This paper was accepted during the last plenary and is intended to be
backported to LLVM 15. When backporting the release notes in the branch
should be updated too.
Note the feature-test macro isn't updated since this will change; three
papers have updated the same macro in the same plenary.
Implements:
- P2508R1 Exposing std::basic-format-string
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130643
I went over the output of the following mess of a command:
`(ulimit -m 2000000; ulimit -v 2000000; git ls-files -z | parallel --xargs -0 cat | aspell list --mode=none --ignore-case | grep -E '^[A-Za-z][a-z]*$' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep -vE '.{25}' | aspell pipe -W3 | grep : | cut -d' ' -f2 | less)`
and proceeded to spend a few days looking at it to find probable typos
and fixed a few hundred of them in all of the llvm project (note, the
ones I found are not anywhere near all of them, but it seems like a
good start).
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Spies: philnik, libcxx-commits, mgorny, arichardson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130905
This patch rewords the static assert diagnostic output. Failing a
_Static_assert in C should not report that static_assert failed. This
changes the wording to be more like GCC and uses "static assertion"
when possible instead of hard coding the name. This also changes some
instances of 'static_assert' to instead be based on the token in the
source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
Looks like we again are going to have problems with libcxx tests that
are overly specific in their dependency on clang's diagnostics.
This reverts commit 6542cb55a3.
This patch is basically the rewording of the static assert statement's
output(error) on screen after failing. Failing a _Static_assert in C
should not report that static_assert failed. It’d probably be better to
reword the diagnostic to be more like GCC and say “static assertion”
failed in both C and C++.
consider a c file having code
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
In clang the output is like:
<source>:1:1: error: static_assert failed: oh no!
_Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
^ ~
1 error generated.
Compiler returned: 1
Thus here the "static_assert" is not much good, it will be better to
reword it to the "static assertion failed" to more generic. as the gcc
prints as:
<source>:1:1: error: static assertion failed: "oh no!"
1 | _Static_assert(0, "oh no!");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Compiler returned: 1
The above can also be seen here. This patch is about rewording
the static_assert to static assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129048
This implements the Grapheme clustering as required by
P1868R2 width: clarifying units of width and precision in std::format
This was omitted in the initial patch, but the paper was marked as completed. This really completes the paper.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126971
This implements a not accepted LWG issue. Not doing so would require
integral types to use the handle class instead of being directly stored
in the basic_format_arg.
The previous code used `std::forward` in places where it wasn't required
by the Standard. These are now removed.
Implements:
- P2418R2 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
- LWG 3631 basic_format_arg(T&&) should use remove_cvref_t<T> throughout
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127570
With to_chars supporting 128-bit it's possible to support the full
128-bit range in format. This only removes the previous restrictions
and updates the tests to validate proper support.
Depends on D128929.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129007
A formatter using a handle only needs to satisfy the BasicFormatter
requirements. The current test allowed more than that minimum. Changed
it to the minimum to make sure it works.
This was due to a post-commit review comment of @vitaut in D121530.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127767
The compilers clang-11, clang-12, and apple-clang-12 are no longer
supported, so remove their annotations in the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127588
The debug mode has been broken pretty much ever since it was shipped
because it was possible to enable the debug mode in user code without
actually enabling it in the dylib, leading to ODR violations that
caused various kinds of failures.
This commit makes the debug mode a knob that is configured when
building the library and which can't be changed afterwards. This is
less flexible for users, however it will actually work as intended
and it will allow us, in the future, to add various kinds of checks
that do not assume the same ABI as the normal library. Furthermore,
this will make the debug mode more robust, which means that vendors
might be more tempted to support it properly, which hasn't been the
case with the current debug mode.
This patch shouldn't break any user code, except folks who are building
against a library that doesn't have the debug mode enabled and who try
to enable the debug mode in their code. Such users will get a compile-time
error explaining that this configuration isn't supported anymore.
In the future, we should further increase the granularity of the debug
mode checks so that we can cherry-pick which checks to enable, like we
do for unspecified behavior randomization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122941
Formatting a string-literal had an off-by-one issue where the NUL
terminator became part of the formatted output.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126665
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
This optimizes the __format_arg_store type to allow a more efficient
storage of the basic_format_args.
It stores the data in two arrays:
- A struct with the tag of the exposition only variant's type and the
offset of the element in the data array. Since this array only depends
on the type information it's calculated at compile time and can be
shared by different instances of this class.
- The arguments converted to the types used in the exposition only
variant of basic_format_arg. This means the packed data can be
directly copied to an element of this variant.
The new code uses rvalue reference arguments in preparation for P2418.
The handle class also has some changes to prepare for P2418. The real
changed for P2418 will be done separately, but these parts make it
easier to implement that paper.
Some parts of existing test code are removed since they were no longer
valid after the changes, but new tests have been added.
