Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets
to show the problem more generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some
value is free to negate, but that use count can change as we
rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression(). So something
that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation
phase becomes not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or
the inverse - something that was not free becomes free).
This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that
everything in an expression that is negatible to be handled
in the corresponding code within getNegatedExpression().
This patch skips the use check during the rewrite phase.
So we determine that some expression isNegatibleForFree
(identically to without this patch), but during the rewrite,
don't rely on use counts to decide how to create the optimal
expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
D53794 introduced code to perform the FP_TO_UINT expansion via FP_TO_SINT in a way that would never expose floating-point exceptions in the intermediate steps. Unfortunately, I just noticed there is still a way this can happen. As discussed in D53794, the compiler now generates this sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// Val = select Sel, Src, Src - 0x8000000000000000
// Ofs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val) ^ Ofs
The problem is with the Src - 0x8000000000000000 expression. As I mentioned in the original review, that expression can never overflow or underflow if the original value is in range for FP_TO_UINT. But I missed that we can get an Inexact exception in the case where Src is a very small positive value. (In this case the result of the sub is ignored, but that doesn't help.)
Instead, I'd suggest to use the following sequence:
// Sel = Src < 0x8000000000000000
// FltOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// IntOfs = select Sel, 0, 0x8000000000000000
// Result = fp_to_sint(Val - FltOfs) ^ IntOfs
In the case where the value is already in range of FP_TO_SINT, we now simply compute Val - 0, which now definitely cannot trap (unless Val is a NaN in which case we'd want to trap anyway).
In the case where the value is not in range of FP_TO_SINT, but still in range of FP_TO_UINT, the sub can never be inexact, as Val is between 2^(n-1) and (2^n)-1, i.e. always has the 2^(n-1) bit set, and the sub is always simply clearing that bit.
There is a slight complication in the case where Val is a constant, so we know at compile time whether Sel is true or false. In that scenario, the old code would automatically optimize the sub away, while this no longer happens with the new code. Instead, I've added extra code to check for this case and then just fall back to FP_TO_SINT directly. (This seems to catch even slightly more cases.)
Original version of the patch by Ulrich Weigand. X86 changes added by Craig Topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67105
InstCombine may synthesize FMINNUM/FMAXNUM nodes from fcmp+select
sequences (where the fcmp is marked nnan). Currently, if the
target does not otherwise handle these nodes, they'll get expanded
to libcalls to fmin/fmax. However, these functions may reside in
libm, which may introduce a library dependency that was not originally
present in the source code, potentially resulting in link failures.
To fix this problem, add code to TargetLowering::expandFMINNUM_FMAXNUM
to expand FMINNUM/FMAXNUM to a compare+select sequence instead of the
libcall. This is done only if the node is marked as "nnan"; in this case,
the expansion to compare+select is always correct. This also suffices to
catch all cases where FMINNUM/FMAXNUM was synthesized as above.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70965
I need to be able to drop an operand for STRICT_FP_ROUND handling on X86. Merging these functions gives me the ArrayRef interface that passes the return type, operands, and debugloc instead of the Node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70503
Summary:
This is a preparatory cleanup before i add more
of this fold to deal with comparisons with non-zero.
In essence, the current lowering is:
```
Name: (X % C1) == 0 -> X * C3 <= C4
Pre: (C1 u>> countTrailingZeros(C1)) * C3 == 1
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; trick alive into making C3 avaliable in precondition
%o0 = urem i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp eq i8 %o0, 0
=>
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; and silence it from complaining about said reg
%C4 = -1 /u C1
%n0 = mul i8 %x, C3
%n1 = lshr i8 %n0, countTrailingZeros(C1) ; rotate right
%n2 = shl i8 %n0, ((8-countTrailingZeros(C1)) %u 8) ; rotate right
%n3 = or i8 %n1, %n2 ; rotate right
%r = icmp ule i8 %n3, %C4
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oqd
It kinda just works, really no weird edge-cases.
But it isn't all that great for when comparing with non-zero.
