The macro is only enabled when the Clang is used with
-fexperimental-library.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130792
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
After checking the libc++abi.dylib shipped in macOS 10.13, I can confirm
that it contains the align_val_t variants of operator new and operator
delete. However, the libc++abi.dylib shipped on macOS 10.12 does not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129198
Display 'static_assert failed: message' instead of
'static_assert failed "message"' to be consistent
with other implementations and be slightly more
readable.
Reviewed By: #libc, aaron.ballman, philnik, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128844
`__GCC_CONSTRUCTIVE_SIZE` and `__GCC_DESTRUCTIVE_SIZE` are available since GCC 12. I'm assuming clang will also implement these for compatability with libstdc++.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: h-vetinari, libcxx-commits, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122276
This mostly copys the `<experimental/functional>` stuff and updates the code to current libc++ style.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: nlopes, adamdebreceni, arichardson, libcxx-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121074
P0798R8 "Monadic operations for std::optional" has been implemented, so
this LWG issue can be adopted.
During review it was discovered another paper bumped the macro. The
part affecting optional of this paper is done, the variant isn't. The
status page is updated to reflect the current state.
Implements
- LWG 3621 Remove feature-test macro __cpp_lib_monadic_optional
Updates status of
- P2231R1 Missing constexpr in std::optional and std::variant
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125813
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
This supersedes and incoroporates content from both D108906 and D54966,
and also some original content.
Co-Authored-by: Marshall Clow <mclow.lists@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Gonzalo Brito Gadeschi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118938
This patch implements P0674R1, i.e. support for arrays in std::make_shared
and std::allocate_shared.
Co-authored-by: Zoe Carver <z.zoelec2@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62641
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
Set std::numeric_limits<>::tinyness_before to true for floating point types on ARM platforms.
Section E1.3.5 in the ARMv8 Architecture Reference Manual specifies:
Underflow. The bit is set to 1 if the absolute value of the result
of an operation, produced before rounding, is less than the minimum
positive normalized number for the destination precision, and the
rounded result is inexact.
Reviewed By: #libc, majnemer, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116338
We shouldn't be calling `rethrow_exception` via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
this ADL ability of `rethrow_exception` in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
In src/, most files can use `constinit` directly because they're always
compiled with C++20. But some files, like "libcxxabi/src/fallback_malloc.cpp",
can't, because they're `#include`d directly from test cases in libcxxabi/test/
and therefore must (currently) compile as C++03. We might consider refactoring
those offending tests, or at least marking them `UNSUPPORTED: c++03`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119264
This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version
doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119460
Back in https://reviews.llvm.org/D109459, we stopped using the C++03
emulation for std::nullptr_t by default, which was an ABI break. We
still left a knob for users to turn it back on if they were broken by
the change, with a note that we would remove that knob after one release.
The time has now come to remove the knob and clean up the std::nullptr_t
emulation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114786
The tests for these are just copy-pasted from the tests for std::{strong,weak,partial}_order,
and then I added an extra clause in each (test_2()) to test the stuff that's not just the same
as std::*_order.
This also includes the fix for https://wg21.link/LWG3465 (which falls naturally out of the
"you must write it three times" style, but I've added test cases for it also).
There is an action item here to go back and give good diagnostics for SFINAE failures
in these CPOs. I've filed this as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53456 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111514
This should fix the regressions detected in D117992.
This lands before D117992 to avoid breaking main.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118056
... from testing with MSVC's STL. Mostly truncation warnings and variables that are only used in `LIBCPP_ASSERT`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116878
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
`__cpp_lib_type_identity` was implemented way back in cf49ccd0 (Clang 8),
probably before the feature-test macro had been settled on.
`__cpp_lib_string_resize_and_overwrite` will be added by D113013 so I didn't add it here.
Fixes#46605.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116433
We didn't support noop_coroutine for GCC in previous conforming patch.
So that GCC couldn't use noop_coroutine() defined in <coroutine>. And
after this patch, GCC should be able to compile the whole <coroutine>
header.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116144
Mark de Wever