using SLP:

  vpmovzxbq       ymm0, dword ptr [rdi + 1] # ymm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,..
  vpsllvq ymm0, ymm0, ymmword ptr [rip + .LCPI0_0]
  movzx   eax, byte ptr [rdi]
  movzx   ecx, byte ptr [rdi + 5]
  shl     rcx, 40
  movzx   edx, byte ptr [rdi + 6]
  shl     rdx, 48
  or      rdx, rcx
  movzx   ecx, byte ptr [rdi + 7]
  shl     rcx, 56
  or      rcx, rdx
  or      rcx, rax
  vextracti128    xmm1, ymm0, 1
  vpor    xmm0, xmm0, xmm1
  vpshufd xmm1, xmm0, 78          # xmm1 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
  vpor    xmm0, xmm0, xmm1
  vmovq   rax, xmm0
  or      rax, rcx
  vzeroupper
  ret

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67841

llvm-svn: 375025
2019-10-16 18:06:24 +00:00
Martin Storsjo dfc1aee25b Revert "[SLP] avoid reduction transform on patterns that the backend can load-combine"
This reverts SVN r373833, as it caused a failed assert "Non-zero loop
cost expected" on building numerous projects, see PR43582 for details
and reproduction samples.

llvm-svn: 373882
2019-10-07 08:21:37 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e2321bb448 [SLP] avoid reduction transform on patterns that the backend can load-combine
I don't see an ideal solution to these 2 related, potentially large, perf regressions:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42708
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43146

We decided that load combining was unsuitable for IR because it could obscure other
optimizations in IR. So we removed the LoadCombiner pass and deferred to the backend.
Therefore, preventing SLP from destroying load combine opportunities requires that it
recognizes patterns that could be combined later, but not do the optimization itself (
it's not a vector combine anyway, so it's probably out-of-scope for SLP).

Here, we add a scalar cost model adjustment with a conservative pattern match and cost
summation for a multi-instruction sequence that can probably be reduced later.
This should prevent SLP from creating a vector reduction unless that sequence is
extremely cheap.

In the x86 tests shown (and discussed in more detail in the bug reports), SDAG combining
will produce a single instruction on these tests like:

  movbe   rax, qword ptr [rdi]

or:

  mov     rax, qword ptr [rdi]

Not some (half) vector monstrosity as we currently do using SLP:

  vpmovzxbq       ymm0, dword ptr [rdi + 1] # ymm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,..
  vpsllvq ymm0, ymm0, ymmword ptr [rip + .LCPI0_0]
  movzx   eax, byte ptr [rdi]
  movzx   ecx, byte ptr [rdi + 5]
  shl     rcx, 40
  movzx   edx, byte ptr [rdi + 6]
  shl     rdx, 48
  or      rdx, rcx
  movzx   ecx, byte ptr [rdi + 7]
  shl     rcx, 56
  or      rcx, rdx
  or      rcx, rax
  vextracti128    xmm1, ymm0, 1
  vpor    xmm0, xmm0, xmm1
  vpshufd xmm1, xmm0, 78          # xmm1 = xmm0[2,3,0,1]
  vpor    xmm0, xmm0, xmm1
  vmovq   rax, xmm0
  or      rax, rcx
  vzeroupper
  ret

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67841

llvm-svn: 373833
2019-10-05 18:03:58 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 8b1eeafb91 [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.

Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel

Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641

llvm-svn: 373166
2019-09-29 14:18:06 +00:00
Jordan Rupprecht f98d2c099a Revert [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
This reverts r372626 (git commit 6a278d9073)

llvm-svn: 373019
2019-09-26 22:09:17 +00:00
Alexey Bataev 6a278d9073 [SLP] Fix for PR31847: Assertion failed: (isLoopInvariant(Operands[i], L) && "SCEVAddRecExpr operand is not loop-invariant!")
Summary:
Initially SLP vectorizer replaced all going-to-be-vectorized
instructions with Undef values. It may break ScalarEvaluation and may
cause a crash.
Reworked SLP vectorizer so that it does not replace vectorized
instructions by UndefValue anymore. Instead vectorized instructions are
marked for deletion inside if BoUpSLP class and deleted upon class
destruction.

Reviewers: mzolotukhin, mkuper, hfinkel, RKSimon, davide, spatel

Subscribers: RKSimon, Gerolf, anemet, hans, majnemer, llvm-commits, sanjoy

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29641

llvm-svn: 372626
2019-09-23 16:25:03 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 4896f7243d [SLPVectorizer] add tests for bogus reductions; NFC
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42708
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43146

llvm-svn: 372393
2019-09-20 14:17:00 +00:00