This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Summary:
Noticed during review of D41102.
I'm not sure whether there are any principal reasons why it returns raw owning pointer,
or it is just a old code that was not updated post-C++11.
I'm not too sure what testing i should do, because `check-all` is not error clean here for some reason,
but it does not //appear// asif those failures are related to these changes.
This is clang part.
Clang-tools-extra part is D43780.
Reviewers: klimek, bkramer, alexfh, pcc
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43779
llvm-svn: 326201
Summary:
Change clang-refactor default behavior to print the new code after refactoring
(instead of editing the source files), which would make it easier to use
and debug the refactoring action.
Reviewers: arphaman, ioeric
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39092
llvm-svn: 316212
This commit allows the refactoring library to use its own set of
refactoring-specific diagnostics to reports things like initiation errors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38772
llvm-svn: 315924
The fixed commit ensures that ParsedSourceRange works correctly
with Windows paths.
Original message:
This commit actually brings clang-refactor to a usable state as it can now
apply the refactoring changes to source files.
The -selection option is now also fully supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38402
llvm-svn: 315918
This commit actually brings clang-refactor to a usable state as it can now
apply the refactoring changes to source files.
The -selection option is now also fully supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38402
llvm-svn: 315738
The recommit fixes a UB bug that occurred only on a small number of bots.
Original message:
This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.
This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856
llvm-svn: 315661
This commit adds initial support for refactoring options. One can now use
optional and required std::string options.
This commit also adds a NewNameOption for the local-rename refactoring action to
allow rename to work with custom names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37856
llvm-svn: 315087
This commit ensures that CommonOptionsParser works with subcommands. This allows
clang-refactor to use the CommonOptionsParser.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37618
llvm-svn: 313260
local-rename action
This commit introduces the clang-refactor tool alongside the local-rename action
which uses the existing renaming engine used by clang-rename. The tool
doesn't actually perform the source transformations yet, it just provides
testing support. This commit also moves only one test from clang-rename over to
test/Refactor. I will continue to move the other tests throughout
development of clang-refactor.
The following options are supported by clang-refactor:
-v: use verbose output
-selection: The source range that corresponds to the portion of the source
that's selected (currently only special command test:<file> is supported).
Please note that a follow-up commit will migrate clang-refactor to
libTooling's common option parser, so clang-refactor will be able to use
the common interface with compilation database and options like -p, -extra-arg,
etc.
The testing support provided by clang-refactor is described below:
When -selection=test:<file> is given, clang-refactor will parse the selection
commands from that file. The selection commands are grouped and the specified
refactoring action invoked by the tool. Each command in a group is expected to
produce an identical result. The precise syntax for the selection commands is
described in a comment in TestSupport.h.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36574
llvm-svn: 313244
Adrian Prantl