In particular, given `(X % C1) == C2`, there will be problems
in the always-false tautological case where `C2 u>= C1`:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pH3
That case is tautological, always-false:
```
Name: (X % Y) u>= Y
%o0 = urem i8 %x, %y
%r = icmp uge i8 %o0, %y
=>
%r = false
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ofu
While we can't/shouldn't get such tautological case normally,
we do deal with non-splat vectors, so unless we want to give up
in this case, we need to fixup/short-circuit such lanes.
There are two lowering variants:
1. We can blend between whatever computed result and the correct tautological result
```
Name: (X % C1) == C2 -> X * C3 <= C4 || false
Pre: (C2 == 0 || C1 u<= C2) && (C1 u>> countTrailingZeros(C1)) * C3 == 1
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; trick alive into making C3 avaliable in precondition
%o0 = urem i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp eq i8 %o0, C2
=>
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; and silence it from complaining about said reg
%C4 = -1 /u C1
%n0 = mul i8 %x, C3
%n1 = lshr i8 %n0, countTrailingZeros(C1) ; rotate right
%n2 = shl i8 %n0, ((8-countTrailingZeros(C1)) %u 8) ; rotate right
%n3 = or i8 %n1, %n2 ; rotate right
%is_tautologically_false = icmp ule i8 C1, C2
%res = icmp ule i8 %n3, %C4
%r = select i1 %is_tautologically_false, i1 0, i1 %res
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/PjT5https://rise4fun.com/Alive/1KV
2. We can invert the comparison result
```
Name: (X % C1) == C2 -> X * C3 <= C4 || false
Pre: (C2 == 0 || C1 u<= C2) && (C1 u>> countTrailingZeros(C1)) * C3 == 1
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; trick alive into making C3 avaliable in precondition
%o0 = urem i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp eq i8 %o0, C2
=>
%zz = and i8 C3, 0 ; and silence it from complaining about said reg
%C4 = -1 /u C1
%n0 = mul i8 %x, C3
%n1 = lshr i8 %n0, countTrailingZeros(C1) ; rotate right
%n2 = shl i8 %n0, ((8-countTrailingZeros(C1)) %u 8) ; rotate right
%n3 = or i8 %n1, %n2 ; rotate right
%is_tautologically_false = icmp ule i8 C1, C2
%C4_fixed = select i1 %is_tautologically_false, i8 -1, i8 %C4
%res = icmp ule i8 %n3, %C4_fixed
%r = xor i1 %res, %is_tautologically_false
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/2xChttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/jpb5
3. We can expand into `and`/`or`:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/WGnhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/lcb5
Blend-one is likely better since we avoid having to load the
replacement from constant pool. `xor` is second best since
it's still pretty general. I'm not adding `and`/`or` variants.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: nick, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70051
Summary:
Replaces
```
unsigned getShiftAmountThreshold(EVT VT)
```
by
```
bool shouldAvoidTransformToShift(EVT VT, unsigned amount)
```
thus giving more flexibility for targets to decide whether particular shift amounts must be considered expensive or not.
Updates the MSP430 target with a custom implementation.
This continues D69116, D69120, D69326 and updates them, so all of them must be committed before this.
Existing tests apply, a few more have been added.
Reviewers: asl, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70042
Summary:
Additional filtering of undesired shifts for targets that do not support them efficiently.
Related with D69116 and D69120
Applies the TLI.getShiftAmountThreshold hook to prevent undesired generation of shifts for the following IR code:
```
define i16 @testShiftBits(i16 %a) {
entry:
%and = and i16 %a, -64
%cmp = icmp eq i16 %and, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_11(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ugt i16 %a, 63
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
define i16 @testShiftBits_12(i16 %a) {
entry:
%cmp = icmp ult i16 %a, 64
%conv = zext i1 %cmp to i16
ret i16 %conv
}
```
The attached diff file shows the piece code in TargetLowering that is responsible for the generation of shifts in relation to the IR above.
Before applying this patch, shifts will be generated to replace non-legal icmp immediates. However, shifts may be undesired if they are even more expensive for the target.