Implements parts of:
- P2418 Add support for std::generator-like types to std::format
Completes:
- LWG3473 Normative encouragement in non-normative note
Depends on D121138
Reviewed By: #libc, vitaut, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121514
This formatter isn't in the list of required formatters in
[format.formatter.spec]/2.2
For each charT, the string type specializations
template<> struct formatter<charT*, charT>;
template<> struct formatter<const charT*, charT>;
template<size_t N> struct formatter<const charT[N], charT>;
template<class traits, class Allocator>
struct formatter<basic_string<charT, traits, Allocator>, charT>;
template<class traits>
struct formatter<basic_string_view<charT, traits>, charT>;
Since remove_cvref_t<const charT[N]> is charT[N] the formatter is
required by
[format.functions]/25
Preconditions: formatter<remove_cvref_t<Ti>, charT> meets the
BasicFormatter requirements ([formatter.requirements]) for each Ti in
Args.
Depends on D120921
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121138
The GCC failures were partly fixed in D124103.
The format functions tests are fixed on GCC but they require a huge
amount of RAM (>10 GB). This fails with parallel testing in the CI. It
can be solved by splitting the test, but GCC-12 will be released shortly
and might fix the memory usage in these tests. Therefore these tests
remain disabled.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124335
Before implementing P2216's format-string adjust the unit tests.
After P2216 the format* functions require a compile-time string literal.
This changes prepares the tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122534
Instead of using a temporary `string` in `__vformat_to_wrapped` use a new
generic iterator. This aids to reduce the number of template instantions
and avoids using a `string` to buffer the entire formatted output.
This changes the type of `format_context` and `wformat_context`, this can
still be done since the code isn't ABI stable yet.
Several approaches have been evaluated:
- Using a __output_buffer base class with:
- a put function to store the buffer in its internal buffer
- a virtual flush function to copy the internal buffer to the output
- Using a `function` to forward the output operation to the output buffer,
much like the next method.
- Using a type erased function point to store the data in the buffer.
The last version resulted in the best performance. For some cases there's
still a loss of speed over the original method. This loss many becomes
apparent when large strings are copied to a pointer like iterator, before
the compiler optimized this using `memcpy`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110495
Before it only accepted one output iterator type. Now it accepts all
output iterator types as required by BasicFormatter.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120916
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
These tests don't seem specific to the debug mode, so it makes sense to
run them even when the debug mode is disabled. When we run with the debug
mode enabled, we'll get the out-of-bounds checking that this test seems
to be concerned with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121241
Fixup tests that believe them to be so. Most notably including some heavy refactoring in `std/iterators/iterator.primitives/iterator.traits/cxx20_iterator_traits.compile.pass.cpp`, which now detects pointers and validates that `iterator_concept` is present only for pointers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117368
This avoids using an libc++ internal macro in our tests. This version
doesn't depend on the internal macro but redefines it.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119460
This change is a preparation for adapting the tests for
P2216 std::format improvements
Reviewed By: #libc, Quuxplusone, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118717
These tests were formatted with older clang-format settings, this
updates them to the current settings.
In order to implement P2216 a lot of changes to these tests are
required. This makes it easier to review those patches.
* Default-initialized `basic_string` iterators are not portably in the domain of `==`.
* Avoid comparing iterators from non-equal string_views which MSVCSTL considers not to be in the domain of equality.
* Don't test invalid range `[in, out + N)`.
Also silence some truncation warnings by testing with a non-narrowing conversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118049
This implements the handler according to P0645. P2418 changes the wording
in the Standard. That isn't implemented and requires changes in more
places. LWG3631 applies modifications to P2418, but is currently
unresolved.
Implements parts of:
* P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115989
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115991
[format.formatter.spec]/5 lists the requirements for the default
formatter. The original implementation didn't implement this. This
implements the default formatter according to the Standard.
This adds additional test to validate the default formatter is disabled
and the required standard formatters are enabled.
While adding the tests it seems the formatters needed a constraint for the
character types they were valid for.
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D115988
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115989
This implements the last required formatter specialization.
Completes:
- LWG 3251 Are std::format alignment specifiers applied to string arguments?
- LWG 3340 Formatting functions should throw on argument/format string mismatch in §[format.functions]
- LWG 3540 §[format.arg] There should be no const in basic_format_arg(const T* p)
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Depends on D114001
Reviewed By: ldionne, vitaut, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115988
This properly implements the formatter for floating-point types.
Completes:
- P1652R1 Printf corner cases in std::format
- LWG 3250 std::format: # (alternate form) for NaN and inf
- LWG 3243 std::format and negative zeroes
Implements parts of:
- P0645 Text Formatting
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, vitaut
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114001
The code in libc++ already satisfy the requirements of LWG-3373. Since
the issue was written to specifically allow the types to be used in
structured bindings, tests have been added to validate the new
requirement.
Implements
LWG-3373 {to,from}_chars_result and format_to_n_result need the "we really mean what we say" wording
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D117337
Igor Zhukov