As was requested in D36313 thread,
with this patch section names and uniqueness calculated once,
and not every time when a range is dumped.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36740
llvm-svn: 310923
As expected, this failed on the windows bots but the instrumentation showed
something interesting. The ADD8ri and INC8r rules are never directly compared
on the windows machines. That implies that the issue lies in transitivity of
the Compare predicate. I believe I've already verified that but maybe I missed
something.
llvm-svn: 310922
Summary:
Support the case where an operand of a pattern is also the whole of the
result pattern. In this case the original result and all its uses must be
replaced by the operand. However, register class restrictions can require
a COPY. This patch handles both cases by always emitting the copy and
leaving it for the register allocator to optimize.
The previous commit failed on the windows bots and this one is likely to fail
on those same bots. However, the added instrumentation should reveal a particular
isHigherPriorityThan() evaluation which I'm expecting to expose that
these machines are weighing priority of two rules differently from the
non-windows machines.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36084
llvm-svn: 310919
With the addition of RISCVInstPrinter, it is now possible to test the basic
operation of the RISCV MC layer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23564
llvm-svn: 310917
Teaches llvm-dwarfdump to print section index and name of range
when it dumps .debug_info.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36313
llvm-svn: 310915
Two minor savings: avoid copying the SinkAfter map and avoid moving a cast if it
is not needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36408
llvm-svn: 310910
Since we don't factor in instruction lengths into outlining calculations
right now, it's never the case that a candidate could have length < 2.
Thus, we should quit early when we see such candidates.
llvm-svn: 310894
This adds support non-canonical compare predicates. InstSimplify can't rely on canonicalization to have occurred.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36646
llvm-svn: 310893
Summary:
This is modeled on the implementation for x86 which stores the command line
option in a 'StackAlignOverride' field in MipsSubtarget and then uses this
to compute a 'stackAlignment' value in
MipsSubtarget::initializeSubtargetDependencies.
The stackAlignment() method in MipsSubTarget is renamed to getStackAlignment()
and returns the computed 'stackAlignment'.
Reviewers: sdardis
Reviewed By: sdardis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35874
llvm-svn: 310891
This recommits r310869, with the moved files and no extra changes.
Original commit message:
This addresses a fixme in InstSimplify about using decomposeBitTest. This also fixes InstSimplify to handle ugt and ult compares too.
I've modified the interface a little to return only the APInt version of the mask that InstSimplify needs. InstCombine now has a small wrapper routine to create a Constant out of it. I've also dropped the returning of 0 since InstSimplify doesn't need that. So InstCombine creates a zero constant itself.
I also had to make decomposeBitTest support vectors since InstSimplify needs that.
As InstSimplify can't use something from the Transforms library, I've moved the CmpInstAnalysis code to the Analysis library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36593
llvm-svn: 310889
localized to the code that uses those analyses.
Technically, this can change behavior as we no longer require the
existence of the ProfileSummaryInfo analysis to use local profile
information via BFI. We didn't actually require the PSI to have an
interesting profile though, so this only really impacts the behavior in
non-default pass pipelines.
IMO, this makes it substantially less surprising how everything works --
before an analysis that wasn't actually used had to exist to trigger
*any* profile aware inlining. I think the new organization makes it more
obvious where various checks for profile signals happen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36710
llvm-svn: 310888
This was running immediately after isel, before
isel pseudos were even expanded which is really
unreasonable. Move this to before pre-reglloc
passes in case some other pre-regalloc pass wants to
use the updated regmask info.
Fixes one of the reasons IPRA doesn't do anything on
AMDGPU currently. Tests will be included with future
patch after a few more are fixed.
llvm-svn: 310875
Failed to add the two files that moved. And then added an extra change I didn't mean to while trying to fix that. Reverting everything.
llvm-svn: 310873
This addresses a fixme in InstSimplify about using decomposeBitTest. This also fixes InstSimplify to handle ugt and ult compares too.
I've modified the interface a little to return only the APInt version of the mask that InstSimplify needs. InstCombine now has a small wrapper routine to create a Constant out of it. I've also dropped the returning of 0 since InstSimplify doesn't need that. So InstCombine creates a zero constant itself.
I also had to make decomposeBitTest support vectors since InstSimplify needs that.
As InstSimplify can't use something from the Transforms library, I've moved the CmpInstAnalysis code to the Analysis library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36593
llvm-svn: 310869
Add codegen for VSX word extract conversion from signed/unsigned to single/double
precision.
For UINT_TO_FP:
Extract word unsigned and convert to float was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D20239.
Here we will add the missing extract integer and conversion to double. This
utilizes the new P9 instruction xxextractuw to extracting an integer element
when the result will be converted to double thereby saving 2 direct moves
(VSR <-> GPR).
For SINT_TO_FP:
We will implement the following sequence which will also reduce the number of
instructions by saving 2 direct moves.
v4i32->f32:
xxspltw
xvcvsxwsp
xscvspdpn
v4i32->f64:
xxspltw
xvcvsxwdp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35859
llvm-svn: 310866
ValueTracking has to strike a balance when attempting to propagate information
backwards from assumes, because if the information is trivially propagated
backwards, it can appear to LLVM that the assumption is known to be true, and
therefore can be removed.
