Summary:
The code `throw -1;` is currently formatted by clang-format as
`throw - 1;`. This diff adds a fix for this edge case and a test to check
for this in the future.
For context, I am looking into a related bug in the clang-formatting of
coroutine keywords: `co_yield -1;` is also reformatted in this manner
as `co_yield - 1;`. A later diff will add these changes and tests for the
`co_yield` and `co_return` keywords.
Patch by Jonathan Thomas (jonathoma)!
Reviewers: modocache, sammccall, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69144
llvm-svn: 375258
Summary:
r373922 added checks for a few tokens that, following an `)` make it
unlikely that the `)` is the closing paren of a cast expression. The
specific check for `tok::l_square` there introduced a regression for
casts of Obj-C calls, like:
```
(cast)[func arg]
```
From the tests added in r373922, I believe the `tok::l_square` case is added to
capture the case where a non-cast `)` is directly followed by an
attribute specifier, like:
```
int f(int x) [[noreturn]];
```
I've specialized the code to look for such attribute specifier instead
of `tok::l_square` in general. Also, I added a regression test and moved
the test cases added in r373922 to an already existing place documenting
other instances of historically misidentified casts.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69164
llvm-svn: 375247
Summary:
r373165 fixed an issue where a templated noexcept member function with a
reference qualifier would be indented more than expected:
```
// Formatting produced with LLVM style with AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
// after:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The way this is done is that in the AnnotatingParser in
`lib/FormatTokenAnnotator.cpp` the determination of the usage of a `&` or `&&`
(the line in determineTokenType
```
Current.Type = determineStarAmpUsage(...
```
is not performed in some cases anymore, combining with a few additional related
checks afterwards. The net effect of these checks results in the `&` or `&&`
token to start being classified as `TT_Unknown` in cases where before `r373165`
it would be classified as `TT_UnaryOperator` or `TT_PointerOrReference` by
`determineStarAmpUsage`.
This inadvertently caused 2 classes of regressions I'm aware of:
- The address-of `&` after a function assignment would be classified as
`TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to surround it, disregarding style options:
```
// before r373165:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = &fun;
// after:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = & fun;
```
- In cases where there is a function declaration list -- looking macro between
a template line and the start of the function declaration, an `&` as part of
the return type would be classified as `TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to
surround it:
```
// before r373165:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type& foo();
// after:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type & foo();
```
In these cases the problems are rooted in the skipping of the classification of
a `&` (and similarly `&&`) by determineStarAmpUsage which effects the formatting
decisions later in the pipeline.
I've looked into the goal of r373165 and noticed that replacing `noexcept` with
`const` in the given example produces no extra indentation with the old code:
```
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & const {}
};
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & noexcept {}
};
```
I investigated how clang-format annotated these two examples differently to
determine the places where the processing of both diverges in the pipeline.
There were two places where the processing diverges, causing the extra indent in
the `noexcept` case:
1. The `const` is annotated as a `TT_TrailingAnnotation`, whereas `noexcept`
is annotated as `TT_Unknown`. I've updated the `determineTokenType` function
to account for this by adding a missing `tok:kw_noexcept` to the clause that
marks a token as `TT_TrailingAnnotation`.
2. The `&` in the second example is wrongly identified as `TT_BinaryOperator`
in `determineStarAmpUsage`. This is the reason for the extra indentation --
clang-format gets confused and thinks this is an expression.
I've updated `determineStarAmpUsage` to check for `tok:kw_noexcept`.
With these two updates in place, the additional parsing introduced by r373165
becomes unnecessary and all added tests pass (with updates, as now clang-format
respects the style configuration for spaces around the `&` in the test
examples).
I've removed these additions and added regression tests for the cases above.
Reviewers: AndWass, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68695
llvm-svn: 374172
Summary:
clang-format is incorrectly thinking the parameter parens are part of a cast operation, this is resulting in there sometimes being not space between the paren and the noexcept (and other keywords like volatile etc..)
```
void operator++(int) noexcept;
void operator++(int &) noexcept;
void operator delete(void *, std::size_t, const std::nothrow_t &)noexcept;
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68481
llvm-svn: 373922
Summary:
This patch makes the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` setting also apply to C++ lambdas with parameters.