For all my previous patches in this series (cited above) I added test cases for the MSP430 target. However, in this case, the target is not suitable for showing improvements related with this patch, because the MSP430 does not implement "isLegalICmpImmediate". The default implementation returns always true, therefore the patched code in TargetLowering is never reached for that target. Targets implementing both "isLegalICmpImmediate" and "getShiftAmountThreshold" will benefit from this.
The differential effect of this patch can only be shown for the MSP430 by temporarily implementing "isLegalICmpImmediate" to return false for large immediates. This is simulated with the implementation of a command line flag that was incorporated in D69975
This patch belongs to a initiative to "relax" the generation of shifts by LLVM for targets requiring it
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri, asl
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: lenary, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69326
We need to be checking the value types for the inner setccs not
the outer setcc. We need to ensure those setccs produce a 0/1
value or that the xor is on the i1 type. I think at the time
this code was originally written, getBooleanContents didn't
take any arguments so this was probably correct. But now we can
have a different boolean contents for integer and floating point.
Not sure why the other combines below the xor were also checking
the boolean contents. None of them involve any setccs other than
the outer one and they only produce a new setcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69480
This combine is only valid if the inner setcc produces a 0/1 result
or the inner type is MVT::i1.
I haven't seen this cause any issues, just happened to notice it
while reviewing combines in this function.
While there also fix another call to use the value type from the
SDValue for the operand instead of calling SDNode::getValueType(0).
Though its likely the use is result 0, its not guaranteed.
This broke various Windows builds, see comments on the Phabricator
review.
This also reverts the follow-up 20bf0cf.
> Summary:
> This fold, helps recover from the rest of the D62266 ARM regressions.
> https://rise4fun.com/Alive/TvpC
>
> Note that while the fold is quite flexible, i've restricted it
> to the single interesting pattern at the moment.
>
> Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, deadalnix
>
> Reviewed By: deadalnix
>
> Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
>
> Tags: #llvm
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62450
We should do the fold only if both constants are plain,
non-opaque constants, at least that is the DAG.FoldConstantArithmetic()
requirement.
And if the constant we are comparing with is zero - we shouldn't be
trying to do this fold in the first place.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43769
Summary:
This fold, helps recover from the rest of the D62266 ARM regressions.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/TvpC
Note that while the fold is quite flexible, i've restricted it
to the single interesting pattern at the moment.
Reviewers: efriedma, craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, deadalnix
Reviewed By: deadalnix
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62450
Provides a TLI hook to allow targets to relax the emission of shifts, thus enabling
codegen improvements on targets with no multiple shift instructions and cheap selects
or branches.
Contributes to a Fix for PR43559:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43559
Patch by: @joanlluch (Joan LLuch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69116
llvm-svn: 375347
This patch converts the DAGCombine isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression into overridable TLI hooks.
The intention is to let us extend existing FNEG combines to work more generally with negatible float ops, allowing it work with target specific combines and opcodes (e.g. X86's FMA variants).
Unlike the SimplifyDemandedBits, we can't just handle target nodes through a Target callback, we need to do this as an override to allow targets to handle generic opcodes as well. This does mean that the target implementations has to duplicate some checks (recursion depth etc.).
Partial reversion of rL372756 - I've identified the infinite loop issue inside the X86 override but haven't fixed it yet so I've only (re)committed the common TargetLowering refactoring part of the patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67557
llvm-svn: 373343
Summary:
It seems we missed that the target hook can't query the known-bits for the
inputs to a target instruction. Fix that oversight
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar
Subscribers: rovka, hiraditya, volkan, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67380
llvm-svn: 373264
ISD::SADDO uses the suggested sequence described in the section §2.4 of
the RISCV Spec v2.2. ISD::SSUBO uses the dual approach but checking for
(non-zero) positive.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47927
llvm-svn: 373187
Summary:
After the switch in SimplifyDemandedBits, it tries to create a
constant when possible. If the original node is a TargetConstant
the default in the switch will call computeKnownBits on the
TargetConstant which will succeed. This results in the
TargetConstant becoming a Constant. But TargetConstant exists to
avoid being changed.
