This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
`SVB.getStateManager().getOwningEngine().getAnalysisManager().getAnalyzerOptions()`
is quite a mouthful and might involve a few pointer indirections to get
such a simple thing like an analyzer option.
This patch introduces an `AnalyzerOptions` reference to the `SValBuilder`
abstract class, while refactors a few cases to use this /simpler/ accessor.
Reviewed By: martong, Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108824
Quoting https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html:
> In the absence of the zero-length array extension, in ISO C90 the contents
> array in the example above would typically be declared to have a single
> element.
We should not assume that the size of the //flexible array member// field has
a single element, because in some cases they use it as a fallback for not
having the //zero-length array// language extension.
In this case, the analyzer should return `Unknown` as the extent of the field
instead.
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108230
D105553 added NoStateChangeFuncVisitor, an abstract class to aid in creating
notes such as "Returning without writing to 'x'", or "Returning without changing
the ownership status of allocated memory". Its clients need to define, among
other things, what a change of state is.
For code like this:
f() {
g();
}
foo() {
f();
h();
}
We'd have a path in the ExplodedGraph that looks like this:
-- <g> -->
/ \
--- <f> --------> --- <h> --->
/ \ / \
-------- <foo> ------ <foo> -->
When we're interested in whether f neglected to change some property,
NoStateChangeFuncVisitor asks these questions:
÷×~
-- <g> -->
ß / \$ @&#*
--- <f> --------> --- <h> --->
/ \ / \
-------- <foo> ------ <foo> -->
Has anything changed in between # and *?
Has anything changed in between & and *?
Has anything changed in between @ and *?
...
Has anything changed in between $ and *?
Has anything changed in between × and ~?
Has anything changed in between ÷ and ~?
...
Has anything changed in between ß and *?
...
This is a rather thorough line of questioning, which is why in D105819, I was
only interested in whether state *right before* and *right after* a function
call changed, and early returned to the CallEnter location:
if (!CurrN->getLocationAs<CallEnter>())
return;
Except that I made a typo, and forgot to negate the condition. So, in this
patch, I'm fixing that, and under the same hood allow all clients to decide to
do this whole-function check instead of the thorough one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108695
D105553 added NoStateChangeFuncVisitor, an abstract class to aid in creating
notes such as "Returning without writing to 'x'", or "Returning without changing
the ownership status of allocated memory". Its clients need to define, among
other things, what a change of state is.
For code like this:
f() {
g();
}
foo() {
f();
h();
}
We'd have a path in the ExplodedGraph that looks like this:
-- <g> -->
/ \
--- <f> --------> --- <h> --->
/ \ / \
-------- <foo> ------ <foo> -->
When we're interested in whether f neglected to change some property,
NoStateChangeFuncVisitor asks these questions:
÷×~
-- <g> -->
ß / \$ @&#*
--- <f> --------> --- <h> --->
/ \ / \
-------- <foo> ------ <foo> -->
Has anything changed in between # and *?
Has anything changed in between & and *?
Has anything changed in between @ and *?
...
Has anything changed in between $ and *?
Has anything changed in between × and ~?
Has anything changed in between ÷ and ~?
...
Has anything changed in between ß and *?
...
This is a rather thorough line of questioning, which is why in D105819, I was
only interested in whether state *right before* and *right after* a function
call changed, and early returned to the CallEnter location:
if (!CurrN->getLocationAs<CallEnter>())
return;
Except that I made a typo, and forgot to negate the condition. So, in this
patch, I'm fixing that, and under the same hood allow all clients to decide to
do this whole-function check instead of the thorough one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108695
MallocOverflow works in two phases:
1) Collects suspicious malloc calls, whose argument is a multiplication
2) Filters the aggregated list of suspicious malloc calls by iterating
over the BasicBlocks of the CFG looking for comparison binary
operators over the variable constituting in any suspicious malloc.
Consequently, it suppressed true-positive cases when the comparison
check was after the malloc call.
