This will become asan errors once the patch lands that poisons the
memory after free. The x86 change is a hack, but I don't see how to
solve this properly at the moment.
llvm-svn: 300867
The original instruction might get legalized and erased and expanded
into intermediate instructions and the intermediate instructions might
fail legalization. This end up in reporting GISelFailure on the erased
instruction.
Instead report GISelFailure on the intermediate instruction which failed
legalization.
Reviewed by: ab
llvm-svn: 299802
Summary:
We don’t actually use LegalizerInfo in Legalizer pass, it’s just passed
as an argument.
In order to check if an instruction is legal or not, we need to get LegalizerInfo
by calling `MI.getParent()->getParent()->getSubtarget().getLegalizerInfo()`.
Instead, make LegalizerInfo accessible in LegalizerHelper.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, ab, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: dberris, llvm-commits, rovka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30838
llvm-svn: 297491
These are simplified variants of the current G_SEQUENCE and G_EXTRACT, which
assume the individual parts will be contiguous, homogeneous, and occupy the
entirity of the larger register. This makes reasoning about them much easer
since you only have to look at the first register being merged and the result
to know what the instruction is doing.
I intend to gradually replace all uses of the more complicated sequence/extract
with these (or single-element insert/extracts), and then remove the older
variants. For now we start with legalization.
llvm-svn: 296921
Iterating on the use-list we're modifying doesn't work: after the first
iteration, the use-list iterator will point to a MachineOperand
referencing the new register. This caused us to skip the other uses to
replace.
Instead, use MRI.replaceRegWith(), which accounts for this behavior.
llvm-svn: 296551
Having more fine-grained information on the specific construct that
caused us to fallback is valuable for large-scale data collection.
We still have the fallback warning, that's also used for FastISel.
We still need to remove the fallback warning, and teach FastISel to also
emit remarks (it currently has a combination of the warning, stats, and
debug prints: the remarks could unify all three).
The abort-on-fallback path could also be better handled using remarks:
one could imagine a "-Rpass-error", analoguous to "-Werror", which would
promote missed/failed remarks to errors. It's not clear whether that
would be useful for other remarks though, so we're not there yet.
llvm-svn: 296013
The previous names were both misleading (the MachineLegalizer actually
contained the info tables) and inconsistent with the selector & translator (in
having a "Machine") prefix. This should make everything sensible again.
The only functional change is the name of a couple of command-line options.
llvm-svn: 284287
Benjamin Kramer