I've fixed the two cases that relied on this in tree by explicitly
making the nodes constant instead of target constant. The Sparc
case is an old bug. The Mips case was recently introduced now that
ImmArg on intrinsics gets turned into a TargetConstant when the
SelectionDAG is created. I've removed the ImmArg since it lowers
to generic code.
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: jyknight, sdardis, wdng, arichardson, hiraditya, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67802
llvm-svn: 372409
This patch converts the DAGCombine isNegatibleForFree/GetNegatedExpression into overridable TLI hooks and includes a demonstration X86 implementation.
The intention is to let us extend existing FNEG combines to work more generally with negatible float ops, allowing it work with target specific combines and opcodes (e.g. X86's FMA variants).
Unlike the SimplifyDemandedBits, we can't just handle target nodes through a Target callback, we need to do this as an override to allow targets to handle generic opcodes as well. This does mean that the target implementations has to duplicate some checks (recursion depth etc.).
I've only begun to replace X86's FNEG handling here, handling FMADDSUB/FMSUBADD negation and some low impact codegen changes (some FMA negatation propagation). We can build on this in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67557
llvm-svn: 372333
As commented on D67557 we have a lot of uses of depth checks all using magic numbers.
This patch adds the SelectionDAG::MaxRecursionDepth constant and moves over some general cases to use this explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67711
llvm-svn: 372315
This is the first sweep of generic code to add isAtomic bailouts where appropriate. The intention here is to have the switch from AtomicSDNode to LoadSDNode/StoreSDNode be close to NFC; that is, I'm not looking to allow additional optimizations at this time. That will come later. See D66309 for context.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66318
llvm-svn: 371786
Loosely based on DAGCombiner version, but this part is slightly simpler in
GlobalIsel because all address calculation is performed by G_GEP. That makes
the inc/dec distinction moot so there's just pre/post to think about.
No targets can handle it yet so testing is via a special flag that overrides
target hooks.
llvm-svn: 371384
Summary:
Normally TargetLowering::expandFixedPointMul would handle
SMULFIXSAT with scale zero by using an SMULO to compute the
product and determine if saturation is needed (if overflow
happened). But if SMULO isn't custom/legal it falls through
and uses the same technique, using MULHS/SMUL_LOHI, as used
for non-zero scales.
Problem was that when checking for overflow (handling saturation)
when not using MULO we did not expect to find a zero scale. So
we ended up in an assertion when doing
APInt::getLowBitsSet(VTSize, Scale - 1)
This patch fixes the problem by adding a new special case for
how saturation is computed when scale is zero.
Reviewers: RKSimon, bevinh, leonardchan, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67071
llvm-svn: 371309
Summary:
Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with
the scale of them provided as the third argument and
performs fixed point multiplication on them. The
result is saturated and clamped between the largest and
smallest representable values of the first 2 operands.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic
in clang where some of the more complex operations
will be implemented as intrinsics.
Patch by: leonardchan, bjope
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, bevinh, leonardchan, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Subscribers: ychen, wuzish, nemanjai, MaskRay, jsji, jdoerfert, Ka-Ka, hiraditya, rjmccall, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57836
llvm-svn: 371308
Summary:
This fixes the bugzilla id 43183 which triggerd by the following commit:
[RISCV] Avoid generating AssertZext for LP64 ABI when lowering floating LibCall
llvm-svn: 370604
Just disable NSW/NUW flags. This matches what we're already doing for the other situations for these nodes, it was just missed for the demanded constant case.
Noticed by inspection - confirmed in offline discussion with @spatel. I've checked we have test coverage in the x86 extract-bits.ll and extract-lowbits.ll tests
llvm-svn: 370497
The patch fixed the issue that RV64 didn't clear the upper bits
when return complex floating value with lp64 ABI.
float _Complex
complex_add(float _Complex a, float _Complex b)
{
return a + b;
}
RealResult = zero_extend(RealA + RealB)
ImageResult = ImageA + ImageB
Return (RealResult | (ImageResult << 32))
The patch introduces shouldExtendTypeInLibCall target hook to suppress
the AssertZext generation when lowering floating LibCall.
