We seem to be inheriting the cost from sse4.1. But if we have 256-bit registers we should be able to do this with just one extract to split the 16i16 and two v8i16->v8i32 operations so our cost should be 3 not 4.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73646
We are missing costs for a lot of truncation cases, I'm hoping to address all the 'zero cost' cases in trunc.ll
I thought this was a vector widening side effect, but even before this we had some interesting LV decisions (notably over indvars) being made due to these zero costs.
llvm-svn: 372498
Based on an IR equivalent of target lowering's generic expansion - target specific costs will typically be lower (IR doesn't have a good mull/mulh equivalent) but we need a baseline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57925
llvm-svn: 354774
Simon Pilgrim