In this patch the checker will consider the relative position of the
relation check to the malloc call.
E.g.:
```lang=C++
void *check_after_malloc(int n, int x) {
int *p = NULL;
if (x == 42)
p = malloc(n * sizeof(int)); // Previously **no** warning, now it
// warns about this.
// The check is after the allocation!
if (n > 10) {
// Do something conditionally.
}
return p;
}
```
Reviewed By: martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107804
Not only global variables can hold references to dead stack variables.
Consider this example:
void write_stack_address_to(char **q) {
char local;
*q = &local;
}
void test_stack() {
char *p;
write_stack_address_to(&p);
}
The address of 'local' is assigned to 'p', which becomes a dangling
pointer after 'write_stack_address_to()' returns.
The StackAddrEscapeChecker was looking for bindings in the store which
referred to variables of the popped stack frame, but it only considered
global variables in this regard. This patch relaxes this, catching
stack variable bindings as well.
---
This patch also works for temporary objects like:
struct Bar {
const int &ref;
explicit Bar(int y) : ref(y) {
// Okay.
} // End of the constructor call, `ref` is dangling now. Warning!
};
void test() {
Bar{33}; // Temporary object, so the corresponding memregion is
// *not* a VarRegion.
}
---
The return value optimization aka. copy-elision might kick in but that
is modeled by passing an imaginary CXXThisRegion which refers to the
parent stack frame which is supposed to be the 'return slot'.
Objects residing in the 'return slot' outlive the scope of the inner
call, thus we should expect no warning about them - except if we
explicitly disable copy-elision.
Reviewed By: NoQ, martong
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107078
The previous behavior was to deduplicate reports based on md5 of the
html file. This algorithm might have worked originally but right now
HTML reports contain information rich enough to make them virtually
always distinct which breaks deduplication entirely.
The new strategy is to (finally) take advantage of IssueHash - the
stable report identifier provided by clang that is the same if and only if
the reports are duplicates of each other.
Additionally, scan-build no longer performs deduplication on its own.
Instead, the report file name is now based on the issue hash,
and clang instances will silently refuse to produce a new html file
when a duplicate already exists. This eliminates the problem entirely.
The '-analyzer-config stable-report-filename' option is deprecated
because report filenames are no longer unstable. A new option is
introduced, '-analyzer-config verbose-report-filename', to produce
verbose file names that look similar to the old "stable" file names.
The old option acts as an alias to the new option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105167
This reverts commit df1f4e0cc6.
Now the test case explicitly specifies the target triple.
I decided to use x86_64 for that matter, to have a fixed
bitwidth for `size_t`.
Aside from that, relanding the original changes of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105184
Currently only `ConstantArrayType` is considered for flexible array
members (FAMs) in `getStaticSize()`.
However, `IncompleteArrayType` also shows up in practice as FAMs.
This patch will ignore the `IncompleteArrayType` and return Unknown
for that case as well. This way it will be at least consistent with
the current behavior until we start modeling them accurately.
I'm expecting that this will resolve a bunch of false-positives
internally, caused by the `ArrayBoundV2`.
Reviewed By: ASDenysPetrov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105184
Summary: Change and replace some functions which IE does not support. This patch is made as a continuation of D92928 revision. Also improve hot keys behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107366
This is a rather common feedback we get from out leak checkers: bug reports are
really short, and are contain barely any usable information on what the analyzer
did to conclude that a leak actually happened.
This happens because of our bug report minimizing effort. We construct bug
reports by inspecting the ExplodedNodes that lead to the error from the bottom
up (from the error node all the way to the root of the exploded graph), and mark
entities that were the cause of a bug, or have interacted with it as
interesting. In order to make the bug report a bit less verbose, whenever we
find an entire function call (from CallEnter to CallExitEnd) that didn't talk
about any interesting entity, we prune it (click here for more info on bug
report generation). Even if the event to highlight is exactly this lack of
interaction with interesting entities.