Thanks to Eli's comments from the Bugzilla
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65497
llvm-svn: 370275
This implements constrained floating point intrinsics for FP to signed and
unsigned integers.
Quoting from D32319:
The purpose of the constrained intrinsics is to force the optimizer to
respect the restrictions that will be necessary to support things like the
STDC FENV_ACCESS ON pragma without interfering with optimizations when
these restrictions are not needed.
Reviewed by: Andrew Kaylor, Craig Topper, Hal Finkel, Cameron McInally, Roman Lebedev, Kit Barton
Approved by: Craig Topper
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D63782
llvm-svn: 370228
Summary: There are at least 2 ways to express the same shuffle. Various pieces of code explicit check for both option, but other places do not when they would benefit from doing it. This patches refactor the codebase to use buildLegalVectorShuffle in order to make that behavior more consistent.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66804
llvm-svn: 370190
Patch showing the effect of enabling bool vector oversimplification.
Non-VLX builds can simplify a kshift shuffle, but VLX builds simplify:
insert_subvector v8i zeroinitializer, v2i --> insert_subvector v8i undef, v2i
Preventing the removal of the AND to clear the upper bits of result
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53022
llvm-svn: 369780
The patch introduces MakeLibCallOptions struct as suggested by @efriedma on D65497.
The struct contain argument flags which will pass to makeLibCall function.
The patch should not has any functionality changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65795
llvm-svn: 369622
Summary:
The general fold is only valid for positive divisors.
Which effectively means, it is invalid for `INT_MIN` divisors,
and we currently bailout if we see them.
But that is too strict, we can just fix-up the results.
For that, let's do a second computation 'in parallel':
```
Name: srem -> and
Pre: isPowerOf2(C)
%o = srem i8 %X, C
%r = icmp eq %o, 0
=>
%n = and i8 %X, C-1
%r = icmp eq %n, 0
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Sup
And then just blend results: if the divisor was `INT_MIN`,
pick the value we got via bit-test,
else pick the value from general fold.
There's interesting observation - `ISD::ROTR` is set to
`LegalizeAction::Expand` before AVX512, so we should not
treat `INT_MIN` divisor as even; and as it can be seen
while `@test_srem_odd_even_one` improves on all run-lines,
`@test_srem_odd_even_INT_MIN` only improves for AVX512.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66300
llvm-svn: 369268
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Partial reverts in:
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FixupLEAs.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
X86FrameLowering.cpp - Some functions return unsigned and arguably should be MCRegister
HexagonBitSimplify.cpp - Function takes BitTracker::RegisterRef which appears to be unsigned&
MachineVerifier.cpp - Ambiguous operator==() given MCRegister and const Register
PPCFastISel.cpp - No Register::operator-=()
PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - TargetInstrInfo::optimizeLoadInstr() takes an unsigned&
MachineTraceMetrics.cpp - MachineTraceMetrics lacks a suitable constructor
Manual fixups in:
ARMFastISel.cpp - ARMEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
HexagonSplitDouble.cpp - Ternary operator was ambiguous between unsigned/Register
HexagonConstExtenders.cpp - Has a local class named Register, used llvm::Register instead of Register.
PPCFastISel.cpp - PPCEmitLoad() now takes a Register& instead of unsigned&
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: arsenm, bogner, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: RKSimon, craig.topper, lenary, aemerson, wuzish, jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 369041
Summary:
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17:
when `C` is constant, the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed
more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
One huge caveat: this signed case is only valid for positive divisors.
While we can freely negate negative divisors, we can't negate `INT_MIN`,
so for now if `INT_MIN` is encountered, we bailout.
As a follow-up, it should be possible to handle that more gracefully
via extra `and`+`setcc`+`select`.
