This patch moves the construction of the default backend from llvm-mca.cpp and
into mca::Context. The Context class is responsible for holding ownership of
the simulated hardware components. These components are subclasses of
HardwareUnit. Right now the HardwareUnit is pretty bare-bones, but eventually
we might want to add some common functionality across all hardware components,
such as isReady() or something similar.
I have a feeling this patch will probably need some updates, but it's a start.
One thing I am not particularly fond of is the rather large interface for
createDefaultPipeline. That convenience routine takes a rather large set of
inputs from the llvm-mca driver, where many of those inputs are generated via
command line options.
One item I think we might want to change is the separating of ownership of
hardware components (owned by the context) and the pipeline (which owns
Stages). In short, a Pipeline owns Stages, a Context (currently) owns hardware.
The Pipeline's Stages make use of the components, and thus there is a lifetime
dependency generated. The components must outlive the pipeline. We could solve
this by having the Context also own the Pipeline, and not return a
unique_ptr<Pipeline>. Now that I think about it, I like that idea more.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48691
llvm-svn: 336456
The DispatchUnit is no longer a dependency of RCU, so this patch removes a
stale include and forward decl. This patch also cleans up some comments.
llvm-svn: 335392
Summary:
This class maintains the same logic as the original RetireControlUnit.
This is just an intermediate patch to make the RCU a Stage. Future patches will remove the dependency on the DispatchStage, and then more properly populate the pre/execute/post Stage interface.
Reviewers: andreadb, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: javed.absar, mgorny, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47244
llvm-svn: 333292
Summary:
The logic of dispatch remains the same, but now DispatchUnit is a Stage (DispatchStage).
This change has the benefit of simplifying the backend runCycle() code.
The same logic applies, but it belongs to different components now. This is just a start,
eventually we will need to remove the call to the DispatchStage in Scheduler.cpp, but
that will be a separate patch. This change is mostly a renaming and moving of existing logic.
This change also encouraged me to remove the Subtarget (STI) member from the
Backend class. That member was used to initialize the other members of Backend
and to eventually call DispatchUnit::dispatch(). Now that we have Stages, we
can eliminate this by instantiating the DispatchStage with everything it needs
at the time of construction (e.g., Subtarget). That change allows us to call
DispatchStage::execute(IR) as we expect to call execute() for all other stages.
Once we add the Stage list (D46907) we can more cleanly call preExecute() on
all of the stages, DispatchStage, will probably wrap cycleEvent() in that
case.
Made some formatting and minor cleanups to README.txt. Some of the text
was re-flowed to stay within 80 cols.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb, courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46983
llvm-svn: 332652
Summary:
This patch eliminates many places where we originally needed to pass index
values to represent an instruction. The index is still used as a key, in various parts of
MCA. I'm not comfortable eliminating the index just yet. By burying the index in
the instruction, we can avoid exposing that value in many places.
Eventually, we should consider removing the Instructions list in the Backend
all together, it's only used to hold and reclaim the memory for the allocated
Instruction instances. Instead we could pass around a smart pointer. But that's
a separate discussion/patch.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46367
llvm-svn: 331660
The logic remains the same. Eventually, I see the RCU acting as its own separate stage in the instruction pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46331
llvm-svn: 331316
Andrea Di Biagio