D105553 generalized the visitor that creates notes for these cases. This patch
adds a new kind of NoStateChangeVisitor that leaves notes in functions that
took a piece of dynamically allocated memory that later leaked as parameter,
and didn't change its ownership status.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105553
Preceding discussion on cfe-dev: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2021-June/068450.html
NoStoreFuncVisitor is a rather unique visitor. As VisitNode is invoked on most
other visitors, they are looking for the point where something changed -- change
on a value, some checker-specific GDM trait, a new constraint.
NoStoreFuncVisitor, however, looks specifically for functions that *didn't*
write to a MemRegion of interesting. Quoting from its comments:
/// Put a diagnostic on return statement of all inlined functions
/// for which the region of interest \p RegionOfInterest was passed into,
/// but not written inside, and it has caused an undefined read or a null
/// pointer dereference outside.
It so happens that there are a number of other similar properties that are
worth checking. For instance, if some memory leaks, it might be interesting why
a function didn't take ownership of said memory:
void sink(int *P) {} // no notes
void f() {
sink(new int(5)); // note: Memory is allocated
// Well hold on, sink() was supposed to deal with
// that, this must be a false positive...
} // warning: Potential memory leak [cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks]
In here, the entity of interest isn't a MemRegion, but a symbol. The property
that changed here isn't a change of value, but rather liveness and GDM traits
managed by MalloChecker.
This patch moves some of the logic of NoStoreFuncVisitor to a new abstract
class, NoStateChangeFuncVisitor. This is mostly calculating and caching the
stack frames in which the entity of interest wasn't changed.
Descendants of this interface have to define 3 things:
* What constitutes as a change to an entity (this is done by overriding
wasModifiedBeforeCallExit)
* What the diagnostic message should be (this is done by overriding
maybeEmitNoteFor.*)
* What constitutes as the entity of interest being passed into the function (this
is also done by overriding maybeEmitNoteFor.*)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105553
Some files still contained the old University of Illinois Open Source
Licence header. This patch replaces that with the Apache 2 with LLVM
Exception licence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107528
This change follows up on a FIXME submitted with D105974. This change simply let's the reference case fall through to return a concrete 'true'
instead of a nonloc pointer of appropriate length set to NULL.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107720
In some cases, when the execution path of the diagnostic
goes back and forth, arrows can overlap and create a mess.
Dimming arrows that are not relevant at the moment, solves this issue.
They are still visible, but don't draw too much attention.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92928
This commit adds a very first version of this feature.
It is off by default and has to be turned on by checking the
corresponding box. For this reason, HTML reports still keep
control notes (aka grey bubbles).
Further on, we plan on attaching arrows to events and having all arrows
not related to a currently selected event barely visible. This will
help with reports where control flow goes back and forth (eg in loops).
Right now, it can get pretty crammed with all the arrows.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92639
This cleanup patch refactors a bunch of functional duplicates of
getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr into a common implementation.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaronpuchert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100713
This change is an extension to D103967 where I added dump methods for
(dis)equality classes of the State. There, the (dis)equality classes and their
contents are dumped in an ordered fashion, they are ordered based on their
string representation. This is very useful once we start to use FileCheck to
test the State dump in certain tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106642
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51109
When we merged two classes, `*this` became an obsolete representation of
the new `State`. This is b/c the member relations had changed during the
previous merge of another member of the same class in a way that `*this`
had no longer any members. (`mergeImpl` might keep the member relations
to `Other` and could dissolve `*this`.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106285
This patch:
- Fixes how the std-namespace test is written in SmartPtrModelling
(now accounts for functions with no Decl available)
- Adds the smart pointer checker flag check where it was missing
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106296
The checker warns if a stream is read that is already in end-of-file
(EOF) state.
The commit adds indication of the last location where the EOF flag is set
on the stream.