This passes llvm's test-suite, and from cursory(!) cross-examination
the folds (the assembly) match those of GCC, and manual checking via alive
did not reveal any issues (other than the `INT_MIN` case)
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, hermord, craig.topper, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, thakis, javed.absar, hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65366
llvm-svn: 368702
The comment initially matched the code, but the code was incorrect
and was fixed after the initial revert back back when it was introduced,
but the comment was never updated.
llvm-svn: 368701
This introduced a false positive MemorySanitizer warning about use of
uninitialized memory in a vectorized crc function in Chromium. That suggests
maybe something is not right with this transformation. See
https://crbug.com/992853#c7 for a reproducer.
This also reverts the follow-up commits r368307 and r368308 which
depended on this.
> This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
>
> In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
>
> The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
llvm-svn: 368660
This patch attempts to peek through vectors based on the demanded bits/elt of a particular ISD::EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT node, allowing us to avoid dependencies on ops that have no impact on the extract.
In particular this helps remove some unnecessary scalar->vector->scalar patterns.
The wasm shift patterns are annoying - @tlively has indicated that the wasm vector shift codegen are to be refactored in the near-term and isn't considered a major issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65887
llvm-svn: 368276
In particular this helps the SSE vector shift cvttps2dq+add+shl pattern by avoiding the need for zeros in shuffle style extensions to vXi32 types as we'll be shifting out those bits anyway
llvm-svn: 368155
https://reviews.llvm.org/D65698
This adds a KnownBits analysis pass for GISel. This was done as a
pass (compared to static functions) so that we can add other features
such as caching queries(within a pass and across passes) in the future.
This patch only adds the basic pass boiler plate, and implements a lazy
non caching knownbits implementation (ported from SelectionDAG). I've
also hooked up the AArch64PreLegalizerCombiner pass to use this - there
should be no compile time regression as the analysis is lazy.
llvm-svn: 368065
Summary:
The SimplifyDemandedVectorElts function can replace with undef
when no elements are demanded, but due to how it interacts with
TargetLoweringOpts, it can only do this when the node has
no other users.
Remove a now unneeded DAG combine from the X86 backend.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65713
llvm-svn: 367788
This allows us to peek through BITCASTs, attempt to simplify the source operand, and then bitcast back.
This reapplies rL367091 which was reverted at rL367118 - we were inconsistently peeking through the bitcasts to the source value.
Fixes PR42777
llvm-svn: 367174
If anything called the recursive isKnownNeverNaN/computeKnownBits/ComputeNumSignBits/SimplifyDemandedBits/SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits with an incorrect depth then we could continue to recurse if we'd already exceeded the depth limit.
This replaces the limit check (Depth == 6) with a (Depth >= 6) to make sure that we don't circumvent it.
This causes a couple of regressions as a mixture of calls (SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits + combineX86ShufflesRecursively) were calling with depths that were already over the limit. I've fixed SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits to not do this. combineX86ShufflesRecursively is trickier as we get a lot of regressions if we reduce its own limit from 8 to 6 (it also starts at Depth == 1 instead of Depth == 0 like the others....) - I'll see what I can do in future patches.
llvm-svn: 367171
We're getting reports of massive compile time increases because SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits was losing track of the depth and not earlying-out. No repro yet, but consider this a pre-emptive commit.
llvm-svn: 367169
Summary:
This was originally reported in D62818.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oPH
InstCombine does the opposite fold, in hope that `C l>>/<< Y` expression
will be hoisted out of a loop if `Y` is invariant and `X` is not.
But as it is seen from the diffs here, if it didn't get hoisted,
the produced assembly is almost universally worse.
Much like with my recent "hoist add/sub by/from const" patches,
we should get almost universal win if we hoist constant,
there is almost always an "and/test by imm" instruction,
but "shift of imm" not so much, so we may avoid having to
materialize the immediate, and thus need one less register.
And since we now shift not by constant, but by something else,
the live-range of that something else may reduce.
Special care needs to be applied not to disturb x86 `BT` / hexagon `tstbit`
instruction pattern. And to not get into endless combine loop.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, wuzish, xbolva00, nikic, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, kristof.beyls, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62871
llvm-svn: 366955
If all the demanded elts are from one operand and are inline, then we can use the operand directly.
