This will simplify clang adoption, and is probably better "etiquette" (since gcc has always accepted this idiom without warning). Once we are over the adoption hurdle, we can turn this into an error.
llvm-svn: 68468
pointer. Its purpose in life is to be a glorified void*, but which does not
implicitly convert to void* or other OpaquePtr's with a different UID.
Introduce Action::DeclPtrTy which is a typedef for OpaquePtr<0>. Change the
entire parser/sema interface to use DeclPtrTy instead of DeclTy*. This
makes the C++ compiler enforce that these aren't convertible to other opaque
types.
We should also convert ExprTy, StmtTy, TypeTy, AttrTy, BaseTy, etc,
but I don't plan to do that in the short term.
The one outstanding known problem with this patch is that we lose the
bitmangling optimization where ActionResult<DeclPtrTy> doesn't know how to
bitmangle the success bit into the low bit of DeclPtrTy. I will rectify
this with a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 67952
LHS type and the computation result type; this encodes information into
the AST which is otherwise non-obvious. Fix Sema to always come up with the
right answer for both of these types. Fix IRGen and the analyzer to
account for these changes. This fixes PR2601. The approach is inspired
by PR2601 comment 2.
Note that this changes real *= complex in CodeGen from a silent
miscompilation to an explicit error.
I'm not really sure that the analyzer changes are correct, or how to
test them... someone more familiar with the analyzer should check those
changes.
llvm-svn: 67889
uniqued representation that should both save some memory and make it
far easier to properly build canonical types for types involving
dependent nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "typename T::Nested::type".
This approach will greatly simplify the representation of
CXXScopeSpec. That'll be next.
llvm-svn: 67799
Treat @package the same as @public. The documentation for @package says it is analogous to private_extern for variables/functions. Fully implementing this requires some kind of linker support (so access is denied to code outside the classes executable image). I don't believe GCC fully implements this semantic. Will discuss with Fariborz offline.
llvm-svn: 67755
incompatibilities in assignments from other pointer incompatibilities.
Based off of the patch in PR3342. (This doesn't implement -Wno-pointer-sign,
but I don't know the driver code very well.)
llvm-svn: 67494
isObjCObjectPointerType to work with qualified types. Adjust test for
changes.
If the SemaExpr changes are wrong or break existing code, feel free to
delete the "ExprTy.addConst();" line and revert my changes to
test/Sema/block-literal.c.
llvm-svn: 67489
dot-syntax expression after earching the list of protocols
in the qualified-id, must keep searching the protocol list
of each of the protocols in the list.
llvm-svn: 67314
dependent qualified-ids such as
Fibonacci<N - 1>::value
where N is a template parameter. These references are "unresolved"
because the name is dependent and, therefore, cannot be resolved to a
declaration node (as we would do for a DeclRefExpr or
QualifiedDeclRefExpr). UnresolvedDeclRefExprs instantiate to
DeclRefExprs, QualifiedDeclRefExprs, etc.
Also, be a bit more careful about keeping only a single set of
specializations for a class template, and instantiating from the
definition of that template rather than a previous declaration. In
general, we need a better solution for this for all TagDecls, because
it's too easy to accidentally look at a declaration that isn't the
definition.
We can now process a simple Fibonacci computation described as a
template metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 67308
QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.
llvm-svn: 67283
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
Type pointer. This allows our nested-name-specifiers to retain more
information about the actual spelling (e.g., which typedef did the
user name, or what exact template arguments were used in the
template-id?). It will also allow us to have dependent
nested-name-specifiers that don't map to any DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 67140
always, refactored the existing logic to tease apart the parser action
and the semantic analysis shared by the parser and template
instantiation.
llvm-svn: 66987
- C++ function casts, e.g., T(foo)
- sizeof(), alignof()
More importantly, this allows us to verify that we're performing
overload resolution during template instantiation, with
argument-dependent lookup and the "cached" results of name lookup from
the template definition.
llvm-svn: 66947
instantiation for binary operators. This change moves most of the
operator-overloading code from the parser action ActOnBinOp to a new,
parser-independent semantic checking routine CreateOverloadedBinOp.
Of particular importance is the fact that CreateOverloadedBinOp does
*not* perform any name lookup based on the current parsing context (it
doesn't take a Scope*), since it has to be usable during template
instantiation, when there is no scope information. Rather, it takes a
pre-computed set of functions that are visible from the context or via
argument-dependent lookup, and adds to that set any member operators
and built-in operator candidates. The set of functions is computed in
the parser action ActOnBinOp based on the current context (both
operator name lookup and argument-dependent lookup). Within a
template, the set computed by ActOnBinOp is saved within the
type-dependent AST node and is augmented with the results of
argument-dependent name lookup at instantiation time (see
TemplateExprInstantiator::VisitCXXOperatorCallExpr).
Sadly, we can't fully test this yet. I'll follow up with template
instantiation for sizeof so that the real fun can begin.
llvm-svn: 66923
This solution is much simpler (and doesn't add any per-scope overhead, which concerned Chris).
The only downside is the LabelMap is now declared in two places (Sema and BlockSemaInfo). My original fix tried to unify the LabelMap in "Scope" (which would support nested functions in general). In any event, this fixes the bug given the current language definition. If/when we decide to support GCC style nested functions, this will need to be tweaked.
llvm-svn: 66896
C++ templates. In particular, keep track of the overloaded operators
that are visible from the template definition, so that they can be
merged with those operators visible via argument-dependent lookup at
instantiation time.
Refactored the lookup routines for argument-dependent lookup and for
operator name lookup, so they can be called without immediately adding
the results to an overload set.
Instantiation of these expressions is completely wrong. I'll work on
that next.
llvm-svn: 66851
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
llvm-svn: 66662
Steve Naroff