Looking through the revision history, it appears support for only array brackets was added, and lambda brackets were ignored. Therefore, I am inclined to think it was simply an omission, rather than a deliberate choice.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17887 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D4944.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68473
llvm-svn: 373821
Summary:
According to the clang-format documentation, "Fundamentally, C++11 braced lists are formatted exactly like function calls would be formatted in their place. If the braced list follows a name (e.g. a type or variable name), clang-format formats as if the `{}` were the parentheses of a function call with that name."
This patch furthers the treatment of C++11 braced list braces as parentheses by respecting the `SpacesInParentheses` setting.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68415
llvm-svn: 373751
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43531
Fix for clang-format incorrectly handles "alternative operators" as described by https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_alternative
compl = ~
not = !
these are unary operators, and clang-format will remove the space between them and a numeric constant
this incorrectly formats the following code
```
int a compl 5;
int a not 5;
```
into:
```
int a compl5;
int a not5;
```
The code adds FIXME unit tests for "alternative token" representations for {} [] and # as defined by the same link, which would require a more detailed change to the FormatTokenLexer
Reviewers: klimek, reuk, owenpan, mitchell-stellar, STL_MSFT
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68332
llvm-svn: 373750
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42417
This revision removes the extra space between the opertor-> and the parens ()
```
class Bug {
auto operator-> () -> int*;
auto operator++(int) -> int;
};
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, byoungyoung, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68242
llvm-svn: 373746
Summary:
When formatting C# there can be issues with a lack of spaces between `using (` , `foreach (` and generic types
The C# code
```
public class Foo
{
Dictionary<string,string> foo;
}
```
will be formatted as
```
public class Foo
{
Dictionary<string, string>foo;
^^^^^ missing a space
}
```
This revision also reverts some of {D66662} in order to make this cleaner and resolve an issues seen by @owenpan that the formatting didn't add a space when not in a code block
This also transforms C# foreach commands to be seen as tok::kw_for commands (to ensure foreach gets the same Brace Wrapping behavior as for without littering the code with `if(Style.isCSharp())`
Reviewers: owenpan, klimek, russellmcc, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67660
llvm-svn: 373709
Summary:
This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43333
This comes with 3 main parts
- C# attributes cause function names on a new line even when AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType is set to None
- Add AlwaysBreakAfterReturnType to None by default in the Microsoft style,
- C# unit tests are not using Microsoft style (which we created to define the default C# style to match a vanilla C# project).
Reviewers: owenpan, klimek, russellmcc, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67629
llvm-svn: 373707
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
Summary:
The historical context:
- clang-format was written when C++11 was current,
and the main language-version concern was >> vs > > template-closers.
An option was added to allow selection of the 03/11 behavior, or auto-detection.
- there was no option to choose simply "latest standard" so anyone who didn't
ever want 03 behavior or auto-detection specified Cpp11.
- In r185149 this option started to affect lexer mode.
- no options were added to cover c++14, as parsing/formatting
didn't change that much. The usage of Cpp11 to mean "latest" became
codified e.g. in r206263
- c++17 added some new constructs. These were mostly backwards-compatible and so
not used in old programs, so having no way to turn them off was OK.
- c++20 added some new constructs and keywords (e.g. co_*) that changed the
meaning of existing programs, and people started to complain that
the c++20 parsing couldn't be turned off.
New plan:
- Default ('Auto') behavior remains unchanged: parse as latest, format
template-closers based on input.
- Add new 'Latest' option that more clearly expresses the intent "use
modern features" that many projects have chosen for their .clang-format files.
- Allow pinning to *any* language version, using the same name as clang -std:
c++03, c++11, c++14 etc. These set precise lexer options, and any
clang-format code depending on these can use a >= check.
- For backwards compatibility, `Cpp11` is an alias for `Latest`, not `c++11`.
This matches the historical documented semantics of this option.
This spelling (and `Cpp03`) are deprecated.
Reviewers: klimek, modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67541
llvm-svn: 373439
Summary:
This is a patch to fix PR43372 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43372) - clang-format can't format file with includes, ( which really keep providing replacements for already sorted headers.)
