This patch connects the check for const-correctness with the new general
utility to add `const` to variables.
The code-transformation is only done, if the detected variable for const-ness
is not part of a group-declaration.
The check allows to control multiple facets of adding `const`, e.g. if pointers themself should be
marked as `const` if they are not changed.
Reviewed By: njames93
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943
Detect template specializations that should be handled specially.
In some cases it is allowed to extend the `std` namespace with
template specializations.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129353
new clang-tidy checker for assignments within the condition clause of an 'if' statement.
Reviewed By: gribozavr2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127114
The current way to specify CheckOptions is pretty verbose and unintuitive.
Given that the options are a dictionary it makes much more sense to treat them as such in the config files.
Example:
```
CheckOptions: {SomeCheck.Option: true, SomeCheck.OtherOption: 'ignore'}
# Or
CheckOptions:
SomeCheck.Option: true
SomeCheck.OtherOption: 'ignore'
```
This change will still handle the old syntax with no issue, ensuring we don't screw up users current config files.
The only observable differences are support for the new syntax and `-dump=config` will emit using the new syntax.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128337
Adds a `-verify-config` command line argument, that when specified will verify the Checks and CheckOptions fields in the config files:
- A warning will be raised for any check that doesn't correspond to a registered check, a suggestion will also be emitted for close misses.
- A warning will be raised for any check glob(containing *) that doesn't match any registered check.
- A warning will be raised for any CheckOption that isn't read by any registered check, a suggestion will also be emitted for close misses.
This can be useful if debuging why a certain check isn't enabled, or the options are being handled as you expect them to be.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127446
Eliminate clutter by reorganizing the Lit test files for clang-tidy:
- Move checkers/<module>-* to checkers/<module>/*.
- Move module specific inputs from Inputs to <module>/Inputs. Remove
any module prefix from the file or subdirectory name as they are no
longer needed.
- Introduce a Lit substitution %clang_tidy_headers for the system
headers in checkers/Inputs/Headers and use this throughout. This
avoids referencing system headers through a relative path to the
parent directory and makes it clear that these fake system headers are
shared among all modules.
- Update add_new_check.py to follow the above conventions when creating
the boiler plate test files for a new check.
- Update Contributing.rst to describe per-module Inputs directory and
fix link to test source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128072
The documentation files were reorganized into subdirectories, but a new
check was added concurrently and wasn't rebased correctly before
submitting. Sort the new clang-tidy checks by check name and fix the
indentation of bugprone-unchecked-optional-access.
- Rename doc files to subdirs by module
- Update release notes and check list to use subdirs
- Update add_new_check.py to handle doc subdirs
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126495
The standard type is vastly more popular than the Abseil polyfill, so it
makes more sense to use it in documentation, even though the checker
actually understands both (and that fact is documented already).
This reverts commit b94db7ed7e.
See comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D112916:
- breaks `check-clangd`, and makes clang-tidy crash on simple inputs
- likely does the wrong thing in cross builds
Also revert follow-up "[gn build] (manually) port b94db7ed7e (Confusables.inc)"
This reverts commit 180bae08a0.
modernize-use-emplace only recommends going from a push_back to an
emplace_back, but does not provide a recommendation when emplace_back is
improperly used. This adds the functionality of warning the user when
an unecessary temporary is created while calling emplace_back or other "emplacy"
functions from the STL containers.
Reviewed By: kuhar, ivanmurashko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101471
Adds an option SimplifyDemorganRelaxed which, when enabled, will transform negated conjunctions or disjunctions when neither operand is a negation.
Default value is `false`.
Reviewed By: LegalizeAdulthood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126162
When looking for whether or not a check provides fixits, the script
examines the implementation of the check. Some checks are not
implemented in source files that correspond one-to-one with the check
name, e.g. cert-dcl21-cpp. So if we can't find the check implementation
directly from the check name, open up the corresponding module file and
look for the class name that is registered with the check. Then consult
the file corresponding to the class name.
Some checks are derived from a base class that implements fixits. So if
we can't find fixits in the implementation file for a check, scrape out
the name of it's base class. If it's not ClangTidyCheck, then consult
the base class implementation to look for fixit support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126134Fixes#55630
Unfortunately, we must restrict the checker to warn for deprecated headers
only if the header is included directly from a c++ source file.
For header files, we cannot know if the project has a C source file
that also directly/indirectly includes the offending header file
otherwise. Thus, it's better to be on the safe side and suppress those
reports.
One can opt-in the old behavior, emitting diagnostics into header files,
if one explicitly sets the WarnIntoHeaders=true, in which case nothing
will be changed.
Reviewed By: LegalizeAdulthood
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125769
Add a recursive descent parser to match macro expansion tokens against
fully formed valid expressions of integral literals. Partial
expressions will not be matched -- they can't be valid initializing
expressions for an enum.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124500Fixes#55055
This check verifies the safety of access to `std::optional` and related
types (including `absl::optional`). It is based on a corresponding Clang
Dataflow Analysis, which does most of the work. This check merely runs it and
converts its findings into diagnostics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121120
Report use of `std::vector<const T>` (and similar containers of const
elements). These are now allowed in standard C++ due to undefined
`std::allocator<const T>`. They do not compile with libstdc++ or MSVC.
