Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
This patch adds initial support for a DemandedElts mask to the internal computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits methods, matching the SelectionDAG and GlobalISel equivalents.
So far only a couple of instructions have been setup to handle the DemandedElts, the remainder still using the existing 'all elements' default. The plan is to extend support as we have test coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73435
We may calculate reassociable math ops in arbitrary order when creating a shuffle reduction,
so there's no guarantee that things like 'nsw' hold on those intermediate values. Drop all
poison-generating flags for safety.
This change is limited to shuffle reductions because I don't think we have a problem in the
general case (where we intersect flags of each scalar op that goes into a vector op), but if
there's evidence of other cases being wrong, we can extend this fix to cover those cases.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44536
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73727
First attempt at implementing -fsemantic-interposition.
Rely on GlobalValue::isInterposable that already captures most of the expected
behavior.
Rely on a ModuleFlag to state whether we should respect SemanticInterposition or
not. The default remains no.
So this should be a no-op if -fsemantic-interposition isn't used, and if it is,
isInterposable being already used in most optimisation, they should honor it
properly.
Note that it only impacts architecture compiled with -fPIC and no pie.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72829
from FC0.ExitBlock to FC1.ExitBlock when proven safe.
Summary:
Currently LoopFusion give up when the second loop nest guard
block or the first loop nest exit block is not empty. For example:
if (0 < N) {
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {}
x+=1;
}
y+=1;
if (0 < N) {
for (int i = 0; i < N; ++i) {}
}
The above example should be safe to fuse.
This PR moves instructions in FC1 guard block (e.g. y+=1;) to
FC0 guard block, or instructions in FC0 exit block (e.g. x+=1;) to
FC1 exit block, which then LoopFusion is able to fuse them.
Reviewer: kbarton, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, fhahn, hfinkel,
bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73641
Summary:
When constant folding, constants that are wrapped in metadata were not
folded. This could lead to dbg.values being the only user of a constant
expression, due to the non-dbg uses having been rewritten, resulting in
the constant later on being removed by some other pass. This occurred
with the attached test case, in which the non-rewritten GEP in the
dbg.value intrinsic was later on removed by globalopt.
This patch makes the code look through metadata and fold such constants.
I guess that we in the future may want to allow dbg.values using GEPs and
other constant expressions to be emittable even if there are no non-dbg
uses, but for example SelectionDAG does not support that.
Reviewers: jmorse, aprantl, vsk, davide
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk, davide
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #debug-info, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73630
Summary:
Add trimming of unused components of s_buffer_load.
For s_buffer_load and unformatted buffer_load also trim unused
components at the beginning of vector and update offset accordingly.
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71785
InstCombine operates on the basic premise that the operands of the
currently processed instruction have already been simplified. It
achieves this by pushing instructions to the worklist in reverse
program order, so that instructions are popped off in program order.
The worklist management in the main combining loop also makes sure
to uphold this invariant.
However, the same is not true for all the code that is performing
manual worklist management. The largest problem (addressed in this
patch) are instructions inserted by InstCombine's IRBuilder. These
will be pushed onto the worklist in order of insertion (generally
matching program order), which means that a) the users of the
original instruction will be visited first, as they are pushed later
in the main loop and b) the newly inserted instructions will be
visited in reverse program order.
This causes a number of problems: First, folds operate on instructions
that have not had their operands simplified, which may result in
optimizations being missed (ran into this in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72048#1800424, which was the original
motivation for this patch). Additionally, this increases the amount
of folds InstCombine has to perform, both within one iteration, and
by increasing the number of total iterations.
This patch addresses the issue by adding a Worklist.AddDeferred()
method, which is used for instructions inserted by IRBuilder. These
will only be added to the real worklist after the combine finished,
and in reverse order, so they will end up processed in program order.
I should note that the same should also be done to nearly all other
uses of Worklist.Add(), but I'm starting with just this occurrence,
which has by far the largest test fallout.
Most of the test changes are due to
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44521 or other cases where
we don't canonicalize something. These are neutral. One regression
has been addressed in D73575 and D73647. The remaining regression
in an shl+sdiv fold can't really be fixed without dropping another
transform, but does not seem particularly problematic in the first
place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73411
A pointer is privatizeable if it can be replaced by a new, private one.
Privatizing pointer reduces the use count, interaction between unrelated
code parts. This is a first step towards replacing argument promotion.
While we can already handle recursion (unlike argument promotion!) we
are restricted to stack allocations for now because we do not analyze
the uses in the callee.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68852
For the
icmp eq (add X, C1), C2 => icmp eq X, C2-C1
icmp eq (sub C1, X), C2 => icmp eq X, C1-C2
folds, this allows C1 to be non-splat and contain undefs.
C2 is still splat, due to the structure of the code.
This is to address the remaining part of the regression in D73411,
where demanded element analysis replaces some elements with undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73647
proven safe.
Summary:
Currently LoopFusion give up when the second loop nest preheader is
not empty. For example:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {}
x+=1;
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {}
The above example should be safe to fuse.
This PR moves instructions in FC1 preheader (e.g. x+=1; ) to
FC0 preheader, which then LoopFusion is able to fuse them.
Reviewer: kbarton, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, dmgreen, fhahn, hfinkel,
bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71821
cmp (splat V1, M), SplatC --> splat (cmp V1, SplatC'), M
As discussed in PR44588:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44588
...we try harder to push shuffles after binops than after compares.
This patch handles the special (but presumably most common case) of
splat shuffles. If both operands are splats, then we can do the
comparison on the non-splat inputs followed by splat of the compare.
That should take care of the regression noted in D73411.
There's another potential fold requested in PR37463 to scalarize the
compare, but that's another patch (and it's not clear if we can do
that without the ability to undo it later):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37463
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73575
If we invalidate an attribute we need to inform all dependent ones even
if the fixpoint state is not invalid. Before we only continued
invalidation if the fixpoint state was invalid, now we signal a change
in case the fixpoint state is valid.
The test case was already included in D71620 but the problem was hiding
because it only manifested with the old PM (for that input).
This patch modularizes the way we check for no-alias call site arguments
by putting the existing logic into helper functions. The reasoning was
not changed but special cases for readonly/readnone were added.
If `null` is not defined we cannot access it, hence the pointer is
`noalias`. While this is not helpful on it's own it simplifies later
deductions that can skip over already known `noalias` pointers in
certain situations.
During extraction, stale llvm.assume handles may be retained in the
original function. The setup is:
1) CodeExtractor unregisters assumptions in the blocks that are to be
extracted.
2) Extraction happens. There are now two functions: f1 and f1.extracted.
3) Leftover assumptions in f1 (/not/ removed as they were not in the set of
blocks to be extracted) now have affected-value llvm.assume handles in
f1.extracted.
When assumptions for a value used in f1 are looked up, ValueTracking can assert
as some of the handles are in the wrong function. To fix this, simply erase the
llvm.assume calls in the extracted function.
Alternatives include flushing the assumption cache in the original function, or
walking all values used in the original function to prune stale affected-value
handles. Both seem more expensive.