A similar issue was addressed by @krasimir in {D60199}, however, this seemingly only prevented the issue when the files being formatted did not contain windows line endings (\r\n)
It's possible this is related to https://twitter.com/StephanTLavavej/status/1176722938243895296 given who @STL_MSFT works for!
As people often used the existence of replacements to determine if a file needs clang-formatting, this is probably pretty important for windows users
There may be a better way of comparing 2 strings and ignoring \r (which appear in both Results and Code), I couldn't choose between this idiom or the copy_if approach, but I'm happy to change it to whatever people consider more performant.
Reviewers: krasimir, klimek, owenpan, ioeric
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, STL_MSFT, krasimir
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68227
llvm-svn: 373388
Summary:
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, ilya-biryukov, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Patch By: AndWass
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373165
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Patch by Andreas Wass (AndWass)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373056
Summary:
This new Style rule is made as a part of adding support for NetBSD KNF in clang-format. NetBSD have it's own priority of includes which should be followed while formatting NetBSD code. This style sorts the Cpp Includes according to the priorities of NetBSD, as mentioned in the [Style Guide](http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup)
The working of this Style rule shown below:
**Configuration:**
This revision introduces a new field under IncludeCategories named `SortPriority` which defines the priority of ordering the `#includes` and the `Priority` will define the categories for grouping the `#include blocks`.
Reviewers: cfe-commits, mgorny, christos, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, rdwampler, christos, mgorny, krytarowski
Patch By: Manikishan
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64695
llvm-svn: 372919
Summary:
This patch adds support for the Whitesmiths indentation style to clang-format. It’s an update to a patch submitted in 2015 (D6833), but reworks it to use the newer API.
There are still some issues with this patch, primarily around `switch` and `case` support. The added unit test won’t currently pass because of the remaining issues.
Reviewers: mboehme, MyDeveloperDay, djasper
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay, echristo, cfe-commits
Patch By: @timwoj (Tim Wojtulewicz)
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67627
llvm-svn: 372497
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41899
```auto lambda = [&a = a]() { a = 2; };```
is formatted as
```auto lambda = [& a = a]() { a = 2; };```
With an extra space if PointerAlignment is set to Left
> The space "& a" looks strange when there is no type in the lambda's intializer expression. This can be worked around with by setting "PointerAlignment: Right", but ideally "PointerAlignment: Left" would not add a space in this case.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67718
llvm-svn: 372249
Summary:
AnnotatedLine has a tree structure, and things like the body of a lambda will be
a child of the lambda expression. For example,
[&]() { foo(a); };
will have an AnnotatedLine with a child:
[&]() {};
'- foo(a);
Currently, when the `Cleaner` class analyzes the affected lines, it does not
cleanup the lines' children nodes, which results in missed cleanup
opportunities, like the lambda body in the example above.
This revision extends the algorithm to visit children, thereby fixing the above problem.
Patch by Eric Li.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67659
llvm-svn: 372129
This patch makes cases work where the lambda's template list doesn't
contain any of + - ! ~ / % << | || && ^ == != >= <= ? : true false
(see added FIXME).
Ports r359967 to clang-format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67246
llvm-svn: 371854
Summary:
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43100
Formatting using statement in C# with clang-format removes the space between using and paren even when SpaceBeforeParens is !
```
using(FileStream fs = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize : 1))
```
this change simply overcomes this for when using C# settings in the .clang-format file
```
using (FileStream fs = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.Read, bufferSize : 1))
```
All FormatTests pass..
```
[==========] 688 tests from 21 test cases ran. (88508 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 688 tests.
```
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, owenpan
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66662
llvm-svn: 371720
Summary:
This option determines whether goto labels are indented according to scope. Setting this option to false causes goto labels to be flushed to the left.
This is mostly copied from [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045014.html | this patch ]] submitted by Christian Neukirchen that didn't make its way into trunk.