This is sound (because an assumption has no semantic effect except for causing
UB), but prevents the assume from allowing further optimizations.
The isEphemeralValueOf check exists to try and prevent this issue by not
removing the source of an assumption. This tries to make it a little bit more
general to handle the case of side-effectful instructions, such as in
%0 = call i1 @get_val()
%1 = xor i1 %0, true
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %1)
Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36590
llvm-svn: 310859
This change let us schedule a bundle with different opcodes in it, for example : [ load, add, add, add ]
Reviewers: mkuper, RKSimon, ABataev, mzolotukhin, spatel, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36518
llvm-svn: 310847
According to the X86ISelLowering.h, UMUL results are low, high, and flags. But this place was treating result 1 or 2 as flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36654
llvm-svn: 310846
Summary:
The flag result is an i32 type. But its only really used for connectivity. I don't think anything even assumes a particular format. We don't ever do any real operations on it. So known bits don't help us optimize anything.
My main motivation is that the UMUL behavior is actually wrong. I was going to fix this in D36654, but then realized there was just no reason for it to be here.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36657
llvm-svn: 310845
Summary: This looks to have been disconnected about 3 years ago in r219358.
Reviewers: gadi.haber, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: gadi.haber
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36658
llvm-svn: 310844
Summary:
I don't think we need this code anymore. It only existed because i1 used to be legal.
There's probably more unneeded code in fast isel still.
Reviewers: guyblank, zvi
Reviewed By: guyblank
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36652
llvm-svn: 310843
The assert was added with r310779 and is usually correct,
but as the test shows, not always. The 'volatile' on the
load is needed to expose the faulty path because without
it, DemandedBits would return that the load is just dead
rather than not demanded, and so we wouldn't hit the
bogus assert.
Also, since the lambda is just a single-line now, get rid
of it and inline the DB.isAllOnesValue() calls.
This should fix (prevent execution of a faulty assert):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34179
llvm-svn: 310842
This adjusts the tests to hopfully pacify the llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win
buildbot.
Unlike many other instructions, these instructions have aliases which
take coprocessor registers, gpr register, accumulator (and dsp accumulator)
registers, floating point registers, floating point control registers and
coprocessor 2 data and control operands.
For the moment, these aliases are treated as pseudo instructions which are
expanded into the underlying instruction. As a result, disassembling these
instructions shows the underlying instruction and not the alias.
Reviewers: slthakur, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35253
llvm-svn: 310834
Summary: It is creating useless work as the commuted nodes is the same as the node we are working on in that case.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33840
llvm-svn: 310832
into vextract(vNiX,Idx) when creating vextract with getNode().
This case appeared in AVX512 after fixing pr33349 in r310552.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36571
llvm-svn: 310828
On some targets, the penalty of executing runtime unrolling checks
and then not the unrolled loop can be significantly detrimental to
performance. This results in the need to be more conservative with
the unroll count, keeping a trip count of 2 reduces the overhead as
well as increasing the chance of the unrolled body being executed. But
being conservative leaves performance gains on the table.
This patch enables the unrolling of the remainder loop introduced by
runtime unrolling. This can help reduce the overhead of misunrolled
loops because the cost of non-taken branches is much less than the
cost of the backedge that would normally be executed in the remainder
loop. This allows larger unroll factors to be used without suffering
performance loses with smaller iteration counts.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36309
llvm-svn: 310824
causing compile time issues.
Moreover, the patch *deleted* the flag in addition to changing the
default, and links to a code review that doesn't even discuss the flag
and just has an update to a Clang test case.
I've followed up on the commit thread to ask for numbers on compile time
at this point, leaving the flag in place until things stabilize, and
pointing at specific code that seems to exhibit excessive compile time
with this patch.
Original commit message for r310583:
"""
[ValueTracking] Enabling ValueTracking patch by default (recommit). Part 2.
The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on
non-negative integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777,
r284022). But was disabled by default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
""""
llvm-svn: 310816
introduce a miscompile bug.
There appears to be a bug where the generated code to extract the sign
bit doesn't work correctly for 32-bit inputs. I've replied to the
original commit pointing out the problem. I think I see by inspection
(and reading the manual for PPC) how to fix this, but I can't be 100%
confident and I also don't know what the best way to test this is.
Currently it seems nearly impossible to get the backend to hit this code
path, but the patch autohr is likely in a better position to craft such
test cases than I am, and based on where the bug is it should be easily
done.
Original commit message for r310346:
"""
[PowerPC] Eliminate compares - add i32 sext/zext handling for SETLE/SETGE
Adds handling for SETLE/SETGE comparisons on i32 values. Furthermore, it
adds the handling for the special case where RHS == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34048
"""
llvm-svn: 310809
Summary:
These functions were overly complicated. The body of this function was rechecking for an And operation to find the constant, but we already knew we were looking at two Ands ORed together and the pieces are in variables. We already had earlier nearby code that checked for ConstantInts. So just inline the remaining parts into the earlier code.
Next step is to use m_APInt instead of ConstantInt.
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, davide, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: zzheng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36439
llvm-svn: 310806
George Rimar