Testing: check-llvm, LNT run with -mllvm -hot-cold-split enabled
rdar://58460728
This patch adds support for explicitly highlighting sub-expressions
shared by multiple leaf nodes. For example consider the following
code
%shared.load = tail call <8 x double> @llvm.matrix.columnwise.load.v8f64.p0f64(double* %arg1, i32 %stride, i32 2, i32 4), !dbg !10, !noalias !10
%trans = tail call <8 x double> @llvm.matrix.transpose.v8f64(<8 x double> %shared.load, i32 2, i32 4), !dbg !10
tail call void @llvm.matrix.columnwise.store.v8f64.p0f64(<8 x double> %trans, double* %arg3, i32 10, i32 4, i32 2), !dbg !10
%load.2 = tail call <30 x double> @llvm.matrix.columnwise.load.v30f64.p0f64(double* %arg3, i32 %stride, i32 2, i32 15), !dbg !10, !noalias !10
%mult = tail call <60 x double> @llvm.matrix.multiply.v60f64.v8f64.v30f64(<8 x double> %trans, <30 x double> %load.2, i32 4, i32 2, i32 15), !dbg !11
tail call void @llvm.matrix.columnwise.store.v60f64.p0f64(<60 x double> %mult, double* %arg2, i32 10, i32 4, i32 15), !dbg !11
We have two leaf nodes (the 2 stores) and the first store stores %trans
which is also used by the matrix multiply %mult. We generate separate
remarks for each leaf (stores). To denote that parts are shared, the
shared expressions are marked as shared (), with a reference to the
other remark that shares it. The operation summary also denotes the
shared operations separately.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, thegameg, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor, LuoYuanke
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72526
Dead instructions do not need to be sunk. Currently we try and record
the recipies for them, but there are no recipes emitted for them and
there's nothing to sink. They can be removed from SinkAfter while
marking them for recording.
Fixes PR44634.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, gilr
Reviewed By: gilr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73423
This patch updates the remark to also include a summary of the number of
vector operations generated for each matrix expression.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, thegameg, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor, LuoYuanke
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72480
from DenseMap to MapVector
The iteration order of LoopVectorizationLegality::Reductions matters for the
final code generation, so we better use MapVector instead of DenseMap for it
to remove the nondeterminacy. reduction-order.ll in the patch is an example
reduced from the case we saw. In the output of opt command, the order of the
select instructions in the vector.body block keeps changing from run to run
currently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73490
Generate remarks for matrix operations in a function. To generate remarks
for matrix expressions, the following approach is used:
1. Collect leafs of matrix expressions (done in
RemarkGenerator::getExpressionLeafs). Leafs are lowered matrix
instructions without other matrix users (like stores).
2. For each leaf, create a remark containing a linearizied version of the
matrix expression.
The following improvements will be submitted as follow-ups:
* Summarize number of vector instructions generated for each expression.
* Account for shared sub-expressions.
* Propagate matrix remarks up the inlining chain.
The information provided by the matrix remarks helps users to spot cases
where matrix expression got split up, e.g. due to inlining not
happening. The remarks allow users to address those issues, ensuring
best performance.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, thegameg, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor, LuoYuanke
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72453
D47163 created a rule that we should not change the casted
type of a select when we have matching types in its compare condition.
That was intended to help vector codegen, but it also could create
situations where we miss subsequent folds as shown in PR44545:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44545
By using shouldChangeType(), we can continue to get the vector folds
(because we always return false for vector types). But we also solve
the motivating bug because it's ok to narrow the scalar select in that
example.
Our canonicalization rules around select are a mess, but AFAICT, this
will not induce any infinite looping from the reverse transform (but
we'll need to watch for that possibility if committed).
Side note: there's a similar use of shouldChangeType() for phi ops
just below this diff, and the source and destination types appear to
be reversed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72733
Followup to D72978. This moves existing negation handling in
InstCombine into freelyNegateValue(), which make it composable.
In particular, root negations of div/zext/sext/ashr/lshr/sub can
now always be performed through a shl/trunc as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73288
This restores 59733525d3 (D71913), along
with bot fix 19c76989bb.
The bot failure should be fixed by D73418, committed as
af954e441a.
I also added a fix for non-x86 bot failures by requiring x86 in new test
lld/test/ELF/lto/devirt_vcall_vis_public.ll.
Summary: masked_load and masked_store instructions require the alignment to be specified and a power of two. It seems to me that this requirement applies to masked_gather and masked_scatter as well.
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73179
Patch by Chris Chrulski
When generating value profiling instrumentation, ensure the call gets the
correct funclet token, otherwise WinEHPrepare will turn the call (and all
subsequent instructions) into unreachable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73221
Patch by Chris Chrulski
This fixes a problem with the current behavior when assertions are enabled.
A loop that exits to a catchswitch instruction is skipped for the counter
promotion, however this check was being done after the PGOCounterPromoter
tried to collect an insertion point for the exit block. A call to
getFirstInsertionPt() on a block that begins with a catchswitch instruction
triggers an assertion. This change performs a check whether the counter
promotion is possible prior to collecting the ExitBlocks and InsertPts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73222
The codegen for splitting a llvm.vector.reduction intrinsic into parts
will be better than the codegen for the generic reductions. This will
only directly effect when vectorization factors are specified by the
user.
Also added tests to make sure the codegen for larger reductions is OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72257
This fixes a bug where a PHI node that is only referenced by a lifetime.end intrinsic in an otherwise empty cleanuppad can cause SimplyCFG to create an SSA violation while removing the empty cleanuppad. Theoretically the same problem can occur with debug intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72540
When we use information only to short-cut deduction or improve it, we
can use OPTIONAL dependences instead of REQUIRED ones to avoid cascading
pessimistic fixpoints.
We also need to track dependences only when we use assumed information,
e.g., we act on assumed liveness information.
When we follow uses, e.g., in AAMemoryBehavior or AANoCapture, we need
to make sure the value is a pointer before we ask for abstract
attributes only valid for pointers. This happens because we follow
pointers through calls that do not capture but may return the value.
Summary:
Third part in series to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization
Enablement, see RFC here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
This patch adds type test metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
even for classes without hidden visibility. It then changes WPD to skip
devirtualization for a virtual function call when any of the compatible
vtables has public vcall visibility.
Additionally, internal LLVM options as well as lld and gold-plugin
options are added which enable upgrading all public vcall visibility
to linkage unit (hidden) visibility during LTO. This enables the more
aggressive WPD to kick in based on LTO time knowledge of the visibility
guarantees.
Support was added to all flavors of LTO WPD (regular, hybrid and
index-only), and to both the new and old LTO APIs.
Unfortunately it was not simple to split the first and second parts of
this part of the change (the unconditional emission of type tests and
the upgrading of the vcall visiblity) as I needed a way to upgrade the
public visibility on legacy WPD llvm assembly tests that don't include
linkage unit vcall visibility specifiers, to avoid a lot of test churn.
I also added a mechanism to LowerTypeTests that allows dropping type
test assume sequences we now aggressively insert when we invoke
distributed ThinLTO backends with null indexes, which is used in testing
mode, and which doesn't invoke the normal ThinLTO backend pipeline.
Depends on D71907 and D71911.
Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777, steven_wu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, Prazek, inglorion, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, dexonsmith, dang, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71913
We currently use integer ranges to merge concrete function arguments.
We use the ParamState range for those, but we only look up concrete
values in the regular state. For concrete function arguments that are
themselves arguments of the containing function, we can use the param
state directly and improve the precision in some cases.
Besides improving the results in some cases, this is also a small step towards
switching to ValueLatticeElement, by allowing D60582 to be a NFC.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71836
Summary:
First patch to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization Enablement,
see RFC here: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
Always emit !vcall_visibility metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
and not just for -fvirtual-function-elimination. The vcall visibility
metadata will (in a subsequent patch) be used to communicate to WPD
which vtables are safe to devirtualize, and we will optionally convert
the metadata to hidden visibility at link time. Subsequent follow on
patches will help enable this by adding vcall_visibility metadata to the
ThinLTO summaries, and always emit type test intrinsics under
-fwhole-program-vtables (and not just for vtables with hidden
visibility).
In order to do this safely with VFE, since for VFE all vtable loads must
be type checked loads which will no longer be the case, this patch adds
a new "Virtual Function Elim" module flag to communicate to GlobalDCE
whether to perform VFE using the vcall_visibility metadata.