```
true: false:
int f() { vs. int f() {
if (foo()) { if (foo()) {
label1: label1:
bar(); bar();
} }
label2: label2:
return 1; return 1;
} }
```
Reviewers: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Patch by: tetsuo-cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67037
llvm-svn: 371719
Summary:
TypeScript 3.4 supports casting into a const type using `as const`:
const x = {x: 1} as const;
Previously, clang-format would insert a space after the `const`. With
this patch, no space is inserted after the sequence `as const`.
Reviewers: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66736
llvm-svn: 369916
PR43085.
Recognize .mjs files as JavaScript. .mjs is the extension for ECMAScript modules.
A specific extension (and associated content type javascript/esm) is
introduced to differentiate it from CommonJS modules and solve some
interoperability problems.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66584
Patch by Fergal Daly
llvm-svn: 369732
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
Summary:
This (invalid) fragment is crashing clang-format:
```
#if 1
int x;
#elif
int y;
#endif
```
The reason being that the parser expects a token after `#elif`, and the
subsequent parsing of the next line does not check if `CurrentToken` is null.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65940
llvm-svn: 368280
This is like r305666 (which added support for `if constexpr`) except
that it allows a macro name after the if.
This is slightly tricky for two reasons:
1. r305666 didn't add test coverage for all cases where it added a
kw_constexpr, so I had to figure out what all the added cases were
for. I now added tests for all `if constexpr` bits that didn't have
tests. (This took a while, see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65223)
2. Parsing `if <ident> (` as an if means that `#if defined(` and
`#if __has_include(` parse as ifs too. Add some special-case code
to prevent this from happening where it's incorrect.
Fixes PR39248.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65227
llvm-svn: 367167
Preparatory change for D65043.
We current use `!=LS_Cpp03` to enable language standards 11,14,17, and
2a. `>=LS_Cpp11` is better if we decide to add new LanguageStandard in
the future.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65183
llvm-svn: 366876
Summary:
Previously, clang-format detected something like the following as a C++11 attribute specifier.
@[[NSArray class]]
instead of an array with an Objective-C method call inside. In general, when the attribute specifier checking runs, if it sees 2 identifiers in a row, it decides that the square brackets represent an Objective-C method call. However, here, `class` is tokenized as a keyword instead of an identifier, so this check fails.
To fix this, the attribute specifier first checks whether the first square bracket has an "@" before it. If it does, then that square bracket is not the start of a attribute specifier because it is an Objective-C array literal. (The assumption is that @[[.*]] is not valid C/C++.)
Contributed by rkgibson2.
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632
llvm-svn: 366267
This option behaves similarly to AlignConsecutiveDeclarations and
AlignConsecutiveAssignments, aligning the assignment of C/C++
preprocessor macros on consecutive lines.
I've worked in many projects (embedded, mostly) where header files full
of large, well-aligned "#define" blocks are a common pattern. We
normally avoid using clang-format on these files, since it ruins any
existing alignment in said blocks. This style option will align "simple"
PP macros (no parameters) and PP macros with parameter lists on
consecutive lines.
Related Bugzilla entry (thanks mcuddie):
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20637
Patch by Nick Renieris (VelocityRa)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462
llvm-svn: 364938
Summary:
Other macros are used to declare namespaces, and should thus be handled
similarly. This is the case for crpcut's TESTSUITE macro, or for
unittest-cpp's SUITE macro:
TESTSUITE(Foo) {
TEST(MyFirstTest) {
assert(0);
}
} // TESTSUITE(Foo)
This patch deals with this cases by introducing a new option to specify
lists of namespace macros. Internally, it re-uses the system already in
place for foreach and statement macros, to ensure there is no impact on
performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813
llvm-svn: 362740
Summary:
Adds a `TypenameMacros` configuration option that causes certain identifiers to be handled in a way similar to `typeof()`.
This is enough to:
- Prevent misinterpreting declarations of pointers to such types as expressions (`STACK_OF(int) * foo` -> `STACK_OF(int) *foo`),
- Avoid surprising line breaks in variable/struct field declarations (`STACK_OF(int)\nfoo;` -> `STACK_OF(int) foo;`, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30353).
Reviewers: Typz, krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: Typz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57184
llvm-svn: 361986
Summary:
Top-level "package" and "import" statements should generally be kept on
one line, for all languages.
