Summary:
If the describeLoadedValue() hook produced a DIExpression when
describing a instruction, and it was not possible to emit a call site
entry directly (the value operand was not an immediate nor a preserved
register), then that described value could not be inserted into the
worklist, and would instead be dropped, meaning that the parameter's
call site value couldn't be described.
This patch extends the worklist so that each entry has an DIExpression
that is built up when iterating through the instructions.
This allows us to describe instruction chains like this:
$reg0 = mv $fp
$reg0 = add $reg0, offset
call @call_with_offseted_fp
Since DW_OP_LLVM_entry_value operations can't be combined with any other
expression, such call site entries will not be emitted. I have added a
test, dbgcall-site-expr-entry-value.mir, which verifies that we don't
assert or emit broken DWARF in such cases.
Reviewers: djtodoro, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75036
Summary:
This is a preparatory patch for D75036, in which a debug expression is
associated with each parameter register in the worklist. In that patch
the two lambda functions addToWorklist() and finishCallSiteParams() grow
a bit, so move those out to separate functions. This patch also prepares
for each parameter register having their own expression moving the
creation of the DbgValueLoc into finishCallSiteParams().
Reviewers: djtodoro, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75050
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
This patch enables the debug entry values feature.
- Remove the (CC1) experimental -femit-debug-entry-values option
- Enable it for x86, arm and aarch64 targets
- Resolve the test failures
- Leave the llc experimental option for targets that do not
support the CallSiteInfo yet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73534
Instructions marked as FrameSetup do not cause requestLabelAfterInsn to
be called and so no such label is generated. Call instructions which
require call site entries to be generated require this label to be
present in order to calculate the return PC offset/address, but the
check for whether the call instruction is marked as FrameSetup was not
present.
Therefore in the case where a call instruction is marked as FrameSetup,
an assertion failure occurs if a call site entry is to be generated.
This is the case with RISC-V's implementation of save/restore via
library calls.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71593
Add the isCandidateForCallSiteEntry predicate to MachineInstr to
determine whether a DWARF call site entry should be created for an
instruction.
For now, it's enough to have any call instruction that doesn't belong to
a blacklisted set of opcodes. For these opcodes, a call site entry isn't
meaningful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74159
Summary:
This patch reorders the emission of debug_str section, so that
string can come after macros.
This is necessary for macro forms like DW_MACRO_define_strp,
which emits macro as a string in debug_str section.
Originally committed in: 1ced28cbe7
Reverted in: f75301d16d
(reverted due to tests failing on non-linux/x86 targets, tests have since been
generalized and specialized... since Split DWARF isn't supported on non-elf
targets anyway and we have no way to run on "whatever elf target is available"
so they fail on MacOS without an explicit target triple)
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This code was incorrectly emitting extra bytes into arbitrary parts of
the object file when it was meant to be hashing them to compute the DWO
ID.
Follow-up patch(es) will refactor this API somewhat to make such bugs
harder to introduce, hopefully.
This is a revert-of-revert (i.e. this reverts commit 802bec89, which
itself reverted fa4701e1 and 79daafc9) with a fix folded in. The problem
was that call site tags weren't emitted properly when LTO was enabled
along with split-dwarf. This required a minor fix. I've added a reduced
test case in test/DebugInfo/X86/fission-call-site.ll.
Original commit message:
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update #1:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Update #2:
Fold in a fix for call site tag emission in the split-dwarf + LTO case.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415, rdar://58888440
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
The Version was used only to determine the size of an operand of
DW_OP_call_ref. The size was 4 for all versions apart from 2, but
the DW_OP_call_ref operation was introduced only in DWARF3. Thus,
the code may be simplified and using of Version may be eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73264
Summary:
This fixes PR44118. For cases where we have a chain like this:
R8 = R1 (entry value)
R0 = R8
call @foo R0
the code that emits call site entries using entry values would not
follow that chain, instead emitting a call site entry with R8 as
location rather than R0. Such a case was discovered when originally
adding dbgcall-site-orr-moves.mir. This patch fixes that issue. This is
done by changing the ForwardedRegWorklist set to a map in which the
worklist registers always map to the parameter registers that they
describe.
Another thing this patch fixes is that worklist registers now can
describe more than one parameter register at a time. Such a case
occurred in dbgcall-site-interpretation.mir, resulting in a call site
entry not being emitted for one of the parameters.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73168
Summary:
Since D70431 the describeLoadedValue() hook takes a parameter register,
meaning that it can now be asked to describe any register. This means
that we can drop the difference between explicit and implicit defines
that we previously had in collectCallSiteParameters().
I have not found any case for any upstream targets where a parameter
register is only implicitly defined, and does not overlap with any
explicit defines. I don't know if such a case would even make sense. So
as far as I have tested, this patch should be a non-functional change.
However, this reduces the complexity of the code a bit, and it will
simplify the implementation of an upcoming patch which solves PR44118.
Reviewers: djtodoro, NikolaPrica, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: djtodoro, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73167
... as well as:
Revert "[DWARF] Defer creating declaration DIEs until we prepare call site info"
This reverts commit fa4701e197.
This reverts commit 79daafc903.
There have been reports of this assert getting hit:
CalleeDIE && "Could not find DIE for call site entry origin
This makes the SectionLabel handling more resilient - specifically for
future PROPELLER work which will have more CU ranges (rather than just
one per function).