Reviewed By: Szelethus
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104925
This patch handles the `std::swap` function specialization
for `std::unique_ptr`. Implemented to be very similar to
how `swap` method is handled
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104300
This change addresses this assertion that occurs in a downstream
compiler with a custom target.
```APInt.h:1151: bool llvm::APInt::operator==(const llvm::APInt &) const: Assertion `BitWidth == RHS.BitWidth && "Comparison requires equal bit widths"'```
No covering test case is susbmitted with this change since this crash
cannot be reproduced using any upstream supported target. The test case
that exposes this issue is as simple as:
```lang=c++
void test(int * p) {
int * q = p-1;
if (q) {}
if (q) {} // crash
(void)q;
}
```
The custom target that exposes this problem supports two address spaces,
16-bit `char`s, and a `_Bool` type that maps to 16-bits. There are no upstream
supported targets with similar attributes.
The assertion appears to be happening as a result of evaluating the
`SymIntExpr` `(reg_$0<int * p>) != 0U` in `VisitSymIntExpr` located in
`SimpleSValBuilder.cpp`. The `LHS` is evaluated to `32b` and the `RHS` is
evaluated to `16b`. This eventually leads to the assertion in `APInt.h`.
While this change addresses the crash and passes LITs, two follow-ups
are required:
1) The remainder of `getZeroWithPtrWidth()` and `getIntWithPtrWidth()`
should be cleaned up following this model to prevent future
confusion.
2) We're not sure why references are found along with the modified
code path, that should not be the case. A more principled
fix may be found after some further comprehension of why this
is the case.
Acks: Thanks to @steakhal and @martong for the discussions leading to this
fix.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105974
This patch handles the `<<` operator defined for `std::unique_ptr` in
the std namespace (ignores custom overloads of the operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105421
This patch handles all the comparision methods (defined via overloaded
operators) on std::unique_ptr. These operators compare the underlying
pointers, which is modelled by comparing the corresponding inner-pointer
SVal. There is also a special case for comparing the same pointer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104616
../../git/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp:2395:17: warning: 'clang::ento::ProgramStateRef {anonymous}::RangeConstraintManager::setRange(clang::ento::ProgramStateRef, {anonymous}::EquivalenceClass, clang::ento::RangeSet)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
../../git/llvm-project/clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp:2384:10: warning: 'clang::ento::RangeSet {anonymous}::RangeConstraintManager::getRange(clang::ento::ProgramStateRef, {anonymous}::EquivalenceClass)' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106063
`PathSensitiveBughReport` has a function to mark a symbol as interesting but
it was not possible to clear this flag. This can be useful in some cases,
so the functionality is added.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105637
This patch simplifies the way we deal with (dis)equalities.
Due to the symmetry between constraint handler and range inferrer,
we can have very similar implementations of logic handling
questions about (dis)equality and assumptions involving (dis)equality.
It also helps us to remove one more visitor, and removes uncertainty
that we got all the right places to put `trackNE` and `trackEQ`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105693
The new component is a symmetric response to SymbolicRangeInferrer.
While the latter is the unified component, which answers all the
questions what does the solver knows about a particular symbolic
expression, assignor associates new constraints (aka "assumes")
with symbolic expressions and can imply additional knowledge that
the solver can extract and use later on.
- Why do we need it and why is SymbolicRangeInferrer not enough?
As it is noted before, the inferrer only helps us to get the most
precise range information based on the existing knowledge and on the
mathematical foundations of different operations that symbolic
expressions actually represent. It doesn't introduce new constraints.
The assignor, on the other hand, can impose constraints on other
symbols using the same domain knowledge.
- But for some expressions, SymbolicRangeInferrer looks into constraints
for similar expressions, why can't we do that for all the cases?
That's correct! But in order to do something like this, we should
have a finite number of possible "similar expressions".
Let's say we are asked about `$a - $b` and we know something about
`$b - $a`. The inferrer can invert this expression and check
constraints for `$b - $a`. This is simple!