Future libc++ will remove the extension (D120996).
See docs/clang-tidy/checks/portability-std-allocator-const.rst for detail.
I have attempted clean-up in a large code base. Here are some statistics:
* 98% are related to the container `std::vector`, among `deque/forward_list/list/multiset/queue/set/stack/vector`.
* 24% are related to `std::vector<const std::string>`.
* Both `std::vector<const absl::string_view>` and `std::vector<const int>` contribute 2%. The other contributors spread over various class types.
The check can be useful to other large code bases and may serve as an example
for future libc++ strictness improvement.
Note: on MSVC where -fdelayed-template-parsing is the default, the check cannot
catch cases in uninstantiated templates.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123655
Report use of ``std::vector<const T>`` (and similar containers of const
elements). These are now allowed in standard C++ due to undefined
``std::allocator<const T>``. They do not compile with libstdc++ or MSVC.
Future libc++ will remove the extension (D120996).
See docs/clang-tidy/checks/portability-std-allocator-const.rst for detail.
I have attempted clean-up in a large code base. Here are some statistics:
* 98% are related to the container `std::vector`, among `deque/forward_list/list/multiset/queue/set/stack/vector`.
* 24% are related to `std::vector<const std::string>`.
* Both `std::vector<const absl::string_view>` and `std::vector<const int>` contribute 2%. The other contributors spread over various class types.
The check can be useful to other large code bases and may serve as an example
for future libc++ strictness improvement.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123655
When scanning a macro expansion to examine it as a candidate enum,
first strip off arbitrary matching parentheses from the outside in,
then examine what remains to see if it is Lit, +Lit, -Lit or ~Lit.
If not, reject it as a possible enum candidate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123479Fixes#54843
[buildbot issues fixed]
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
This check performs basic analysis of macros and replaces them
with an anonymous unscoped enum. Using an unscoped anonymous enum
ensures that everywhere the macro token was used previously, the
enumerator name may be safely used.
Potential macros for replacement must meet the following constraints:
- Macros must expand only to integral literal tokens. The unary
operators plus, minus and tilde are recognized to allow for positive,
negative and bitwise negated integers.
- Macros must be defined on sequential source file lines, or with
only comment lines in between macro definitions.
- Macros must all be defined in the same source file.
- Macros must not be defined within a conditional compilation block.
- Macros must not be defined adjacent to other preprocessor directives.
- Macros must not be used in preprocessor conditions
Each cluster of macros meeting the above constraints is presumed to
be a set of values suitable for replacement by an anonymous enum.
From there, a developer can give the anonymous enum a name and
continue refactoring to a scoped enum if desired. Comments on the
same line as a macro definition or between subsequent macro definitions
are preserved in the output. No formatting is assumed in the provided
replacements.
The check cppcoreguidelines-macro-to-enum is an alias for this check.
Fixes#27408
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117522
The docs URL was dangling, and the docs suggested that it has no fixits,
but it actually had.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121372
Document the connection between this checker and the corresponding CERT
rule.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121214
The checker missed a check for a case when the parameter is referenced by an lvalue and this could cause build breakages.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117090
This option allows callers to disable the warning from
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/performance-move-const-arg.html
that would warn on the following
```
void f(const string &s);
string s;
f(std::move(s)); // ALLOWED if performance-move-const-arg.CheckMoveToConstRef=false
```
The reason people might want to disable this check, is because it allows
callers to use `std::move()` or not based on local reasoning about the
argument, and without having to care about how the function `f` accepts
the argument. Indeed, `f` might accept the argument by const-ref today,
but change to by-value tomorrow, and if the caller had moved the
argument that they were finished with, the code would work as
efficiently as possible regardless of how `f` accepted the parameter.
Reviewed By: ymandel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119370
This reverts commit 36892727e4 which
breaks the build when LLVM_INSTALL_TOOLCHAIN_ONLY is enabled with:
CMake Error at cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake:683 (add_dependencies):
The dependency target "clang-tidy-headers" of target "CTTestTidyModule"
does not exist.
The check previously inspected only the immediate parent namespace.
`static` in a named namespace within an unnamed namespace is still
redundant.
We will use `Decl::isInAnonymousNamespace()` method that traverses the
namespaces hierarchy recursively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118010
A semicolon-separated list of the names of functions or methods to be considered as not having side-effects was added for bugprone-assert-side-effect. It can be used to exclude methods like iterator::begin/end from being considered as having side-effects.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116478
This commit introduces a new check `readability-container-contains` which finds
usages of `container.count()` and `container.find() != container.end()` and
instead recommends the `container.contains()` method introduced in C++20.
For containers which permit multiple entries per key (`multimap`, `multiset`,
...), `contains` is more efficient than `count` because `count` has to do
unnecessary additional work.
While this this performance difference does not exist for containers with only
a single entry per key (`map`, `unordered_map`, ...), `contains` still conveys
the intent better.
Reviewed By: xazax.hun, whisperity
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D112646
Rashmi Mudduluru