----
This reverts commit rL356912.
The regression from rL356835 was fixed via rC358275.
Reviewers: krasimir, sammccall, MyDeveloperDay, xinz, dchai, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir, xinz, dchai
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60661
llvm-svn: 360411
Summary:
Currently clang-format uses ContinuationIndent to indent the contents of a raw
string literal that is the last parameter of the function call. This is to
achieve formatting similar to trailing:
```
f(1, 2, R"pb(
x: y)pb");
```
However this had the unfortunate consequence of producing format like this:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
This patch makes clang-format consider indenting a trailing raw string param
after a newline based off the start of the format delimiter, producing:
```
fffffff(1, 2,
R"pb(
a: b
)pb");
```
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60558
llvm-svn: 358689
Summary:
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41170
The AlwaysBreakAfterReturn type setting can go wrong if the line ends with a comment
```
void foo() /* comment */
```
or
```
void foo() // comment
```
It will incorrectly see such functions as Declarations and not Definitions
The following code addresses this by looking for function which end with `; <comment>` rather than just `;` or `<comment>`
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, reuk, russellmcc, owenpan, sammccall
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits, sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60363
llvm-svn: 358375
Summary:
AnnotatingParser::next() is needed to implicitly set TT_BlockComment
versus TT_LineComment. On most other paths through
AnnotatingParser::parseLine(), all tokens are consumed to achieve that.
This change updates one place where this wasn't done.
Contributed by @dchai!
Reviewers: krasimir
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60541
llvm-svn: 358275
Summary:
Addresses PR40696 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40696
The BreakAfterReturnType didn't work if it had a single arguments which was a template with an integer template parameter
```
int foo(A<8> a) { return a; }
```
When run with the Mozilla style. would not break after the `int`
```
int TestFn(A<8> a)
{
return a;
}
```
This revision resolves this issue by allowing numeric constants to be considered function parameters if if seen inside `<>`
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, krasimir, reuk, alexfh
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59309
llvm-svn: 357837
Adding in androidx as another import group.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60203
Patch from Sam Maier <smaier@chromium.org>!
llvm-svn: 357700
Summary:
r357567 started to regroup include block for Google style; it was meant to apply
only for C++. This patch reverts this for ObjC.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: thakis, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60263
llvm-svn: 357695
Summary:
Currently clang-format would always emit a replacement for multi-block #include
sections if `IBS_Regroup`, even if the sections are correct:
```
% cat ~/test.h
#include <a.h>
#include "b.h"
% bin/clang-format --output-replacements-xml -style=google ~/test.h
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<replacements xml:space='preserve' incomplete_format='false'>
<replacement offset='0' length='30'>#include <a.h> #include "b.h"</replacement>
</replacements>
%
```
This change makes clang-format not emit replacements in this case.
The logic is similar to the one implemented for Java in r354452.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60199
llvm-svn: 357599
Summary:
Import sorting of java file, incorrectly move import statement to after a function beginning with the word import.
Make 1 character change to regular expression to ensure there is always at least one space/tab after the word import
Previously clang-format --style="LLVM" would format
```
import X;
class C {
void m() {
importFile();
}
}
```
as
```
class C {
void m() {
importFile();
import X;
}
}
```
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, reuk, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59684
llvm-svn: 357345
This patch aims to add support for the following rules from the JUCE coding standards:
- Always put a space before an open parenthesis that contains text - e.g. foo (123);
- Never put a space before an empty pair of open/close parenthesis - e.g. foo();
Patch by Reuben Thomas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55170
llvm-svn: 357344
Summary:
This option `AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine` similar to the other `AllowShort*` options, but applied to C++ lambdas.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57687
llvm-svn: 357027
Summary:
Revision r356575 had the unfortunate consequence that now clang-format never
detects an ObjC call expression after `&&`.
This patch tries harder to distinguish between C++17 structured bindings and
ObjC call expressions and adds a few regression tests.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59774
llvm-svn: 356928
This reverts commit r356835. This patch causes a regression, see the
test below:
verifyFormat("// Detached comment\n\n"
"// Leading comment\n"
"syntax = \"proto2\"; // trailing comment\n\n"
"// in foo.bar package\n"
"package foo.bar; // foo.bar package\n");
llvm-svn: 356912
Summary:
Top-level "package" and "import" statements should generally be kept on one
line, for all languages.