But let's say we are asked about `$a` and we know that `$a * $b != 0`.
In this situation, we can imply that `$a != 0`, but the inferrer shouldn't
try every possible symbolic expression `X` to check if `$a * X` or
`X * $a` is constrained to non-zero.
With the assignor mechanism, we can catch this implication right at
the moment we associate `$a * $b` with non-zero range, and set similar
constraints for `$a` and `$b` as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105692
Summary: This patch is a part of an attempt to obtain more
timer data from the analyzer. In this patch, we try to use
LLVM::TimeRecord to save time before starting the analysis
and to print the time that a specific function takes while
getting analyzed.
The timer data is printed along with the
-analyzer-display-progress outputs.
ANALYZE (Syntax): test.c functionName : 0.4 ms
ANALYZE (Path, Inline_Regular): test.c functionName : 2.6 ms
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: NoQ, xazax.hun, teemperor, vsavchenko
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105565
The `-analyzer-display-progress` displayed the function name of the
currently analyzed function. It differs in C and C++. In C++, it
prints the argument types as well in a comma-separated list.
While in C, only the function name is displayed, without the brackets.
E.g.:
C++: foo(), foo(int, float)
C: foo
In crash traces, the analyzer dumps the location contexts, but the
string is not enough for `-analyze-function` in C++ mode.
This patch addresses the issue by dumping the proper function names
even in stack traces.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105708
C++23 will make these conversions ambiguous - so fix them to make the
codebase forward-compatible with C++23 (& a follow-up change I've made
will make this ambiguous/invalid even in <C++23 so we don't regress
this & it generally improves the code anyway)
Prior to this patch, we always gave priority to constraints that we
actually know about symbols in question. However, these can get
outdated and we can get better results if we look at all possible
sources of knowledge, including sub-expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105436
Fix offset calculation routines in padding checker to avoid assertion
errors described in bugzilla issue 50426. The fields that are subojbects
of zero size, marked with [[no_unique_address]] or empty bitfields will
be excluded from padding calculation routines.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104097
It seems like ExprEngine::handleLVectorSplat() was used at only 2
places. It might be better to directly inline them for readability.
It seems like these cases were not covered by tests according to my
coverage measurement, so I'm adding tests as well, demonstrating that no
behavior changed.
Besides that, I'm handling CK_MatrixCast similarly to how the rest of
the unhandled casts are evaluated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105125
Reviewed by: NoQ
Previously `LValueToRValueBitCast`s were modeled in the same way how
a regular `BitCast` was. However, this should not produce an l-value.
Modeling bitcasts accurately is tricky, so it's probably better to
model this expression by binding a fresh conjured value.
The following code should not result in a diagnostic:
```lang=C++
__attribute__((always_inline))
static inline constexpr unsigned int_castf32_u32(float __A) {
return __builtin_bit_cast(unsigned int, __A); // no-warning
}
```
Previously, it reported
`Address of stack memory associated with local variable '__A' returned
to caller [core.StackAddressEscape]`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105017
Reviewed by: NoQ, vsavchenko
It turns out that the CheckerManager::hasPathSensitiveCheckers() missed
checking for the BeginFunctionCheckers.
It seems like other callbacks are also missing:
- ObjCMessageNilCheckers
- BeginFunctionCheckers
- NewAllocatorCheckers
- PointerEscapeCheckers
- EndOfTranslationUnitCheckers
In this patch, I wanted to use a fold-expression, but until C++17
arrives we are left with the old-school method.
When I tried to write a unittest I observed an interesting behavior. I
subscribed only to the BeginFunction event, it was not fired.
However, when I also defined the PreCall with an empty handler, suddenly
both fired.
I could add this test demonstrating the issue, but I don't think it
would serve much value in a long run. I don't expect regressions for
this.
However, I think it would be great to enforce the completeness of this
list in a runtime check.
