According to the X86ISelLowering.h, UMUL results are low, high, and flags. But this place was treating result 1 or 2 as flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36654
llvm-svn: 310846
Summary:
The flag result is an i32 type. But its only really used for connectivity. I don't think anything even assumes a particular format. We don't ever do any real operations on it. So known bits don't help us optimize anything.
My main motivation is that the UMUL behavior is actually wrong. I was going to fix this in D36654, but then realized there was just no reason for it to be here.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36657
llvm-svn: 310845
Previously it would not return true for extracting either of the upper quarters of a 512-bit registers.
For mask registers we support extracting anything from index 0. And otherwise we only support extracting the upper half of a register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36638
llvm-svn: 310794
Summary:
Without the SrcVT its hard to know what is really being asked for. For example if your target has 128, 256, and 512 bit vectors. Maybe extracting 128 from 256 is cheap, but maybe extracting 128 from 512 is not.
For x86 we do support extracting a quarter of a 512-bit register. But for i1 vectors we don't have isel patterns for extracting arbitrary pieces. So we need this to have a correct implementation of isExtractSubvectorCheap for mask vectors.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36649
llvm-svn: 310793
Add an X86 combine for TESTM when one of the operands is a BUILD_VECTOR(0,0,...).
TESTM op0, BUILD_VECTOR(0,0,...) -> BUILD_VECTOR(0,0,...)
TESTM BUILD_VECTOR(0,0,...), op1 -> BUILD_VECTOR(0,0,...)
Differential Revision:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36536
llvm-svn: 310787
Summary:
Previously we were creating the flag result with MVT::Other which is interpretted as a Chain node. If we used a memory form of the instruction we would end up with a copyToReg that consumed the chain result of the adcx instruction instead of the flag result.
Pretty sure we should be using MVT::i32 here, that's what we do other places we create these node types.
We should probably consider this for 5.0 as well.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36645
llvm-svn: 310784
Summary:
Previously we would use these instructions if sse was disabled and fastmath was enabled.
As mentioned in D28335, this is a bad idea.
Reviewers: efriedma, scanon, DavidKreitzer
Reviewed By: DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: zvi, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36344
llvm-svn: 310762
Summary:
This autoupgrades most of the broadcast intrinsics. They've been unused in clang for some time.
This leaves the 32x2 intrinsics because they are still used in clang.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, igorb
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36606
llvm-svn: 310725
Summary:
This teaches 512-bit shuffles to detect unused halfs in order to reduce shuffle size.
We may need to refine the 512-bit exit point. I couldn't remember if we had good cross lane shuffles for 8/16 bit with AVX-512 or not.
I believe this is step towards being able to handle D36454 without a special case.
From here we need to improve our ability to combine extract_subvector with insert_subvector and other extract_subvectors. And we need to support narrowing binary operations where we don't demand all elements. This may be improvements to DAGCombiner::narrowExtractedVectorBinOp(by recognizing an insert_subvector in addition to concat) or we may need a target specific combiner.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, delena, jbhateja
Reviewed By: RKSimon, jbhateja
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36601
llvm-svn: 310724
The previous rev (r310208) failed to account for overflow when subtracting the
constants to see if they're suitable for shift/lea. This version add a check
for that and more test were added in r310490.
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. We could avoid the
push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on a different reg? That's a
post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so we don't actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what is likely a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310717
Move store merge to happen after intrinsic lowering to allow lowered
stores to be merged.
Some regressions due in MergeConsecutiveStores to missing
insert_subvector that are addressed in follow up patch.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34559
llvm-svn: 310710
Summary:
Preserve chain dependecies between old and new loads constructed to
prevent loads from reordering below later stores.
Fixes PR34088.
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36528
llvm-svn: 310604
a legal cond operand.
When scalarizing the result of a vselect, the legalizer currently expects
to already have scalarized the operands. While this is true for the true/false
operands (which have the same type as the result), it is not case for the
condition operand. On X86 AVX512, v1i1 is legal - this leads to operations such
as '< N x type> vselect < N x i1> < N x type> < N x type>' where < N x type > is
illegal to hit an assertion during the scalarization.
The handling is similar to r205625.