The changes are mainly from SSE41 targets which has blendvpd but not cmpgtq, allowing the v2i64 comparison to be simplified as we only need the signbit from alternate v4i32 elements.
llvm-svn: 366817
This patch introduces the DAG version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits, which attempts to peek through ops (mainly and/or/xor so far) that don't contribute to the demandedbits/elts of a node - which means we can do this even in cases where we have multiple uses of an op, which normally requires us to demanded all bits/elts. The intention is to remove a similar instruction - SelectionDAG::GetDemandedBits - once SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits has matured.
The InstCombine version of SimplifyMultipleUseDemandedBits can constant fold which I haven't added here yet, and so far I've only wired this up to some basic binops (and/or/xor/add/sub/mul) to demonstrate its use.
We do see a couple of regressions that need to be addressed:
AMDGPU unsigned dot product codegen retains an AND mask (for ZERO_EXTEND) that it previously removed (but otherwise the dotproduct codegen is a lot better).
X86/AVX2 has poor handling of vector ANY_EXTEND/ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG - it prematurely gets converted to ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG.
The code owners have confirmed its ok for these cases to fixed up in future patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63281
llvm-svn: 366799
Summary:
Four things here:
1. Generalize the fold to handle non-splat divisors. Reasonably trivial.
2. Unban power-of-two divisors. I don't see any reason why they should
be illegal.
* There is no ban in Hacker's Delight
* I think the ban came from the same bug that caused the miscompile
in the base patch - in `floor((2^W - 1) / D)` we were dividing by
`D0` instead of `D`, and we **were** ensuring that `D0` is not `1`,
which made sense.
3. Unban `1` divisors. I no longer believe Hacker's Delight actually says
that the fold is invalid for `D = 0`. Further considerations:
* We know that
* `(X u% 1) == 0` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `(X u% 1) != 0` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* Also, we know that
* `X u<= -1` can be constant-folded to `1`,
* `X u> -1` can be constant-folded to `0`,
* https://godbolt.org/z/7jnZJXhttps://rise4fun.com/Alive/oF6p
* We know will end up with the following:
`(setule/setugt (rotr (mul N, P), K), Q)`
* Therefore, for given new DAG nodes and comparison predicates
(`ule`/`ugt`), we will still produce the correct answer if:
`Q` is a all-ones constant; and both `P` and `K` are *anything*
other than `undef`.
* The fold will indeed produce `Q = all-ones`.
4. Try to re-splat the `P` and `K` vectors - we don't care about
their values for the lanes where divisor was `1`.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hermord, craig.topper, spatel, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, javed.absar, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63963
llvm-svn: 366637
If we have:
R = sub X, Y
P = cmp Y, X
...then flipping the operands in the compare instruction can allow using a subtract that sets compare flags.
Motivated by diffs in D58875 - not sure if this changes anything there,
but this seems like a good thing independent of that.
There's a more involved version of this transform already in IR (in instcombine
although that seems misplaced to me) - see "swapMayExposeCSEOpportunities()".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63958
llvm-svn: 365711
Don't do this locally, computeKnownBits does this better (and can handle non-constant cases as well).
A next step would be to actually simplify non-constant elements - building on what we already do in SimplifyDemandedVectorElts.
llvm-svn: 365309
The SDAGBuilder behavior stems from the days when we didn't have fast
math flags available in SDAG. We do now and doing the transformation in
the legalizer has the advantage that it also works for vector types.
llvm-svn: 364743
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
This is a recommit, the original commit rL364563 was reverted in rL364568
because test-suite detected miscompile - the new comparison constant 'Q'
was being computed incorrectly (we divided by `D0` instead of `D`).
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: dexonsmith, kristina, xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364600
Summary:
I'm submitting a new revision since i don't understand how to reclaim/reopen/take over the existing one, D50222.
There is no such action in "Add Action" menu...
Original patch D50222 by @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)
This implements an optimization described in Hacker's Delight 10-17: when `C` is constant,
the result of `X % C == 0` can be computed more cheaply without actually calculating the remainder.
The motivation is discussed here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35479.