I could not come up with a solution for this though.
PS: Thank you @Szelethus for helping me debugging this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105101
Reviewed by: vsavchenko
This commit adds a function to the top-class of SVal hierarchy to
provide type information about the value. That can be extremely
useful when this is the only piece of information that the user is
actually caring about.
Additionally, this commit introduces a testing framework for writing
unit-tests for symbolic values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104550
This reverts commit 6f3b775c3e.
Test fails flakily, see comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D103967
Also revert follow-up "[Analyzer] Attempt to fix windows bots test
failure b/c of new-line"
This reverts commit fe0e861a4d.
Since RangeSet::Factory actually contains BasicValueFactory, we can
remove value factory from many function signatures inside the solver.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105005
Consider the code
```
void f(int a0, int b0, int c)
{
int a1 = a0 - b0;
int b1 = (unsigned)a1 + c;
if (c == 0) {
int d = 7L / b1;
}
}
```
At the point of divisiion by `b1` that is considered to be non-zero,
which results in a new constraint for `$a0 - $b0 + $c`. The type
of this sym is unsigned, however, the simplified sym is `$a0 -
$b0` and its type is signed. This is probably the result of the
inherent improper handling of casts. Anyway, Range assignment
for constraints use this type information. Therefore, we must
make sure that first we simplify the symbol and only then we
assign the range.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104844
This is mostly a mechanical change, but a testcase that contains
parts of the StringRef class (clang/test/Analysis/llvm-conventions.cpp)
isn't touched.
The checker contains check for passing a NULL stream argument.
This change should make more easy to identify where the passed pointer
becomes NULL.
Reviewed By: NoQ
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104640
This fixes a crash in MallocChecker for the situation when operator new (delete) is invoked via NTTP and makes the behavior of CallContext.getCalleeDecl(Expr) identical to CallEvent.getDecl().
Reviewed By: vsavchenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103025
D66572 separated BugReport and BugReporter into basic and path sensitive
versions. As a result, checker silencing, which worked deep in the path
sensitive report generation facilities became specific to it. DeadStoresChecker,
for instance, despite being in the static analyzer, emits non-pathsensitive
reports, and was impossible to silence.
This patch moves the corresponding code before the call to the virtual function
generateDiagnosticForConsumerMap (which is overriden by the specific kinds of
bug reporters). Although we see bug reporting as relatively lightweight compared
to the analysis, this will get rid of several steps we used to throw away.
Quoting from D65379:
At a very high level, this consists of 3 steps:
For all BugReports in the same BugReportEquivClass, collect all their error
nodes in a set. With that set, create a new, trimmed ExplodedGraph whose leafs
are all error nodes.
Until a valid report is found, construct a bug path, which is yet another
ExplodedGraph, that is linear from a given error node to the root of the graph.
Run all visitors on the constructed bug path. If in this process the report got
invalidated, start over from step 2.
Checker silencing used to kick in after all of these. Now it does before any of
them :^)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102914
Change-Id: Ice42939304516f2bebd05a1ea19878b89c96a25d
One interesting problem was discovered here. When we do interrupt
Tracker's track flow, we want to interrupt only it and not all the
other flows recursively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103914
Update `setConstraint` to simplify existing equivalence classes when a
new constraint is added. In this patch we iterate over all existing
equivalence classes and constraints and try to simplfy them with
simplifySVal. This solves problematic cases where we have two symbols in
the tree, e.g.:
```
int test_rhs_further_constrained(int x, int y) {
if (x + y != 0)
return 0;
if (y != 0)
return 0;
clang_analyzer_eval(x + y == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
clang_analyzer_eval(y == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
return 0;
}
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103314
<string> is currently the highest impact header in a clang+llvm build:
https://commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium-browser-clang/llvm-include-analysis.html
One of the most common places this is being included is the APInt.h header, which needs it for an old toString() implementation that returns std::string - an inefficient method compared to the SmallString versions that it actually wraps.
