(Cond0 s> -1) ? N1 : 0 --> ~(Cond0 s>> BW-1) & N1
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/mGCBrd
This was suggested as a potential enhancement in D113212 (also 7e30404c3b ).
There's an improvement for AArch that could be generalized ( X > -1 --> X >= 0 ).
For x86, we have a counter-acting fold for most cases that turns the shift+not
back into a setcc, so that needs a work-around to get more cases to use "pandn":
D113603
Note that this pattern (and a previous one) are not currently canonical forms
in IR:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/e4o96b
Adding swapped variants is left as a TODO item here, but is planned as
a near-term follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113426
As suggested on D113371, this adds a wrapper to SelectionDAG::ComputeNumSignBits, similar to the llvm::ComputeMinSignedBits wrapper.
I've included some usage, its not exhaustive, just the more obvious cases where the intention is obvious.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113396
We have several places where we need to extract the raw bits data from a BUILD_VECTOR node, so consolidate this to a single helper function that handles Undefs and Integer/FP constants, including implicit truncation.
This should make it easier to extend D113202 to handle more constant folding of bitcasted constant data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113351
Currently FoldConstantArithmetic only handles binops, so replacing other uses of FoldConstantVectorArithmetic (in particular for SETCC nodes), still require more work.
This is the 'or' sibling for the fold added with:
D113212
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/tgnp7K
Note that neither of these transforms is poison-safe,
but it does not seem to matter at this level. We have
had the scalar version of D113212 for a long time, so
this is just making optimizer behavior consistent.
We do not have the scalar version of *this* fold,
however, so that is another follow-up.
Another minor step towards merging FoldConstantVectorArithmetic into FoldConstantArithmetic.
We don't use SDNodeFlags in any constant folding inside DAG, so passing the Flags argument is a waste of time - an alternative would be to wire up FoldConstantArithmetic to take SDNodeFlags just-in-case we someday start using it, but we don't have any way to test it and I'd prefer to avoid dead code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113276
(X s< 0) ? Y : 0 --> (X s>> BW-1) & Y
We canonicalize to the icmp+select form in IR, and we already have this fold
for scalar select in SDAG, so I think it's an oversight that we don't have
the fold for vectors. It seems neutral for AArch64 and saves some instructions
on x86.
Whether we should also have the sibling folds for the inverse condition or
all-ones true value may depend on target-specific factors such as whether
there's an "and-not" instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113212
Fold (srl (mul (zext i32:$a to i64), i64:c), 32) -> (mulhu $a, $b),
if c can truncate to i32 without loss.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck, craig.topper, RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108129
Rely on the hasOperation() instead - as commented on D77804, the mid-term intention is to recognise rotate/funnel-by-constant pre-legalization to help avoid SimplifyDemandedBits regressions.
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
As suggested in D112085, we can substitute 'xor' with 'add'
in this pattern, and it is logically equivalent:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/eJtWWC
We canonicalize to 'xor' in IR, but SDAG does not do that
(and it probably should not - https://llvm.org/PR52267 ), so
it is possible to see either pattern in codegen. Note that
'sub' is a another potential pattern, but that is
canonicalized to 'add' in DAGCombiner, so we don't need to
worry about that variation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112377
EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR indices are always constant, we don't need to check for ConstantSDNode, we should just use getConstantOperandVal which will assert for the constant.
Instead of returning a bool to indicate success and a separate
SDValue, return the SDValue and have the callers check if it is
null.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112331
(i8 X ^ 128) & (i8 X s>> 7) --> usubsat X, 128
I haven't found a generalization of this identity:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/_sriEQ
Note: I was actually looking at the first form of the pattern in that link,
but that's part of a long chain of potential missed transforms in codegen
and IR....that I hope ends here!
The predicates for when this is profitable are a bit tricky. This version of
the patch excludes multi-use but includes custom lowering (as opposed to
legal only).
On x86 for example, we have custom lowering for some vector types, and that
uses umax and sub. So to enable that fold, we need add use checks to avoid
regressions. Even with legal-only lowering, we could see code with extra
reg move instructions for extra uses, so that constraint would have to be
eased very carefully to avoid penalties.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112085
With unoptimized code, we may see lots of stores and spend too much time in mergeTruncStores.
Fixes PR51827.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111596
Inspired by D111968, provide a isNegatedPowerOf2() wrapper instead of obfuscating code with (-Value).isPowerOf2() patterns, which I'm sure are likely avenues for typos.....
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111998
This is NFC-intended for the callers. Posting in case there are
other potential users that I missed.
I would also use this from VectorCombine in a patch for:
https://llvm.org/PR52178 ( D111901 )
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111891
We were previously silently generating incorrect code when extracting a
fixed-width vector from a scalable vector. This is worse than crashing,
since the user will have no indication that this is currently unsupported
behaviour. I have fixed the code to only perform DAG combines when safe
to do so, i.e. the input and output vectors are both fixed-width or
both scalable.