This also exposes the fact that (v1i1 extract_subvector) should be legal
and selectable on AVX512 - We do this by custom lowering to vector_extract_elt.
This still leaves us in some cases with redundant dag nodes which will be
combined in a separate soon to come patch.
This fixes pr33349.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36511
llvm-svn: 310552
We can convert any select-of-constants to math ops:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/d7d
For this patch, I'm enhancing an existing x86 transform that uses fake multiplies
(they always become shl/lea) to avoid cmov or branching. The current code misses
cases where we have a negative constant and a positive constant, so this is just
trying to plug that hole.
The DAGCombiner diff prevents us from hitting a terrible inefficiency: we can start
with a select in IR, create a select DAG node, convert it into a sext, convert it
back into a select, and then lower it to sext machine code.
Some notes about the test diffs:
1. 2010-08-04-MaskedSignedCompare.ll - We were creating control flow that didn't exist in the IR.
2. memcmp.ll - Choose -1 or 1 is the case that got me looking at this again. I
think we could avoid the push/pop in some cases if we used 'movzbl %al' instead of an xor on
a different reg? That's a post-DAG problem though.
3. mul-constant-result.ll - The trade-off between sbb+not vs. setne+neg could be addressed if
that's a regression, but I think those would always be nearly equivalent.
4. pr22338.ll and sext-i1.ll - These tests have undef operands, so I don't think we actually care about these diffs.
5. sbb.ll - This shows a win for what I think is a common case: choose -1 or 0.
6. select.ll - There's another borderline case here: cmp+sbb+or vs. test+set+lea? Also, sbb+not vs. setae+neg shows up again.
7. select_const.ll - These are motivating cases for the enhancement; replace cmov with cheaper ops.
Assembly differences between movzbl and xor to avoid a partial reg stall are caused later by the X86 Fixup SetCC pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35340
llvm-svn: 310208
This patch is in 2 parts:
1 - replace combineBT's use of SimplifyDemandedBits (hasOneUse only) with SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to more aggressively determine the lower bits used by BT.
2 - update SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits to support ANY_EXTEND - if the demanded bits are only in the non-extended portion, then peek through and demand from the source value and then ANY_EXTEND that if we found a match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35896
llvm-svn: 309486
The X86 tail call eligibility logic was correct when it was written, but
the addition of inalloca and argument copy elision broke its
assumptions. It was assuming that fixed stack objects were immutable.
Currently, we aim to emit a tail call if no arguments have to be
re-arranged in memory. This code would trace the outgoing argument
values back to check if they are loads from an incoming stack object.
If the stack argument is immutable, then we won't need to store it back
to the stack when we tail call.
Fortunately, stack objects track their mutability, so we can just make
the obvious check to fix the bug.
This was http://crbug.com/749826
llvm-svn: 309343
Like r309323, X86 had a typo where it passed the wrong flags to TLO.
Found by inspection; I haven't been able to tickle this into having
observable behavior. I don't think it does, given that X86 doesn't have
custom demanded bits logic, and the generic logic doesn't have a lot of
exposure to illegal constructs.
llvm-svn: 309325
Assign all concat elements to zero and then just replace the first element, instead of setting them all to null and copying everything in.
llvm-svn: 309261
Changing mask argument type from const SmallVectorImpl<int>& to
ArrayRef<int>.
This came up in D35700 where a mask is received as an ArrayRef<int> and
we want to pass it to TargetLowering::isShuffleMaskLegal().
Also saves a few lines of code.
llvm-svn: 309085
splitting patch D34601 into two part. This part changes the location of two functions.
The second part will be based on that patch. This was requested by @RKSimon.
Reviewers:
1. dorit
2. Farhana
3. RKSimon
4. guyblank
5. DavidKreitzer
llvm-svn: 309084
D35067/rL308322 attempted to support up to 4 load pairs for memcmp inlining which resulted in regressions for some optimized libc memcmp implementations (PR33914).
Until we can match these more optimal cases, this patch reduces the memcmp expansion to a maximum of 2 load pairs (which matches what we do for -Os).
This patch should be considered for the 5.0.0 release branch as well
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35830
llvm-svn: 308986
This patch makes LSR generate better code for SystemZ in the cases of memory
intrinsics, Load->Store pairs or comparison of immediate with memory.