This patch replaces these APInt/APSInt methods with a pair of llvm::toString() helpers inside StringExtras.h, adjusts users accordingly and removes the <string> from APInt.h - I was hoping that more of these users could be converted to use the SmallString methods, but it appears that most end up creating a std::string anyhow. I avoided trying to use the raw_ostream << operators as well as I didn't want to lose having the integer radix explicit in the code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103888
Whenever Tracker spawns a visitor that needs to call tracker
back, we have to use TrackingBugReporterVisitor in order to maintain
all the hooks that the checker might've used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103628
This component should not be used directly at this point and it is
simply an implementation detail, that's why StoreSiteFinder is
out of the header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103624
Additionally, this commit completely removes any uses of
FindLastStoreBRVisitor from the analyzer except for the
one in Tracker.
The next step is actually removing this class altogether
from the header file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103618
This commit moves trackExpressionValue into the Tracker interface
as DefaultExpressionHandler. It still can be split into smaller
handlers, but that can be a future change.
Additionally, this commit doesn't remove the original trackExpressionValue
interface, so it's not too big. One of the next commits will address it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103616
Tracking values through expressions and the stores is fundamental
for producing clear diagnostics. However, the main components
participating in this process, namely `trackExpressionValue` and
`FindLastStoreBRVisitor`, became pretty bloated. They have an
interesting dynamic between them (and some other visitors) that
one might call a "chain reaction". `trackExpressionValue` adds
`FindLastStoreBRVisitor`, and the latter calls `trackExpressionValue`.
Because of this design, individual checkers couldn't affect what's
going to happen somewhere in the middle of that chain. Whether they
want to produce a more informative note or keep the overall tracking
going by utilizing some of the domain expertise. This all lead to two
biggest problems that I see:
* Some checkers don't use it
This should probably never be the case for path-sensitive checks.
* Some checkers incorporated their logic directly into those
components
This doesn't make the maintenance easier, breaks multiple
architecture principles, and makes the code harder to read adn
understand, thus, increasing the probability of the first case.
This commit introduces a prototype for a new interface that will be
responsible for tracking. My main idea here was to make operations
that I want have as a checker developer easy to implement and hook
directly into the tracking process.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103605
Implementation of the unroll directive introduced in OpenMP 5.1. Follows the approach from D76342 for the tile directive (i.e. AST-based, not using the OpenMPIRBuilder). Tries to use `llvm.loop.unroll.*` metadata where possible, but has to fall back to an AST representation of the outer loop if the partially unrolled generated loop is associated with another directive (because it needs to compute the number of iterations).
Reviewed By: ABataev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99459
This renames the expression value categories from rvalue to prvalue,
keeping nomenclature consistent with C++11 onwards.
C++ has the most complicated taxonomy here, and every other language
only uses a subset of it, so it's less confusing to use the C++ names
consistently, and mentally remap to the C names when working on that
context (prvalue -> rvalue, no xvalues, etc).
Renames:
* VK_RValue -> VK_PRValue
* Expr::isRValue -> Expr::isPRValue
* SK_QualificationConversionRValue -> SK_QualificationConversionPRValue
* JSON AST Dumper Expression nodes value category: "rvalue" -> "prvalue"
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103720
Summary: Replaced code on region cast with a function-wrapper SValBuilder::getCastedMemRegionVal. This is a next step of code refining due to suggestions in D103319.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103803
The majority of all `addVisitor` callers follow the same pattern:
addVisitor(std::make_unique<SomeVisitor>(arg1, arg2, ...));
This patches introduces additional overload for `addVisitor` to simplify
that pattern:
addVisitor<SomeVisitor>(arg1, arg2, ...);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103457
Summary: Make StoreManager::castRegion function usage safier. Replace `const MemRegion *` with `Optional<const MemRegion *>`. Simplified one of related test cases due to suggestions in D101635.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103319
The original version of this was reverted, and @rjmcall provided some
advice to architect a new solution. This is that solution.