Original patch author: @hermord (Dmytro Shynkevych)!
Notes:
- In principle, it's possible to also handle the `X % C1 == C2` case, as discussed on bugzilla.
This seems to require an extra branch on overflow, so I refrained from implementing this for now.
- An explicit check for when the `REM` can be reduced to just its LHS is included:
the `X % C` == 0 optimization breaks `test1` in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` otherwise.
I hadn't managed to find a better way to not generate worse output in this case.
- The `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll` regresses, and is being fixed by a followup patch D63390.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, hermord, xbolva00
Reviewed By: RKSimon, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, javed.absar, llvm-commits, hermord
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63391
llvm-svn: 364563
Change the generic ctpop expansion to more efficiently handle a
check for not-a-power-of-two value:
(ctpop x) != 1 --> (x == 0) || ((x & x-1) != 0)
This is the inverted predicate sibling pattern that was added with:
D63004
This should have been done before I changed IR canonicalization to
favor this form with:
rL364246
...so if this requires revert/changing, the earlier commit may also
need to modified.
llvm-svn: 364319
Simplify ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if the extended bits are not required.
Matches what we already do for ZERO_EXTEND.
Reapplies rL363850 but now with legality checks added at rL364290
llvm-svn: 364303
This should not cause any visible change in output, but it's
more efficient because we were producing non-canonical 'sub x, 1'
and 'setcc ugt x, 0'. As mentioned in the TODO, we should also
be handling the inverse predicate.
llvm-svn: 364302
Simplify SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG if the extended bits are not required/known zero.
Matches what we already do for SIGN_EXTEND.
Reapplies rL363802 but now with legality checks added at rL364290
llvm-svn: 364299
As part of the fix for rL364264 + rL364272 - limit the *_EXTEND conversion to !TLO.LegalOperations || isOperationLegal cases.
We'll improve X86 legality in future commits.
llvm-svn: 364290
Summary:
This addresses the regression that is being exposed by D50222 in `test/CodeGen/X86/jump_sign.ll`
The missing fold, at least partially, looks trivial:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zsln
i.e. if we are comparing with zero, and comparing the `urem`-by-non-power-of-two,
and the `urem` is of something that may at most have a single bit set (or no bits set at all),
the `urem` is not needed.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, xbolva00, spatel
Reviewed By: xbolva00, spatel
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63390
llvm-svn: 364286
This reverts the following patches.
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG -> ANY/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG"
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG -> ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG"
"[TargetLowering] SimplifyDemandedBits - add ANY_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG support"
We can end up with an any_extend_vector_inreg with a 256 bit result type
and a 128 bit result type. This is allowed by the ISD opcode, but the
generic operation legalizer is only able to expand cases where the
total vector width is the same.
The X86 backend creates these mismatched cases for zext_vec_inreg/sext_vec_inreg.
The SimplifyDemandedBits changes are allowing those nodes to become
aext_vec_inreg. For the zext/sext cases, the X86 backend has Custom
handling and never lets them get to the generic legalizer. We need to do the same
for aext_vec_inreg.
llvm-svn: 364264
Other than adding consistent demanded elts handling which was a trivial addition, the other differences in functionality will be added in later patches.
llvm-svn: 363713
Other than adding consistent demanded elts handling which was a trivial addition, the other differences in functionality will be added in later patches.
llvm-svn: 363710
As discussed on D62910, we need to check whether particular types of memory access are allowed, not just their alignment/address-space.
This NFC patch adds a MachineMemOperand::Flags argument to allowsMemoryAccess and allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses, and wires up calls to pass the relevant flags to them.
If people are happy with this approach I can then update X86TargetLowering::allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses to handle misaligned NT load/stores.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63075
llvm-svn: 363179
Most parts of LLVM don't care whether the byval type is derived from an
explicit Attribute or from the parameter's pointee type, so it makes
sense for the main access function to just return the right value.
The very few users who do care (only BitcodeReader so far) can find out
how it's specified by accessing the Attribute directly.
llvm-svn: 362642
Ulrich Weigand