Test added here:
CodeGen/AArch64/sve-extract-scalable-vector.ll
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110624
Stop using APInt constructors and methods that were soft-deprecated in
D109483. This fixes all the uses I found in llvm, except for the APInt
unit tests which should still test the deprecated methods.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110807
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit extracted loads to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
I've also cleaned up the alignment calculation code - if we have a constant extraction index then the alignment can be based on an offset from the original vector load alignment, but for non-constant indices we should assume the worst (single element alignment only).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110486
This patch adds a generic DAGCombine for vector-predicated (VP) nodes.
Those for which we can determine that no vector element is active can be
replaced by either undef or, for reductions, the start value.
This is tested rather trivially at the IR level, where it's possible
that we want to teach instcombine to perform this optimization.
However, we can also see the zero-evl case arise during SelectionDAG
legalization, when wide VP operations can be split into two and the
upper operation emerges as trivially false.
It's possible that we could perform this optimization "proactively"
(both on legal vectors and before splitting) and reduce the width of an
operation and insert it into a larger undef vector:
```
v8i32 vp_add x, y, mask, 4
->
v8i32 insert_subvector (v8i32 undef), (v4i32 vp_add xsub, ysub, mask, 4), i32 0
```
This is somewhat analogous to similar vector narrow/widening
optimizations, but it's unclear at this point whether that's beneficial
to do this for VP ops for any/all targets.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109148
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit store narrowing to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory access by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
The fmul is a canonicalizing operation, and fneg is not so this would
break denormals that need flushing and also would not quiet signaling
nans. Fold to fsub instead, which is also canonicalizing.
This extends the custom lowering for extending loads on
fixed length vectors in SVE to support masked extending loads.
The existing tests for correct behaviour of masked extending loads
exhibit bad code generation due to the legalistaion of i1 vectors.
They have been left as-is and new tests have been added that do not
exhibit this behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108200
Soft deprecrate isNullValue/isAllOnesValue and update in tree
callers. This matches the changes to the APInt interface from
D109483.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109535
This renames the primary methods for creating a zero value to `getZero`
instead of `getNullValue` and renames predicates like `isAllOnesValue`
to simply `isAllOnes`. This achieves two things:
1) This starts standardizing predicates across the LLVM codebase,
following (in this case) ConstantInt. The word "Value" doesn't
convey anything of merit, and is missing in some of the other things.
2) Calling an integer "null" doesn't make any sense. The original sin
here is mine and I've regretted it for years. This moves us to calling
it "zero" instead, which is correct!
APInt is widely used and I don't think anyone is keen to take massive source
breakage on anything so core, at least not all in one go. As such, this
doesn't actually delete any entrypoints, it "soft deprecates" them with a
comment.
Included in this patch are changes to a bunch of the codebase, but there are
more. We should normalize SelectionDAG and other APIs as well, which would
make the API change more mechanical.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109483
Given a select_cc producing a constant and a invertion of the constant
for a comparison more than zero, we can produce an xor with ashr
instead, which produces smaller code. The ashr either sets all bits or
clear all bits depending on if the value is negative. This is then xor'd
with the constant to optionally negate the value.
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/DTFaBZ
This includes a OneUseCheck on the Cmp, which seems to make thinks a
little worse and will be removed in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109149
The check for whether a rotate is possible occurs before the
memory legality checks for the integer type. So it's possible we
decide we can use a rotate, but then fail the legality checks. If
that happens we should not fall back to a vector type. This triggers
an assertion in the rotate handling when it finds a vector type
instead of an integer type.
In theory we could use a shufflevector in place of the rotate, but
right now I'd just like to fix the crash.
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108839
Without this change only the preferred fusion opcode is tested
when attempting to combine FMA operations.
If both FMA and FMAD are available then FMA ops formed prior to
legalization will not be merged post legalization as FMAD becomes
the preferred fusion opcode.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108619
This is another bug exposed by https://llvm.org/PR51612
(and the one that triggered the initial assertion) in the report.
That example was suppressed with:
985b48f183
...but these would still crash because we created nodes
like UADDO without the expected 2 output values.
There are 2 bugs here:
1. We were not checking uses of operand 2 (the false value of the select).
2. We were not checking for multiple uses of nodes that produce >1 result.
Correcting those is enough to avoid the crash in the reduced test based on:
https://llvm.org/PR51612
The additional use check on operand 0 (the condition value of the select)
should not strictly be necessary because we are only replacing one use
with another (whether it makes performance sense to do the transform with
that pattern is not clear). But as noted in the TODO, changing that
uncovers another bug.
Note: there's at least one more bug here - we aren't propagating EVTs
correctly, but I plan to fix that in another patch.
For ISD::EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR, its second operand must be a constant
multiple of the known-minimum vector length of the result type.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107795
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines (in this case for fp->int load/store copies) to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108318
One of the cases identified in PR45116 - we don't need to limit load combines (in this case for ISD::BUILD_PAIR) to ABI alignment, we can use allowsMemoryAccess - which tests using getABITypeAlign, but also checks if a target permits (fast) misaligned memory loads by checking allowsMisalignedMemoryAccesses as a fallback.
This helps in particular for 32-bit X86 cases loading 64-bit size data, reducing codegen diffs vs x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108307
Simon Pilgrim