Reviewers: sammccall, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59627
Patch By: dchai (Donald Chai)
llvm-svn: 356835
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for formatting C# files with clang-format, I know the barrier to entry is high here so I'm sending this revision in to test the water as to whether this might be something we'd consider landing.
Tracking in Bugzilla as:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Justification:
C# code just looks ugly in comparison to the C++ code in our source tree which is clang-formatted.
I've struggled with Visual Studio reformatting to get a clean and consistent style, I want to format our C# code on saving like I do now for C++ and i want it to have the same style as defined in our .clang-format file, so it consistent as it can be with C++. (Braces/Breaking/Spaces/Indent etc..)
Using clang format without this patch leaves the code in a bad state, sometimes when the BreakStringLiterals is set, it fails to compile.
Mostly the C# is similar to Java, except instead of JavaAnnotations I try to reuse the TT_AttributeSquare.
Almost the most valuable portion is to have a new Language in order to partition the configuration for C# within a common .clang-format file, with the auto detection on the .cs extension. But there are other C# specific styles that could be added later if this is accepted. in particular how `{ set;get }` is formatted.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir, benhamilton, JonasToth
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58404
llvm-svn: 356662
Summary:
Sometime after 6.0.0 and the current trunk 9.0.0 the following code would be considered as objective C and not C++
Reported by: https://twitter.com/mattgodbolt/status/1096188576503644160
$ clang-format.exe test.h
Configuration file(s) do(es) not support Objective-C: C:\clang\build\.clang-format
--- test.h --
```
std::vector<std::pair<std::string,std::string>> C;
void foo()
{
for (auto && [A,B] : C)
{
std::string D = A + B;
}
}
```
The following code fixes this issue of incorrect detection
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, reuk
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59546
llvm-svn: 356575
Addresses PR40999 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40999
Private fields and methods in JavaScript would get incorrectly indented
(it sees them as preprocessor directives and hence left aligns them)
In this revision `#identifier` tokens `tok::hash->tok::identifier` are
merged into a single new token `tok::identifier` with the `#` contained
inside the TokenText.
Before:
```
class Example {
pub = 1;
static pub2 = "foo";
static #priv2 = "bar";
method() { this.#priv = 5; }
static staticMethod() {
switch (this.#priv) {
case '1':
break;
}
}
this.#privateMethod(); // infinite loop
}
static #staticPrivateMethod() {}
}
```
After this fix the code will be correctly indented
```
class Example {
pub = 1;
#priv = 2;
static pub2 = "foo";
static #priv2 = "bar";
method() { this.#priv = 5; }
static staticMethod() {
switch (this.#priv) {
case '1':
#priv = 3;
break;
}
}
#privateMethod() {
this.#privateMethod(); // infinite loop
}
static #staticPrivateMethod() {}
}
```
NOTE: There might be some JavaScript code out there which uses the C
processor to preprocess .js files
http://www.nongnu.org/espresso/js-cpp.html. It's not clear how this
revision or even private fields and methods would interact.
Patch originally by MyDeveloperDays (thanks!).
llvm-svn: 356449
Before:
const x = veryLongIdentifier
`hello`;
After:
const x =
veryLongIdentifier`hello`;
While it's allowed to have the template string and tag identifier
separated by a line break, currently the clang-format output is not
stable when a break is forced. Additionally, disallowing a line break
makes it clear that the identifier is actually a tag for a template
string.
Patch originally by mitchellwills (thanks!).
llvm-svn: 356447
rC355158 added an optional language parameter to getLLVMStyle(), but this parameter was not used in getPredefinedStyle(). Because unit tests directly specify the style, this codepath wasn't tested. Add an additional unit test for getStyle().
llvm-svn: 356099
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356031
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356029
Summary:
The revision r355434 had the unfortunate side-effect that it started to
recognize certain ObjC expressions with a call subexpression followed by a
`a->b` subexpression as C++ lambda expressions.