In order to achieve this, the following common code changes were made:
* New TTI hook: LSRWithInstrQueries(), which defaults to false. Controls if
LSR should do instruction-based addressing evaluations by calling
isLegalAddressingMode() with the Instruction pointers.
* In LoopStrengthReduce: handle address operands of memset, memmove and memcpy
as address uses, and call isFoldableMemAccessOffset() for any LSRUse::Address,
not just loads or stores.
SystemZ changes:
* isLSRCostLess() implemented with Insns first, and without ImmCost.
* New function supportedAddressingMode() that is a helper for TTI methods
looking at Instructions passed via pointers.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Quentin Colombet
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35262https://reviews.llvm.org/D35049
llvm-svn: 308729
Currently we only support (i32 bitcast(v32i1)) using the AVX2 VPMOVMSKB ymm instruction.
This patch adds support for splitting pre-AVX2 targets into 2 x (V)PMOVMSKB xmm instructions and merging the integer results.
In future we could probably generalize this to handle more cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35303
llvm-svn: 308723
It should be a win to avoid going out to the system lib for all small memcmp() calls using scalar ops. For x86 32-bit, this means most everything up to 16 bytes. For 64-bit, that doubles because we can do 8-byte loads.
Notes:
Reduced from 4 to 2 loads for -Os behavior, which might not be optimal in all cases. It's effectively a question of how much do we trust the system implementation. Linux and macOS (and Windows I assume, but did not test) have optimized memcmp() code for x86, so it's probably not bad either way? PPC is using 8/4 for defaults on these. We do not expand at all for -Oz.
There are still potential improvements to make for the CGP expansion IR and/or lowering such as avoiding select-of-constants (D34904) and not doing zexts to the max load type before doing a compare.
We have special-case SSE/AVX codegen for (memcmp(x, y, 16/32) == 0) that will no longer be produced after this patch. I've shown the experimental justification for that change in PR33329:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33329#c12
TLDR: While the vector code is a likely winner, we can't guarantee that it's a winner in all cases on all CPUs, so I'm willing to sacrifice it for the greater good of expanding all small memcmp(). If we want to resurrect that codegen, it can be done by adjusting the CGP params or poking a hole to let those fall-through the CGP expansion.
Committed on behalf of Sanjay Patel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35067
llvm-svn: 308322
This isn't legal code, but we shouldn't crash on it. Now we just don't convert the gather intrinsic if the scale isn't constant and let it go through to isel where we'll report an isel failure.
Fixes PR33772.
llvm-svn: 308267
Rename the enum value from X86_64_Win64 to plain Win64.
The symbol exposed in the textual IR is changed from 'x86_64_win64cc'
to 'win64cc', but the numeric value is kept, keeping support for
old bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34474
llvm-svn: 308208
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
x86 scalar select-of-constants (Cond ? C1 : C2) combining/lowering is a mess
with missing optimizations. We handle some patterns, but miss logical variants.
To clean that up, we should convert all select-of-constants to logic/math and
enhance the combining for the expected patterns from that. Selecting 0 or -1
needs extra attention to produce the optimal code as shown here.
Attempt to verify that all of these IR forms are logically equivalent:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/plxs
Earlier steps in this series:
rL306040
rL306072
rL307404 (D34652)
As acknowledged in the earlier review, there's a possibility that some Intel
uarch would prefer to produce an xor to clear the fake register operand with
sbb %eax, %eax. This will likely need to be addressed in a separate pass.
llvm-svn: 307471
x86 scalar select-of-constants (Cond ? C1 : C2) combining/lowering is a mess
with missing optimizations. We handle some patterns, but miss logical variants.
To clean that up, we should convert all select-of-constants to logic/math and
enhance the combining for the expected patterns from that. DAGCombiner already
has the foundation to allow the transforms, so we just need to fill in the holes
for x86 math op lowering. Selecting 0 or -1 needs extra attention to produce the
optimal code as shown here.
Attempt to verify that all of these IR forms are logically equivalent:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/plxs
Earlier steps in this series:
rL306040
rL306072
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34652
llvm-svn: 307404
Craig Topper