One additional advantage of using the vcall_visibility metadata to drive
more WPD at LTO link time is that we can use the same mechanism to
enable more aggressive VFE at LTO link time as well. The link time
option proposed in the RFC will convert vcall_visibility metadata to
hidden (aka linkage unit visibility), which combined with
-fvirtual-function-elimination will allow it to be done more
aggressively at LTO link time under the same conditions.
Reviewers: pcc, ostannard, evgeny777, steven_wu
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, hiraditya, dexonsmith, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71907
Calling `operator*` on a WeakVH with a null value yields a null
reference, which is UB. Avoid this by implicitly converting the WeakVH
to a `Value *` rather than dereferencing and then taking the address
for the type conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73280
In case of loops with multiple exit where all-but-one exit are deoptimizing
it might happen that the first rotation will end up with latch having a deoptimizing
exit. This makes the loop unsuitable for trip-count analysis (say, getLoopEstimatedTripCount)
as well as for loop transformations that know how to handle multple deoptimizing exits.
It pretty much means that canonical form in multple-deoptimizing-exits case should be
with non-deoptimizing exit at latch.
Teach loop-rotation to reach this canonical form by repeating rotation.
-loop-rotate-multi option introduced to control this behavior, currently disabled by default.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea, reames, fhahn
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73058
It is incorrect to call ValueHandleBase::ValueIsRAUWd when only one use
is replaced since it simply violates semantics of the callback and leads
to bugs like PR44320.
Previously this call was used specifically to keep LICM's cache of
AliasSetTrackers up to date across passes (as PR36801 showed, even for
that purpose it didn't work properly), but since LICM doesn't have that
cache anymore, we can safely remove this incorrect call with no
repercussions.
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44320
Reviewers: asbirlea, fhahn, efriedma, reames
Reviewed-By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73089
Currently due to the edge caching, we create wrong predicates for
branches with matching true and false successors. We will cache the
condition for the edge from the true successor, and then lookup the same
edge (src and dst are the same) for the edge to the false successor.
If both successors match, the condition should always be true. At the
moment, we cannot really create constant VPValues, but we can just
create a true condition as X | !X. Later passes will clean that up.
Fixes PR44488.
Reviewers: rengolin, hsaito, fhahn, Ayal, dorit, gilr
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73079
This patch adds a custom implementation of isLegalNTStore to AArch64TTI
that supports vector types that can be directly stored by STNP. Note
that the implementation may not catch all valid cases (e.g. because the
vector is a multiple of 256 and could be broken down to multiple valid 256 bit
stores), but it is good enough for LV to vectorize loops with NT stores,
as LV only passes in a vector with 2 elements to check. LV seems to also
be the only user of isLegalNTStore.
We should also do the same for NT loads, but before that we need to
ensure that we properly lower LDNP of vectors, similar to D72919.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, t.p.northover, ab
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73158
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44529. We already have
a combine to sink a negation through a left-shift, but it currently
only works if the shift operand is negatable without creating any
instructions. This patch introduces freelyNegateValue() as a more
powerful extension of dyn_castNegVal(), which allows negating a
value as long as this doesn't end up increasing instruction count.
Specifically, this patch adds support for negating A-B to B-A.
This mechanism could in the future be extended to handle general
negation chains that a) start at a proper 0-X negation and b) only
require one operand to be freely negatable. This would end up as a
weaker form of D68408 aimed at the most obviously profitable subset
that eliminates a negation entirely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72978
This is 1 of the potential folds uncovered by extending D72521.
We don't seem to do this in the backend either (unless I'm not
seeing some target-specific transform).
icc and gcc (appears to be target-specific) do this transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73057
Summary:
We don't have control/verify what will be the RHS of the division, so it might
happen to be zero, causing UB.
Reviewers: Vasilis, RKSimon, ABataev
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: vporpo, ABataev, hiraditya, llvm-commits, vdmitrie
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72740
Summary:
New `@test13` in `Attributor/align.ll` is the main motivation - `null` pointer
really does not limit our alignment knowledge, in fact it is fully aligned
since it has no bits set.
Here we don't special-case `null` pointer because it is somewhat controversial
to add one more place where we enforce that `null` pointer is zero,
but instead we do the more general thing of trying to perform constant-fold
of pointer constant to an integer, and perform alignment inferrment on that.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, gchatelet, courbet, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73131
This should be the last step needed to solve the problem in the
description of PR44153:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44153
If we're casting an FP value to int, testing its signbit, and then
choosing between a value and its negated value, that's a
complicated way of saying "copysign":
(bitcast X) < 0 ? -TC : TC --> copysign(TC, X)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72643
As mentioned in D72643, we'd like to be able to assert that any select
of equivalent constants has been removed before we're deep into InstCombine.
But there's a loophole in that assertion for vectors with undef elements
that don't match exactly.
This patch should close that gap. If we have undefs, we can't safely
propagate those unless both constants elements for that lane are undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72958
Summary: Vectorized loop processes VFxUF number of elements in one iteration thus total number of iterations decreases proportionally. In addition epilog loop may not have more than VFxUF - 1 iterations. This patch updates profile information accordingly.
Reviewers: hsaito, Ayal, fhahn, reames, silvas, dcaballe, SjoerdMeijer, mkuper, DaniilSuchkov
Reviewed By: Ayal, DaniilSuchkov
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, hiraditya, rkruppe, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67905
Summary: Current implementation of getLoopEstimatedTripCount returns 1 iteration less than it should. The reason is that in bottom tested loop first iteration is executed before first back branch is taken. For example for loop with !{!"branch_weights", i32 1 // taken, i32 1 // exit} metadata getLoopEstimatedTripCount gives 1 while actual number of iterations is 2.
Reviewers: Ayal, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71990
Currently there are 4 different mechanisms for controlling denormal
flushing behavior, and about as many equivalent frontend controls.
- AMDGPU uses the fp32-denormals and fp64-f16-denormals subtarget features
- NVPTX uses the nvptx-f32ftz attribute
- ARM directly uses the denormal-fp-math attribute
- Other targets indirectly use denormal-fp-math in one DAGCombine
- cl-denorms-are-zero has a corresponding denorms-are-zero attribute
AMDGPU wants a distinct control for f32 flushing from f16/f64, and as
far as I can tell the same is true for NVPTX (based on the attribute
name).
Work on consolidating these into the denormal-fp-math attribute, and a
new type specific denormal-fp-math-f32 variant. Only ARM seems to
support the two different flush modes, so this is overkill for the
other use cases. Ideally we would error on the unsupported
positive-zero mode on other targets from somewhere.
Move the logic for selecting the flush mode into the compiler driver,
instead of handling it in cc1. denormal-fp-math/denormal-fp-math-f32
are now both cc1 flags, but denormal-fp-math-f32 is not yet exposed as
a user flag.
-cl-denorms-are-zero, -fcuda-flush-denormals-to-zero and
-fno-cuda-flush-denormals-to-zero will be mapped to
-fp-denormal-math-f32=ieee or preserve-sign rather than the old
attributes.
Stop emitting the denorms-are-zero attribute for the OpenCL flag. It
has no in-tree users. The meaning would also be target dependent, such
as the AMDGPU choice to treat this as only meaning allow flushing of
f32 and not f16 or f64. The naming is also potentially confusing,
since DAZ in other contexts refers to instructions implicitly treating
input denormals as zero, not necessarily flushing output denormals to
zero.
This also does not attempt to change the behavior for the current
attribute. The LangRef now states that the default is ieee behavior,
but this is inaccurate for the current implementation. The clang
handling is slightly hacky to avoid touching the existing
denormal-fp-math uses. Fixing this will be left for a future patch.
AMDGPU is still using the subtarget feature to control the denormal
mode, but the new attribute are now emitted. A future change will
switch this and remove the subtarget features.
During the SeparateConstOffsetFromGEP pass, signed extensions are distributed
to the values that feed into them and then later recombined. The recombination
stage is somewhat problematic- it doesn't differ add and sub instructions
from another when matching the sext(a) +/- sext(b) -> sext(a +/- b) pattern
in some instances.