This implements a builtin to provide a unique name that is stable across
compilations of this TU for the purposes of implementing the library
component of the unnamed kernel feature of SYCL. It does this by
running the Itanium mangler with a few modifications.
Because it is somewhat common to wrap non-kernel-related lambdas in
macros that aren't present on the device (such as for logging), this
uniquely generates an ID for all lambdas involved in the naming of a
kernel. It uses the lambda-mangling number to do this, except replaces
this with its own number (starting at 10000 for readabililty reasons)
for lambdas used to name a kernel.
Additionally, this implements itself as constexpr with a slight catch:
if a name would be invalidated by the use of this lambda in a later
kernel invocation, it is diagnosed as an error (see the Sema tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103112
The program point created by the checker, even if it is an error node,
might not be the same as the name under which the report is emitted.
Make sure we're checking the name of the checker, because thats what
we're silencing after all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102683
When searching for stores and creating corresponding notes, the
analyzer is more specific about the target region of the store
as opposed to the stored value. While this description was tweaked
for constant and undefined values, it lacked in the most general
case of symbolic values.
This patch tries to find a memory region, where this value is stored,
to use it as a better alias for the value.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101041
Since we can report memory leaks on one variable, while the originally
allocated object was stored into another one, we should explain
how did it get there.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100852
When reporting leaks, we try to attach the leaking object to some
variable, so it's easier to understand. Before the patch, we always
tried to use the first variable that stored the object in question.
This can get very confusing for the user, if that variable doesn't
contain that object at the moment of the actual leak. In many cases,
the warning is dismissed as false positive and it is effectively a
false positive when we fail to properly explain the warning to the
user.
This patch addresses the bigest issue in cases like this. Now we
check if the variable still contains the leaking symbolic object.
If not, we look for the last variable to actually hold it and use
that variable instead.
rdar://76645710
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100839
Allocation site is the key location for the leak checker. It is a
uniqueing location for the report and a source of information for
the warning's message.
Before this patch, we calculated and used it twice in bug report and
in bug report visitor. Such duplication is not only harmful
performance-wise (not much, but still), but also design-wise. Because
changing something about the end piece of the report should've been
repeated for description as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100626
When we report an argument constraint violation, we should track those
other arguments that participate in the evaluation of the violation. By
default, we depend only on the argument that is constrained, however,
there are some special cases like the buffer size constraint that might
be encoded in another argument(s).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101358
In this patch, I provide a detailed explanation for each argument
constraint. This explanation is added in an extra 'note' tag, which is
displayed alongside the warning.
Since these new notes describe clearly the constraint, there is no need
to provide the number of the argument (e.g. 'Arg3') within the warning.
However, I decided to keep the name of the constraint in the warning (but
this could be a subject of discussion) in order to be able to identify
the different kind of constraint violations easily in a bug database
(e.g. CodeChecker).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101060
Summary: Remove dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions since their functionality has been moved to common evalCast function. Use evalCast instead.
Post-clean up patch for https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090 patch. The patch shall not change any behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97277
Summary: Move logic from CastRetrievedVal to evalCast and replace CastRetrievedVal with evalCast. Also move guts from SimpleSValBuilder::dispatchCast inside evalCast.
evalCast intends to substitute dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc in the future. OriginalTy provides additional information for casting, which is useful for some cases and useless for others. If `OriginalTy.isNull()` is true, then cast performs based on CastTy only. Now evalCast operates in two ways. It retains all previous behavior and take over dispatchCast behavior. dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc is considered as buggy since it doesn't take into account OriginalTy of the SVal and should be improved.
From this patch use evalCast instead of dispatchCast, evalCastFromNonLoc and evalCastFromLoc functions. dispatchCast redirects to evalCast.
This patch shall not change any behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96090
Kristóf Umann