Ultimately it might be nice to make this more general/resilient to
arbitrary labels (rather than relying on the labels being created for CU
ranges & then being reused by ranges, loclists, and possibly other
addresses). It's possible that other (non-rnglist/loclist) uses of
addresses will need the addresses to be in SectionLabels earlier (eg:
move the CU.addRange to be done on function begin, rather than function
end, so during function emission they are already populated for other
use).
[this re-applies c0176916a4
with the correct commit message and phabricator link]
This addresses point 1 of PR44213.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44213
The DW_AT_LLVM_sysroot attribute is used for Clang module debug info,
to allow LLDB to import a Clang module from source. Currently it is
part of each DW_TAG_module, however, it is the same for all modules in
a compile unit. It is more efficient and less ambiguous to store it
once in the DW_TAG_compile_unit.
This should have no effect on DWARF consumers other than LLDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71732
This is a purely cosmetic change that is NFC in terms of the binary
output. I bugs me that I called the attribute DW_AT_LLVM_isysroot
since the "i" is an artifact of GCC command line option syntax
(-isysroot is in the category of -i options) and doesn't carry any
useful information otherwise.
This attribute only appears in Clang module debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71722
This reverts D53469, which changed llvm's DWARF emission to emit
DW_AT_call_return_pc as a function-local offset. Such an encoding is not
compatible with post-link block re-ordering tools and isn't standards-
compliant.
In addition to reverting back to the original DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding, teach lldb how to fix up DW_AT_call_return_pc when the address
comes from an object file pointed-to by a debug map. While doing this I
noticed that lldb's support for tail calls that cross a DSO/object file
boundary wasn't covered, so I added tests for that. This latter case
exercises the newly added return PC fixup.
The dsymutil changes in this patch were originally included in D49887:
the associated test should be sufficient to test DW_AT_call_return_pc
encoding purely on the llvm side.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72489
It isn't necessary to create DIEs for all of the declaration subprograms
in a CU's retainedTypes list. We can defer creating these subprograms
until we need to prepare a call site tag that refers to one.
This cleanup was mentioned in passing in D70350.
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
Update:
Reland with a fix to create a declaration DIE when the declaration is
missing from the CU's retainedTypes list. The declaration is left out
of the retainedTypes list in two cases:
1) Re-compiling pre-r266445 bitcode (in which declarations weren't added
to the retainedTypes list), and
2) Doing LTO function importing (which doesn't update the retainedTypes
list).
It's possible to handle (1) and (2) by modifying the retainedTypes list
(in AutoUpgrade, or in the LTO importing logic resp.), but I don't see
an advantage to doing it this way, as it would cause more DWARF to be
emitted compared to creating the declaration DIEs lazily.
Tested with a stage2 ThinLTO+RelWithDebInfo build of clang, and with a
ReleaseLTO-g build of the test suite.
rdar://46577651, rdar://57855316, rdar://57840415
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
Extends DWARF expression language to express locals/globals locations. (via
target-index operands atm) (possible variants are: non-virtual registers
or address spaces)
The WebAssemblyExplicitLocals can replace virtual registers to targertindex
operand type at the time when WebAssembly backend introduces
{get,set,tee}_local instead of corresponding virtual registers.
Reviewed By: aprantl, dschuff
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52634
Since the address pool doesn't get populated in this case (due to the
lack of inlining, no child DIEs are added to the CU - so no addresses
are needed for the DIEs themselves) until the range list is emitted - at
the time the attributes are added to the CU, the address pool is empty.
So check whether the address pool will be used for the range lists & add
an addr_base if that's the case.
Move these data structures closer together so their emission code can
eventually share more of its implementation.
Was an egregious bug (completely untested, evidently) where I hadn't
inverted a DWARFv5 test as needed, so it was doing the exact opposite of
what was required & thus tried to emit a DWARFv5 range list header in
DWARFv4.
Reapply 8e04896288 which was
reverted in a8154e5e0c.
added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission."
This was reverted in caa4120906,
since it was causing an assertion failure on Windows bots.
This revision is revised to fix that.
Original commit message -
[DebugInfo] Refactored macro related generation, added a test case for macinfo.dwo emission.
Reviewers: dblaikie, aprantl, jini.susan.george
Tags: #debug-info #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71008
(except for v4 loclists, which are sufficiently different to not fit
well in this generic implementation)
In subsequent patches I intend to refactor the DebugLoc and ranges data
structures to be more similar so I can common more of the implementation
here.
Summary:
Support alloca-referencing dbg.value in hwasan instrumentation.
Update AsmPrinter to emit DW_AT_LLVM_tag_offset when location is in
loclist format.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: srhines, aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70753
This reverts commit 30038da15b. It causes
the stage2 thinLTO bot to fail with:
Assertion failed: (CU.getDIE(CalleeSP) && "Expected declaration subprogram DIE for callee")
rdar://57840415
This allows a call site tag in CU A to reference a callee DIE in CU B
without resorting to creating an incomplete duplicate DIE for the callee
inside of CU A.
We already allow cross-CU references of subprogram declarations, so it
doesn't seem like definitions ought to be special.
This improves entry value evaluation and tail call frame synthesis in
the LTO setting. During LTO, it's common for cross-module inlining to
produce a call in some CU A where the callee resides in a different CU,
and there is no declaration subprogram for the callee anywhere. In this
case llvm would (unnecessarily, I think) emit an empty DW_TAG_subprogram
in order to fill in the call site tag. That empty 'definition' defeats
entry value evaluation etc., because the debugger can't figure out what
it means.
As a follow-up, maybe we could add a DWARF verifier check that a
DW_TAG_subprogram at least has a DW_AT_name attribute.
rdar://46577651
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70350
David Stenberg