An example- the IR contains:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extA + extB
The problematic optimization will transform that into:
%unextendedA
%unextendedB
%subuAuB = unextendedA - unextendedB
%extA = extend A
%extB = extend B
%addeAeB = extend subuAuB ; Obviously not semantically equivalent to the IR input.
This patch fixes that.
Patch by Drew Wock <drew.wock@sas.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65967
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44552. We need to make
sure that the store is reprocessed, because performing DSE may
expose more DSE opportunities.
There is a slight caveat here though: We need to make sure that we
add back the store the worklist first, because that means it will
be processed after the operands of the removed store have been
processed. This is a general bug in InstCombine worklist management
that I hope to address at some point, but for now it means we need
to do this manually rather than just returning the instruction as
changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72807
There are two related bugs here: First, we don't add the operand
we're replacing to the worklist, which means it may not get DCEd
(see test change). Second, usually this would just get picked up
in the next iteration, but we also do not report the instruction
as changed. This means that we do not get that extra instcombine
iteration, and more importantly, may break the pass pipeline, as
the function is not marked as changed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72864
Currently, there is no way to disable ExpensiveCombines when doing
a standalone opt -instcombine run, as that's the default, and the
opt option can currently only be used to force enable, not to force
disable. The only way to disable expensive combines is via -O1 or -O2,
but that of course also runs the rest of the kitchen sink...
This patch allows using opt -instcombine -expensive-combines=0 to
run InstCombine without ExpensiveCombines.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72861
Blindly following unique-successors chain appeared to be a bad idea.
In a degenerate case when block jumps to itself that goes into endless loop.
Discovered this problem when playing with additional changes,
managed to reproduce it on existing LoopPredication code.
Fix by checking a "visited" set while iterating through unique successors.
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72908
Introduce parsing, add a few instances of parameter use into GVN-PRE tests.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72752
This reverts commit 3f3017e because there's a failure on peel-loop-nests.ll
with LLVM_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
Summary:
The old pass manager separated speed optimization and size optimization
levels into two unsigned values. Coallescing both in an enum in the new
pass manager may lead to unintentional casts and comparisons.
In particular, taking a look at how the loop unroll passes were constructed
previously, the Os/Oz are now (==new pass manager) treated just like O3,
likely unintentionally.
This change disallows raw comparisons between optimization levels, to
avoid such unintended effects. As an effect, the O{s|z} behavior changes
for loop unrolling and loop unroll and jam, matching O2 rather than O3.
The change also parameterizes the threshold values used for loop
unrolling, primarily to aid testing.
Reviewers: tejohnson, davidxl
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: zzheng, ychen, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, dang, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72547
Summary:
This commits is a rework of the patch in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
The rework was requested to prevent out-of-tree performance regression
when vectorizing out-of-tree IR intrinsics. The vectorization of such
intrinsics is enquired via the static function `isTLIScalarize`. For
detail see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D67572.
Reviewers: uabelho, fhahn, sdesmalen
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72734
llvm.memset intrinsics do only write memory, but are missing
IntrWriteMem, so they doesNotReadMemory() returns false for them.
The test change is due to the test checking the fn attribute ids at the
call sites, which got bumped up due to a new combination with writeonly
appearing in the test file.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, reames, efriedma, nlopes, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72789
The assume intrinsic is intentionally marked as may reading/writing
memory, to avoid passes moving them around. When flattening the CFG
for predicated blocks, we have to drop the assume calls, as they
are control-flow dependent.
There are some cases where we can do better (when control flow is
preserved), but that is follow-up work.
Fixes PR43620.
Reviewers: hsaito, rengolin, dcaballe, Ayal
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68814
Suppose an inline instance has hot total sample count but 0 entry count, and
it is an indirect call target. If the indirect call has no other call target
and inline instance associated with it and it is promoted, currently the
conditional branch generated by indirect call promotion will have invalid
branch profile which is !{!"branch_weights", i32 0, i32 0} -- because the
entry count of the promoted target is 0 and the total entry count of all
targets is also 0. This caused a SEGV in Control Height Reduction and may
cause problem in other passes.
Function entry count of an inline instance is computed by a heuristic --
using either the sample of the starting line or starting inner inline
instance. The patch changes the heuristic a little bit so that when total
sample count is larger than 0, the computed entry count will be at least 1.
Then the new branch profile will be !{!"branch_weights", i32 1, i32 0}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72790
Summary:
This patch could be treated as a rebase of D33960. It also fixes PR35547.
A fix for `llvm/test/Other/close-stderr.ll` is proposed in D68164. Seems
the consensus is that the test is passing by chance and I'm not
sure how important it is for us. So it is removed like in D33960 for now.
The rest of the test fixes are just adding `--crash` flag to `not` tool.
** The reason it fixes PR35547 is
`exit` does cleanup including calling class destructor whereas `abort`
does not do any cleanup. In multithreading environment such as ThinLTO or JIT,
threads may share states which mostly are ManagedStatic<>. If faulting thread
tearing down a class when another thread is using it, there are chances of
memory corruption. This is bad 1. It will stop error reporting like pretty
stack printer; 2. The memory corruption is distracting and nondeterministic in
terms of error message, and corruption type (depending one the timing, it
could be double free, heap free after use, etc.).
Reviewers: rnk, chandlerc, zturner, sepavloff, MaskRay, espindola
Reviewed By: rnk, MaskRay
Subscribers: wuzish, jholewinski, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, arichardson, jgravelle-google, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, cfe-commits, MaskRay, filcab, davide, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, steven_wu, dexonsmith, rupprecht, seiya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67847
After extracting, fix up debug info in both the old and new functions by
1) Pointing line locations and debug intrinsics to the new subprogram
scope, and
2) Deleting intrinsics which point to values outside of the new
function.
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D72795.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, a build of LNT in the `-Os -g` config
with "-mllvm -hot-cold-split=1" set, and end-to-end debugging of a toy
program which undergoes splitting to verify that lldb can find
variables, single step, etc. in extracted code.
rdar://45507940
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72801
Summary:
Current peeling implementation bails out in case of loop nests.
The patch introduces a field in TargetTransformInfo structure that
certain targets can use to relax the constraints if it's
profitable (disabled by default).
Also additional option is added to enable peeling manually for
experimenting and testing purposes.
Reviewers: fhahn, lebedev.ri, xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70304
As discussed in the motivating PR44509:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44509
...we can end up with worse code using fast-math than without.
This is because the reassociate pass greedily transforms fsub
into fneg/fadd and apparently (based on the regression tests
seen here) expects instcombine to clean that up if it wasn't
profitable. But we were missing this fold:
(X - Y) - Z --> X - (Y + Z)
There's another, more specific case that I think we should
handle as shown in the "fake" fneg test (but missed with a real
fneg), but that's another patch. That may be tricky to get
right without conflicting with existing transforms for fneg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72521
Summary:
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created in `getAssumedConstant` method when `AAValueSimplify` returns `nullptr`(worst state).
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: phosek, davezarzycki, baziotis, hiraditya, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
When multiple guard intrinsics are merged into one, currently the
result of eraseInstFromFunction() is returned -- however, this
should only be done if the current instruction is being removed.
In this case we're removing a different instruction and should
instead report that the current one has been modified by returning it.
For this test case, this reduces the number of instcombine iterations
from 5 to 2 (the minimum possible).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72558
This ports the MergeFunctions pass to the NewPM. This was rather
straightforward, as no analyses are used.
Additionally MergeFunctions needs to be conditionally enabled in
the PassBuilder, but I left that part out of this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72537
This fixes the issue encountered in D71164. Instead of using a
range-based for, manually iterate over the users and advance the
iterator beforehand, so we do not skip any users due to iterator
invalidation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72657
Summary:
If aligment on `LoadInst` isn't specified, load is assumed to be ABI-aligned.