This patch adds a bit of logic to handle these cases and documents them in
tests.
The commented-out test cases in the new test suite are ones that were
problematic before r355434.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, gribozavr
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59210
llvm-svn: 355831
Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
llvm-svn: 355450
A template specialization of a template foo<int N> can contain integer constants and a whole bunch of operators - e. g. foo< 1 ? !0 : (3+1)%4 >
Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58934
llvm-svn: 355434
Summary:
If the clang-format on/off is in a /* comment */ then the sorting of headers is not ignored
PR40901 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40901
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, krasimir, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: alexfh, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58819
llvm-svn: 355266
Previously revisions commited non-clang-formatted changes to the Format library, this means submitting any revision e.g. {D55170} can cause additional whitespace changes to potentially be included in a revision.
Commit a non functional change using latest build Windows clang-format r351376 with no other changes, to remove these differences
All FormatTests
pass [==========] 652 tests from 20 test cases ran.
llvm-svn: 355182
Summary:
clang-formatting wants to add spaces around items in square braces, e.g. [1, 2] -> [ 1, 2 ]. Based on a quick check [1], it seems like most cases are using the [1, 2] format, so make that the consistent one.
[1] in llvm `.td` files, the regex `\[[^ ]` (bracket followed by not-a-space) shows up ~400 times, but `\[\s[^ ]` (bracket followed by one space and one not-a-space) shows up ~40 times => ~90% uses this format.
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55964
llvm-svn: 355158
Summary:
getLLVMStyle() sets the default style, but doesn't take the language as a parameter, so can't set default parameters when they differ from C++. This change adds LanguageKind as an input to getLLVMStyle so that we can start doing that.
See D55964 as a motivation for this, where we want Tablegen to be formatted differently than C++.
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: jdoerfert, MyDeveloperDay, kristina, cfe-commits, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56943
llvm-svn: 355123
Summary:
Currently clang-format would always emit a replacement for a block of Java imports even if it is correctly formatted:
```
% cat /tmp/Aggregator.java
import X;
% clang-format /tmp/Aggregator.java
import X;
% clang-format -output-replacements-xml /tmp/Aggregator.java
<?xml version='1.0'?>
<replacements xml:space='preserve' incomplete_format='false'>
<replacement offset='0' length='9'>import X;</replacement>
</replacements>
%
```
This change makes clang-format not emit replacements in this case. Note that
there is logic to not emit replacements in this case for C++.
Reviewers: ioeric
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58436
llvm-svn: 354452
Trailing comments are not always aligned properly when UseTab is set to Always.
Consider:
int a; // x
int bbbbbbbb; // x
With .clang-format:
---
Language: Cpp
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
UseTab: Always
...
The trailing comments of this code block should be aligned, but aren't
To align the first trailing comment it needs to insert 8 spaces. This should be
one tab plus six spaces. It skips the logic of the first partial tab in
FirstTabWidth (=2) + Style.TabWidth (=8) <= Spaces (=8) and only inserts one
tab. Proposed fix and test is attached.
Patch by Hylke Kleve.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57655
llvm-svn: 354183
Summary:
Currently, `UnwrappedLineParser` thinks an arrow token after
an ObjC method expression is a C++ lambda arrow, so it formats:
```
[foo bar]->baz
```
as:
```
[foo bar] -> baz
```
Because `UnwrappedLineParser` runs before `TokenAnnotator`, it can't
know if the arrow token is after an ObjC method expression or not.
This diff makes `TokenAnnotator` remove the TT_LambdaArrow on
the arrow token if it follows an ObjC method expression.
Test Plan: New test added. Ran test with:
% ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Confirmed test failed before diff and passed after diff.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57923
llvm-svn: 353531
Summary:
From https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40516
```
$ cat a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::operator++() {
// do stuff
}
$ ~/ll/build/opt/bin/clang-format -style=LLVM a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &
NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::
operator++() {
// do stuff
}
```
What was happening is that the split penalty before `operator` was being set to
a smaller value by a prior if block. Moved checks around to fix this and added a
regression test.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57604
llvm-svn: 353033
Brian Gesiak