And said aligment may be different for different types.
So if we change load type, but don't pay extra attention to the aligment
(i.e. keep it unspecified), we may either overpromise (if the default aligment
of the new type is higher), or underpromise (if the default aligment
of the new type is smaller).
Thus, if no alignment is specified, we need to manually preserve the implied ABI alignment.
This addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44543 by making combineLoadToNewType preserve ABI alignment of the load.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72710
Summary: This fixes a crash in internal builds under SamplePGO.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72653
Fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44419 by preserving the
nuw on sub of geps. We only do this if the offset has a multiplication
as the final operation, as we can't be sure the operations is nuw
in the other cases without more thorough analysis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72048
Teach SCEV about the @loop.decrement.reg intrinsic, which has exactly the same
semantics as a sub expression. This allows us to query hardware-loops, which
contain this @loop.decrement.reg intrinsic, so that we can calculate iteration
counts, exit values, etc. of hardwareloops.
This "int_loop_decrement_reg" intrinsic is defined as "IntrNoDuplicate". Thus,
while hardware-loops and tripcounts now become analysable by SCEV, this
prevents the usual loop transformations from applying transformations on
hardware-loops, which is what we want at this point, for which I have added
test cases for loopunrolling and IndVarSimplify and LFTR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71563
pass.
Summary: This patch changes LoopUnrollAndJamPass to a function pass, and
keeps the loops traversal order same as defined in
FunctionToLoopPassAdaptor LoopPassManager.h.
The next patch will change the loop traversal to outer to inner order,
so more loops can be transform.
Discussion in llvm-dev mailing list:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/llvm-dev/LF4rUjkVI2g
Reviewer: dmgreen, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, kbarton, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Subscribers: hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72230
This is a special case of Z / (X / Y) => (Y * Z) / X, with X = 1.0.
The m_OneUse check is avoided because even in the case of the
multiple uses for 1.0/Y, the number of instructions remain the same
and a division is replaced by a multiplication.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72319
This is step 1 of damage control assuming that we need to remove several
over-reaching folds for select-of-booleans because they can cause
miscompiles as shown in D72396.
The scalar case seems obviously safe:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/jSj
And I don't think there's any danger for vectors either - if the
condition is poisoned, then the select must be poisoned too, so undef
elements don't make any difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72412
Architecturally, it's allowed to have MVE-I without an FPU, thus
-mfpu=none should not disable MVE-I, or moves to/from FP-registers.
This patch removes `+/-fpregs` from features unconditionally added to
target feature list, depending on FPU and moves the logic to Clang
driver, where the negative form (`-fpregs`) is conditionally added to
the target features list for the cases of `-mfloat-abi=soft`, or
`-mfpu=none` without either `+mve` or `+mve.fp`. Only the negative
form is added by the driver, the positive one is derived from other
features in the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71843
We don't unroll vector loops for MVE targets, but we miss the case
when loops only contain intrinsic calls. So just move the logic a
bit to catch this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72440
This patch updates the shape propagation to iterate until no new shape
information is discovered.
As initial seed for the forward propagation, we use the matrix intrinsic
instructions. Both propagateShapeForward and propagateShapeBackward
return new work lists, with the instructions to be used for the next
iteration. When propagating forward, we record all instructions we added
new shape information for. When propagating backward, we record all
users of instructions we added new shape information for.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70901
This patch extends to shape propagation to also include load
instructions and implements shape aware lowering for vector loads.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70900
This patch extends the shape propagation for matrix operations to also
propagate the shape of instructions to their operands.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70899
This addresses a vectorisation regression for tail-folded loops that are
counting down, e.g. loops as simple as this:
void foo(char *A, char *B, char *C, uint32_t N) {
while (N > 0) {
*C++ = *A++ + *B++;
N--;
}
}
These are loops that can be vectorised, but when tail-folding is requested, it
can't find a primary induction variable which we do need for predicating the
loop. As a result, the loop isn't vectorised at all, which it is able to do
when tail-folding is not attempted. So, this adds a check for the primary
induction variable where we decide how to lower the scalar epilogue. I.e., when
there isn't a primary induction variable, a scalar epilogue loop is allowed
(i.e. don't request tail-folding) so that vectorisation could still be
triggered.
Having this check for the primary induction variable make sense anyway, and in
addition, in a follow-up of this I will look into discovering earlier the
primary induction variable for counting down loops, so that this can also be
tail-folded.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72324
When we replace instructions with unreachable we delete instructions. We
now avoid dangling pointers to those deleted instructions in the
`ToBeChangedToUnreachableInsts` set. Other modification collections
might need to be updated in the future as well.
The added testcase shows the current transformation for the operation
Z / (1.0 / Y), which remains unchanged. This will be updated to align
with the transformed code (Y * Z) with D72319.
The existing transformation Z / (X / Y) => (Y * Z) / X is not handling
this case as there are multiple uses for (1.0 / Y) in this testcase.
Patch by: @raghesh (Raghesh Aloor)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72388
This reverts commit a041c4ec6f.
This looks like a non-trivial change and there has been no code
reviews (at least there were no phabricator revisions attached to the
commit description). It is also causing a regression in one of our
downstream integration tests, we haven't been able to come up with a
minimal reproducer yet.
Factor out common logic into some reasonable commented helper functions. In the process, ensure that the in-block vs cross-block cases are handled the same. They previously weren't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67126
not (select ?, (cmp TPred, ?, ?), (cmp FPred, ?, ?) -->
select ?, (cmp TPred', ?, ?), (cmp FPred', ?, ?)
If both sides of the select are cmps, we can remove an instruction.
The case where only side is a cmp is deferred to a possible
follow-on patch.
We have a more general 'isFreeToInvert' analysis, but I'm not seeing
a way to use that more widely without inducing infinite looping
(opposing transforms).
Here, we flip the compare predicates directly, so we should not have
any danger by creating extra intermediate 'not' ops.
Alive proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/jKa
Name: both select values are compares - invert predicates
%tcmp = icmp sle i32 %x, %y
%fcmp = icmp ugt i32 %z, %w
%sel = select i1 %cond, i1 %tcmp, i1 %fcmp
%not = xor i1 %sel, true
=>
%tcmp_not = icmp sgt i32 %x, %y
%fcmp_not = icmp ule i32 %z, %w
%not = select i1 %cond, i1 %tcmp_not, i1 %fcmp_not
Name: false val is compare - invert/not
%fcmp = icmp ugt i32 %z, %w
%sel = select i1 %cond, i1 %tcmp, i1 %fcmp
%not = xor i1 %sel, true
=>
%tcmp_not = xor i1 %tcmp, -1
%fcmp_not = icmp ule i32 %z, %w
%not = select i1 %cond, i1 %tcmp_not, i1 %fcmp_not
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72007
Don't overwrite existing target-cpu attributes.
I've often found the replacement behavior annoying, and this is
inconsistent with how the fast math command line flags interact with
the function attributes.
Does not yet change target-features, since I think that should behave
as a concatenation.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D67148, we use isFloatTy to test floating
point type, otherwise we return GPRRC.
So 'double' will be classified as GPRRC, which is not accurate.
This patch covers other floating point types.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71946
Summary:
Make `AAMDNodes`' `getAAMetadata()` and `setAAMetadata()` to take `!tbaa.struct`
into account as well as `!tbaa`. This impacts llvm.org/pr42022.
This is a temprorary fix needed to keep `!tbaa.struct` tag by SROA pass.
New field `TBAAStruct` should be deleted when `!tbaa` tag replaces `!tbaa.struct`.
Merging two `!tbaa.struct`'s to one is conservatively considered to be `nullptr`
(giving `MayAlias`) -- this could be enhanced, but relying on the said future
replacement.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, vporpo
Subscribers: hiraditya, kosarev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70924
Summary:
In addMustTailToCoroResumes, we set musttail on those resume instructions that are followed by a ret instruction. This is done by simplifyTerminatorLeadingToRet which replace a sequence of branches leading to a ret with a clone of the ret.
However it forgets to remove corresponding PHI values that come from basic block of replaced branch, and may cause jumpthreading pass hangs (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43720)
This patch fix this issue
Test Plan:
cppcoro library with O3+flto
check-llvm
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov, lewissbaker
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, EricWF, hiraditya, dexonsmith, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71826
Patch by junparser (JunMa)!
Summary:
For artificial cases (huge array, few usages), Global SRA optimization creates
a lot of redundant data. It creates an instance of GlobalVariable for each array
element. For huge array, that means huge compilation time and huge memory usage.
Following example compiles for 10 minutes and requires 40GB of memory.
namespace {
char LargeBuffer[64 * 1024 * 1024];
}
int main ( void ) {
LargeBuffer[0] = 0;
printf("\n ");
return LargeBuffer[0] == 0;
}
The fix is to avoid Global SRA for large arrays.
Reviewers: craig.topper, rnk, efriedma, fhahn
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: xbolva00, lebedev.ri, lkail, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71993
Name: (X & (- Y)) - X -> - (X & (Y - 1)) (PR44448)
%negy = sub i8 0, %y
%unbiasedx = and i8 %negy, %x
%r = sub i8 %unbiasedx, %x
=>
%ymask = add i8 %y, -1
%xmasked = and i8 %ymask, %x
%r = sub i8 0, %xmasked
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/OIpla
This decreases use count of %x, may allow us to
later hoist said negation even further,
and results in marginally nicer X86 codegen.
See
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44448https://reviews.llvm.org/D71499
If we replace a function with a new one because we rewrite the
signature, dead users may still refer to the old version. With this
patch we reuse the code that deals with dead functions, which the old
versions are, to avoid problems.
An inbounds GEP results in poison if the value is not "inbounds", not in
UB. We accidentally derived nonnull and dereferenceable from these
inbounds GEPs even in the absence of accesses that would make the poison
to UB.
The patch makes sure that the LastThrowing pointer does not point to any instruction deleted by call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
While iterating through the instructions the pass maintains a pointer to the lastThrowing Instruction. A call to deleteDeadInstruction deletes a dead store and other instructions feeding the original dead instruction which also become dead. The instruction pointed by the lastThrowing pointer could also be deleted by the call to DeleteDeadInstruction and thus it becomes a dangling pointer. Because of this, we see an error in the next iteration.
In the patch, we maintain a list of throwing instructions encountered previously and use the last non deleted throwing instruction from the container.
Reviewers: fhahn, bcahoon, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65326
As shown in P44383:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44383
...we can't safely propagate a vector constant through this icmp fold
if that vector constant contains undefined elements.
We know that each defined element of the constant is safe though, so
find the first of those and replicate it into the formerly undef lanes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72101
This is a less ambitious alternative to previous attempts to fix
this bug with:
rG56b2aee1875a
rGef02831f0a4e
rG56b2aee1875a
...because those all failed bot testing with use-after-free or
other problems.
The original crashing/assert problem is still showing up on
various fuzzers, so I've added a new minimal test based on
another one of those failures.
Instead of trying to manage and coordinate the logic in
isAllocSiteRemovable() with the deletion loops, just loosen
the existing code that handles casts and GEP by replacing
with undef to allow other opcodes. That means that no
instructions with uses should assert on deletion, and there
are hopefully no non-obvious sanitizer bugs induced.
This patch introduces `AAValueConstantRange`, which answers a possible range for integer value in a specific program point.
One of the motivations is propagating existing `range` metadata. (I think we need to change the situation that `range` metadata cannot be put to Argument).
The state is a tuple of `ConstantRange` and it is initialized to (known, assumed) = ([-∞, +∞], empty).
Currently, AAValueConstantRange is created when AAValueSimplify cannot
simplify the value.
Supported
- BinaryOperator(add, sub, ...)
- CmpInst(icmp eq, ...)
- !range metadata
`AAValueConstantRange` is not intended to extend to polyhedral range value analysis.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71620
The instructions use a mask to either pack disjoint bits together(pext) or spread bits to disjoint locations(pdep). If the mask is all 0s then no bits are extracted or deposited. If the mask is all ones, then the source value is written to the result since no compression or expansion happens. Otherwise if both the source and mask are constant we can walk the bits in the source/mask and calculate the result.
There other crazier things we could do like computeKnownBits or turning pext into shift/and if only a single contiguous range of bits is extracted.
Fixes PR44389
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71952
This does not solve PR17101, but it is one of the
underlying diffs noted here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17101#c8
We could ease the one-use checks for the 'clear'
(no 'not' op) half of the transform, but I do not
know if that asymmetry would make things better
or worse.
Proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/uVB
Name: masked bit set
%sh1 = shl i32 1, %y
%and = and i32 %sh1, %x
%cmp = icmp ne i32 %and, 0
%r = zext i1 %cmp to i32
=>
%s = lshr i32 %x, %y
%r = and i32 %s, 1
Name: masked bit clear
%sh1 = shl i32 1, %y
%and = and i32 %sh1, %x
%cmp = icmp eq i32 %and, 0
%r = zext i1 %cmp to i32
=>
%xn = xor i32 %x, -1
%s = lshr i32 %xn, %y
%r = and i32 %s, 1
Judging by the existing comments, this was the intention, but the
transform never actually checked if the existing phi's would be removed.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44242 for an example where
this causes much worse code generation on AMDGPU.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71209
As part of the Attributor manifest we want to change the signature of
functions. This patch introduces a fairly generic interface to do so.
As a first, very simple, use case, we remove unused arguments. A second
use case, pointer privatization, will be committed with this patch as
well.
A lot of the code and ideas are taken from argument promotion and we
run all argument promotion tests through this framework as well.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68765
Since the information is known we can simply use it at the call site.
This is especially useful for callbacks but also helps regular calls.
The test changes are mechanical.
This is the second step after D67871 to make use of abstract call sites.
In this patch the argument we associate with a abstract call site
argument can be the one in the callback callee instead of the one in the
callback broker.
Caveat: We cannot allow no-alias arguments for problematic callbacks:
As described in [1], adding no-alias (or restrict) to arguments could
break synchronization as the synchronization effect, e.g., a barrier,
does not "alias" with the pointer anymore. This disables no-alias
annotation for potentially problematic arguments until we implement the
fix described in [1].
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68008
[1] Compiler Optimizations for OpenMP, J. Doerfert and H. Finkel,
International Workshop on OpenMP 2018,
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt18.pdf
Especially for callbacks, annotating the call site arguments is
important. Doing so exposed a too strong dependence of AAMemoryBehavior
on AANoCapture since we handle the case of potentially captured pointers
explicitly.
The changes to the tests are all mechanical.
This patch adds necessary test cases for load-update-store pattern
which only updates single element of vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71886
Summary: This patch makes `AAValueSimplify` use `changeUsesAfterManifest` in `manifest`. This will invoke simple folding after the manifest.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71972
A branch is considered UB if it depends on an undefined / uninitialized value.
At this point this handles simple UB branches in the form: `br i1 undef, ...`
We query `AAValueSimplify` to get a value for the branch condition, so the branch
can be more complicated than just: `br i1 undef, ...`.
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71799
This patch extends the current shape propagation and shape aware
lowering to also support binary operators. Those operators are uniform
with respect to their shape (shape of the input operands is the same as
the shape of their result).
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70898
Summary:
Follow-up on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
We basically use `checkForAllInstructions` to loop through all the instructions in a function that access memory through a pointer: load, store, atomicrmw, atomiccmpxchg
Note that we can now use the `getPointerOperand()` that gets us the pointer operand for an instruction that belongs to the aforementioned set.
Question: This function returns `nullptr` if the instruction is `volatile`. Why?
Guess: Because if it is volatile, we don't want to do any transformation to it.
Another subtle point is that I had to add AtomicRMW, AtomicCmpXchg to `initializeInformationCache()`. Following `checkAllInstructions()` path, that
seemed the most reasonable place to add it and correct the fact that these instructions were ignored (they were not in `OpcodeInstMap` etc.). Is that ok?
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, sstefan1
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71787
_Eventually_, this attribute will be assigned to a function if it
contains undefined behavior. As a first small step, I tried to make it
loop through the load instructions in a function (eventually, the plan
is to check if a load instructions causes undefined behavior, because
e.g. dereferences a null pointer - Also eventually, this won't happen in
initialize() but in updateImpl()).
Patch By: Stefanos Baziotis (@baziotis)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71435
If the matrix.multiply calls have the contract fast math flag, we can
use fmuladd. This als adds a command line option to force fmuladd
generation. We can retire this option once there is a clang-level
option.
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70951
This patch adds infrastructure for forward shape propagation to
LowerMatrixIntrinsics. It also updates the pass to make use of
the shape information to break up larger vector operations and to
eliminate unnecessary conversion operations between columnwise matrixes
and flattened vectors: if shape information is available for an
instruction, lower the operation to a set of instructions operating on
columns. For example, a store of a matrix is broken down into separate
stores for each column. For users that do not have shape
information (e.g. because they do not yet support shape information
aware lowering), we pack the result columns into a flat vector and
update those users.
It also adds shape aware lowering for the first non-intrinsic
instruction: vector stores.
Example:
For
%c = call <4 x double> @llvm.matrix.transpose(<4 x double> %a, i32 2, i32 2)
store <4 x double> %c, <4 x double>* %Ptr
We generate the code below without shape propagation. Note %9 which
combines the columns of the transposed matrix into a flat vector.
%split = shufflevector <4 x double> %a, <4 x double> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%split1 = shufflevector <4 x double> %a, <4 x double> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 2, i32 3>
%1 = extractelement <2 x double> %split, i64 0
%2 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %1, i64 0
%3 = extractelement <2 x double> %split1, i64 0
%4 = insertelement <2 x double> %2, double %3, i64 1
%5 = extractelement <2 x double> %split, i64 1
%6 = insertelement <2 x double> undef, double %5, i64 0
%7 = extractelement <2 x double> %split1, i64 1
%8 = insertelement <2 x double> %6, double %7, i64 1
%9 = shufflevector <2 x double> %4, <2 x double> %8, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
store <4 x double> %9, <4 x double>* %Ptr
With this patch, we propagate the 2x2 shape information from the
transpose to the store and we generate the code below. Note that we
store the columns directly and do not need an extra shuffle.
%9 = bitcast <4 x double>* %Ptr to double*
%10 = bitcast double* %9 to <2 x double>*
store <2 x double> %4, <2 x double>* %10, align 8
%11 = getelementptr double, double* %9, i32 2
%12 = bitcast double* %11 to <2 x double>*
store <2 x double> %8, <2 x double>* %12, align 8
Reviewers: anemet, Gerolf, reames, hfinkel, andrew.w.kaylor
Reviewed By: anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70897
This reverts commit ee7579409b.
It causes crashes during ThinLTO. I suspect the issue is related to
races on the global TypeSize variable, which is 80 at the time of the
crash.
As discussed in PR44330:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44330
...the transform from pow(X, -0.5) libcall/intrinsic to
reciprocal square root can result in small deviations from
the expected result due to differences in the pow()
implementation and/or the extra rounding step from the division.
This patch proposes to allow that difference with either the
'approximate functions' or 'reassociate' FMF:
http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#fast-math-flags
In practice, this likely means that the code is compiled with
all of 'fast' (-ffast-math), but I have preserved the existing
specializations for -0.0/-INF that enable generating safe code
if those special values are allowed simultaneously with
allowing approximation/reassociation.
The question about whether a similar restriction is needed for
the non-reciprocal case -- pow(X, 0.5) -- is deferred. That
transform is allowed without FMF currently, and this patch does
not change that behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71706
Summary:
This patch limits the default number of iterations performed by InstCombine. It also exposes a new option that allows to specify how many iterations is considered getting stuck in an infinite loop.
Based on experiments performed on real-world C++ programs, InstCombine seems to perform at most ~8-20 iterations, so treating 1000 iterations as an infinite loop seems like a safe choice. See D71145 for details.
The two limits can be specified via command line options.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic, xbolva00, grosser
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71673
A sequence of additions or multiplications that is known not to wrap, may wrap
if it's order is changed (i.e., reassociated). Therefore when vectorizing
integer sum or product reductions, their no-wrap flags need to be removed.
Fixes PR43828
Patch by Denis Antrushin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69563
Summary:
It is pretty common to assume that something is not zero.
Even optimizer itself sometimes emits such assumptions
(e.g. `addAssumeNonNull()` in `PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp`).
But we currently don't deal with such assumptions :)
The only way `isKnownNonZero()` handles assumptions is
by calling `computeKnownBits()` which calls `computeKnownBitsFromAssume()`.
But `x != 0` does not tell us anything about set bits,
it only says that there are *some* set bits.
So naturally, `KnownBits` does not get populated,
and we fail to make use of this assumption.
I propose to deal with this special case by special-casing it
via adding a `isKnownNonZeroFromAssume()` that returns boolean
when there is an applicable assumption.
While there, we also deal with other predicates,
mainly if the comparison is with constant.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43267 | PR43267 ]].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71660
This is a pretty rare case, when CxtI and assume are
in the same basic block, with assume being located later.
We were already checking that assumption was guaranteed to be
executed, but we omitted CxtI itself from consideration,
and as the test (miscompile) shows, that is incorrect.
As noted in D71660 review by @nikic.
@escape() may throw here, we don't know that assumption, which is located
afterwards in the same block, is executed, therefore %load arg of
call to @escape() can not be marked as non-null.
As noted in D71660 review by @nikic.
A function marked `noreturn` may contain unreachable terminators: these
should not be considered cold, as the function may be a trampoline.
rdar://58068594
Summary:
Ignore looking at blocks that are unreachable from entry when
collecting candidates for hosting.
Normally the consthoist pass is executed in the llc pipeline,
just after unreachableblockelim. So it is abnormal to have code
that is unreachable from the entry block. But when running the
pass as part of opt, for example as part of fuzzy testing, we
might trigger various kinds of asserts when collecting candidates
if we include unreachable blocks in that analysis.
It seems like a waste of time to hoist constants in unreachble
blocks, so the solution is to simply ignore such blocks when
collecting the hoisting candidates.
The two added test cases used to end up in two different asserts,
and the intention with the checks is just to verify that we no
longer fail.
Fixes: PR43903
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, uabelho, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71678
In certain situations after inlining and simplification we end up with
code that is _almost_ a min/max pattern, but contains constants that
have been demand-bit optimised to the wrong values, ending up with code
like:
%1 = icmp slt i32 %shr, -128
%2 = select i1 %1, i32 128, i32 %shr
%.inv = icmp sgt i32 %shr, 127
%spec.select.i = select i1 %.inv, i32 127, i32 %2
%conv7 = trunc i32 %spec.select.i to i8
This should be turned into a min/max pattern, but the -128 in the first
select was instead transformed into 128, as only the bottom byte was
ever demanded.
To fix this, I've put in further canonicalisation for the immediates of
selects, preferring to use the same value as the icmp if available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71516
Summary:
This patch adds instructions to the InstCombine worklist after they are properly inserted. This way we don't get `<badref>`s printed when logging added instructions.
It also adds a check in `Worklist::Add` that ensures that all added instructions have parents.
Simple test case that illustrates the difference when run with `--debug-only=instcombine`:
```
define i32 @test35(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%1 = or i32 %a, 1135
%2 = or i32 %1, %b
ret i32 %2
}
```
Before this patch:
```
INSTCOMBINE ITERATION #1 on test35
IC: ADDING: 3 instrs to worklist
IC: Visiting: %1 = or i32 %a, 1135
IC: Visiting: %2 = or i32 %1, %b
IC: ADD: %2 = or i32 %a, %b
IC: Old = %3 = or i32 %1, %b
New = <badref> = or i32 %2, 1135
IC: ADD: <badref> = or i32 %2, 1135
...
```
With this patch:
```
INSTCOMBINE ITERATION #1 on test35
IC: ADDING: 3 instrs to worklist
IC: Visiting: %1 = or i32 %a, 1135
IC: Visiting: %2 = or i32 %1, %b
IC: ADD: %2 = or i32 %a, %b
IC: Old = %3 = or i32 %1, %b
New = <badref> = or i32 %2, 1135
IC: ADD: %3 = or i32 %2, 1135
...
```
Reviewers: fhahn, davide, spatel, foad, grosser, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: nikic, lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71093
Summary:
This patch teaches InstCombine to accept a new parameter: maximum number of iterations over functions.
InstCombine tries to simplify instructions by iterating over the whole function until the function stops changing. As a consequence, the last iteration before reaching a fixpoint visits all instructions in the worklist and never performs any rewrites.
Bounding the number of iterations can have 2 benefits:
* In case the users of the pass can make a good guess about the number of required iterations, we can save the time normally spent on the last iteration that doesn't change anything.
* When the wants to use InstCombine as a cleanup pass, it may be enough to run just a few iterations and stop even before reaching a fixpoint. This can be also useful for implementing a lightweight pass pipeline (think `-O1`).
This patch does not change the behavior of opt or Clang -- limiting the number of iterations is entirely opt-in.
Reviewers: fhahn, davide, spatel, foad, nlopes, grosser, lebedev.ri, nikic, xbolva00
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: craig.topper, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71145
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
We somehow missed doing this when we were working on Power9 exploitation.
This just adds the missing legalization and cost for producing the vector
intrinsics.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70436
Summary:This PR move instructions from FC0.Latch bottom up to the
beginning of FC1.Latch as long as they are proven safe.
To illustrate why this is beneficial, let's consider the following
example:
Before Fusion:
header1:
br header2
header2:
br header2, latch1
latch1:
br header1, preheader3
preheader3:
br header3
header3:
br header4
header4:
br header4, latch3
latch3:
br header3, exit3
After Fusion (before this PR):
header1:
br header2
header2:
br header2, latch1
latch1:
br header3
header3:
br header4
header4:
br header4, latch3
latch3:
br header1, exit3
Note that preheader3 is removed during fusion before this PR.
Notice that we cannot fuse loop2 with loop4 as there exists block latch1
in between.
This PR move instructions from latch1 to beginning of latch3, and remove
block latch1. LoopFusion is now able to fuse loop nest recursively.
After Fusion (after this PR):
header1:
br header2
header2:
br header3
header3:
br header4
header4:
br header2, latch3
latch3:
br header1, exit3
Reviewer: kbarton, jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, fhahn, hfinkel,
bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: kbarton, Meinersbur
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71165
Summary:
Add trimming of unused components of s_buffer_load.
Extend trimming of *buffer_load to also include
unused components at the beginning of vectors and update offset.
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70315
Summary:
This patch restricts loop fusion to only consider rotated loops as valid candidates.
This simplifies the analysis and transformation and aligns with other loop optimizations.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, Whitney, fhahn, hfinkel
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: ormris, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71025
Summary:
In commit d60f34c20a (llvm-svn 317128,
PR35113) MergeBlockIntoPredecessor was changed into
discarding some dbg.value intrinsics referring to
PHI values, post-splice due to loop rotation.
That elimination of dbg.value intrinsics did not
consider which dbg.value to keep depending on the
context (e.g. if the variable is changing its value
several times inside the basic block).
In the past that hasn't been such a big problem since
CodeGenPrepare::placeDbgValues has moved the dbg.value
to be next to the PHI node anyway. But after commit
00e238896c CodeGenPrepare isn't doing that
any longer, so we need to be more careful when avoiding
duplicate dbg.value intrinsics in MergeBlockIntoPredecessor.
This patch replaces the code that tried to avoid duplicate
dbg.values by using the RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs helper.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: jholewinski, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71480
Summary:
In commit d60f34c20a (llvm-svn 317128,
PR35113) MergeBlockIntoPredecessor was changed into
discarding some dbg.value intrinsics referring to
PHI values, post-splice due to loop rotation.
That elimination of dbg.value intrinsics does not
consider which dbg.value to keep based on the context.
Such as always keeping the one that comes first textually,
or the need to keep several of them in case the variable
is changing it's value several times inside the basic block.
In the past that hasn't been such a big problem since
CodeGenPrepare::placeDbgValues has moved the dbg.value
to be next to the PHI node anyway. But after commit
00e238896c CodeGenPrepare isn't doing that
any longer, so we need to be more careful when avoiding
duplicate dbg.value intrinsics in MergeBlockIntoPredecessor.
This patch is just a pre commit of the test case.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71479
Summary:
Add a RemoveRedundantDbgInstrs to BasicBlockUtils with the
goal to remove redundant dbg intrinsics from a basic block.
This can be useful after various transforms, as it might
be simpler to do a filtering of dbg intrinsics after the
transform than during the transform.
One primary use case would be to replace a too aggressive
removal done by MergeBlockIntoPredecessor, seen at loop
rotate (not done in this patch).
The elimination algorithm currently focuses on dbg.value
intrinsics and is doing two iterations over the BB.
First we iterate backward starting at the last instruction
in the BB. Whenever a consecutive sequence of dbg.value
instructions are found we keep the last dbg.value for
each variable found (variable fragments are identified
using the {DILocalVariable, FragmentInfo, inlinedAt}
triple as given by the DebugVariable helper class).
Next we iterate forward starting at the first instruction
in the BB. Whenever we find a dbg.value describing a
DebugVariable (identified by {DILocalVariable, inlinedAt})
we save the {DIValue, DIExpression} that describes that
variables value. But if the variable already was mapped
to the same {DIValue, DIExpression} pair we instead drop
the second dbg.value.
To ease the process of making lit tests for this utility a
new pass is introduced called RedundantDbgInstElimination.
It can be executed by opt using -redundant-dbg-inst-elim.
Reviewers: aprantl, jmorse, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71478
shuf (inselt ?, C, IndexC), undef, <IndexC, IndexC...> --> <C, C...>
This is another missing shuffle fold pattern uncovered by the
shuffle correctness fix from D70246.
The problem was visible in the post-commit thread example, but
we managed to overcome the limitation for that particular case
with D71220.
This is something like the inverse of the previous fix - there
we didn't demand the inserted scalar, and here we are only
demanding an inserted scalar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71488
Summary:
In preparation of D65531 as well as the reuse of these tests for the
Attributor, we modernize them and use the update_test_checks to simplify
updates.
This was done with the update_test_checks after D68819 and D68850.
Reviewers: hfinkel, vsk, dblaikie, davidxl, tejohnson, tstellar, echristo, chandlerc, efriedma, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: bollu, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68766
The Attributor can, to some degree, do what IPConstantProp does. We can
consequently use the corner cases already collected and tested for in
the IPConstantProp tests to improve Attributor test coverage.
This exposed various bugs fixed in previous Attributor patches.
Not all functionality of IPConstantProp is available in AAValueSimplify
and AAIsDead so some tests show that we cannot perform the expected
constant propagation.
Reviewers: fhahn, efriedma, mssimpso, davide
Subscribers: bollu, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69748
Tyker